Advanced Search+
LIU Meiqin (刘美琴), LI Bolun (李博轮), LIU Chunliang (刘纯亮), Fuks MIKHAIL, Edl SCHAMILOGLU. Simulation of Secondary Electron and Backscattered Electron Emission in A6 Relativistic Magnetron Driven by Different Cathode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/1/12
Citation: LIU Meiqin (刘美琴), LI Bolun (李博轮), LIU Chunliang (刘纯亮), Fuks MIKHAIL, Edl SCHAMILOGLU. Simulation of Secondary Electron and Backscattered Electron Emission in A6 Relativistic Magnetron Driven by Different Cathode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/1/12

Simulation of Secondary Electron and Backscattered Electron Emission in A6 Relativistic Magnetron Driven by Different Cathode

Funds: supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61302010), the Foundation of Science and Technology on High Power Microwave Laboratory, Central University Foundation (2013KW07). Work at the University of New Mexico in USA was supported by ONR Grant N00014-13-1-0565
More Information
  • Received Date: January 03, 2014
  • Prticle-in-cell (PIC) simulations demonstrated that, when the relativistic magnetron with diffraction output (MDO) is applied with a 410 kV voltage pulse, or when the relativistic magnetron with radial output is applied with a 350 kV voltage pulse, electrons emitted from the cathode with high energy will strike the anode block wall. The emitted secondary electrons and backscattered electrons affect the interaction between electrons and RF fields induced by the operating modes, which decreases the output power in the radial output relativistic magnetron by about 15% (10% for the axial output relativistic magnetron), decreases the anode current by about 5% (5% for the axial output relativistic magnetron), and leads to a decrease of electronic efficiency by 8% (6% for the axial output relativistic magnetron). The peak value of the current formed by secondary and backscattered current equals nearly half of the amplitude of the anode current, which may help the growth of parasitic modes when the applied magnetic field is near the critical magnetic field separating neighboring modes. Thus, mode competition becomes more serious.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Hai DU (杜海), LeiWANG (王磊), Wenjie KONG (孔文杰), Zhiwei SHI (史志伟), Keming CHENG (程克明), Zheng LI (李铮). Vortex dynamics over an airfoil controlled by a nanosecond pulse discharge plasma actuator at low wind speed[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(12): 125503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab43f5
    [2]N C ROY, M M HASAN, A H KABIR, M A REZA, M R TALUKDER, A N CHOWDHURY. Atmospheric pressure gliding arc discharge plasma treatments for improving germination, growth and yield of wheat[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 115501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac647
    [3]Rahul NAVIK, Sameera SHAFI, Md Miskatul ALAM, Md Amjad FAROOQ, Lina LIN (林丽娜), Yingjie CAI (蔡映杰). Influence of dielectric barrier discharge treatment on mechanical and dyeing properties of wool[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 65504-065504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaaadd
    [4]Zheng ZHANG (张政), Xueke CHE (车学科), Wangsheng NIE (聂万胜), Jinlong LI (李金龙), Tikai ZHENG (郑体凯), Liang LI (李亮), Qinya CHEN (陈庆亚), Zhi ZHENG (郑直). Study of vortex in flow fields induced by surface dielectric barrier discharge actuator at low pressure based on Q criterion[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(1): 14006-014006. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8e95
    [5]Guoqiang GAO (高国强), Kaisheng PENG (彭开晟), Lei DONG (董磊), Wenfu WEI (魏文赋), Guangning WU (吴广宁). Parametric study on the characteristics of a SDBD actuator with a serrated electrode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 64010-064010. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa5b39
    [6]QI Xiaohua (齐晓华), YANG Liang (杨亮), YAN Huijie (闫慧杰), JIN Ying (金英), HUA Yue (滑跃), REN Chunsheng (任春生). Experimental Study on Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator with Different Encapsulated Electrode Widths for Airflow Control at Atmospheric Pressure[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(10): 1005-1011. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/10/07
    [7]J. P. SARRETTE, O. EICHWALD, F. MARCHAL, O. DUCASSE, M. YOUSFI. Electro-Hydrodynamics and Kinetic Modeling of Dry and Humid Air Flows Activated by Corona Discharges[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 469-472. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/04
    [8]CHEN Bingyan (陈秉岩), ZHU Changping (朱昌平), FEI Juntao (费峻涛), HE Xiang (何湘), YIN Cheng (殷澄), WANG Yuan (王媛), GAO Ying (高莹), JIANG Yongfeng (蒋永锋), WEN Wen (文文), CHEN Longwei (陈龙威). Yield of Ozone, Nitrite Nitrogen and Hydrogen Peroxide Versus Discharge Parameter Using APPJ Under Water[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(3): 278-286. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/3/11
    [9]LIU Xin (刘欣), LI Shengli (李胜利), LI Mingshu (李铭书). Factors Influencing the Electron Yield of Needle-Ring Pulsed Corona Discharge Electron Source for Negative Ion Mobility Spectrometer[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(12): 1215-1220. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/12/10
    [10]JIN Di (金迪), LI Yinghong (李应红), JIA Min (贾敏), SONG Huimin (宋慧敏), et al.. Experimental Characterization of the Plasma Synthetic Jet Actuator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(10): 1034-1040. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/10/14

Catalog

    Article views (324) PDF downloads (1577) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return