Processing math: 20%
Advanced Search+
Mingxiang LU, Le HAN, Qi ZHAO, Juncheng QIU, Jianhong ZHOU, Dinghua HU, Nanyu MOU, Xuemei CHEN. Microchannel cooling technique for dissipating high heat flux on W/Cu flat-type mock-up for EAST divertor[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095602. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac684c
Citation: Mingxiang LU, Le HAN, Qi ZHAO, Juncheng QIU, Jianhong ZHOU, Dinghua HU, Nanyu MOU, Xuemei CHEN. Microchannel cooling technique for dissipating high heat flux on W/Cu flat-type mock-up for EAST divertor[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095602. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac684c

Microchannel cooling technique for dissipating high heat flux on W/Cu flat-type mock-up for EAST divertor

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Xuemei CHEN, E-mail: xuemeichen@njust.edu.cn

  • 3 Mingxiang Lu and Le Han contributed equally to the article

  • Received Date: December 14, 2021
  • Revised Date: April 17, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 18, 2022
  • Available Online: December 07, 2023
  • Published Date: July 12, 2022
  • As an important component of tokamaks, the divertor is mainly responsible for extracting heat and helium ash, and the targets of the divertor need to withstand high heat flux of 10 MW m-2 for steady-state operation. In this study, we proposed a new strategy, using microchannel cooling technology to remove high heat load on the targets of the divertor. The results demonstrated that the microchannel-based W/Cu flat-type mock-up successfully withstood the thermal fatigue test of 1000 cycles at 10 MW m-2 with cooling water of 26 l min-1, 30 ℃ (inlet), 0.8 MPa (inlet), 15 s power on and 15 s dwell time; the maximum temperature on the heat-loaded surface (W surface) of the mock-up was 493 ℃, which is much lower than the recrystallization temperature of W (1200 ℃). Moreover, no occurrence of macrocrack and 'hot spot' at the W surface, as well as no detachment of W/Cu tiles were observed during the thermal fatigue testing. These results indicate that microchannel cooling technology is an efficient method for removing the heat load of the divertor at a low flow rate. The present study offers a promising solution to replace the monoblock design for the EAST divertor.

  • The influence of the isotope mass on plasma confinement properties has been a longstanding issue in magnetically confined plasmas. According to gyro-Bohm scaling [1, 2], the plasma transport diffusivity scales as ρ2iω*ρ2ikV*m0.5i (ρi, ω*, V*, and k represent the ion Larmor radius, diamagnetic drift frequency, diamagnetic drift velocity and perpendicular wavenumber of turbulence, respectively). Therefore, it is expected that the plasma confinement should be degraded with increasing ion mass mi. However, in the past decades, there have been a significant amount of experiments showing strong deviations from the gyro-Bohm expectation in both tokamaks [312] and stellarators [1316] under comparable hydrogen (H) and deuterium (D) discharge conditions. Meanwhile, theoretical and numerical efforts [1726] have been made to unveil the physical mechanisms behind the isotope effects, among which the possible impact by isotopic mass on shear flow rates [25] and zonal flows [17, 23, 24] has been proposed.

    The first experimental observation in the TEXTOR tokamak has demonstrated that the amplitude of geodesic acoustic mode (GAM) zonal flows substantially increases during the transition from H to D dominated plasmas [9], which is qualitatively consistent with the GKV simulation [17]. However, up to date, there has been little evidence showing the increase of nonlinear interplay between ambient turbulence and zonal flows in heavier mass isotope plasmas.

    In this paper, we present direct experimental evidence to expose the fact that in D majority plasmas, the nonlinear energy transfer plays a dominant role in exciting larger GAM zonal flows by extracting more energy from ambient turbulence, which results in lower turbulent transport and better confinement compared to H majority plasmas. The results provide additional proof for understanding the isotope effects in fusion plasmas.

