
Citation: | Rajesh Prakash GURAGAIN, Hom Bahadur BANIYA, Santosh DHUNGANA, Ganesh Kuwar CHHETRI, Binita SEDHAI, Niroj BASNET, Aavash SHAKYA, Bishnu Prasad PANDEY, Suman Prakash PRADHAN, Ujjwal Man JOSHI, Deepak Prasad SUBEDI. Effect of plasma treatment on the seed germination and seedling growth of radish (Raphanus sativus)[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 015502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac3476 |
The effect on the germination and seedling growth of radish (Raphanus sativus) seeds were examined employing a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) at atmospheric pressure and room temperature for various treatment time. DBD plasma using argon gas of flow rate 2 l m-1 was employed in this study. Radish seeds were treated with DBD plasma for 1–5 min, respectively. Germination characteristics, seedling growth parameters, the contact angle of the seed coat, water uptake capacity, mass loss, the temperature of the seeds, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents of the seedlings were measured before and after the DBD plasma treatments. Plasma treatment of radish seeds significantly increased germination-related characters, including germination percentage, fresh and dry weight, vigor index, and total carotenoids contents. However, the cumulative production rate was found to be decreased. Results from the experiment indicate an acceleration in the water uptake of the radish seeds and make the seed surface hydrophilic by plasma treatment. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that etching effects on the seed coat occurred after the argon plasma treatments, which affected the wettability of the radish seed. The experimental findings showed that seeds being treated by DBD plasma for 2 and 3 min had a positive effect on the germination and seedling growth of radish.
Water-electrode discharges can normally operate at atmospheric pressure and at a glow discharge mode [1], because the water electrode limits discharge current, and water evaporation has a cooling effect [2]. They are attracting more and more attentions due to abundance in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [2, 3]. Accordingly, water-electrode glow discharges at atmospheric pressure have broad potentials in diversified application fields, including water purification and activation [4–8], nanomaterials synthesis [9, 10], catalysis [11, 12], and medicine [13, 14].
The plasma attachment to a water electrode is apt to be uniform, presenting a disk shape in the interface between the glow plasma and the water electrode [15]. Other than the uniform disk, some discrete spots can also be formed above a water electrode [16]. Under proper conditions, some self-organized patterns appear, especially above a water anode [17, 18]. A single ring is formed if the electrical conductivity of water anode is higher than 17.3 μS·cm-1 [19, 20]. The single ring is attributed to the distinctive rotating motion of a micro-discharge channel, resulting from the generated electronegative species during the discharge that poison the discharge [21]. Diameter of the single ring increases until reaching a maximum, and then decreases with the increase of discharge current [18]. Besides, the single-ring pattern varies and may transit to other discharge patterns with adjusting gas flow rate, discharge current, and gap width [22]. Although various parameters can affect pattern transitions, the determining factor is related to electrode and gas temperatures [22]. In fact, the formation mechanism of pattern is still not understood very well [23]. With a reaction–diffusion mechanism, patterns above a water anode are initiated with an autocatalytic reaction of electrons, which is dictated by discharge current and ionic strength [24].
More complex ring patterns have been observed above a water anode. For example, a double-ring pattern is formed with 1.0% NaCl solution used as a water anode [25]. Excited by an alternating-current (AC) sinusoidal voltage, the double-ring pattern has also been found under a low conductivity of 55 nS·cm-1 [26]. Compared to the double ring, a triple-ring pattern is only formed with a conductivity higher than several hundred μS·cm-1, which can be excited by a direct-current (DC) voltage [27], an asymmetric sine [28], or a square wave [29]. Up to now, concentric-ring patterns more than quadruple rings have not been reported in the literature.
In this work, concentric-ring patterns up to five rings are formed in the interface between the water anode and the glow discharge plasma. The ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with increasing ionic strength (electrical conductivity) and discharge current. These concentric-ring patterns are numerically reproduced based on the model of the autocatalytic reaction.
