High-Sensitivity In-Situ Diagnosis of NO 2 Production and Removal in DBD Using Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

WU Xingwei(吴兴伟); LI Cong(李聪); ZHANG Chenfei(张辰飞); DING Hongbin(丁洪斌)

doi:10.1088/1009-0630/16/2/10

Plasma Science and Technology > 2014 > 16(2): 142-148. > DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/2/10 CSTR: 32219.14.1009-0630/16/2/10

WU Xingwei(吴兴伟), LI Cong(李聪), ZHANG Chenfei(张辰飞), DING Hongbin(丁洪斌). High-Sensitivity In-Situ Diagnosis of NO 2 Production and Removal in DBD Using Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/2/10

Citation:

PDF (1029 KB)

High-Sensitivity In-Situ Diagnosis of NO 2 Production and Removal in DBD Using Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion and Electron Beams, Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Optical Electronic Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Funds: supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program of China (No.2013GB109005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.11175035, 10875023), Chinesisch-Deutsches Forschungs Project (GZ768), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT12ZD(G)01) and Mmlab Research Project of China (DP1051208)

More Information

Received Date: August 20, 2013

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

A highly-sensitive in-situ diagnosis approach for nitrogen dioxide (NO ₂ ) has been developed in dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) based on pulsed cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS). Absorption bands of NO₂ in a spectral region from 508 nm to 509 nm were used, and a detection limit of 17.5 ppb was achieved. At this level of sensitivity, the quantitative and real-time monitoring of the production and removal of NO ₂ are accomplished for the first time in the discharge region. By measuring the removal amount and rate at different NO ₂ initial number densities from 1.54 × 10 ¹³ cm ⁻³ to 2.79 × 10 ¹⁴ cm⁻³, we determined the relationship between them and NO ₂ initial number densities. The removal amount linearly increases with the initial number density, while the removal rate increases logarithmically. At a lower initial number density, the removal rate is limited. By considering the chemical kinetic mechanism in plasma, a qualitative explanation for the above phenomena is proposed: the additional NO₂ produced by discharge limits the removal rate, since the NO ₂ concentration is dominated by the competition between the forward reactions (production) and the reverse reactions (removal).
- DBD,
- CRDS,
- NO ₂ production,
- NO ₂ removal

