| Citation: |
Zhonghe JIANG, Yonghua DING, Bo RAO, Nengchao WANG, Yangbo LI, Jie HUANG. A brief review of the development and optimization of the three-dimensional magnetic configuration system in the J-TEXT tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 124014. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca18d
|
The three-dimensional (3D) magnetic configuration system in the J-TEXT tokamak has featured in many experimental studies. The system mainly consists of three subsystems: the static resonant magnetic perturbation (SRMP) system, the dynamic resonant magnetic perturbation (DRMP) system and the helical coil system. The SRMP coil system consist of two kinds of coils, i.e. three six-loop coils and two five-loop coils. It can suppress tearing modes with a moderate strength, and may also cause mode locking with larger amplitude. The DRMP coil system consists of 12 single-turn saddle coils (DRMP1) and 12 double-turn saddle coils (DRMP2). Its magnetic field can be rotated at a few kHz, leading to either acceleration or deceleration of the tearing mode velocity and the plasma rotation. The helical coil system consists of two closed coils, and is currently under construction to provide external rotational transform in J-TEXT. The 3D magnetic configuration system can suppress tearing modes, preventing and avoiding the occurrence of major disruption.
Plasma aerodynamic actuation, an emerging active flow control technology, has garnered significant attention for its potential to enhance aircraft performance [1‒4]. Plasma actuation primarily includes dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), arc discharge, and spark discharge. DBD plasma actuation has become a focal point in international aerodynamics and plasma physics research due to its simple design and rapid response [5‒8]. A typical DBD plasma actuator configuration comprises an exposed electrode and a covered electrode, separated by a dielectric film. Applying high-frequency AC voltage to the exposed electrode initiates plasma formation above the covered electrode. Under the influence of the electric field, ionized particles generate controlled disturbances in the adjacent flow field [9]. However, low induced velocities and limited discharge extension significantly restrict the practical engineering applications of plasma actuators.
Despite its simple structure, the effectiveness of a typical DBD actuator is influenced by numerous factors. These factors include the electrodes’ geometrical parameters and the dielectric layer material choice [10‒14]. External actuation parameters such as waveform, amplitude, and power supply frequency exert considerable influence [15, 16]. Furthermore, the working environment, including air humidity, ambient temperature, and operating pressure during plasma discharge, plays a crucial role [17, 18]. Above all, the most significant determinant is the intrinsic structure of the plasma actuator itself. To enhance the effectiveness of DBD plasma actuators, scholars predominantly focus on optimizing the design through refinement of the actuator geometric structure.
Moreau et al initially proposed a three-electrode DBD actuator structure, featuring a double-electrode system driven by high AC voltage and a third electrode applying high positive DC voltage [19]. This configuration significantly enhances the ionic wind generated by the DBD plasma actuator, although the underlying physical mechanism remains unexplained. Mitsuhashi et al used the Pockels effect to measure potential distribution variations during surface DBD discharge and found that the dielectric surface charge distribution affects the discharge pattern, directly influences the induced jet velocity [20]. Thus, controlling the charge distribution is crucial for enhancing DBD plasma actuator performance.
In studying the non-constant flow characteristics of three-electrode sliding discharge with different actuation modes, Zheng et al found that an additional positive DC component attracts negative ions, increases the velocity and strength of the flow vortex during the negative half-cycle, and then analyzed the performance of different actuation modes [21]. Further investigations showed that optimizing the dielectric material and thickness can reduce power consumption and the flow control effectiveness of plasma actuation. Wojewodka et al investigated various dielectric materials (polyimide (Kapton), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and glass-reinforced epoxy (GRE)) with different thicknesses, actuation voltages, and frequencies [22]. They found that thinner dielectric materials performed better than thicker ones at constant voltage inputs. Additionally, Kapton, due to its higher dielectric constant, yields higher velocities among materials of the same thickness than PTFE and GRE. It is found that the carrier frequency of 12 kHz is more beneficial for plasma ionization, but the induced velocity remains unaffected by further frequency increase, thus limiting its application range.