As shown in figure 1, a 3.0 mm diameter rod is made from tungsten, which has a flat end. The rod electrode is placed above a glass reservoir, which has a diameter (inner diameter) of about 75 mm. The reservoir with a depth of 75 mm is full of water, whose initial electrical conductivity is 330 μS·cm-1. The electrical conductivity of the water anode is measured by a conductivity tester (Inesa DDSJ-308F). The water reservoir is cooled by being placed in a water tank at a constant temperature of about 25 ℃. Water in the reservoir serves as the anode through electrical ground via an immersed metal mesh, and the rod acts as the cathode through being connected to a DC power source (Glassman EK15R40). In the circuit, a ballast resistor (R=50 kΩ) is used to restrict the discharge current. The gap width (d) is 5.0 mm. The gas discharge in the gap is carried out in atmospheric environment. Hence, the working gas is room air at a pressure of 1.013×105 Pa, with a temperature of 300 K and a humidity of 35%. A single-lens-reflex camera (Canon EOS 5D Mark IV) with variable exposure time (texp) is used to obtain water-anode discharge patterns at an oblique angle (45°). After being focused by a lens, light emission is transmitted by an optical fiber into the entrance slit of a spectrometer (PI ACTON SP2750) with a grating of 2400 grooves mm-1, thus optical emission spectrum can be collected. A voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A) is used to detect applied voltage (Va), and a current coil (Pearson 8600) is employed to measure discharge current (I). Waveforms of Va and I are monitored by a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO4104). Typical waveforms of Va and I are presented in figure 1(b). It can be seen that no pulse can be found in Va and I, which means that the discharge operates in a continuous mode.
After atmospheric pressure glow discharge is initiated in the air gap, a radial-stripe pattern is formed at once above the water anode with I of 30.0 mA, as illustrated in figure 2. The radial-stripe pattern is surrounded by a ring as time elapses, leading to a single-ring pattern at 10 min. The ring number continuously increases from 15 to 25 min. That is to say, the concentric-ring pattern undergoes a scenario from a double ring (15 min), a triple ring (20 min), to a quadruple ring (25 min). For these concentric-ring patterns, the center is luminous. At last (30 min), a quintuple ring is time-invariantly stabilized above the water anode. Different to other concentric-ring patterns, the quintuple-ring pattern has a dark center. In a word, the ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with time elapsing, and up to five rings have been observed under the constant current of 30.0 mA. It is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in atmospheric pressure water-anode glow discharge.
As mentioned above, pattern becomes time-invariant after about half an hour operation of the discharge. However, the final time-invariant pattern evolves with varying discharge current, as presented in figure 3. At a low discharge current (5.0 mA), the pattern seems like a diffuse spot. Its diameter slightly increases with increasing discharge current. With a current of 10.0 mA, the diffuse-spot pattern transits to a single ring (the center is dark), which is similar to that reported by Shirai et al [30, 31]. When discharge current is increased to 14.0 mA, a diffuse spot appears in the center of the single-ring pattern. The diameter of the single ring increases and the central spot grows as discharge current is further elevated (16.0 mA). When discharge current reaches 20.0 mA, the central spot evolves into a new ring, resulting in a double-ring pattern. In a word, it seems that as discharge current increases, newcomer tends to appear in the center, which then transits to a new ring under a proper current. Interestingly, the pattern obeys this rule with further increasing discharge current, as can be seen for the transitions from the double-ring pattern (20.0 mA) to the triple ring (24.0 mA), from the triple-ring pattern (25.0 mA) to the quadruple ring (27.0 mA), and from the quadruple ring (28.0 mA) to the quintuple ring (30.0 mA). During these transitions, the ring number increases with increasing discharge current. Up to five concentric rings have been formed, and there is a central spot in the center of the quintuple ring at 31.0 mA. With further increasing discharge current, the concentric-ring patterns cannot be sustained above the water surface, and some discrete spots can be seen above the water anode (32.0 mA).
