Advanced Search+
WEN Xueqing (闻雪晴), XIN Yu (信裕), FENG Chunlei (冯春雷), DING Hongbin (丁洪斌). Electron Energy and the Effective Electron Temperature of Nanosecond Pulsed Argon Plasma Studied by Global Simulations Combined with Optical Emission Spectroscopic Measurements[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 40-47. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/10
Citation: WEN Xueqing (闻雪晴), XIN Yu (信裕), FENG Chunlei (冯春雷), DING Hongbin (丁洪斌). Electron Energy and the Effective Electron Temperature of Nanosecond Pulsed Argon Plasma Studied by Global Simulations Combined with Optical Emission Spectroscopic Measurements[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 40-47. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/10

Electron Energy and the Effective Electron Temperature of Nanosecond Pulsed Argon Plasma Studied by Global Simulations Combined with Optical Emission Spectroscopic Measurements

Funds: supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 10875023,11175035), the PhD research program (no. 200801411040 ) of Educational Ministry, the Scientific and Technical Foundation of Liaoning Province (no. 20082168) and National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program of China (nos. 2009GB106004, 2008CB717801).
More Information
  • Received Date: August 05, 2011
  • The behavior of argon plasma driven by nanosecond pulsed plasma in a low-pressure plasma reactor is investigated using a global model, and the results are compared with the experimental measurements. The time evolution of plasma density and the electron energy probability function are calculated by solving the energy balance and Boltzmann equations. During and shortly after the discharge pulse, the electron energy probability function can be represented by a bi-Maxwellian distribution, indicating two energy groups of electrons. According to the effective electron temperature calculation, we find that there are more high-energy electrons that play an important role in the excitation and ionization processes than low-energy electrons. The effective electron temperature is also measured via optical emission spectroscopy to evaluate the simulation model. In the comparison, the simulation results are found to be in agreement with the measurements. Furthermore, variations of the effective electron temperature are presented versus other discharge parameters, such as pulse width time, pulse rise time and gas pressure.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Huihui WANG (王慧慧), Zun ZHANG (张尊), Kaiyi YANG (杨凯翼), Chang TAN (谭畅), Ruilin CUI (崔瑞林), Jiting OUYANG (欧阳吉庭). Axial profiles of argon helicon plasma by optical emission spectroscope and Langmuir probe[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 74009-074009. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab175b
    [2]Ying WANG (王莹), Anmin CHEN (陈安民), Qiuyun WANG (王秋云), Dan ZHANG (张丹), Laizhi SUI (隋来志), Suyu LI (李苏宇), Yuanfei JIANG (姜远飞), Mingxing JIN (金明星). Enhancement of optical emission generated from femtosecond double-pulse laser-induced glass plasma at different sample temperatures in air[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34013-034013. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaefa1
    [3]Zilu ZHAO (赵紫璐), Dezheng YANG (杨德正), Wenchun WANG (王文春), Hao YUAN (袁皓), Li ZHANG (张丽), Sen WANG (王森). Volume added surface barrier discharge plasma excited by bipolar nanosecond pulse power in atmospheric air: optical emission spectra influenced by gap distance[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 115403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac881
    [4]Saravanan ARUMUGAM, Prince ALEX, Suraj Kumar SINHA. Feedback model of secondary electron emission in DC gas discharge plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 25404-025404. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8e3f
    [5]Xiang HE (何湘), Chong LIU (刘冲), Yachun ZHANG (张亚春), Jianping CHEN (陈建平), Yudong CHEN (陈玉东), Xiaojun ZENG (曾小军), Bingyan CHEN (陈秉岩), Jiaxin PANG (庞佳鑫), Yibing WANG (王一兵). Diagnostic of capacitively coupled radio frequency plasma from electrical discharge characteristics: comparison with optical emission spectroscopy and fluid model simulation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 24005-024005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9a31
    [6]Yong WANG (王勇), Cong LI (李聪), Jielin SHI (石劼霖), Xingwei WU (吴兴伟), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Measurement of electron density and electron temperature of a cascaded arc plasma using laser Thomson scattering compared to an optical emission spectroscopic approach[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa861d
    [7]NIU Zhiwen (牛志文), WEN Xiaoqiong (温小琼), REN Chunsheng (任春生), QIU Yuliang (邱玉良). Measurement of Temporally and Spatially Resolved Electron Density in the Filament of a Pulsed Spark Discharge in Water[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 821-825. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/05
    [8]XU Yongli (徐永丽), LIANG Haiying (梁海英), GUO Hairui (郭海瑞), HAN Yinlu (韩银录), SHEN Qingbiao (申庆彪). The Nucleon-Actinide Global Optical Model Potential Below 300 MeV[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 499-505. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/14
    [9]M. M. MORSHED, S. M. DANIELS. Electron Density and Optical Emission Measurements of SF6/O2 Plasmas for Silicon Etch Processes[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(4): 316-320. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/4/09
    [10]ZHU Ximing (朱悉铭), PU Yikang (蒲以康). Determination of Non-Maxwellian Electron Energy Distributions in Low-Pressure Plasmas by Using the Optical Emission Spectroscopy and a Collisional-Radiative Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(3): 267-278.

Catalog

    Article views (793) PDF downloads (1914) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return