Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Wangwen XU, Zhanghu HU, Dexuan HUI, Younian WANG. High energy electron beam generation during interaction of a laser accelerated proton beam with a gas-discharge plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 055001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac4d1d
Citation: Wangwen XU, Zhanghu HU, Dexuan HUI, Younian WANG. High energy electron beam generation during interaction of a laser accelerated proton beam with a gas-discharge plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 055001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac4d1d

High energy electron beam generation during interaction of a laser accelerated proton beam with a gas-discharge plasma

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Zhanghu HU, E-mail: zhanghu@dlut.edu.cn

  • Received Date: November 29, 2021
  • Revised Date: January 14, 2022
  • Accepted Date: January 18, 2022
  • Available Online: December 11, 2023
  • Published Date: April 18, 2022
  • The study of the interaction between ion beam and plasma is very important to the areas of inertial fusion energy and high energy density physics. With detailed one-dimensional electromagnetic particle-in-cell simulations, we investigate here the interaction of a laser-accelerated proton beam assuming an ideal monoenergetic beam with a gas-discharge plasma. After the saturation stage of the two-stream instability excited by the proton beam, significant high energy electrons are observed, with maximum energy approaching 2 MeV, and a new two-stream instability occurs between the high energy electrons and background electrons. The trajectories of plasma electrons are studied, showing the process of electron trapping and de-trapping from the wakefield.

  • Water-electrode discharges can normally operate at atmospheric pressure and at a glow discharge mode [1], because the water electrode limits discharge current, and water evaporation has a cooling effect [2]. They are attracting more and more attentions due to abundance in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [2, 3]. Accordingly, water-electrode glow discharges at atmospheric pressure have broad potentials in diversified application fields, including water purification and activation [48], nanomaterials synthesis [9, 10], catalysis [11, 12], and medicine [13, 14].

    The plasma attachment to a water electrode is apt to be uniform, presenting a disk shape in the interface between the glow plasma and the water electrode [15]. Other than the uniform disk, some discrete spots can also be formed above a water electrode [16]. Under proper conditions, some self-organized patterns appear, especially above a water anode [17, 18]. A single ring is formed if the electrical conductivity of water anode is higher than 17.3 μS·cm-1 [19, 20]. The single ring is attributed to the distinctive rotating motion of a micro-discharge channel, resulting from the generated electronegative species during the discharge that poison the discharge [21]. Diameter of the single ring increases until reaching a maximum, and then decreases with the increase of discharge current [18]. Besides, the single-ring pattern varies and may transit to other discharge patterns with adjusting gas flow rate, discharge current, and gap width [22]. Although various parameters can affect pattern transitions, the determining factor is related to electrode and gas temperatures [22]. In fact, the formation mechanism of pattern is still not understood very well [23]. With a reaction–diffusion mechanism, patterns above a water anode are initiated with an autocatalytic reaction of electrons, which is dictated by discharge current and ionic strength [24].

    More complex ring patterns have been observed above a water anode. For example, a double-ring pattern is formed with 1.0% NaCl solution used as a water anode [25]. Excited by an alternating-current (AC) sinusoidal voltage, the double-ring pattern has also been found under a low conductivity of 55 nS·cm-1 [26]. Compared to the double ring, a triple-ring pattern is only formed with a conductivity higher than several hundred μS·cm-1, which can be excited by a direct-current (DC) voltage [27], an asymmetric sine [28], or a square wave [29]. Up to now, concentric-ring patterns more than quadruple rings have not been reported in the literature.

    In this work, concentric-ring patterns up to five rings are formed in the interface between the water anode and the glow discharge plasma. The ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with increasing ionic strength (electrical conductivity) and discharge current. These concentric-ring patterns are numerically reproduced based on the model of the autocatalytic reaction.

    As shown in figure 1, a 3.0 mm diameter rod is made from tungsten, which has a flat end. The rod electrode is placed above a glass reservoir, which has a diameter (inner diameter) of about 75 mm. The reservoir with a depth of 75 mm is full of water, whose initial electrical conductivity is 330 μS·cm-1. The electrical conductivity of the water anode is measured by a conductivity tester (Inesa DDSJ-308F). The water reservoir is cooled by being placed in a water tank at a constant temperature of about 25 ℃. Water in the reservoir serves as the anode through electrical ground via an immersed metal mesh, and the rod acts as the cathode through being connected to a DC power source (Glassman EK15R40). In the circuit, a ballast resistor (R=50 kΩ) is used to restrict the discharge current. The gap width (d) is 5.0 mm. The gas discharge in the gap is carried out in atmospheric environment. Hence, the working gas is room air at a pressure of 1.013×105 Pa, with a temperature of 300 K and a humidity of 35%. A single-lens-reflex camera (Canon EOS 5D Mark IV) with variable exposure time (texp) is used to obtain water-anode discharge patterns at an oblique angle (45°). After being focused by a lens, light emission is transmitted by an optical fiber into the entrance slit of a spectrometer (PI ACTON SP2750) with a grating of 2400 grooves mm-1, thus optical emission spectrum can be collected. A voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A) is used to detect applied voltage (Va), and a current coil (Pearson 8600) is employed to measure discharge current (I). Waveforms of Va and I are monitored by a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO4104). Typical waveforms of Va and I are presented in figure 1(b). It can be seen that no pulse can be found in Va and I, which means that the discharge operates in a continuous mode.

    Figure  1.  (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. (b) Waveforms of applied voltage (Va) and discharge current.

    After atmospheric pressure glow discharge is initiated in the air gap, a radial-stripe pattern is formed at once above the water anode with I of 30.0 mA, as illustrated in figure 2. The radial-stripe pattern is surrounded by a ring as time elapses, leading to a single-ring pattern at 10 min. The ring number continuously increases from 15 to 25 min. That is to say, the concentric-ring pattern undergoes a scenario from a double ring (15 min), a triple ring (20 min), to a quadruple ring (25 min). For these concentric-ring patterns, the center is luminous. At last (30 min), a quintuple ring is time-invariantly stabilized above the water anode. Different to other concentric-ring patterns, the quintuple-ring pattern has a dark center. In a word, the ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with time elapsing, and up to five rings have been observed under the constant current of 30.0 mA. It is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in atmospheric pressure water-anode glow discharge.

    Figure  2.  Temporal evolution of self-organized patterns on the water surface (initiation moment corresponds to 0 min). Discharge current is 30 mA, gap width is 5.0 mm, and texp is 10 ms.

    As mentioned above, pattern becomes time-invariant after about half an hour operation of the discharge. However, the final time-invariant pattern evolves with varying discharge current, as presented in figure 3. At a low discharge current (5.0 mA), the pattern seems like a diffuse spot. Its diameter slightly increases with increasing discharge current. With a current of 10.0 mA, the diffuse-spot pattern transits to a single ring (the center is dark), which is similar to that reported by Shirai et al [30, 31]. When discharge current is increased to 14.0 mA, a diffuse spot appears in the center of the single-ring pattern. The diameter of the single ring increases and the central spot grows as discharge current is further elevated (16.0 mA). When discharge current reaches 20.0 mA, the central spot evolves into a new ring, resulting in a double-ring pattern. In a word, it seems that as discharge current increases, newcomer tends to appear in the center, which then transits to a new ring under a proper current. Interestingly, the pattern obeys this rule with further increasing discharge current, as can be seen for the transitions from the double-ring pattern (20.0 mA) to the triple ring (24.0 mA), from the triple-ring pattern (25.0 mA) to the quadruple ring (27.0 mA), and from the quadruple ring (28.0 mA) to the quintuple ring (30.0 mA). During these transitions, the ring number increases with increasing discharge current. Up to five concentric rings have been formed, and there is a central spot in the center of the quintuple ring at 31.0 mA. With further increasing discharge current, the concentric-ring patterns cannot be sustained above the water surface, and some discrete spots can be seen above the water anode (32.0 mA).

    Figure  3.  Transition of the time-invariant patterns with increasing discharge current. Gap width is 5.0 mm, and texp is 100 ms.

    Electronegative species generated in the discharge, such as O, O3, H, OH, NO, NO2, NO3, NH, and NH2, can attach free electrons [21]. Resultantly, negative ions, mainly O-, H-, OH-, NO-, etc, will be deposited on the water surface [15, 32]. The deposited negative ions enhance the electric field in the interface between the bulk plasma and the water anode, resulting in a layer near the water surface, which is brighter than the plasma above it [15, 33]. When these negative ions are distributed nonuniformly, the region with more negative ions is brighter due to a higher enhanced field. In the bulk plasma, electrons are mainly produced near the axis of the discharge due to the high α (the first Townsend ionization coefficient) resulting from the maximal electric field in the center. In turn, more electrons will generate more electronegative species near the discharge axis. After generation, electrons and electronegative species near the axis diffuse to the rim. Hence, compared with the discharge rim, more electrons and electronegative species are abundant in the center. As a result, more negative ions tend to be deposited above the central region of the pattern. Therefore, newcomer is inclined to appear in the center of the concentric-ring patterns with increasing current.

    As pointed out by Rumbach P et al [24], ionic strength (IS) and discharge current (I) mutually dictate the autocatalytic reaction of electrons. Hence, IS and I should be responsible for the pattern evolution mentioned before. Between them, IS is positively related with electrical conductivity. Hence, the electrical conductivity of the water anode is studied, as indicated in figure 4. Resulting from the generation of HNO3 and HNO2 [34, 35], the conductivity of the water anode increases with time, which reaches saturation after about 30 min operation. Moreover, the conductivity increases with increasing discharge current. In combination with figures 2 and 3, it can be deduced from figure 4 that pattern type varies with the variation of electrical conductivity (related with IS).

    Figure  4.  Average conductivity of the water anode as a function of operation time (a) and discharge current (b).

    Figure 5 presents 300–800 nm scanned optical spectrum emitted from the discharge above the water anode. Besides the second positive system of N2(C3Πu→B3Πg) [32], spectral lines of Ar I (4p→4s) [36], and O I (3p3P→3s3S) at 844 nm [37], the first negative system of N+2, system band from OH(A2Σ+→X2Π) [38], NH(A3Π→X3Σ) [39], and NO(A2Σ+→X2Π) [26], can also be discerned. From optical emission spectrum, intensity ratio of spectral lines (391.4 nm to 380.5 nm, and 371.1 nm to 380.5 nm) has been investigated, as presented in figure 6. The line intensity ratio of 391.4–380.5 nm is an indicator to electron temperature (Te), while that of 371.1–to 380.5 nm can reflect the variation trend of electron density (ne) [40, 41]. Results show that both Te and ne increase as time elapses or current increases. In addition, gas temperature (Tg) has been estimated from the first negative system of N+2 through using LIFBASE software [42]. Obviously, as time elapses, Tg keeps increasing until reaching a constant value after 30 min discharge operation. Tg also increases with increasing current. As is well known [22], Tg has a decisive effect on the pattern structure. Therefore, the concentric-ring pattern transits concurrently with Tg variation.

    Figure  5.  Optical emission spectrum scanned from 300 to 800 nm.
    Figure  6.  Intensity ratio and gas temperature as functions of operation time and discharge current.

    The aforementioned concentric-ring patterns are simulated by the same method explored by Rumbach P et al [24]. From the Turing reaction–diffusion mechanism [43], it is believed that electrons are used as activators. Through the collision ionization of electrons, the autocatalytic reaction is realized, which is dictated by discharge current (I) and ionic strength (IS). With this model, the discharge patterns are given by the eigenfunctions (harmonics) of the cylindrical Laplacian (Ylmn) as follows, and detailed derivative process of the cylindrical Laplacian can be found in the [24]. Here, l, m, and n are positive integers

    Ylmn(r,z,θ)=Jm(κmlr)[Amlcos(mθ)+Bmlsin(mθ)]sin(knz), (1)

    where Jm(kmlr) corresponds to the mth Bessel function of the first kind. (r, z, θ) are cylindrical coordinates. kml=aml/rp (rp is the finite radius of the plasma), where aml corresponds to the lth zero of the mth Bessel function. Aml and Bml are undetermined coefficients, and knz=π/2 for simplicity. According to the formula, the cylindrical harmonics (the simulated patterns) are obtained with m=0, as shown in figure 7. With l=2 and m=0, the simulated pattern is the single ring with a dark center (hollow structure). A central spot appears in the single ring with l=3 and m=0. With increasing l, the simulated concentric-ring patterns increase in ring number.

    Figure  7.  The concentric-ring patterns given by the cylindrical Laplacian equation where knz=π/2.

    The relationship between the l value and discharge current is listed in table 1. From table 1, one can see that the integer (l) increases with increasing discharge current. However, discharge current has a small variation range for a specific l value. Hence, all of the concentric-ring patterns formed in experiments have been numerically reproduced in simulations. However, at most five rings have been observed in experiments, which transit to discrete spots with current higher than 32 mA. This can be explained from the criteria for stability, which is related with the first Townsend ionization coefficient (α) [24]. α in the interfacial layer between the bulk plasma and the water anode is influenced by Tg. With a current higher than 32 mA, Tg is so high that stability criteria cannot be satisfied any more, resulting in the disappearance of the concentric-ring patterns. As a result, at most five concentric rings have been observed in our experiment. However, the maximal number of concentric rings is not limited according to formula (1). Hence, we believe that more rings could be obtained if the onset of thermal instability are restrained. Therefore, we will try our best to reduce the gas temperature in our future work through the usage of liquid nitrogen as a refrigerant, similar to that reported in the [4446].

    Table  1.  The relationship between the l value and the discharge current (I).
    l I (mA) Pattern type
    l=2 10≤I < 14 Single ring
    l=3 14≤I < 20 Single ring with a central spot
    l=4 20≤I < 22 Double ring
    l=5 22≤I < 24 Double ring with a central spot
    l=6 24≤I < 25 Triple ring
    l=7 25≤I < 27 Triple ring with a central spot
    l=8 27≤I < 28 Quadruple ring
    l=9 28≤I < 30 Quadruple ring with a central spot
    l=10 30≤I < 31 Quintuple ring
    l=11 31≤I < 32 Quintuple ring with a central spot
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In summary, various concentric-ring patterns have been formed above the water anode of a glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. The results reveal that the ring number of the patterns increases with time elapsing. Moreover, it increases with increasing discharge current. Among these concentric-ring patterns, it is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in water-anode glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. For both the quadruple ring and the quintuple ring, the center is either luminous or dark, depending on the discharge current. It has been found that the electrical conductivity of the water anode, electron temperature, electron density, and gas temperature vary as a function of time elapses and increasing discharge current. At last, the various concentric-ring patterns are reproduced in simulations based on the autocatalytic reaction model dictated by ionic strength and discharge current.

    This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12075046 and 11775042).

  • [1]
    Patel P K et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 125004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.125004
    [2]
    Li C K et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 135003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.135003
    [3]
    Wilson R R 1946 Radiology 47 487 doi: 10.1148/47.5.487
    [4]
    Tabak M et al 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1 1626 doi: 10.1063/1.870664
    [5]
    Roth M et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 436 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.436
    [6]
    Kim J et al 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 054801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.054801
    [7]
    Chen P et al 1987 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 15 218 doi: 10.1109/TPS.1987.4316688
    [8]
    Tokluoglu E K et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 052122 doi: 10.1063/1.5038878
    [9]
    Roberts K V and Berk H L 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 297 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.297
    [10]
    Ren J R et al 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 5157 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18986-5
    [11]
    Davidson R C et al 2004 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7 114801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.7.114801
    [12]
    Tokluoglu E and Kaganovich I D 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 040701 doi: 10.1063/1.4917245
    [13]
    Hara K, Kaganovich I D and Startsev E A 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 011609 doi: 10.1063/1.5002688
    [14]
    Cheng R et al 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103 063216 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.063216
    [15]
    Macchi A, Borghesi M and Passoni M 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 751 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.751
    [16]
    Snavely R A et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 2945 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2945
    [17]
    Polz J et al 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 16534 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52919-7
    [18]
    Ramakrishna B et al 2020 Matter Radiat. Extremes 5 045402 doi: 10.1063/5.0004801
    [19]
    Batani D et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 054506 doi: 10.1063/1.5029854
    [20]
    Kumar S, Gopal K and Gupta D N 2019 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 085001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ab216e
    [21]
    Kim I J et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 070701 doi: 10.1063/1.4958654
    [22]
    Wagner F et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 205002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.205002
    [23]
    Higginson A et al 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 724 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03063-9
    [24]
    Shen B F et al 2009 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12 121301 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.121301
    [25]
    Zhang X M et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 123102 doi: 10.1063/1.3518762
    [26]
    Li S et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 023111 doi: 10.1063/1.5020713
    [27]
    Huang H et al 2021 Matter Radiat. Extremes 6 044401 doi: 10.1063/5.0029163
    [28]
    Xue K et al 2020 Matter Radiat. Extremes 5 054402 doi: 10.1063/5.0007734
    [29]
    Raffestin D et al 2021 Matter Radiat. Extremes 6 056901 doi: 10.1063/5.0046679
    [30]
    Arber T D et al 2015 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57 113001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/57/11/113001
    [31]
    Belyaev G et al 1996 Phys. Rev. E 53 2701 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.2701
    [32]
    Zhao Y T et al 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 115001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.115001
    [33]
    Startsev E A, Kaganovich I D and Davidson R C 2014 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 733 80 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.090
  • Related Articles

    [1]Qingdong ZENG, Guanghui CHEN, Wenxin LI, Zitao LI, Juhong TONG, Mengtian YUAN, Boyun WANG, Honghua MA, Yang LIU, Lianbo GUO, Huaqing YU. Classification of steel based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with restricted Boltzmann machine and support vector machine[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 084009. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac72e3
    [2]Yaguang MEI (梅亚光), Shusen CHENG (程树森), Zhongqi HAO (郝中骐), Lianbo GUO (郭连波), Xiangyou LI (李祥友), Xiaoyan ZENG (曾晓雁), Junliang GE (葛军亮). Quantitative analysis of steel and iron by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using GA-KELM[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34020-034020. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf6f3
    [3]Liuyang ZHAN (詹浏洋), Xiaohong MA (马晓红), Weiqi FANG (方玮骐), Rui WANG (王锐), Zesheng LIU (刘泽生), Yang SONG (宋阳), Huafeng ZHAO (赵华凤). A rapid classification method of aluminum alloy based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and random forest algorithm[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34018-034018. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf7bf
    [4]Haobin PENG (彭浩斌), Guohua CHEN (陈国华), Xiaoxuan CHEN (陈小玄), Zhimin LU (卢志民), Shunchun YAO (姚顺春). Hybrid classification of coal and biomass by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with K-means and SVM[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34008-034008. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaebc4
    [5]Minchao CUI (崔敏超), Yoshihiro DEGUCHI (出口祥啓), Zhenzhen WANG (王珍珍), Seiya TANAKA (田中诚也), Min-Gyu JEON (全敏奎), Yuki FUJITA (藤田裕贵), Shengdun ZHAO (赵升吨). Remote open-path laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for the analysis of manganese in steel samples at high temperature[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34007-034007. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaeba7
    [6]Qingdong ZENG (曾庆栋), Fan DENG (邓凡), Zhiheng ZHU (朱志恒), Yun TANG (唐云), Boyun WANG (王波云), Yongjun XIAO (肖永军), Liangbin XIONG (熊良斌), Huaqing YU (余华清), Lianbo GUO (郭连波), Xiangyou LI (李祥友). Portable fiber-optic laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy system for the quantitative analysis of minor elements in steel[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34006-034006. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aadede
    [7]Dan LUO (罗丹), Ying LIU (刘英), Xiangyu LI (李香宇), Zhenyang ZHAO (赵珍阳), Shigong WANG (王世功), Yong ZHANG (张勇). Quantitative analysis of C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr and Cu in low-alloy steel under ambient conditions via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 75504-075504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aabc5d
    [8]Jiao PENG (彭姣), Rong YAN (鄢容), Rui DING (丁锐), Junling CHEN (陈俊凌), Dahuan ZHU (朱大焕), Zengming ZHANG (张增明). Repetitive cleaning of a stainless steel first mirror using radio frequency plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(10): 105601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa7629
    [9]KONG Haiyang (孔海洋), SUN Lanxiang (孙兰香), HU Jingtao (胡静涛), XIN Yong (辛勇), CONG Zhibo (丛智博). Selection of Spectral Data for Classification of Steels Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(11): 964-970. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/11/14
    [10]WANG Qing(王庆), BA Dechun(巴德纯), MING Yue(明悦), XU Lin(徐林), GUO Deyu(郭德宇). Low Temperature Nitriding of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Using RF-ICP Method: the Role of Ion Beam Flux Density[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 960-963. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/10
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. Zhang, J., Zhu, M., Zhang, C. Dynamic of mode transition in air surface micro-discharge plasma: reactive species in confined space. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad862c
    2. Li, C., Feng, J., Wang, S. et al. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a
    3. Zhang, X.-X., Jia, P.-Y., Ran, J.-X. et al. Discharge characteristics and parameter diagnosis of brush-shaped air plasma plumes under auxiliary discharge | [辅助放电下刷状空气等离子体羽的放电特性和参数诊断]. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 085201. DOI:10.7498/aps.73.20231946
    4. Wu, J., Li, X., Ran, J. et al. Discharge aspects of a snake-like plasma plume generated by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet with variable argon flow rate. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2023, 20(8): 2200188. DOI:10.1002/ppap.202200188
    5. Cai, Z., Wang, Z. Evaluation of Salt Matrix and Organic Additives in Solution Anode Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry: Taking Silver, Cadmium and Mercury as Examples. Atomic Spectroscopy, 2023, 44(5): 354-364. DOI:10.46770/AS.2023.190
    6. Kolobov, V.I., Golubovskii, Y.B. The principle of minimal power. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2022, 31(9): 094003. DOI:10.1088/1361-6595/ac8b31
    7. Chen, J., Zhang, F., Jia, P. et al. Argon plume transition from a hollow swell to a diffuse swell with increasing amplitude of a trapezoidal voltage. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 085402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ac6570

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article views (128) PDF downloads (70) Cited by(7)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return