Electronegative species generated in the discharge, such as O, O3, H, OH, NO, NO2, NO3, NH, and NH2, can attach free electrons [21]. Resultantly, negative ions, mainly O-, H-, OH-, NO-, etc, will be deposited on the water surface [15, 32]. The deposited negative ions enhance the electric field in the interface between the bulk plasma and the water anode, resulting in a layer near the water surface, which is brighter than the plasma above it [15, 33]. When these negative ions are distributed nonuniformly, the region with more negative ions is brighter due to a higher enhanced field. In the bulk plasma, electrons are mainly produced near the axis of the discharge due to the high α (the first Townsend ionization coefficient) resulting from the maximal electric field in the center. In turn, more electrons will generate more electronegative species near the discharge axis. After generation, electrons and electronegative species near the axis diffuse to the rim. Hence, compared with the discharge rim, more electrons and electronegative species are abundant in the center. As a result, more negative ions tend to be deposited above the central region of the pattern. Therefore, newcomer is inclined to appear in the center of the concentric-ring patterns with increasing current.
As pointed out by Rumbach P et al [24], ionic strength (IS) and discharge current (I) mutually dictate the autocatalytic reaction of electrons. Hence, IS and I should be responsible for the pattern evolution mentioned before. Between them, IS is positively related with electrical conductivity. Hence, the electrical conductivity of the water anode is studied, as indicated in figure 4. Resulting from the generation of HNO3 and HNO2 [34, 35], the conductivity of the water anode increases with time, which reaches saturation after about 30 min operation. Moreover, the conductivity increases with increasing discharge current. In combination with figures 2 and 3, it can be deduced from figure 4 that pattern type varies with the variation of electrical conductivity (related with IS).
Figure 5 presents 300–800 nm scanned optical spectrum emitted from the discharge above the water anode. Besides the second positive system of N2(C3Πu→B3Πg) [32], spectral lines of Ar I (4p→4s) [36], and O I (3p3P→3s3S) at 844 nm [37], the first negative system of
The aforementioned concentric-ring patterns are simulated by the same method explored by Rumbach P et al [24]. From the Turing reaction–diffusion mechanism [43], it is believed that electrons are used as activators. Through the collision ionization of electrons, the autocatalytic reaction is realized, which is dictated by discharge current (I) and ionic strength (IS). With this model, the discharge patterns are given by the eigenfunctions (harmonics) of the cylindrical Laplacian (
Ylmn(r,z,θ)=Jm(κmlr)[Amlcos(mθ)+Bmlsin(mθ)]sin(knz), | (1) |
where Jm(kmlr) corresponds to the mth Bessel function of the first kind. (r, z, θ) are cylindrical coordinates.
The relationship between the l value and discharge current is listed in table 1. From table 1, one can see that the integer (l) increases with increasing discharge current. However, discharge current has a small variation range for a specific l value. Hence, all of the concentric-ring patterns formed in experiments have been numerically reproduced in simulations. However, at most five rings have been observed in experiments, which transit to discrete spots with current higher than 32 mA. This can be explained from the criteria for stability, which is related with the first Townsend ionization coefficient (α) [24]. α in the interfacial layer between the bulk plasma and the water anode is influenced by Tg. With a current higher than 32 mA, Tg is so high that stability criteria cannot be satisfied any more, resulting in the disappearance of the concentric-ring patterns. As a result, at most five concentric rings have been observed in our experiment. However, the maximal number of concentric rings is not limited according to formula (1). Hence, we believe that more rings could be obtained if the onset of thermal instability are restrained. Therefore, we will try our best to reduce the gas temperature in our future work through the usage of liquid nitrogen as a refrigerant, similar to that reported in the [44–46].