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

1 Bilitza D, Rawer K, Bossy L, et al. 1993, Adv. Space Res., 13: 15

2 Merche D, Vandencasteele N and Reniers F. 2012,Thin Solid Films, 520: 4219;

3 Park G Y, Park S J, Choi M Y, et al. 2012, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 21: 043001;

4 Rahman M. 2005, NOx Production by Ionisation Pro-cesses in Air [Ph.D]. Uppsala University, Sweden;

5 Sathiamoorthy G, Kalyana S, FinneyWC, et al. 1999,Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38: 1844;

6 Mok Y S and Nam I S. 2002, Chem. Eng. J., 85: 87;

7 Takaki K and Fujiwara T. 2001, IEEE. Trans. Plasma Sci., 29: 518;

8 Lowke J J and Morrow R. 1995, IEEE. Trans. PlasmaSci., 23: 661;

9 Rousseau A, Gatilova L V, Ropcke J, et al. 2005, Appl.Phys. Lett., 86: 211501;

10 Rousseau A, Dantier A, Gatilova L, et al. 2005, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 14: 70;

11 Beckers F, Hoeben W, Pemen A, et al. 2013, J. Phys.D: Appl. Phys., 46: 295201;

12 Platt U. 1999, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1: 5409;

13 Thornton J A, Wooldridge P J and Cohen R C. 2000,Anal. Chem., 72: 528;

14 Rao G N and Karpf A. 2010, Appl. Optics., 49: 4906;

15 Ramponi A J, Milanovich F P, Kan T, et al. 1988,Appl. Optics., 27: 4606;

16 Berden G, Peeters R and Meijer G. 2000, Int. Rev.Phys. Chem., 19: 565;

17 Evertsen R, Staicu A, Dam N, et al. 2002, Appl. Phys.B: Lasers Opt., 74: 465;

18 Yamamoto Y, Sumizawa H, Yamada H, et al. 2011,Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., 105: 923;

19 Biennier L, Salama F, Allamandola L J, et al. 2003, J.Chem. Phys., 118: 7863;

20 Wang Chuji. 2007, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 22: 1347;

21 Plaksin V Y, Penkov O V, Ko M K, et al. 2010, Plasma Sci. Technol., 12: 688;

22 Vinogradov I P and Wiesemann K. 1997, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 6: 307;

23 Stefanovic I, Bibinov N K, Deryugin A A, et al. 2001,Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 10: 406;

24 Brown S S, Stark H and Ravishankara A R. 2002,Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., 75:173;

25 Voigt S, Orphal J and Burrows J. 2002, J. Photochem.Photobiol. A, 149: 1;

26 Vandaele A C, Hermans C, Fally S, et al. 2002, J. Geo-phys. Res., 107: 4348;

27 Nizkorodov S A, Sander S P and Brown L R. 2004, J.Phys. Chem. A, 108: 4864;

28 Gatilova L V, Allegraud K, Guillon J, et al. 2007,Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 16: S107;

29 Henriques J, Tatarova E, Guerra V, et al. 2002, J.Appl. Phys., 91: 5622;

30 DeMore W B, Sander S P, Golden D M, et al. 1997,Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling. NASA Jet Propulsion Labo-ratory, Pasadena, California;

31 Kossyi I, Kostinsky A Y, Matveyev A, et al. 1992,Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 1: 207

[1]	Bingyan CHEN (陈秉岩), Xiangxiang GAO (高香香), Ke CHEN (陈可), Changyu LIU (刘昌裕), Qinshu LI (李沁书), Wei SU (苏巍), Yongfeng JIANG (蒋永锋), Xiang HE (何湘), Changping ZHU (朱昌平), Juntao FEI (费峻涛). Regulation characteristics of oxide generation and formaldehyde removal by using volume DBD reactor[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 24009-024009. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9b7a
[2]	N C ROY, M R TALUKDER, A N CHOWDHURY. OH and O radicals production in atmospheric pressure air/Ar/H₂O gliding arc discharge plasma jet[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa86a7
[3]	Xingwei WU (吴兴伟), Cong LI (李聪), Chunlei FENG (冯春雷), Qi WANG (王奇), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Time-resolved measurements of NO₂ concentration in pulsed discharges by high-sensitivity cavity ring-down spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55506-055506. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6473
[4]	WANG Jingting (王婧婷), CAO Xu (曹栩), ZHANG Renxi (张仁熙), GONG Ting (龚挺), HOU Huiqi (侯惠奇), CHEN Shanping (陈善平), ZHANG Ruina (张瑞娜). Effect of Water Vapor on Toluene Removal in Catalysis-DBD Plasma Reactors[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 370-375. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/07
[5]	ZHENG Dianchun(郑殿春), WANG Jia(王佳), CHEN Chuntian(陈春天), ZHAO Dawei(赵大伟), ZHANG Chunxi(张春喜), YANG Jiaxiang(杨嘉祥). Dynamic Characteristics of SF₆ -N ₂ -CO ₂ Gas Mixtures in DC Discharge Process[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(9): 848-855. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/08
[6]	Djilali BENYOUCEF, Mohammed YOUSFI. Ar ⁺ /Ar, O₂ ⁺ /O₂ and N₂ ⁺ /N ₂ Elastic Momentum Collision Cross Sections: Calculation and Validation Using the Semi-Classical Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(6): 588-592. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/6/09
[7]	LIU Xuan(刘璇), GE Jie(葛婕), YANG Yi(杨轶), SONG Yixu(宋亦旭), REN Tianling(任天令). Feature Scale Simulation of PECVD of SiO ₂ in SiH ₄ /N₂ O Mixture[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 385-389. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/15
[8]	YOU Zuowei(尤左伟), DAI Zhongling(戴忠玲), WANG Younian(王友年). Simulation of Capacitively Coupled Dual-Frequency N ₂, O₂, N ₂ /O ₂Discharges: Effects of External Parameters on Plasma Characteristics[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 335-343. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/07
[9]	JIANG Song(姜松), WEN Yiyong(文贻勇), LIU Kefu(刘克富). Yield of H₂ O ₂in Gas-Liquid Phase with Pulsed DBD[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(1): 59-62. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/1/13
[10]	QI Bin (亓斌), WANG Shouyu (王守宇), ZHAO Xingyan (赵兴言), ZHU Xiaoying (祝笑颖), SUN Dapeng (孙大鹏), LIU Chen (刘晨), XU Changjiang (徐长江). The Influence of Triaxiality Parameter Υ on the Chiral Doublet Bands with (?g9/2)-1 (?h11/2)2 Configuration[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(7): 595-597. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/7/06