
Citation: | Jiali CHEN, Peiyu JI, Maoyang LI, Tianyuan HUANG, Lanjian ZHUGE, Xuemei WU. Synthesis of Ag-decorated vertical graphene nanosheets and their electrocatalytic efficiencies[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 054001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac4bb5 |
Herein we report the successful preparation of silver (Ag)-decorated vertically oriented graphene sheets (Ag/VGs) via helicon wave plasma chemical vapor deposition (HWP-CVD) and radiofrequency plasma magnetron sputtering (RF-PMS). VGs were synthesized in a mixture of argon and methane (Ar/CH4) by HWP-CVD and then the Ag nanoparticles on the prepared VGs were modified using the RF-PMS system for different sputtering times and RF power levels. The morphology and structure of the Ag nanoparticles were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and the results revealed that Ag nanoparticles were evenly dispersed on the mesoporous wall of the VGs. X-ray diffraction results showed that the diameter of the Ag particles increased with the increase in Ag loading, and the average size was between 10.49 nm and 25.9 nm, consistent with the transmission electron microscopy results. Ag/VGs were investigated as effective electrocatalysts for use in an alkaline aqueous system. Due to the uniquely ordered and interconnected wall structure of VGs, the area of active sites increased with the Ag loading, giving the Ag/VGs a good performance in the oxygen evolution reaction. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) of the Ag/VGs under different Ag loadings were studied, and the results showed that the highest Ag content gave the best Cdl (1.04 mF cm-2). Our results show that Ag/VGs are likely to be credible electrocatalytic materials.
Water-electrode discharges can normally operate at atmospheric pressure and at a glow discharge mode [1], because the water electrode limits discharge current, and water evaporation has a cooling effect [2]. They are attracting more and more attentions due to abundance in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [2, 3]. Accordingly, water-electrode glow discharges at atmospheric pressure have broad potentials in diversified application fields, including water purification and activation [4–8], nanomaterials synthesis [9, 10], catalysis [11, 12], and medicine [13, 14].
The plasma attachment to a water electrode is apt to be uniform, presenting a disk shape in the interface between the glow plasma and the water electrode [15]. Other than the uniform disk, some discrete spots can also be formed above a water electrode [16]. Under proper conditions, some self-organized patterns appear, especially above a water anode [17, 18]. A single ring is formed if the electrical conductivity of water anode is higher than 17.3 μS·cm-1 [19, 20]. The single ring is attributed to the distinctive rotating motion of a micro-discharge channel, resulting from the generated electronegative species during the discharge that poison the discharge [21]. Diameter of the single ring increases until reaching a maximum, and then decreases with the increase of discharge current [18]. Besides, the single-ring pattern varies and may transit to other discharge patterns with adjusting gas flow rate, discharge current, and gap width [22]. Although various parameters can affect pattern transitions, the determining factor is related to electrode and gas temperatures [22]. In fact, the formation mechanism of pattern is still not understood very well [23]. With a reaction–diffusion mechanism, patterns above a water anode are initiated with an autocatalytic reaction of electrons, which is dictated by discharge current and ionic strength [24].
More complex ring patterns have been observed above a water anode. For example, a double-ring pattern is formed with 1.0% NaCl solution used as a water anode [25]. Excited by an alternating-current (AC) sinusoidal voltage, the double-ring pattern has also been found under a low conductivity of 55 nS·cm-1 [26]. Compared to the double ring, a triple-ring pattern is only formed with a conductivity higher than several hundred μS·cm-1, which can be excited by a direct-current (DC) voltage [27], an asymmetric sine [28], or a square wave [29]. Up to now, concentric-ring patterns more than quadruple rings have not been reported in the literature.
In this work, concentric-ring patterns up to five rings are formed in the interface between the water anode and the glow discharge plasma. The ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with increasing ionic strength (electrical conductivity) and discharge current. These concentric-ring patterns are numerically reproduced based on the model of the autocatalytic reaction.