    The experiments were carried out in the Ohmically-heated H and D plasmas at the HL-2A tokamak with a limiter configuration. The major and minor radii are R = 165 cm and a = 40 cm, respectively, line-averaged plasma density ˉne=1.3×1019m-3, plasma current Ip = 150 kA and toroidal magnetic field BT = 1.3 T. In the present experiments, the D (H) content was about 25% (75%) in the 'H-dominant' plasma and 70% (30%) in the 'D-dominant' plasma, respectively. To measure the edge plasma parameters and their fluctuations, a two-step Langmuir probe holder radially separated by 0.3 cm was installed at the outer midplane (low-field side) of the torus. On each step of the holder, a four-pin probe array was equipped in the triple probe model to measure the local equilibrium electron temperature Te, density ne and floating potential Vf [27]. The radial electric field Er is hence deduced from the radial derivative of the plasma potential Vp = Vf + αTe, where α is chosen to be 2.5 and 2.8 for H and D plasmas [28], respectively. The turbulent particle flux Γr is computed from the fluctuating density (ñe) and poloidal electric field (θ) by Γr=〈ñeθ〉/BT in H and D dominant plasmas, where the brackets denote an ensemble average. Here, ñe is estimated from the ion saturation current fluctuations (˜Is) and electron temperature fluctuations (˜Te) detected by the triple probe with ˜ne/ne=˜Is/Is-0.5˜Te/Te [29], and ˜Eθ is calculated from the floating potential fluctuation difference measured on two probe pins poloidally separated by 0.4 cm. The turbulence-driven energy flux Qr is calculated by Qr=3/2(Te·Γr+ne·˜Te˜Vr) [30]. The fluctuation data were sampled at 1MHz. The whole probe system was installed on a fast reciprocating manipulator with a scanning speed of 1.0 m s-1 [31]. In this experiment, the deepest radial position plunged by the fast probe is about 3.8 cm inside the last closed flux surface (LCFS).

    Typical discharge waveforms in H and D dominant plasmas are plotted in figure 1. It can be seen that with the same plasma current, loop voltage and line-averaged density, the plasma stored energy in D majority plasmas is higher than that in H ones, similar to those observed in other devices [4, 5, 7, 8, 1012, 16]. Figure 1(e) shows time traces of the reciprocating Langmuir probes plunged in the stationary phase of the H and D discharges. The probe measurement in both discharges passed through approximately the same radial locations. It has been confirmed that the plasma horizontal position kept almost unchanged as the probes plunged into the plasma. Figure 2 depicts the edge equilibrium profiles averaged in several similar H (black) and D (red) majority discharges. Here, the ∆r = 0 denotes the LCFS location. As shown in figures 2(a) and (b), the local ne and Te in the edge region (inside the LCFS, ∆r < 0) are both enhanced in D plasmas, suggesting a higher edge pressure gradient, in agreement with higher stored energy achieved in the D plasma (see figure 1(d)). Inside the LCFS, both Vf and Vp are substantially lower in D plasmas than in H ones, leading to a slightly deeper Er well and larger Er shear (E') in the edge region of the D plasmas, as displayed in figures 2(e) and (f). To evaluate the role of the Er shear in suppressing turbulence and turbulent transport, we have roughly estimated the mean Er × B flow shear rates (ωs|E'r|/BT) and compared them with local turbulence decorrelation rates τc-1 (τc is the autocorrelation time of density fluctuations) in both H and D dominant plasmas. It is found that the ωs increases from 2 × 105 s-1 in H plasmas to 3 × 105 s-1 in D plasmas in the plasma edge (∆r ≈ -2.5 cm). As both are comparable with the local turbulence decorrelation rate τc-1(1-2)×105s-1, it is concluded that in the present experiment the mean Er × B flow shear does not play a significant role in suppressing turbulent transport.

    Figure  1.  Time traces of discharge waveforms in H (black curves) and D (red curves) majority plasmas. (a) Plasma current, (b) loop voltage, (c) central line-averaged density, (d) plasmas stored energy and (e) radial position of the reciprocating probes.
    Figure  2.  Radial profiles of edge plasma parameters in H (black curves) and D (red curves) majority plasmas. (a) Plasma density, (b) electron temperature, (c) floating potential, (d) plasma potential, (e) radial electric field Er and (f) Er shear. The error bars indicate the standard deviation about the mean estimated in similar discharges.

    In order to gain an insight into the isotope effects on turbulence levels and associated transport, we compared the RMS values of density, electron temperature and radial velocity fluctuations, n~erms, T~erms and V~rrms, together with turbulence-induced particle flux Γr and Qr measured in the same H and D discharges illustrated in figure 1. The results are shown in figure 3. It can be seen that in the edge region inside the LCFS the RMS values in density, electron temperature and radial velocity fluctuations are all lower in the D discharge (red curves). As a result, the turbulent particle and energy flux are also reduced in the edge of the D plasma. Thus, the lower thermal flux (Qr) in the D plasma is consistent with the reduced plasma stored energy (WE) observed in the D discharge (see figure 1(d)).

    Figure  3.  Radial profiles of (a) rms level of density fluctuations, (b) rms level of electron temperature fluctuations, (c) rms level of radial velocity fluctuations, (d) fluctuation-driven particle flux and (e) fluctuation-driven energy flux measured by the fast reciprocating probe array in H (black curves) and D (red curves) majority plasmas.

    To understand the mechanisms responsible for the reduction of turbulent transport in the isotope deuterium plasmas, we analyzed the spectrum characteristics of edge turbulence and zonal flows in H and D plasmas. In HL-2A, a low frequency coherent mode with long-range toroidal correlations, namely GAM zonal flows, has been routinely observed in floating potential signals [32, 33]. Theories predict that the GAM zonal flow has poloidally symmetric (m/n = 0/0) potential and asymmetric (m/n = 1/0) density perturbations [34, 35]. In the present experiments, it is found that the maximum GAM amplitude presents at ∆r ≈ -3 cm inside the LCFS [36]. Plotted in figure 4 are the frequency spectra of floating potential (V~f) and density (n~e) fluctuations detected at ∆r ≈ -3 cm in H and D majority plasmas averaged over several similar shots. As shown in figure 4(a), the V~f spectrum exhibits a sharp peak at f ≈ 8–10 kHz in both H and D plasmas, whereas the n~e spectrum displays quasi-coherent modes in higher frequency ranges.

    Figure  4.  Frequency spectra of (a) floating potential fluctuations and (b) density fluctuations measured at ∆r ≈ -3 cm in H (black curves) and D (red curves) plasmas averaged over several similar shots.

    According to theories [34, 35], the GAM frequency fGAMthCs2+1/q2/(2πR), where Cs=(Te+Ti)/mi is the ion sound speed. The local safety factor at ∆r ≈ - 3 cm is q ≈ 3.8 for both H and D plasmas, as shown in figure 5, where the q profiles are computed from the two dimensional MHD equilibrium code EFIT [37], constrained by the external magnetic measurements and internal Faraday angle measurements. At ∆r ≈ - 3 cm, Te ≈ 55 eV and 80 eV for H and D plasmas, respectively. Assuming that TeTi in both scenarios, we get fGAMth 10 kHz and 9 kHz for H and D plasmas, respectively. These results are close to the peaking frequencies in the V~f spectra of H and D plasmas. For GAM density fluctuations, it is predicted by theory [35] to have a sinθ dependence, i. e., n~GAMsinθ, where θ is the poloidal angle. As the density fluctuations were measured near the midplane (θ ≈ 0), there should be no GAM activity appearing in n~e signals around f ≈ 8–10 kHz, just as we observed in figure 4(b). From figure 4, it is noted that (ⅰ) the GAM amplitude in H plasmas is much lower than that in D ones; (ⅱ) the density fluctuation power in the whole frequency range is substantially higher in H plasmas than that in D plasmas. In figure 5, it is shown that the local q values (at ∆r ≈ - 3 cm) in H and D plasmas are almost equal, suggesting that the Landau damping of GAM, described as exp(-q2), is nearly the same for the isotope plasmas in the present experiments. The obvious drop of the density fluctuation power in D plasmas appears to be related to stronger GAM zonal flows generated in the D plasmas. The results presented here imply a crucial role played by the isotope mass on the interaction between ambient turbulence and GAM zonal flows.