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |
In summary, various concentric-ring patterns have been formed above the water anode of a glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. The results reveal that the ring number of the patterns increases with time elapsing. Moreover, it increases with increasing discharge current. Among these concentric-ring patterns, it is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in water-anode glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. For both the quadruple ring and the quintuple ring, the center is either luminous or dark, depending on the discharge current. It has been found that the electrical conductivity of the water anode, electron temperature, electron density, and gas temperature vary as a function of time elapses and increasing discharge current. At last, the various concentric-ring patterns are reproduced in simulations based on the autocatalytic reaction model dictated by ionic strength and discharge current.
The authors are very thankful to Prof Dr Eun Ha Choi, and Dr Bhagirath Ghimire (Kwangwoon University, Korea), Milan Simek (Institute of Plasma Physics, The Czech Academy of Sciences), and Dr Johannes Gruenwald (Gruenwald Laboratories) for their valuable help and support. The corresponding author would also like to thank Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal for providing financial and technical support. The authors are also grateful to all the researchers of the Department of Physics, Kathmandu University who provided valuable suggestions for the completion of this work.
[1] |
Šimek M et al 2019 Plasma Process. Polym. 16 1700250 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201700250
|
[2] |
Bonizzoni G and Vassallo E 2002 Vacuum 64 327 doi: 10.1016/S0042-207X(01)00341-4
|
[3] |
Šerá B and Šerý M 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 044012 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaacc6
|
[4] |
Cvelbar U et al 2019 Plasma Process. Polym. 16 1700228 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201700228
|
[5] |
Bruggeman P and Leys C 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 053001 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/053001
|
[6] |
Zahoranová A et al 2016 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 36 397 doi: 10.1007/s11090-015-9684-z
|
[7] |
Baniya H B et al 2021 J. Chem. 2021 6638939 doi: 10.1155/2021/6638939
|
[8] |
Bekeschus S et al 2019 Plasma Process. Polym. 16 1800033 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201800033
|
[9] |
Weltmann K D et al 2019 Plasma Process. Polym. 16 1800118 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201800118
|
[10] |
Guragain R P et al 2021 Rev. Adhes. Adhes. 9 153
|
[11] |
Ambrico P F et al 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 104001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab5b1b
|
[12] |
Zhou R et al 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35714 doi: 10.1038/srep35714
|
[13] |
Brandenburg R et al 2019 Plasma Process. Polym. 16 1700238 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201700238
|
[14] |
Pankaj S K et al 2018 Foods 7 4 doi: 10.3390/foods7010004
|
[15] |
Štěpánová V et al 2018 Plasma Process. Polym. 15 1700076 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201700076
|
[16] |
Phan K T K et al 2017 Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52 2127 doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13509
|
[17] |
Randeniya L K and De Groot G J J B 2015 Plasma Process. Polym. 12 608 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201500042
|
[18] |
Bhilwadikar T et al 2019 Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18 1003 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12453
|
[19] |
Sivachandiran L and Khacef A 2017 RSC Adv. 7 1822 doi: 10.1039/C6RA24762H
|
[20] |
Ling L et al 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 5859 doi: 10.1038/srep05859
|
[21] |
Calicioglu O et al 2019 Sustainability 11 222 doi: 10.3390/su11010222
|
[22] |
Jiang J F et al 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 54 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/1/12
|
[23] |
Stolárik T et al 2015 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 35 659 doi: 10.1007/s11090-015-9627-8
|
[24] |
Šerá B et al 2010 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38 2963 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2060728
|
[25] |
Banihani S A 2017 Nutrients 9 1014 doi: 10.3390/nu9091014
|
[26] |
Song J S et al 2020 Front. Plant Sci. 11 1 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00001
|
[27] |
Adhikari B, Adhikari M and Park G 2020 Appl. Sci. 10 6045 doi: 10.3390/app10176045
|
[28] |
Sery M et al 2020 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 48 939 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2020.2981600
|
[29] |
Scholtz V et al 2019 J. Food Qual. 2019 7917825 doi: 10.1155/2019/6468018
|
[30] |
Henselová M et al 2012 Biologia 67 490 doi: 10.2478/s11756-012-0046-5
|
[31] |
Li L et al 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 13033 doi: 10.1038/srep13033
|
[32] |
Tong J Y et al 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 260 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/3/16
|
[33] |
Hayashi N et al 2015 Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 54 06GD01 doi: 10.7567/JJAP.54.06GD01
|
[34] |
Ji S H et al 2016 Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 605 117 doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.02.028
|
[35] |
Wang C Q and He X N 2006 Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 3377 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.205
|
[36] |
Šimek M, Pekárek S and Prukner V 2010 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 30 607 doi: 10.1007/s11090-010-9245-4
|
[37] |
Nersisyan G and Graham W G 2004 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13 582 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/13/4/005
|
[38] |
Kriegseis J et al 2011 J. Electrostat. 69 302 doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2011.04.007
|
[39] |
Manley T C 1943 Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 84 83 doi: 10.1149/1.3071556
|
[40] |
Wagner H E et al 2003 Vacuum 71 417 doi: 10.1016/S0042-207X(02)00765-0
|
[41] |
Tao X P, Lu R D and Li H 2012 Plasma Sci. Technol. 14 723 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/8/08
|
[42] |
Kim J H, Choi Y H and Hwang Y S 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 093501 doi: 10.1063/1.2338282
|
[43] |
Šimek M 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 463001 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/46/463001
|
[44] |
Homola T et al 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 095014 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aba987
|
[45] |
Guragain R P et al 2020 J. Technol. Space Plasmas 1 27 doi: 10.31281/jtsp.v1i1.11
|
[46] |
Wang Y et al 2017 Plasma Sci. Technol. 19 115403 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa861d
|
[47] |
Šimek M et al 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 055019 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aac240
|
[48] |
Kramida A, Ralchenko Y, Reader J and NIST ASD Team 2020 ‘NIST Atomic Spectra Database’ (version 5.8) (https://physics.nist.gov/asd)
|
[49] |
Etzler F M 2013 Rev. Adhes. Adhes. 1 3 doi: 10.7569/RAA.2013.097301
|
[50] |
Volin J C et al 2000 Crop Sci. 40 1706 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4061706x
|
[51] |
Zhang J J et al 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 41917 doi: 10.1038/srep41917
|
[52] |
Copeland L O and McDonald M B 1999 Principles of Seed Science and Technology (Boston: Springer US)
|
[53] |
Pérez-Pizá M C et al 2019 Heliyon 5 e01495 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01495
|
[54] |
Abdul-Baki A A and Anderson J D 1973 Crop Sci. 13 630 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
|
[55] |
Bahadur B, Rajam M V, Sahijram L and Krishnamurthy K V 2015 Plant Biology and Biotechnology: Plant Diversity, Organization, Function and Improvement vol 1 (India: Springer)
|
[56] |
Young A J 1991 Physiol. Plant. 83 702 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02490.x
|
[57] |
Sumanta N et al 2014 Res. J. Chem. Sci. 4 63
|
[58] |
Fernandes F A N, Santos V O and Rodrigues S 2019 Food Res. Int. 115 16 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.042
|
[59] |
Nabi F et al 2020 J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 104 1809 doi: 10.1111/jpn.13375
|
[60] |
Molina R et al 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 16442 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34801-0
|
[61] |
Lotfy K, Al-Harbi N A and El-raheem H A 2019 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 39 897 doi: 10.1007/s11090-019-09969-6
|
[62] |
Varnagiris S et al 2020 Processes 8 1575 doi: 10.3390/pr8121575
|
[63] |
Karmakar S et al 2021 Heliyon 7 e06458 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06458
|
[1] | Caixia LI, Jianyu FENG, Shuchang WANG, Cheng LI, Junxia RAN, Yuyang PAN, Lifang DONG. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a |
[2] | Xiaoxi DUAN (段晓溪), Benqiong LIU (刘本琼), Huige ZHANG (张惠鸽), Ben LI (李犇), Jiting OUYANG (欧阳吉庭). Various patterns in dielectric barrier glow discharges simulated by a dynamic model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 85401-085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0d51 |
[3] | Songru XIE (谢松汝), Yong HE (何勇), Dingkun YUAN (袁定琨), Zhihua WANG (王智化), Sunel KUMAR, Yanqun ZHU (朱燕群), Kefa CEN (岑可法). The effects of gas flow pattern on the generation of ozone in surface dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 55505-055505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aafc50 |
[4] | Yaqi YANG (杨亚奇), Weiguo LI (李卫国). Self-organized pattern on the surface of a metal anode in low-pressure DC discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35402-035402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa997f |
[5] | Xingwei WU (吴兴伟), Cong LI (李聪), Chunlei FENG (冯春雷), Qi WANG (王奇), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Time-resolved measurements of NO2 concentration in pulsed discharges by high-sensitivity cavity ring-down spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55506-055506. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6473 |
[6] | Jianyu FENG (冯建宇), Lifang DONG (董丽芳), Caixia LI (李彩霞), Ying LIU (刘莹), Tian DU (杜天), Fang HAO (郝芳). Hollow hexagonal pattern with surface discharges in a dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55401-055401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa594a |
[7] | WANG Lijun(王立军), HUANG Xiaolong(黄小龙), JIA Shenli(贾申利), ZHOU Xin(周鑫), SHI Zongqian(史宗谦). Modeling and Simulation of Deflected Anode Erosion in Vacuum Arcs[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(3): 226-231. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/3/10 |
[8] | HONG Yi (洪义), LU Na (鲁娜), PAN Jing (潘静), LI Jie (李杰), WU Yan (吴彦). Discharge Characteristics of an Atmospheric Pressure Argon Plasma Jet Generated with Screw Ring-Ring Electrodes in Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(8): 780-786. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/8/12 |
[9] | ZHENG Na (郑娜), ZHONG Chunlai (钟春来), FAN Tieshuan(樊铁栓). The Calculation of Prompt Fission Neutron from 233U(n, f) Reaction by Multi-Modal Los Alamos Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 521-525. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/19 |
[10] | JIANG Songsheng (蒋崧生), HE Ming (何明). Anomalous nuclear reaction in Earth’s interior: a new field in physics science?[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 438-441. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/25 |
1. | Li, J., Zhang, X., Tian, S. et al. Temporal evolution of self-organized spiral patterns formed in a liquid-electrode discharge sustained in atmospheric pressure air. Physics of Plasmas, 2025, 32(3): 032107. DOI:10.1063/5.0249081 | |
2. | Zhang, J., Zhu, M., Zhang, C. Dynamic of mode transition in air surface micro-discharge plasma: reactive species in confined space. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad862c | |
3. | Li, C., Feng, J., Wang, S. et al. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a | |
4. | Zhang, X.-X., Jia, P.-Y., Ran, J.-X. et al. Discharge characteristics and parameter diagnosis of brush-shaped air plasma plumes under auxiliary discharge | [辅助放电下刷状空气等离子体羽的放电特性和参数诊断]. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 085201. DOI:10.7498/aps.73.20231946 | |
5. | Wu, J., Li, X., Ran, J. et al. Discharge aspects of a snake-like plasma plume generated by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet with variable argon flow rate. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2023, 20(8): 2200188. DOI:10.1002/ppap.202200188 | |
6. | Cai, Z., Wang, Z. Evaluation of Salt Matrix and Organic Additives in Solution Anode Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry: Taking Silver, Cadmium and Mercury as Examples. Atomic Spectroscopy, 2023, 44(5): 354-364. DOI:10.46770/AS.2023.190 | |
7. | Kolobov, V.I., Golubovskii, Y.B. The principle of minimal power. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2022, 31(9): 094003. DOI:10.1088/1361-6595/ac8b31 | |
8. | Chen, J., Zhang, F., Jia, P. et al. Argon plume transition from a hollow swell to a diffuse swell with increasing amplitude of a trapezoidal voltage. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 085402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ac6570 |
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |