Advanced Search+
Zhaoyu WANG (王昭宇), Hong LI (李鸿), Chao ZHONG (钟超), Yanlin HU (扈延林), Yongjie DING (丁永杰), Liqiu WEI (魏立秋), Daren YU (于达仁). Matching characteristics of magnetic field configuration and chamfered channel wall in a magnetically shielded Hall thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 104008. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2121
Citation: Zhaoyu WANG (王昭宇), Hong LI (李鸿), Chao ZHONG (钟超), Yanlin HU (扈延林), Yongjie DING (丁永杰), Liqiu WEI (魏立秋), Daren YU (于达仁). Matching characteristics of magnetic field configuration and chamfered channel wall in a magnetically shielded Hall thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 104008. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2121

Matching characteristics of magnetic field configuration and chamfered channel wall in a magnetically shielded Hall thruster

Funds: This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52076054 and 51736003), Civil Aerospace Technology Pre-research Project (No. D03015), and Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (No. JCKY2019603B005).
More Information
  • Received Date: March 03, 2021
  • Revised Date: August 20, 2021
  • Accepted Date: August 24, 2021
  • To date, the selection of the magnetic field line used to match the chamfered inner and outer channel walls in a magnetically shielded Hall thruster has not been quantitatively studied. Hence, an experimental study was conducted on a 1.35 kW magnetically shielded Hall thruster with a xenon propellant. Different magnetic field lines were chosen, and corresponding tangentially matched channel walls were manufactured and utilized. The results demonstrate that high performance and a qualified anti-sputtering effect cannot be achieved simultaneously. When the magnetic field lines that match the chamfered wall have a strength at the channel centerline of less than 12% of the maximum field strength, the channel wall can be adequately protected from ion sputtering. When the magnetic field lines have a strength ratio of 12%–20%, the thruster performance is high. These findings provide the first significant quantitative design reference for the match between the magnetic field line and chamfered channel wall in magnetically shielded Hall thrusters.
  • [1]
    Yang L et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 075503
    [2]
    Ding Y J et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 035509
    [3]
    Dudeck M et al 2012 IOP Conf: Ser: Mater. Sci. Eng. 29 012010
    [4]
    Jacobson D and Manzella D 2003 50 kW class krypton Hall thruster performance Proc. 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (Huntsville, Alabama: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-4550)
    [5]
    Brandhorst H W Jr et al 2002 Acta Astronaut. 51 57
    [6]
    Dudzinski L A et al 2007 Electric propulsion requirements and mission analysis under NASA’s in-space propulsion technology project Proc. 30th Int. Electric Propulsion Conf. Paper IEPC (Florence, Italy)
    [7]
    Clauss C et al 1997 Preliminary study of possibility to ensure large enough lifetime of SPT operating under increased powers Proc. 33rd Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (Seattle, WA: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-2789)
    [8]
    Mazouffre S et al 2003 Plasma induced erosion phenomena in a Hall thruster Proc. Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE)
    [9]
    Becatti G et al 2017 J. Propul. Power 34 893
    [10]
    Raitses Y et al 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 057104
    [11]
    Li H et al 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 105209
    [12]
    Ahedo E, Gallardo J M and Martınez-Sánchez M 2003 Phys.Plasmas 10 3397
    [13]
    Roy S and Pandey B P 2002 J. Plasma Phys. 68 305
    [14]
    Keidar M et al 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 5315
    [15]
    Jacobson D et al 2004 NASA’s Hall thruster program Proc.40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (Fort Lauderdale, Florida: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-3600)
    [16]
    Welander B et al 2016 Life and operating range extension of the bpt-4000 qualification model Hall thruster Proc. 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit (Sacramento, California: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-5263)
    [17]
    Hofer R R et al 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 043304
    [18]
    Mikellides I G et al 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 043303
    [19]
    Mikellides I G et al 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 053302
    [20]
    Mikellides I G et al 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 033501
    [21]
    Zhang G C et al 2020 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 33 3018
    [22]
    Zhang G C et al 2018 Design and experiments of a 100 watt magnetically shielded Hall thruster Proc. 54th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. (Cincinnati, Ohio: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4587)
    [23]
    Hang G R et al 2020 Aerosp. China 21 31
    [24]
    Tian L C et al 2020 Development of 50kW Hall thruster Proc.16th CEPC (Beijing, China) (in Chinese)
    [25]
    Mao Wei et al 2020 Proc. 16th CEPC (Beijing, China) (in Chinese)
    [26]
    Ding M H et al 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 3108
    [27]
    Li W B et al 2020 Vacuum 174 109169
    [28]
    Li H, Ning Z X and Yu D R 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 083303
    [29]
    Polk J E et al 2017 J. Propul. Power 33 539
    [30]
    Goebel D M and Katz I 2008 Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley) (https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470436448.ch3)
    [31]
    Brown D L et al 2017 J. Propul. Power 33 582
    [32]
    Walker M L R et al 2002 The effects of nude Faraday probe design and vacuum facility backpressure on the measured ion current density profile of Hall thruster plumes Proc. 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf.(Indianapolis, IND: AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4253)
    [33]
    Mao W et al 2020 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 094016
    [34]
    Duan X Y et al 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 128 183301
    [35]
    Ma D et al 2020 Vacuum 180 109547
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. Liu, Q., Li, Y., Hu, Y. et al. Effects of Magnetic Field Gradient on the Performance of a Magnetically Shielded Hall Thruster. Aerospace, 2023, 10(11): 942. DOI:10.3390/aerospace10110942
    2. Wang, Z., Li, H., Hu, Y. et al. Expanding the design freedom of the chamfered wall shape of a magnetically shielded Hall thruster. Vacuum, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111603
    3. Wang, L., Xu, Y., Ding, Y. et al. Effects of the peak magnetic field location on discharge performance of a 100-W Hall thruster with large gradient magnetic field. Vacuum, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.110965
    4. Thoreau, P., Little, J. Influence of Field Topology on Magnetically Shielded Hall Thruster Plume Divergence. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2022. DOI:10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843247
    5. Tang, H., Yu, D., Wang, H. et al. Special issue on selected papers from CEPC 2020. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 100101. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ac22f7

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (105) PDF downloads (140) Cited by(5)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return