Sato et al added an embedded electrodes in the coplanar discharge, achieving large-area discharge by disrupting the distribution of the symmetric electric field [23]. This approach generated a single ionic wind and advanced the development of plasma actuators without exposed electrodes. However, the insulation problem of coplanar discharge plasma actuators remains a significant challenge for practical industrial applications. The exploratory studies by these researchers provide valuable guidance for optimizing the performance, enhancing the aerodynamic characteristics of moving parts, and achieving effective flow control. However, the low induced velocity of conventional DBD plasma actuators remains a significant challenge in high-speed flow environments.
Various plasma actuator configurations have been proposed as innovative approaches to flow control designed to create unique flow fields [24‒27]. According to the study mentioned above, the three-electrode DBD actuator, actuated by both AC and DC power sources, can induce a maximum jet velocity of 3.2 m/s. The direction of the induced jet is significantly affected by the polarity and magnitude of the applied voltage at the third electrode [21]. On the other hand, an annular DBD actuator with an annular electrode can reach a peak jet velocity of 4.63 m/s at Vpp = 13 kV [9]. Consequently, a sector-shaped dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator (SS-DBD-PA) with a controllable jet angle based on the annular DBD plasma actuator is proposed to enhance the actuation effectiveness of the plasma actuator. In contrast to the annular DBD actuator, when the actuation voltage is applied to the SS-DBD plasma actuator, it simultaneously generates a deflected jet at a certain angle to the wall and a horizontal jet, and the induced velocity of the deflected jet is greater than that of the conventional three-electrode actuator. This design overcomes the limitations of conventional DBD actuators, which include weak jet strength and the restriction to a single jet orientation along the wall.
This paper proposes an SS-DBD plasma actuator with an adjustable jet angle. The research investigates the effects of different actuation voltages and sector-shaped angles on the induced jet characteristics of the SS-DBD plasma actuator using electrodiagnostic techniques and particle image velocimetry (PIV). By analyzing the spatiotemporal progression of plasma actuation-induced jets and comprehending their energy transfer mechanisms, this investigation aims to enhance the efficiency of plasma actuation in active flow control.
The sector-shaped DBD plasma actuator consists of a sector-shaped exposed electrode, an annular covered electrode, and an insulating dielectric layer in the middle. It is actuated by a high-frequency voltage, transferring momentum from ionized particles to neutral particles, generating body force and actively interfering with the surrounding flow field. The sector shaped angles θ are 60°, 120°, 180°, 240°, and 300°, with 120° shown in figure 1. The exposed and covered electrodes are made of 0.05 mm thick copper foil, while the dielectric layer is made of a 1 mm thick printed circuit board (PCB) board with a dielectric constant of 4.7. The entire assembly is fabricated as a single piece through an etching process. The exposed and covered electrodes are positioned on the upper and lower sides of the dielectric layer, respectively. The center of the electrode coincides with the axis, and the horizontal distance between them is 0 mm. During plasma discharge, the plasma spreads from the inner side of the high-voltage electrode to the covered electrode. The grounded electrode is covered with 0.3 mm thick Kapton to prevent arcing during plasma discharge.
For the experiment, the power supply is Nanjing Suman power supply CTP-2000K, with an output voltage range of 0‒30 kV and a carrier frequency range of 5–20 kHz. Considering that the focal point of this study revolves around the evolution of SS-DBD actuator under steady actuation, the frequencies discussed herein specifically pertain to the carrier frequency. The Tektronix P6015A high-voltage probe is used to measure the actuation voltage, while the Pearson Model 2877 current loop is adopted to calculate the actuation current. The voltage and current signals are matched with 1 MΩ and 50 Ω coaxial cable and then transmitted to the two ports of the Tektronix DPO2024 oscilloscope for measurement.
PIV is an advanced non-contact technique that overcomes the limitations of single-point flow field measurements. It can quickly and accurately measure velocity and vortex structures in a cross-section of a flow field. The flow field is quantitatively analyzed by using a the Dantec Dynamics two-dimensional PIV system, which consists of a dual-pulse laser, a light-slicing device, a light-guide arm, a CCD camera, a tracer particle generator, a synchronization controller, a computer, a three-dimensional calibration kit, and acquisition and analysis software. Detailed schematics and device connections are described in the literature [28]. Optimal alignment of the PIV system’s laser plane requires it to be perpendicular orientation to the plasma actuator’s spreading direction along the x-axis. Meticulous calibration ensures that the laser plane’s thinnest section aligns precisely with the actuator’s flow direction along the y-axis, as shown in figure 2(a) for elucidation.