As shown in figure 1, a 3.0 mm diameter rod is made from tungsten, which has a flat end. The rod electrode is placed above a glass reservoir, which has a diameter (inner diameter) of about 75 mm. The reservoir with a depth of 75 mm is full of water, whose initial electrical conductivity is 330 μS·cm-1. The electrical conductivity of the water anode is measured by a conductivity tester (Inesa DDSJ-308F). The water reservoir is cooled by being placed in a water tank at a constant temperature of about 25 ℃. Water in the reservoir serves as the anode through electrical ground via an immersed metal mesh, and the rod acts as the cathode through being connected to a DC power source (Glassman EK15R40). In the circuit, a ballast resistor (R=50 kΩ) is used to restrict the discharge current. The gap width (d) is 5.0 mm. The gas discharge in the gap is carried out in atmospheric environment. Hence, the working gas is room air at a pressure of 1.013×105 Pa, with a temperature of 300 K and a humidity of 35%. A single-lens-reflex camera (Canon EOS 5D Mark IV) with variable exposure time (texp) is used to obtain water-anode discharge patterns at an oblique angle (45°). After being focused by a lens, light emission is transmitted by an optical fiber into the entrance slit of a spectrometer (PI ACTON SP2750) with a grating of 2400 grooves mm-1, thus optical emission spectrum can be collected. A voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A) is used to detect applied voltage (Va), and a current coil (Pearson 8600) is employed to measure discharge current (I). Waveforms of Va and I are monitored by a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO4104). Typical waveforms of Va and I are presented in figure 1(b). It can be seen that no pulse can be found in Va and I, which means that the discharge operates in a continuous mode.
After atmospheric pressure glow discharge is initiated in the air gap, a radial-stripe pattern is formed at once above the water anode with I of 30.0 mA, as illustrated in figure 2. The radial-stripe pattern is surrounded by a ring as time elapses, leading to a single-ring pattern at 10 min. The ring number continuously increases from 15 to 25 min. That is to say, the concentric-ring pattern undergoes a scenario from a double ring (15 min), a triple ring (20 min), to a quadruple ring (25 min). For these concentric-ring patterns, the center is luminous. At last (30 min), a quintuple ring is time-invariantly stabilized above the water anode. Different to other concentric-ring patterns, the quintuple-ring pattern has a dark center. In a word, the ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with time elapsing, and up to five rings have been observed under the constant current of 30.0 mA. It is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in atmospheric pressure water-anode glow discharge.
As mentioned above, pattern becomes time-invariant after about half an hour operation of the discharge. However, the final time-invariant pattern evolves with varying discharge current, as presented in figure 3. At a low discharge current (5.0 mA), the pattern seems like a diffuse spot. Its diameter slightly increases with increasing discharge current. With a current of 10.0 mA, the diffuse-spot pattern transits to a single ring (the center is dark), which is similar to that reported by Shirai et al [30, 31]. When discharge current is increased to 14.0 mA, a diffuse spot appears in the center of the single-ring pattern. The diameter of the single ring increases and the central spot grows as discharge current is further elevated (16.0 mA). When discharge current reaches 20.0 mA, the central spot evolves into a new ring, resulting in a double-ring pattern. In a word, it seems that as discharge current increases, newcomer tends to appear in the center, which then transits to a new ring under a proper current. Interestingly, the pattern obeys this rule with further increasing discharge current, as can be seen for the transitions from the double-ring pattern (20.0 mA) to the triple ring (24.0 mA), from the triple-ring pattern (25.0 mA) to the quadruple ring (27.0 mA), and from the quadruple ring (28.0 mA) to the quintuple ring (30.0 mA). During these transitions, the ring number increases with increasing discharge current. Up to five concentric rings have been formed, and there is a central spot in the center of the quintuple ring at 31.0 mA. With further increasing discharge current, the concentric-ring patterns cannot be sustained above the water surface, and some discrete spots can be seen above the water anode (32.0 mA).
Electronegative species generated in the discharge, such as O, O3, H, OH, NO, NO2, NO3, NH, and NH2, can attach free electrons [21]. Resultantly, negative ions, mainly O-, H-, OH-, NO-, etc, will be deposited on the water surface [15, 32]. The deposited negative ions enhance the electric field in the interface between the bulk plasma and the water anode, resulting in a layer near the water surface, which is brighter than the plasma above it [15, 33]. When these negative ions are distributed nonuniformly, the region with more negative ions is brighter due to a higher enhanced field. In the bulk plasma, electrons are mainly produced near the axis of the discharge due to the high α (the first Townsend ionization coefficient) resulting from the maximal electric field in the center. In turn, more electrons will generate more electronegative species near the discharge axis. After generation, electrons and electronegative species near the axis diffuse to the rim. Hence, compared with the discharge rim, more electrons and electronegative species are abundant in the center. As a result, more negative ions tend to be deposited above the central region of the pattern. Therefore, newcomer is inclined to appear in the center of the concentric-ring patterns with increasing current.
