Effect of Water Vapor on Toluene Removal in Catalysis-DBD Plasma Reactors

WANG Jingting (王婧婷); CAO Xu (曹栩); ZHANG Renxi (张仁熙); GONG Ting (龚挺); HOU Huiqi (侯惠奇); CHEN Shanping (陈善平); ZHANG Ruina (张瑞娜)

doi:10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/07

Plasma Science and Technology > 2016 > 18(4): 370-375. > DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/07

WANG Jingting (王婧婷), CAO Xu (曹栩), ZHANG Renxi (张仁熙), GONG Ting (龚挺), HOU Huiqi (侯惠奇), CHEN Shanping (陈善平), ZHANG Ruina (张瑞娜). Effect of Water Vapor on Toluene Removal in Catalysis-DBD Plasma Reactors[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 370-375. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/07

Citation:

PDF (361 KB)

Effect of Water Vapor on Toluene Removal in Catalysis-DBD Plasma Reactors

1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China 2Shanghai Institute for Design & Research on Environmental Engineering, Shanghai 200232, China

Funds: supported by the Key Project which is sponsored by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 13231201903), the Key Programs for Science and Technology Development sponsored by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Nos. 13231201901 and 14DZ1208401), and the Key Project sponsored by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of Shanghai, China (No. 2013019)

More Information

Received Date: August 31, 2015

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The experiment was carried out in a cylindrical dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor assisted with a catalyst to decompose toluene under different humidity. In order to explore the synergistic effect on removing toluene in the catalysis-DBD reactor, this paper investigated the decomposition efficiency and the energy consumption in the catalysis-DBD and the non-catalyst DBD reactors under different humidity. The results showed that the catalysis-DBD reactor had a better performance than the non-catalysis one at the humidity ratio of 0.4%, and the removal efficiency of toluene could reach 88.6% in the catalysis-DBD reactor, while it was only 59.9% in the non-catalytic reactor. However, there was no significant difference in the removal efficiency of toluene between the two reactors when the humidities were 1.2% and 2.4%. Additionally, the degradation products were also analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of decomposing toluene in a catalysis-DBD reactor.
- toluene,
- dielectric barrier discharge,
- TiO2,
- humidity,
- catalytic reaction

FullText(HTML)

References (1)

References

1 Mohanty S, Das S P. 2014, International Journal of Science and Research, 3: 1360 2 Atkinson R. 2000, Atmospheric Environment, 34: 2063 3 Guo Y F, Ye D Q, Chen K F, et al. 2007, Catalysis Today, 126: 328 4 Theakston F. 2000, Air Quality Guidelines for Europe.World Health Organization, Copenhagen, WHO Regional Publications 5 An H T Q, Huu T P, Van T L, et al. 2011, Catalysis oday, 176: 474 6 Subrahmanyam C, Renken A, Kiwi-Minsker L. 2012,Chemical Engineering Journal, 160: 677 7 Vandenbroucke A M, Morent R, Geyter N D, et al.2011, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 195: 30 8 Assadi A A, Bouzaza A, Vallet C, et al. 2014, Chemical ngineering Journal, 254: 124 9 Ye Z L, Jie Z, Huang H Y, et al. 2013, Journal of azardous Materials, 260: 32 10 Gandhi M S, Mok Y S. 2012, Journal of Environmental ciences, 24: 1234 11 Ayrault C, Barrault J, Blin-Simiand N, et al. 2004,Catalysis Today, 89: 75 12 Trinh H Q, Mok Y S. 2014, Chemical Engineering ournal, 251: 199 13 Subrahmanyam C, Renken A, Kiwi-Minsker L. 2007,Chemical Engineering Journal, 134: 78 14 Tang X J, Feng F, Ye L L, et al. 2013, Catalysis Today,211: 39 15 Sun R B, Xi Z G, Chao F H, et al. 2007, Atmospheric nvironment, 41: 6853 16 Jovic M S, Dojcinovic B P, Kovacevic V V, et al. 2014,Chemical Engineering Journal, 248: 63 17 Song Y H, Kim S J, Choi K I, et al. 2002, Journal of lectrostatics, 55: 189 18 Karuppiah J, Reddy E L, Reddy P M K, et al. 2012,Journal of Hazardous Materials, 237: 283 19 Lu M J, Huang R, Wang P T, et al. 2014, Plasma hemistry and Plasma Processing, 34: 1141 20 Lu B, Zhang X, Yu X, et al. 2006, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137: 633 21 Lahousse C, Bernier A, Grange P, et al. 1998, Journal of Catalysis, 178: 214 22 Cao S, Huang X M, Cao L. 2012, Environmental Science and Technology, 35: 18 (in Chinese) 23 Kim K J, Choi W S, Inyang I H. 2008, Environmental echnology, 29: 559 24 Zhang H, Li K, Sun T, et al. 2013, Research on Chemical Intermediates, 41: 175 25 Ogata A, Ito D, Mizuno K, et al. 2002. Applied Catalysis A General, 236: 9 26 Zhang Y H, Su H, Zhong L J, et al. 2008, Atmospheric Environment, 42: 6203 27 Zhang H B, Li K, Sun T H, et al. 2013, Research on hemical Intermediates, 39: 1021 28 Zhang Zhitao. 2003, Study of the Narrow Discharge ap DBD Plasma Source at Atmospheric Pressure and Its Basic Applications [Ph.D]. Northeastern University in Chinese) 29 Martin L, Ognier S, Gasthauer E, et al. 2007, Energy uels, 22: 576 30 Xiao G, Xu W P, Wu R B, et al. 2014, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 34: 1033 31 Liang W J, Ma L, Liu H, et al. 2013, Chemosphere,92: 1390