The study employs an Nd:YAG laser from Beamtech Optronics Corp, featuring a maximum pulse energy of 200 mJ and a beam thickness of about 1 mm. The PIV measurements are conducted in a glass box measuring 600 mm in length, 300 mm in width, and 350 mm in height. The sector-shaped DBD actuator is actuated for 15 s before data collection to ensure a stable flow field. The tracer particles with a diameter of 2 µm and a density of 1000 kg/m3 are generated by the smoke cake, and the motion state of the tracer particles reflects the motion state of the flow field to be measured. To obtain a high-spatial resolution of the flow field, a CCD camera is chosen to cover an area of about 40 mm×30 mm, and the spatial resolution of the adjacent velocity vectors is less than 0.28 mm, the time interval between two laser pulses is 60 μs. In the experiment, a sheet light illuminates the entire flow field, and a CCD camera captures two consecutive particle images. Analysis of these images reveals the flow field’s dynamics.
To investigate the influence law of different actuation voltages on the induced flow field of SS-DBD plasma actuator, the covered electrodes of the actuator are selected with effective diameter d1 = 10 mm, exposed electrode diameter d2 =11 mm, width d0 = 1 mm, carrier frequency F = 10 kHz, and sector-shaped angle θ = 120°. In this study, the time-averaged velocities are sampled from a 40 mm×30 mm region located to the right of the inner ring of the SS-DBD actuator, as shown in figure 2(a). The evolution laws of SS-DBD plasma actuator induced flow field under actuation voltage Vpp = 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 kV are investigated.
Time-averaged velocity clouds for the SS-DBD plasma actuator under various actuation voltages are depicted in figure 2(b). The SS-DBD plasma actuator generates a horizontal jet parallel to the wall along the x-axis and a deflected jet angled to the wall, reaching heights above 30 mm. As shown by the color changes in figure 2, the peak jet velocities generated by the SS-DBD plasma actuator all increase steadily as the actuation voltage increases. In particular, the peak horizontal jet velocity Vx-max (x = 15 mm, y = 1 mm) and the peak deflected jet velocity Vmax (x = 15 mm, y = 5 mm) increase from the initial 0.8 m/s and 1.2 m/s (figure 2, Vpp = 9 kV) to 2.3 m/s and 3.4 m/s (figure 2, Vpp = 12 kV), which are 187.5% and 183.3% higher, respectively, than the previous ones. In addition, the deflected jet flow is not affected by the viscous effect in the air, and the radius becomes larger and more dispersive with increasing height, but the average velocity gradually decreases with height.
The velocity profiles of the SS-DBD plasma actuator induced flow field at different y positions (y/d1 = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1) are shown in figure 3. It can be seen from figures 3(a)‒(d) that as the actuator voltage increases, the velocity profiles at different positions are shifted upward, indicating rising energy injection by the actuator and a corresponding increase in jet velocity. At y/d1 = 0.25, it can be seen that a valley appears near the (x = 10 mm, y = 2.5 mm) position, indicating that the velocity decreases near the sector region at the bottom of the actuator, and this conclusion is confirmed by the fact that only a peak appears in the velocity profiles at y/d1 = 0.5 and 0.75 as the height of the profile increases. In the velocity profiles at y/d1 = 1, the wave valley reappears at actuation voltages of 12 kV and 13 kV, which is attributed to the fact that the energy of the deflected jet begins to diffuse to both ends as the height increases, and the velocity in the middle region gradually becomes smaller. Finally, the corresponding velocity profiles are gradually shifted to the right at the three different profile positions of y/d1 = 0.5, 0.75, and 1, where the peak velocity occurs at y = 5 mm, x = 15 mm, and the peak velocity reaches 3.52 m/s when the actuation voltage is 13 kV.