As pointed out by Rumbach P et al [24], ionic strength (IS) and discharge current (I) mutually dictate the autocatalytic reaction of electrons. Hence, IS and I should be responsible for the pattern evolution mentioned before. Between them, IS is positively related with electrical conductivity. Hence, the electrical conductivity of the water anode is studied, as indicated in figure 4. Resulting from the generation of HNO3 and HNO2 [34, 35], the conductivity of the water anode increases with time, which reaches saturation after about 30 min operation. Moreover, the conductivity increases with increasing discharge current. In combination with figures 2 and 3, it can be deduced from figure 4 that pattern type varies with the variation of electrical conductivity (related with IS).
Figure 5 presents 300–800 nm scanned optical spectrum emitted from the discharge above the water anode. Besides the second positive system of N2(C3Πu→B3Πg) [32], spectral lines of Ar I (4p→4s) [36], and O I (3p3P→3s3S) at 844 nm [37], the first negative system of
The aforementioned concentric-ring patterns are simulated by the same method explored by Rumbach P et al [24]. From the Turing reaction–diffusion mechanism [43], it is believed that electrons are used as activators. Through the collision ionization of electrons, the autocatalytic reaction is realized, which is dictated by discharge current (I) and ionic strength (IS). With this model, the discharge patterns are given by the eigenfunctions (harmonics) of the cylindrical Laplacian (
Ylmn(r,z,θ)=Jm(κmlr)[Amlcos(mθ)+Bmlsin(mθ)]sin(knz), | (1) |
where Jm(kmlr) corresponds to the mth Bessel function of the first kind. (r, z, θ) are cylindrical coordinates.
The relationship between the l value and discharge current is listed in table 1. From table 1, one can see that the integer (l) increases with increasing discharge current. However, discharge current has a small variation range for a specific l value. Hence, all of the concentric-ring patterns formed in experiments have been numerically reproduced in simulations. However, at most five rings have been observed in experiments, which transit to discrete spots with current higher than 32 mA. This can be explained from the criteria for stability, which is related with the first Townsend ionization coefficient (α) [24]. α in the interfacial layer between the bulk plasma and the water anode is influenced by Tg. With a current higher than 32 mA, Tg is so high that stability criteria cannot be satisfied any more, resulting in the disappearance of the concentric-ring patterns. As a result, at most five concentric rings have been observed in our experiment. However, the maximal number of concentric rings is not limited according to formula (1). Hence, we believe that more rings could be obtained if the onset of thermal instability are restrained. Therefore, we will try our best to reduce the gas temperature in our future work through the usage of liquid nitrogen as a refrigerant, similar to that reported in the [44–46].
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |
In summary, various concentric-ring patterns have been formed above the water anode of a glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. The results reveal that the ring number of the patterns increases with time elapsing. Moreover, it increases with increasing discharge current. Among these concentric-ring patterns, it is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in water-anode glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. For both the quadruple ring and the quintuple ring, the center is either luminous or dark, depending on the discharge current. It has been found that the electrical conductivity of the water anode, electron temperature, electron density, and gas temperature vary as a function of time elapses and increasing discharge current. At last, the various concentric-ring patterns are reproduced in simulations based on the autocatalytic reaction model dictated by ionic strength and discharge current.
