Advanced Search+
Yuhao JIANG, Chengming QIN, Wei ZHANG, Lunan LIU, Zhengshuyan WANG, Yaoyao GUO, Xinjun ZHANG, Lin AI, Rui DING, Vincent CHAN, Jiale CHEN, Xiaojie WANG, Guoliang XU, Jiangang LI. Simulation analysis of ICRF heating scenarios for CFEDR[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(10): 104012. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/adfef5
Citation: Yuhao JIANG, Chengming QIN, Wei ZHANG, Lunan LIU, Zhengshuyan WANG, Yaoyao GUO, Xinjun ZHANG, Lin AI, Rui DING, Vincent CHAN, Jiale CHEN, Xiaojie WANG, Guoliang XU, Jiangang LI. Simulation analysis of ICRF heating scenarios for CFEDR[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(10): 104012. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/adfef5

Simulation analysis of ICRF heating scenarios for CFEDR

  • As a critical ion heating technique for future fusion reactors, Ion Cyclotron Range of Frequencies (ICRF) heating is an important auxiliary heating method. The China Fusion Engineering Demo Reactor (CFEDR) plans to inject 20 MW of ICRF power into the plasma for sustaining H-mode operation. In this study, two candidate minority heating schemes, 3He minority heating (60 MHz) and H minority heating (90 MHz), are considered. Power deposition simulations have been carried out by using the TOMCAT code, including optimization of the minority ion concentration ( X_\textMI ), toroidal mode number ( N_\texttor ), and RF frequency ( f_\textICRF ) of both heating schemes. The primary goal is to maximize the ion absorption ratio, and minimize electron absorption, thereby ensuring efficient core heating for CFEDR operation. It is shown that in the cases of X^3\textHe = 2\% and X\textH = 4\% , N_\texttor = 40 and f_\textICRF = 60\;\textMHz for 3He minority heating ( f_\textICRF = 90\;\textMHz for H minority heating), maximum power absorption can be achieved with the two main minority heating scenarios, in which ion absorption ratios exceed 70% for 3He minority heating and 85% for H minority heating, respectively. During the plasma current ramp-up phase, RF power deposition on the minorities of 3He is about 54%–74% and H is around 62%–85% with off-axis heating. In the flat-top phase, RF power is absorbed predominantly by ions and is on-axis heating. This study aims to optimize ICRF heating scenarios by maximizing ion absorption and ensuring central power deposition while minimizing electron damping losses.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return