    Figure  5.  Radial dependence of the safety factor calculated from the two dimensional MHD equilibrium code EFIT as a function of the radial position normalized by a.

    To further compare the strength of the nonlinear coupling in turbulence between H and D plasmas, the squared auto-bicoherence [38], defined as b2(f1, f2) = |B(f1, f2)|2/(〈|X(f1)X(f2)|2〉〈|X(f1 ± f2)|2〉), where B(f1, f2) = 〈X(f1)X(f2)X*(f1 ± f2)〉 and X(f) is the Fourier transform of the fluctuation signal x(t), has been computed. Figures 6(a) and (b) show contour-plots of the squared auto-bicoherence estimated by floating potential fluctuation signals measured at ∆r ≈ - 3 cm in D and H dominant plasmas. It is clear that the bicoherence along the f2 = ±10 kHz and f2 = - f1 ± 10 kHz lines are much more prominent in D plasmas than that in H ones. This comparison illustrates stronger nonlinear coupling occurred between GAM zonal flows and turbulence in D plasmas. The summation of the squared bicoherence is calculated as b2(f)=b2(f1,f2)/N(f)|f=f1±f2, where N(f) is the number of Fourier components for each f in the summation. The result is depicted in figure 6(c). One can see a significant peak appeared at f ≈ 10 kHz in D plasmas, while in the H case the magnitude of ∑b2(f) is much weaker. The above results explicitly reveal that GAM zonal flows extract more energy via nonlinear interaction from ambient turbulence in D plasmas than in H plasmas. In figure 6(a), it is interesting to note that the nonlinear coupling between the GAM zonal flow and background turbulence takes place mainly in the high frequency range (f > 100 kHz). These results imply that the quasi-coherent mode turbulence displayed in figure 4(b) is driven linearly by plasma-free energy and does not interact with the GAM zonal flow. To further understand isotope effects on the driving mechanism of GAM zonal flows by the Reynolds stress dynamics, we have calculated the joint probability distribution function (joint-PDF) of the fluctuating poloidal (V~θ) and radial (V~r) velocities measured at ∆r ≈ -3 cm by the two step Langmuir probe arrays. Figure 7 shows the joint-PDF of V~θ and V~r computed by P = P(x, y) = N/N0 (N is the number of events that occur in the time interval (x, x + ∆x) and (y, y + ∆y), where ∆x and ∆y are the bin dimensions of the x and y time series, and N0 is the total number of events (data points)). It can be seen that the joint-PDF is not symmetrically distributed in the four quadrants. It has an elliptical shape across the first and the third quadrants in both H and D plasmas. It is due to the asymmetric distribution that results in a non-zero Reynolds stress. Apparently, in D plasmas the Reynolds stress tensor V~rV~θ is much more asymmetric than that in H ones, suggesting a stronger Reynolds stress drive for the generation of GAM zonal flows in D plasmas. Moreover, it is found that the tilting angle of the Reynolds stress tensor, V~θ/V~r, is also larger in D plasmas, implying a larger tilting angle of the turbulence eddy structure as V~θ/V~rE~r/E~θkr/kθ. These results are consistent with stronger Er × B shear flows detected in D plasmas (see figure 2(f)) for effectively tilting the eddy structure and hence symmetry-breaking of the Reynolds stress, as pointed out earlier in references [39, 40]. The experimental measurements also show that in the plasma edge region the poloidal and radial correlation lengths (lθ and lr) of turbulence are substantially larger in D plasmas than those in H ones [36], in accordance with previous observations [14, 41, 42] and theoretical calculations [43].

    Figure  6.  Contour-plot of the squared auto-bicoherence of Vf fluctuations (a) in H plasmas and (b) in D plasmas. Shown in (c) is the summed squared auto-bicoherence in H (black curves) and D (red curves) plasmas. The horizontal dotted line indicates the statistical noise level.
    Figure  7.  Contour-plot of the joint-PDF of the Reynolds stress tensor between poloidal velocity fluctuations (V~θ) and radial velocity fluctuations (V~r) in H (left side) and D (right side) dominant plasmas. The PDF values are normalized by the maximum one.

    In summary, the isotope effects on plasma confinement, edge turbulence and turbulent transport as well as GAM zonal flows have been studied using a two-step Langmuir probe array in H and D majority plasmas in the HL-2A tokamak. Evidence shows that under similar discharge parameters the D plasma has better confinement and lower turbulent transport than the H plasma. Meanwhile, it is observed that the magnitude of GAM zonal flows, the tilting angle of the Reynolds stress tensor, and the turbulence correlation lengths are all larger in the edge region of the D plasma. The results provide direct experimental proof on the importance of the nonlinear energy transfer between turbulence and zonal flows for governing the isotope effects in fusion plasmas.

    The authors acknowledge financial support from the National MCF Energy R & D Program (No. 2018YFE0312300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51706100), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20180477) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 30918011205).

  • [1]
    Pitts RA et al 2019 Nucl. Mater. Energy 20 100696 doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2019.100696
    [2]
    Tian K et al 2021 Fusion Eng. Des. 165 112254 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112254
    [3]
    Cao L, Yao D M and Li J G 2016 J. Fusion Energy 35 556 doi: 10.1007/s10894-016-0074-1
    [4]
    Wang L et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 114002 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/11/114002
    [5]
    Deng G Z et al 2018 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 045001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aaa8c5
    [6]
    Mazul I V et al 2011 Fusion Eng. Des. 86 576 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.022
    [7]
    Li Q et al 2017 Phys. Scr. 2017 014020 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/aa8921
    [8]
    Schlosser J et al 2004 Phys. Scr. 2004 199 doi: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.111a00199
    [9]
    Zhao S X et al 2017 Fusion Sci. Technol. 67 784 doi: 10.13182/FST14-835
    [10]
    Lian Y Y et al 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 184 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/2/15
    [11]
    Lim J H et al 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 161 112072 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.112072
    [12]
    Oh H et al 2021 Fusion Eng. Des. 162 112101 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.112101
    [13]
    Muvvala V N et al 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 155 111543 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111543
    [14]
    Mou N Y et al 2021 Fusion Eng. Des. 169 112670 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112670
    [15]
    Wang Y P and Dedov A V 2020 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1683 022100 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1683/2/022100
    [16]
    Tuckerman D B and Pease R F W 1981 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2 126 doi: 10.1109/EDL.1981.25367
    [17]
    Fu B R, Lee C Y and Pan C N 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 58 53 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.050
    [18]
    Yang F H et al 2014 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 68 716 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.09.060
    [19]
    Yin L F et al 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 137 204 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.108
    [20]
    Li Q et al 2013 Fusion Eng. Des. 88 1808 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.03.076
    [21]
    Moffat R J 1988 Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 1 3 doi: 10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X
    [22]
    Li L et al 2021 Plasma Sci. Technol. 23 095601 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac0689
    [23]
    Pan Z W et al 2020 Opt. Lasers Eng. 127 105942 doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105942
  • Related Articles

    [1]Bo SHI (史博), Jinhong YANG (杨锦宏), Cheng YANG (杨程), Desheng CHENG (程德胜), Hui WANG (王辉), Hui ZHANG (张辉), Haifei DENG (邓海飞), Junli QI (祁俊力), Xianzu GONG (龚先祖), Weihua WANG (汪卫华). Double-null divertor configuration discharge and disruptive heat flux simulation using TSC on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 74006-074006. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aab48e
    [2]Jianhua WANG (王健华), Gen CHEN (陈根), Yanping ZHAO (赵燕平), Yuzhou MAO (毛玉周), Shuai YUAN (袁帅), Xinjun ZHANG (张新军), Hua YANG (杨桦), Chengming QIN (秦成明), Yan CHENG (程艳), Yuqing YANG (杨宇晴), Guillaume URBANCZYK, Lunan LIU (刘鲁南), Jian CHENG (程健). Design and test of voltage and current probes for EAST ICRF antenna impedance measurement[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45603-045603. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa7ea
    [3]Pengfei ZHANG (张鹏飞), Ling ZHANG (张凌), Zhenwei WU (吴振伟), Zong XU (许棕), Wei GAO (高伟), Liang WANG (王亮), Qingquan YANG (杨清泉), Jichan XU (许吉禅), Jianbin LIU (刘建斌), Hao QU (屈浩), Yong LIU (刘永), Juan HUANG (黄娟), Chengrui WU (吴成瑞), Yumei HOU (侯玉梅), Zhao JIN (金钊), J D ELDER, Houyang GUO (郭后扬). OEDGE modeling of plasma contamination efficiency of Ar puffing from different divertor locations in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45104-045104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa7e8
    [4]CHEN Gen (陈根), QIN Chengming (秦成明), MAO Yuzhou (毛玉周), ZHAO Yanping (赵燕平), YUAN Shuai (袁帅), ZHANG Xinjun (张新军). Power Compensation for ICRF Heating in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 870-874. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/14
    [5]LIAN Youyun (练友运), LIU Xiang (刘翔), FENG Fan (封范), CHEN Lei (陈蕾), CHENG Zhengkui (程正奎), WANG Jin (王金), CHEN Jiming (谌继明). Manufacturing and High Heat Flux Testing of Brazed Flat-Type W/CuCrZr Plasma Facing Components[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(2): 184-189. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/2/15
    [6]CHEN Lei(陈蕾), LIAN Youyun(练友运), LIU Xiang(刘翔). Behavior of Brazed W/Cu Mockup Under High Heat Flux Loads[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(3): 278-282. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/3/19
    [7]GAO Yu(高宇), GAN Kaifu(甘开福), GONG Xianzu(龚先祖), GAO Xiang(高翔), LIANG Yunfeng(梁云峰), EAST Team. Study of Striated Heat Flux on EAST Divertor Plates Induced by LHW Using Infrared Camera[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(2): 93-98. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/2/02
    [8]GAO Jinming (高金明), LI Wei (李伟), XIA Zhiwei (夏志伟), PAN Yudong (潘宇东), et al.. Analysis of Divertor Heat Flux with Infrared Thermography During Gas Fuelling in the HL-2A Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(11): 1103-1107. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/11/05
    [9]WANG Fumin (王福敏), GAN Kaifu (甘开福), GONG Xianzu (龚先祖), EAST team. Temperature Distribution and Heat Flux on the EAST Divertor Targets in H-Mode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(3): 225-229. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/3/07
    [10]LU Bo (吕波), SHI Yuejiang (石跃江), WANG Fudi (王福地), WAN Baonian (万宝年), Manfred BITTER, Kenneth W. HILL, Sang-gon LEE, LI Yingying (李颖颖), FU Jia (符佳), ZHANG Jizong (张继宗), XU Jingcui (徐经翠), SHEN Yongcai. Test of a High Throughput Detector on the X-ray Crystal Spectrometer of the EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(2): 97-100. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/2/03
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. Qin, C., Huang, J., Li, M.-S. The isotope effect on ion temperature gradient mode in CFQS | [CFQS 中离子温度梯度模的同位素效应研究]. Hejubian Yu Dengliziti Wuli/Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics, 2024, 44(3): 359-366. DOI:10.16568/j.0254-6086.202403017
    2. Zhou, H., Xu, Y., Kobayashi, M. et al. Isotope effects on transport characteristics of edge and core plasmas heated by neutral beam injection (NBI) in an inward shifted configuration at the Large Helical Device. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(3): 036023. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad22f6

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(11)  /  Tables(2)

    Article views (145) PDF downloads (71) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return