Velocity profiles for the SS-DBD plasma actuator’s induced flow field at x positions (x/d1 = 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2) are displayed in figure 4. It is observed that when the actuation voltage is greater than 12 kV, there is a sudden increase in velocity, which is related to the impedance matching of the power supply. The two profile positions at x/d1 = 0.5 and 1 show a steeply rising and falling trend in velocity change, whereas the velocity change at x/d1 = 1.5 and 2 is slower. At actuation voltages of 12 kV and 13 kV, a valley forms near y = 2.5 mm. This occurs as the deflected and horizontal jets begin to bifurcate noticeably beyond x = 15 mm, with reduced energy in the inner region of the jets’ angle.
The relationship between the actuation voltage and the induced jet flow field has been elaborated above. To further investigate the influence of different sector-shaped angles on the aerodynamic actuation of the SS-DBD plasma actuator, the carrier frequency is fixed at 10 kHz and actuation voltage at 12 kV. The sector-shaped angles studied are 60°, 120°, 180°, and 240°. Time-averaged velocity clouds for different sector-shaped angles are shown in figure 5. It can be seen from figure 5 that the angle of the deflected jet starts to increase with the increase of the sector-shaped angle. Relational equations between the jet angle and sector-shaped angle are provided in table 1. During the change of the sector-shaped angle from 60° to 120°, the total increase of the deflected jet angle is 22.2°, and the growth trend is particularly obvious; on the other hand, the deflected jet angle increases only 11° when the sector-shaped angle is increased from 120° to 180°, and the growth rate of the deflected jet angle becomes flat during this period. Further observation of the sector-shaped angle from 180° to 240°, the deflected jet increases by 11.9°, and the deflected jet angle continues to grow flat. Comparing the evolutions of the whole jet in figures 5(a)‒(d), it can be seen that as the sector-shaped angle increases, the energy of the horizontal and deflected jets gradually spreads to the two sides. When the sector-shaped angle increases to 240°, the two jets begin to merge, and the energy of the jet is uniformly distributed in the inner region.
| Sector-shaped angle |
Deflected jet angle |
Fitting equation |
| 60° | 26.9° | y = −0.0007x2 + 0.4584x + 2.575 (R² = 0.9934) |
| 120° | 49.1° | |
| 180° | 60.1° | |
| 240° | 72° |
DownLoad:
CSV
In this study, a sector-shaped DBD plasma actuator with an adjustable jet angle is devised to enhance its applicability in industrial settings. Employing the particle image velocimetry (PIV) system, an exhaustive quantitative examination is conducted on the flow field induced by the SS-DBD plasma actuator across different sector-shaped angles. The ensuing conclusions are derived from the observed discharge patterns of the actuator and an analytical exploration of its fundamental mechanisms.
(1) The SS-DBD plasma actuator generates a deflected jet exceeding 30 mm in height and a horizontal jet along the wall. Increasing the actuation voltage from 9 kV to 12 kV boosts the velocities of both jets by 187.5% and 183.3% respectively. The deflected jet is unaffected by air viscosity, expanding radially as height increases, albeit with a gradual decrease in average velocity.
(2) In the velocity profile at x/d1 = 0.25, velocity decay occurs within the sector region. At x/d1 = 1, the deflected jet’s energy disperses laterally, causing a progressive reduction in velocity within the central region. At x/d1 = 1.5 and 2, velocity changes are less prominent, accompanied by a distinct bifurcation between the deflected and horizontal jets, resulting in diminished energy within the inter-jet region.
(3) The deflected jet angle linearly increases with the sector angle, following the equation y = −0.0007x2 + 0.4584x + 2.575, where for the 120° sector shaped angle, the deflected jet is close to the ideal 45°, and for the 240° sector shaped angle, the deflected and horizontal jets tend to merge.
This investigation explores the spatiotemporal evolution of plasma actuation-induced jets and elucidates their energy transfer mechanisms, advancing developments in flow control. However, the ability of the actuation system to consistently maintain optimal performance in practical engineering applications remains uncertain. Consequently, forthcoming efforts will focus on further scrutinizing the effectiveness of flow control and its underlying mechanisms. This will be achieved through wind tunnel experiments incorporating flow field visualization techniques and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Moreover, the effectiveness of the actuator is significantly influenced by the choice of dielectric material. Therefore, future research endeavors will prioritize an in-depth exploration of the impact of dielectric material selection on actuation performance.
The authors are very grateful for the help of the J-TEXT team. This work is supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Energy R & D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFE0309100 and 2018YFE0310300) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12075096, 11905077, 11905078, 11905079, 11905080, 12047526 and 51821005).
| [1] |
Hender T C et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S128 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S03
|
| [2] |
de Vries P C et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 053018 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053018
|
| [3] |
Sweeney R et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 016019 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/57/1/016019
|
| [4] |
Zhuang G et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 094020 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/9/094020
|
| [5] |
Ding Y H et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 125101 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aadcfd
|
| [6] |
Liang Y et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112016 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab1a72
|
| [7] |
Wang N C et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 042016 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac3aff
|
| [8] |
1995 The Texas Experimental Tokamak: A plasma research facility. A proposal submitted to the Department of Energy in response to Program Notice 95-10: Innovations in toroidal magnetic confinement systems. DOE/ER/542-41-151 FRCR #470 University of Texas at Austin (https://doi.org/10.2172/468596)
|
| [9] |
Rao B et al 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 043504 doi: 10.1063/1.4801461
|
| [10] |
Rao B et al 2013 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55 122001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/55/12/122001
|
| [11] |
Huang J and Suzuki YJ-TEXT Team 2021 Plasma Fusion Res. 16 2403047 doi: 10.1585/pfr.16.2403047
|
| [12] |
McCool S C et al 1989 Nucl. Fusion 29 547 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/29/4/001
|
| [13] |
Rao B et al 2013 Phys. Lett. A 377 315 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.11.043
|
| [14] |
Rao B et al 2014 Fusion Eng. Des. 89 378 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.038
|
| [15] |
Hu Q M et al 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 083011 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083011
|
| [16] |
Jin W et al 2013 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55 035010 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/55/3/035010
|
| [17] |
Fitzpatrick R 1993 Nucl. Fusion 33 1049 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/33/7/I08
|
| [18] |
Zeng W B et al 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 1074 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/11/14
|
| [19] |
Yi B et al 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 594 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2014.2387851
|
| [20] |
Xu G et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 085601 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aabd2f
|
| [21] |
Li M et al 2019 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 47 1458 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2018.2890587
|
| [22] |
Ohyabu N et al 1994 Nucl. Fusion 34 387 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/34/3/I07
|
| [23] |
Wolf R C et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 102020 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa770d
|
| [24] |
Pandya M D et al 2005 Phys. Plasmas 22 110702 doi: 10.1063/1.4935396
|
| [25] |
Todo Y et al 2010 Plasma Fusion Res. 5 S2062 doi: 10.1585/pfr.5.S2062
|
| [26] |
Suzuki Y 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 054008 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa5adc
|
| 1. | Yan, W., Zou, G., Che, Z. et al. Influence of 3D helical magnetic perturbations on runaway electron generation in J-TEXT tokamak. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 035104. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ada5c6 |
| 2. | Huang, Y., Liu, K., Mao, W. et al. Equilibrium reconstruction method for self-organized plasmas on reversed field pinches with polarimeter-interferometer. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 125104. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad79b0 |
| 3. | Hu, B., Zhou, S., Wang, N. et al. Measurement of the mechanical vibration and its impact on the magnetic diagnostics in the J-TEXT tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114670 |
| 4. | Li, Y., Rao, B., Mao, F. et al. The design of the external rotational transform coil on the J-TEXT tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114591 |
| 5. | Zhao, C., Li, J., Zhang, X. et al. Development of a toroidal soft x-ray imaging system and application for investigating three-dimensional plasma on J-TEXT. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 034014. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad1364 |
| 6. |
Li, Y.B., Rao, B., Wang, N.C. et al. Exploration of the application of stellarator-like external rotational transform on the J-TEXT tokamak. 2024.
|
| 7. | Li, K., Li, Z., Jiang, Z. Simulation on the suppression effect of external passive field on runaway electrons on J-TEXT. 2023. DOI:10.1109/CIYCEE59789.2023.10401841 |
Figures(9) / Tables(1)
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
| Sector-shaped angle |
Deflected jet angle |
Fitting equation |
| 60° | 26.9° | y = −0.0007x2 + 0.4584x + 2.575 (R² = 0.9934) |
| 120° | 49.1° | |
| 180° | 60.1° | |
| 240° | 72° |
DownLoad:
CSV
