Advanced Search+
OU Jing(欧靖), GAN Chunyun(甘春芸), YE Lei(叶磊). Estimates of EAST Operation Window with LHCD by Using a Core-SOL-Divertor Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 907-91. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/02
Citation: OU Jing(欧靖), GAN Chunyun(甘春芸), YE Lei(叶磊). Estimates of EAST Operation Window with LHCD by Using a Core-SOL-Divertor Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 907-91. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/02

Estimates of EAST Operation Window with LHCD by Using a Core-SOL-Divertor Model

Funds: supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11105176 and 11105224)
More Information
  • Received Date: August 18, 2013
  • An experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST) operation window with the lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) in H-mode is estimated by using a core-SOL-divertor (C-S-D) model validated by the present EAST divertor experiments. The operation window con- sists of four limits including two usual limits, one of which is the maximum allowable heat load onto the divertor plate, and two additional limits associated with the LHCD. The predictive EAST operation window is not qualified to fulfill its mission for high input power. To extend the opera- tion window, gas puffing and impurity seeding are presented as two effective methods. In addition, the effect of the LHCD current on the operation window is also discussed. Our numerical analysis results provide a reference for the safe operation of EAST experiments with LHCD in future.
  • 1 Zhu S. 2000, Contrib. Plasma Phys., 40: 322
    2 Zhu S, Hiwatari R, Hatayma A A, Tomita R. 2006, Plasma Sci. Technol., 8: 118
    3 Jin L, Zhu S. 2007, Plasma Sci. Technol., 9: 403
    4 Hiwatari R, Kuzuyama Y, Hatayama A, et al. 2005, J. Nucl. Mater., 337: 386
    5 Hiwatari R, Hatayama Y, Zhu S, Tomita Y. 2009, Plasma Sci. Technol., 11: 389
    6 Wang D S, Guo H Y, Wang H Q, et al. 2011, Phys. Plasmas, 18: 032505
    7 Yang Y, Gao X, EAST team. 2011, Plasma Sci. Technol., 13: 312
    8 Li M H, Ding B J, Kong E H, et al. 2011, Chin. Phys. B, 20: 125202
    9 Wang L, Xu G S, Guo H Y, et al. 2012, Nucl. Fusion, 52: 063024
    10 Liu Z X, Gao X, ZhangWY, et al. 2012, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 54: 085005
    11 Pacher G W, Pacher H D, Janeschitz G, et al. 2004, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 46: A257
    12 Pacher G W, Pacher H D, Janeschitz G, et al. 2008, Nucl. Fusion, 48: 105003
    13 Stankiewica R and Zagórski R. 2001. J. Nucl. Mater., 290: 738
    14 Zhou D, Holger S J, Hu Y M, et al. 2009, Plasma Sci. Technol., 11: 417
    15 Uchan N and ITER Physics Group. 1990, ITER Physics Design Guidelines: 1989 ITER Documentation Series No. 10
    16 Cesario R, Amicucci L, Cardinali A, et al. 2010, Nature Comms., 1: 55
    17 Martin Y R, Takizuka T, ITPA CDBM H-mode Threshold Database Working Group. 2008, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 123: 012033
    18 Ou J, Yang J H. 2011, Chin. Phys. B, 20: 095201
    19 Ou J, Yang J H. 2012, Acta Phys. Sin., 61: 075201 (in Chinese)
    20 Pitcher C S, Stangeby P C. 1997, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 39: 779
    21 Miyamoto K, Asakura N. 1988, J. Plasma Fusion Res., 74: 266
    22 ITER Physics Expert Group on Divertor. 1999, Nucl. Fusion, 39: 2391
    23 Stangeby P C. 2000, The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices. Bristol, Institute of Plasma Publishing, UK, p.602
    24 Kotov V, Reiter D, Pitts R A, et al. 2008, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 50: 105012

Catalog

    Article views (143) PDF downloads (1159) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return