Advanced Search+
Yaroslav MURZAEV, Gennadii LIZIAKIN, Andrey GAVRIKOV, Rinat TIMIRKHANOV, Valentin SMIRNOV. A comparison of emissive and cold floating probe techniques for electric potential measurements in rf inductive discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 45401-045401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf250
Citation: Yaroslav MURZAEV, Gennadii LIZIAKIN, Andrey GAVRIKOV, Rinat TIMIRKHANOV, Valentin SMIRNOV. A comparison of emissive and cold floating probe techniques for electric potential measurements in rf inductive discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 45401-045401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf250

A comparison of emissive and cold floating probe techniques for electric potential measurements in rf inductive discharge

  • A cold floating probe method was compared with the emissive floating probe method in terms of a low-pressure radio-frequency inductive discharge. The dependences of difference between the plasma potential and the floating potential on the electron temperature 1–8 eV, plasma density 109 –1012 cm−3 and magnetic field 100–650 G were obtained. It was demonstrated that the difference between the potentials that obtained by these two methods can differ significantly from the expected value of 5.2 kTe/e for argon.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return