[1]	Shoujie LI, Ronger ZHENG, Yoshihiro DEGUCHI, Wangquan YE, Ye TIAN, Jinjia GUO, Ying LI, Yuan LU. Spectra-assisted laser focusing in quantitative analysis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for copper alloys[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 045510. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca5f4
[2]	Xiaonan ZHANG (张小楠), Xianxiu MEI (梅显秀), Shanshan LI (李山山). The irradiation variation of amorphous alloy FeSiB using for fusion devices induced by 2 MeV He ions[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 25601-025601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/abd97a
[3]	Liuyang ZHAN (詹浏洋), Xiaohong MA (马晓红), Weiqi FANG (方玮骐), Rui WANG (王锐), Zesheng LIU (刘泽生), Yang SONG (宋阳), Huafeng ZHAO (赵华凤). A rapid classification method of aluminum alloy based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and random forest algorithm[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34018-034018. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf7bf
[4]	Xiaoyong HE (何小勇), Runhua LI (李润华), Fujuan WANG (王福娟). Elemental analysis of copper alloy by high repetition rate LA-SIBS using compact fiber spectrometer[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34005-034005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae1f1
[5]	Donglai WANG (王东来), Tiebing LU (卢铁兵), Yuan WANG (王源), Bo CHEN (陈博), Xuebao LI (李学宝). Measurement of surface charges on the dielectric film based on field mills under the HVDC corona wire[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(5): 54008-054008. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaac26
[6]	Yuqing XIONG (熊玉卿), Hengjiao GAO (高恒蛟), Ni REN (任妮), Zhongwei LIU(刘忠伟). Atomic layer deposition of copper thin film and feasibility of deposition on inner walls of waveguides[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35507-035507. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9cdf
[7]	Yang LIU (刘洋), Kaihong FANG (方开洪), Huiyi LV (吕会议), Jiwei LIU (刘际伟), Boyu WANG (王博宇). Hydrogenation of zirconium film by implantation of hydrogen ions[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(3): 35502-035502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/3/035502
[8]	LIN Xiaomei (林晓梅), LI Han (李晗), YAO Qinghua (姚清华). Signal Detection of Carbon in Iron-Based Alloy by Double-Pulse Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(11): 953-957. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/11/12
[9]	JIN Shuoxue (靳硕学), GUO Liping (郭立平), YANG Zheng (杨铮), ZHOU Zhongpo (周忠坡), FU Dejun (付德君), LIU Chuansheng (刘传胜), TANG Rui (唐睿), LIU Feihua (刘飞华), QIAO Yanxin (乔岩欣), et, al. Structural Characterization of Nickel-Base Alloy C-276 Irradiated with Ar Ions[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 548-552. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/26
[10]	YUE Hongyun, WU Aimin, QIN Fuwen, LI Tingju. Study on AlxNiy Alloys as Diffusion Barriers in Flexible Thin Film Solar Cells[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(5): 600-603.