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11975163), the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
[1] |
Wei H L et al 2021 Chin. J. Catal. 42 1451 doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63752-4
|
[2] |
Yang X H, He P and Xia Y Y 2009 Electrochem. Commun. 11 1127 doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.03.029
|
[3] |
Li J et al 2013 Nanoscale 5 4647 doi: 10.1039/c3nr00337j
|
[4] |
Liu L L, Niu Z Q and Chen J 2016 Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 4340 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00041J
|
[5] |
Che G L et al 1998 Nature 393 346 doi: 10.1038/30694
|
[6] |
Gong K P et al 2009 Science 323 760 doi: 10.1126/science.1168049
|
[7] |
Zhang H B, Pan X L and Bao X H 2013 J. Energy Chem. 22 251 doi: 10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60031-5
|
[8] |
Yu L et al 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 16461 doi: 10.1021/jp302311r
|
[9] |
Zhang C J et al 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 560 149908 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149908
|
[10] |
Yoo E and Zhou H S 2011 ACS Nano 5 3020 doi: 10.1021/nn200084u
|
[11] |
Zhang Z Y, Lee C S and Zhang W J 2017 Adv. Energy Mater 7 1700678 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700678
|
[12] |
Xiao X C et al 2011 Electrochem. Commun. 13 209 doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.016
|
[13] |
Zheng B et al 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 2108 doi: 10.1039/C4CS00352G
|
[14] |
Giorgi L et al 2007 Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 126 144 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.11.018
|
[15] |
Machino T et al 2009 Appl. Phys. Express 2 025001 doi: 10.1143/APEX.2.025001
|
[16] |
Yang B J et al 2002 Nano Lett. 2 751 doi: 10.1021/nl025572r
|
[17] |
Mao S et al 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 1696 doi: 10.1038/srep01696
|
[18] |
Kim H et al 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 15514 doi: 10.1039/c2jm33150k
|
[19] |
Bo Z et al 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 2108 doi: 10.1039/C4CS00352G
|
[20] |
Yu K H et al 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 188 doi: 10.1039/C2TA00380E
|
[21] |
Xie X H et al 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 15390 doi: 10.1039/C7TA03287K
|
[22] |
Liu B C et al 2018 Chem. Eur. J. 24 3283 doi: 10.1002/chem.201705521
|
[23] |
Chen W Q et al 2018 Chem. Commun. 54 7900 doi: 10.1039/C8CC03136C
|
[24] |
Ji P Y et al 2020 Diam. Relat. Mater. 108 107958 doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107958
|
[25] |
Zhang C X et al 2011 Electrochim. Acta 56 6033 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.091
|
[26] |
Yu X Y, Jiang Z Q and Meng Y D 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 87 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/12/1/18
|
[27] |
Li S H et al 2016 RSC Adv. 6 99179 doi: 10.1039/C6RA23049K
|
[28] |
Qaseem A et al 2016 Catal. Sci. Technol. 6 3317 doi: 10.1039/C5CY02270C
|
[29] |
Wang D L et al 2012 Nat. Mater. 12 81 doi: 10.1038/nmat3458
|
[30] |
Deng D H et al 2011 Chem. Mater. 23 1188 doi: 10.1021/cm102666r
|
[31] |
Zheng X M et al 2015 AIP Adv. 5 057133 doi: 10.1063/1.4921316
|
[32] |
Schedin F et al 2010 ACS Nano 4 5617 doi: 10.1021/nn1010842
|
[33] |
Sun S T and Wu P Y 2011 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 21116 doi: 10.1039/c1cp22727k
|
[34] |
Huang M Q et al 2020 Small 16 2000158 doi: 10.1002/smll.202000158
|
[35] |
Yuan L Z et al 2014 Electrochim. Acta 135 168 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.137
|
[36] |
Espinosa E H et al 2007 Thin Solid Films 515 8322 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.017
|
[37] |
Huang L et al 2017 J. Mater. Chem. 5 18610 doi: 10.1039/C7TA05821G
|
[38] |
Deng Y Y et al 2021 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 585 800 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.060
|
[39] |
Chen G et al 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1900883 doi: 10.1002/adma.201900883
|
[40] |
Wang G H et al 2016 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 8850 doi: 10.1002/anie.201511558
|
[41] |
Zhang C W et al 2014 ACS Catal. 4 1926 doi: 10.1021/cs500107t
|
[42] |
Sun M H et al 2016 Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 3479 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00135A
|
[43] |
Sun T T et al 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 12751 doi: 10.1039/C8TA03672A
|
