Activation and Environmental Aspects of In-Vacuum Vessel Components of CFETR

ZHANG Xiaokang (张小康); LIU Songlin (刘松林); ZHU Qingjun (祝庆军); GAO Fangfang (高芳芳); LI Jia (李佳)

doi:10.1088/1009-0630/18/11/12

Plasma Science and Technology > 2016 > 18(11): 1130-1138. > DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/11/12

ZHANG Xiaokang (张小康), LIU Songlin (刘松林), ZHU Qingjun (祝庆军), GAO Fangfang (高芳芳), LI Jia (李佳). Activation and Environmental Aspects of In-Vacuum Vessel Components of CFETR[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(11): 1130-1138. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/11/12

Citation:

PDF (933 KB)

Activation and Environmental Aspects of In-Vacuum Vessel Components of CFETR

1Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China 2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China

Funds: supported by National Special Project for Magnetic Confined Nuclear Fusion Energy of China (Nos. 2013GB108004, 2015BG108002, 2014GB122000, 2014GB119000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11175207)

More Information

Received Date: December 15, 2015

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The water-cooled ceramic breeder (WCCB) blanket is one of the three candidates of China’s Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR). The evaluation of the radioactivity and decay heat produced by neutrons for the in-vacuum vessel components is essential for the assessment of radioactive wastes and the safety of CFETR. The activation calculation of CFETR in-vacuum vessel components was carried out by using the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code MCNP, IAEA Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library FENDL2.1, and the nuclear inventory code FISPACT-2007 and corresponding EAF-2007 libraries. In these analyses, the three-dimensional (3-D) neutronics model was employed and the WCCB blanket, the divertor, and the shield were modeled in detail to provide the detailed spatial distribution of the neutron flux and energy spectra. Then the neutron flux, energy spectra and the materials specification were transferred to FISPACT for the activation calculation with an assumed irradiation scenario of CFETR. This paper presents the main results of the activation analysis to evaluate the radioactivity, the decay heat, the contact dose, and the waste classification of the radioactive materials. At the time of shutdown, the activity of the WCCB blanket is 1.88×10¹⁹ Bq and the specific activity, the decay heat and the contact dose rate are 1.7×10¹³ Bq/kg, 3.05 MW, and 2.0×10³ Sv/h respectively. After cooling for 100 years, 79% (4166.4 tons) radioactive wastes produced from the blanket, divertor, high temperature shield (HTS) and low temperature shield (LTS) need near surface disposal, while 21% (1112.3 tons) need geological disposal. According to results of the contact dose rate, all the components of the blanket, divertor, HTS and LTS could potentially be recycled after shutdown by using advanced remote handling equipment. In addition, the selection of Eurofer97 or RAFM for the divertor is better than that of SS316 because SS316 makes the activity of the divertor-body keep at a relatively high level.
- CFETR,
- blanket,
- activation,
- radioactive waste

FullText(HTML)

References (1)

References

1 Wan Yuanxi. 2013, Design and strategy for the Chinese fusion engineering testing reactor (CFETR). Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE-25), San Francisco, California, USA 2 Liu Songlin, Pu Yong, Cheng Xiaoman, et al. 2014,Fusion Eng. Des., 89: 1380 3 Zhu Qingjun, Li Jia, Liu Songlin. 2015, Plasma Science and Technology, 18: 775 4 Liu Songlin, Song Yuntao, Chen Yixue, et al. 2014,Nuclear analysis of Chinese fusion engineering testing reactor with water-cooled ceramic breeder blanket.28th Symposium on Fusion Technology (SOFT 2014),San Sebastian, Spain 5 Briesmeister J F. 2000, MCNP4C: Monte Carlo N-particle transport code system. Los Alamos NationalLaboratory, New Mexcico, USA 6 Lopez Al-dama D, Trkov A. 2004, FENDL-2.1:update of an evaluated nuclear data library for fusion applications. ReportINDC(NDS)-46, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria 7 Forrest R. 2007, FISPACT-2007: User manual.EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Abingdon,UK http://159.226.251.229/videoplayer/ukaea-fus-534.pdf?ich u r i=bd0af8a0f58f5201e8fbb75dd6cd126 7&ich s t a r t=0&ich e n d=0&ich k e y=1645058912750763222416&ich t y p e=1&ich d i s k i d=5&ich u n i t=1 8 Klueh R, Cheng E, Grossbeck M, et al. 2000, J. Nucl.Mater., 280: 353 9 Barabash V. 2010, Chemical composition and some properties of materials for the ITER in-vessel components for type B radioactive waste assessment.IDM: ITER D 2DKPK7. ITER Organization,Cadarache, French 10 Chinese nuclear safety codes and guidelines HAD401-04, 1998. National Nuclear Safety Administration,Beijing, China (in Chinese) http://wenku.baidu.com/link?url=lAmZUuBr na8mN677JApfPvIubrmUoEYwxlR-50Qn6sSNTPOL8mP98mpbDzit7G3nfPmLN0aETx NH7gpyXt9NpNum0Y2HNGXonYrgVENqW7 11 Chinese national standards classification of radioactive waste, GB9133-1995, 1995 (in Chinese) http://www.sepa.gov.cn/image20010518/2093.pdf 12 El-Guebaly L, Mynsberge L, Martin C, et al. 2015,Fusion Sci. Technol., 67: 179 13 El-Guebalya L, Massautb V, Tobitac K, et al. 2008,Fusion Eng. Des., 83: 928 14 ICRP. 1991, ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Elsevier, Amsterdam,Holland

Cited By