Advanced Search+
Vadym PRYSIAZHNYI, Pavel SLAVICEK, Eliska MIKMEKOVA, Milos KLIMA. Influence of Chemical Precleaning on the Plasma Treatment Efficiency of Aluminum by RF Plasma Pencil[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 430-437. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/17
Citation: Vadym PRYSIAZHNYI, Pavel SLAVICEK, Eliska MIKMEKOVA, Milos KLIMA. Influence of Chemical Precleaning on the Plasma Treatment Efficiency of Aluminum by RF Plasma Pencil[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 430-437. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/17

Influence of Chemical Precleaning on the Plasma Treatment Efficiency of Aluminum by RF Plasma Pencil

More Information
  • Received Date: January 22, 2015
  • This paper is aimed to show the influence of initial chemical pretreatment prior to subsequent plasma activation of aluminum surfaces. The results of our study showed that the state of the topmost surface layer (i.e. the surface morphology and chemical groups) of plasma modified aluminum significantly depends on the chemical precleaning. Commonly used chemicals (isopropanol, trichlorethane, solution of NaOH in deionized water) were used as precleaning agents. The plasma treatments were done using a radio frequency driven atmospheric pressure plasma pencil developed at Masaryk University, which operates in Ar, Ar/O2 gas mixtures. The effectiveness of the plasma treatment was estimated by the wettability measurements, showing high wettability improvement already after 0.3 s treatment. The effects of surface cleaning (hydrocarbon removal), surface oxidation and activation (generation of OH groups) were estimated using infrared spectroscopy. The changes in the surface morphology were measured using scanning electron microscopy. Optical emission spectroscopy measurements in the near-to-surface region with temperature calculations showed that plasma itself depends on the sample precleaning procedure.
  • 1 Pappas D. 2011, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A29: 020801 2 Shashurin A, Stepp M A, Hawley T S, et al. 2010,Plasma Process. Polym., 7: 294 3 Noeske M, Degenhardt J, Strudthoff S, et al. 2004, Int.J. Adhes. Adhes., 24: 171 4 Regula C, Lukasczyk T, Ihde J, et al. 2012, Prog. Org.Coat., 74: 734 5 Prysiazhnyi V, Svoboda T, Dvo?rák M, et al. 2012, Surf. Coat. Technol., 206: 140 6 Kawashima R, Araki Y, Onuki M, et al. 1997, Degreasing cleaner and method for cleaning oil-deposited material. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. US Patent 5674827 7 Song J L, Liu X, Lu Y, et al. 2012, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 197: 351 8 Radetic M, Jovancic P, Puac N, et al. 2007, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 71: 012017 9 Shin D H, Bang C U, Kim J H, et al. 2006, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 34: 1241 10 Sperandio C, Bardon J, Laachachi A, et al. 2010, Int.J. Adhes. Adhes., 30: 720 11 Xia Y, Wu Z, Li G, et al. 2007, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253:8398 12 Wang H, Dai D, Wu X. 2008, Appl. Surf. Sci., 254:5599 13 Klima M, Janca J, Kapicka V, et al. 2005, The Method of Making a Physically and Chemically Active Environment by Means of a Plasma jet and the Related Plasma Jet. Brno, Czech Republic. US Patent .525.481, EP 1077021 B1 14 Mullerova I, Frank L. 2003, Adv. Imag. Electron Physics, 128: 309 15 Navratil Z, Trunec D, Smid R, et al. 2006, Czech J.Phys., 56: B944 16 Skacelova D, Slavicek P. 2012, IEEE Trans. Plasma.Sci., 40: 2920 17 Calzada M D. 2005, Mem. S. A. It., 7: 198 18 Nylund A, Olefjord I. 1994, Surf. Interface Anal., 21:283 19 Toshifuji J, Katsumata T, Takikawa H, et al. 2002,Surf. Coal. Technol., 171: 302 20 Sorrentino L, Carrino L. 2009, J. Mater. Process.Tech., 209: 1400 21 Kersten H, Rohde D, Deutsch H, et al. 2000, Acta Phys. Slovaca, 50: 439 22 Zajickova L, Bursikova V, Franta D. 1999, Czech J.Phys., 49: 1213

Catalog

    Article views (1052) PDF downloads (615) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return