[1] | Caixia LI, Jianyu FENG, Shuchang WANG, Cheng LI, Junxia RAN, Yuyang PAN, Lifang DONG. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a |
[2] | Xiaoxi DUAN (段晓溪), Benqiong LIU (刘本琼), Huige ZHANG (张惠鸽), Ben LI (李犇), Jiting OUYANG (欧阳吉庭). Various patterns in dielectric barrier glow discharges simulated by a dynamic model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 85401-085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0d51 |
[3] | Songru XIE (谢松汝), Yong HE (何勇), Dingkun YUAN (袁定琨), Zhihua WANG (王智化), Sunel KUMAR, Yanqun ZHU (朱燕群), Kefa CEN (岑可法). The effects of gas flow pattern on the generation of ozone in surface dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 55505-055505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aafc50 |
[4] | Yaqi YANG (杨亚奇), Weiguo LI (李卫国). Self-organized pattern on the surface of a metal anode in low-pressure DC discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35402-035402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa997f |
[5] | Xingwei WU (吴兴伟), Cong LI (李聪), Chunlei FENG (冯春雷), Qi WANG (王奇), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Time-resolved measurements of NO2 concentration in pulsed discharges by high-sensitivity cavity ring-down spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55506-055506. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6473 |
[6] | Jianyu FENG (冯建宇), Lifang DONG (董丽芳), Caixia LI (李彩霞), Ying LIU (刘莹), Tian DU (杜天), Fang HAO (郝芳). Hollow hexagonal pattern with surface discharges in a dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55401-055401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa594a |
[7] | WANG Lijun(王立军), HUANG Xiaolong(黄小龙), JIA Shenli(贾申利), ZHOU Xin(周鑫), SHI Zongqian(史宗谦). Modeling and Simulation of Deflected Anode Erosion in Vacuum Arcs[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(3): 226-231. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/3/10 |
[8] | HONG Yi (洪义), LU Na (鲁娜), PAN Jing (潘静), LI Jie (李杰), WU Yan (吴彦). Discharge Characteristics of an Atmospheric Pressure Argon Plasma Jet Generated with Screw Ring-Ring Electrodes in Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(8): 780-786. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/8/12 |
[9] | ZHENG Na (郑娜), ZHONG Chunlai (钟春来), FAN Tieshuan(樊铁栓). The Calculation of Prompt Fission Neutron from 233U(n, f) Reaction by Multi-Modal Los Alamos Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 521-525. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/19 |
[10] | JIANG Songsheng (蒋崧生), HE Ming (何明). Anomalous nuclear reaction in Earth’s interior: a new field in physics science?[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 438-441. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/25 |
1. | Li, J., Zhang, X., Tian, S. et al. Temporal evolution of self-organized spiral patterns formed in a liquid-electrode discharge sustained in atmospheric pressure air. Physics of Plasmas, 2025, 32(3): 032107. DOI:10.1063/5.0249081 | |
2. | Zhang, J., Zhu, M., Zhang, C. Dynamic of mode transition in air surface micro-discharge plasma: reactive species in confined space. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad862c | |
3. | Li, C., Feng, J., Wang, S. et al. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a | |
4. | Zhang, X.-X., Jia, P.-Y., Ran, J.-X. et al. Discharge characteristics and parameter diagnosis of brush-shaped air plasma plumes under auxiliary discharge | [辅助放电下刷状空气等离子体羽的放电特性和参数诊断]. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 085201. DOI:10.7498/aps.73.20231946 | |
5. | Wu, J., Li, X., Ran, J. et al. Discharge aspects of a snake-like plasma plume generated by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet with variable argon flow rate. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2023, 20(8): 2200188. DOI:10.1002/ppap.202200188 | |
6. | Cai, Z., Wang, Z. Evaluation of Salt Matrix and Organic Additives in Solution Anode Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry: Taking Silver, Cadmium and Mercury as Examples. Atomic Spectroscopy, 2023, 44(5): 354-364. DOI:10.46770/AS.2023.190 | |
7. | Kolobov, V.I., Golubovskii, Y.B. The principle of minimal power. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2022, 31(9): 094003. DOI:10.1088/1361-6595/ac8b31 | |
8. | Chen, J., Zhang, F., Jia, P. et al. Argon plume transition from a hollow swell to a diffuse swell with increasing amplitude of a trapezoidal voltage. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 085402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ac6570 |
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |