Advanced Search+
Mingming SUN (孙明明), Liang WANG (王亮), Juntai YANG (杨俊泰), Xiaodong WEN (温晓东), Yongjie HUANG (黄永杰), Meng WANG (王蒙). Study of the key factors affecting the triple grid lifetime of the LIPS-300 ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45504-045504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa66a
Citation: Mingming SUN (孙明明), Liang WANG (王亮), Juntai YANG (杨俊泰), Xiaodong WEN (温晓东), Yongjie HUANG (黄永杰), Meng WANG (王蒙). Study of the key factors affecting the triple grid lifetime of the LIPS-300 ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45504-045504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa66a

Study of the key factors affecting the triple grid lifetime of the LIPS-300 ion thruster

Funds: This work is supported by the fund of National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics (Grant No. 6142207030103), and with many thanks to Associate Professor Yongbin Ma for providing the ANSYS software.
More Information
  • Received Date: November 19, 2017
  • In order to ascertain the key factors affecting the lifetime of the triple grids in the LIPS-300 ion thruster, the thermal deformation, upstream ion density and component lifetime of the grids are simulated with finite element analysis, fluid simulation and charged-particle tracing simulation methods on the basis of a 1500 h short lifetime test. The key factor affecting the lifetime of the triple grids in the LIPS-300 ion thruster is obtained and analyzed through the test results. The results show that ion sputtering erosion of the grids in 5 kW operation mode is greater than in the case of 3 kW. In 5 kW mode, the decelerator grid shows the most serious corrosion, the accelerator grid shows moderate corrosion, and the screen grid shows the least amount of corrosion. With the serious corrosion of the grids in 5 kW operation mode, the intercept current of the acceleration and deceleration grids increases substantially. Meanwhile, the cold gap between the accelerator grid and the screen grid decreases from 1 mm to 0.7 mm, while the cold gap between the accelerator grid and the decelerator grid increases from 1 mm to 1.25 mm after 1500 h of thruster operation. At equilibrium temperature with 5 kW power, the finite element method (FEM) simulation results show that the hot gap between the screen grid and the accelerator grid reduces to 0.2 mm. Accordingly, the hot gap between the accelerator grid and the decelerator grid increases to 1.5 mm. According to the fluid method, the plasma density simulated in most regions of the discharge chamber is 1×1018- 8×1018 m-3. The upstream plasma density of the screen grid is in the range 6×1017 - 6×1018 m-3 and displays a parabolic characteristic. The charged particle tracing simulation method results show that the ion beam current without the thermal deformation of triple grids has optimal perveance status. The ion sputtering rates of the accelerator grid hole and the decelerator hole are 5.5×10-14 kg s-1 and 4.28×10-14 kg s-1, respectively, while after the thermal deformation of the triple grids, the ion beam current has over-perveance status. The ion sputtering rates of the accelerator grid hole and the decelerator hole are 1.41×10-13 kg s-1 and 4.1×10-13 kg s-1, respectively. The anode current is a key factor for the triple grid lifetime in situations where the structural strength of the grids does not change with temperature variation. The average sputtering rates of the accelerator grid and the decelerator grid, which were measured during the 1500 h lifetime test in 5 kW operating conditions, are 2.2×10-13 kg s-1 and 7.3×10-13 kg s-1, respectively. These results are in accordance with the simulation, and the error comes mainly from the calculation distribution of the upstream plasma density of the grids.
  • [1]
    Sun M M et al 2016 J. Propuls. Technol. 37 1393 (in Chinese)
    [2]
    Sengupta A et al 2004 An overview of the results from the 30 000 h life test of deep space 1 ?ight spare ion engine Proc. of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Fort Lauderdale, FL: AIAA)
    [3]
    Chien K R et al 2005 L-3 communications ETI electric propulsion overview Presented at the 29th Int. Electric Propulsion Conf. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
    [4]
    Van Noord J L 2007 Lifetime assessment of the NEXT ion thruster Proc. of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Cincinnati, OH: AIAA)
    [5]
    Tighe W G et al 2006 Performance evaluation of the XIPS 25 cm thruster for application to NASA discovery missions Proc. of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Sacramento, CA: AIAA)
    [6]
    Sun M M et al 2015 J. Propul. Technol. 36 1274 (in Chinese)
    [7]
    ANSYS Workbench 14.5 2013 (www.ansys.com)
    [8]
    Chen M L et al 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 094104 (in Chinese)
    [9]
    Soula G C and Frandina M M 2004 Ion engine grid gap measurements Proc. of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Fort Lauderdale, FL: AIAA)
    [10]
    COMSOL Multiphysics 5.2a 2016 (www.comsol.com)
    [11]
    Sovey J S 1984 J. Spacecr. 21 488
    [12]
    Beattie J R, Matossian J N and Robson R R 1990 J. Propul. Power 6 145
    [13]
    Mikellides I, Katz I and Mandell M A 2001 1D model of the Hall-effect thruster with an exhaust region Proc. of the 37th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Salt Lake City, UT: AIAA)
    [14]
    Sun M M et al 2017 High Power Laser Part. Beams 29 044003 (in Chinese)
    [15]
    SunMM,ZhangT PandWuXM2015 High Power Laser Part. Beams 27 054003 (in Chinese)
    [16]
    Lafferty J M 1998 Foundations of Vacuum Science and Technology (New York: Wiley)
    [17]
    Wang Y Z and Chen X 2007 Vacuum Technology 2nd edn (Beijing: Beihang University Press)
    [18]
    Wirz R and Katz I 2005 Plasma processes of DC ion thruster discharge chambers Proc. of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Tucson, AZ: AIAA)
    [19]
    Mikelides I G et al 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 113303
    [20]
    Rapp D and Englander-Golden P 1965 J. Chem. Phys. 43 1464
    [21]
    Haag T 2005 Mechanical design of carbon ion optics Proc. of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Tucson, Arizona: AIAA)
    [22]
    Meckel N and Polaha J 2004 Structural analysis of pyrolytic graphite optics for the HiPEP ion thruster Proc. of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Joint Propulsion Conferences (Fort Lauderdale, FL: AIAA)
  • Related Articles

    [1]Bin Gao, Juan Li, Juanjuan Chen, Dongbing Liu, Zengjie Gu, Hai Geng, Dongsheng Wang, Nengwen Yan. Investigation into the performance effect on carbon-carbon composite grid of 10 cm ion thruster with different configurations[J]. Plasma Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/adb792
    [2]Mingming SUN, Jianfei LONG, Juanjuan CHEN, Wei YANG, Weilong GUO, Xinwei CHEN. A study of grid failure mode drivers and methods for accelerated life testing of a 30 cm diameter ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 115502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acdfa4
    [3]Jinwei BAI, Yong CAO, Yang LI, Kaifa WANG, Bin TIAN, Yuan HU. Numerical study of the radio-frequency biased accelerating system in ion thrusters[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 085502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acbef4
    [4]Mingming SUN, Jianfei LONG, Weilong GUO, Chao LIU, Yong ZHAO. A study of the influence of different grid structures on plasma characteristics in the discharge chamber of an ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 015509. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac839a
    [5]Juanjuan CHEN(陈娟娟), Yanhui JIA(贾艳辉), Hai GENG(耿海), Ning GUO(郭宁), Dezhou GUO(郭德洲). Investigation of variable aperture on the performance and lifetime of ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 104002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac11af
    [6]Yanhui JIA (贾艳辉), Juanjuan CHEN (陈娟娟), Ning GUO (郭宁), Xinfeng SUN (孙新锋), Chenchen WU (吴辰宸), Tianping ZHANG (张天平). 2D hybrid-PIC simulation of the two and three-grid system of ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aace52
    [7]Juan YANG (杨涓), Yuliang FU (付瑜亮), Xianchuang LIU (刘宪闯), Haibo MENG (孟海波), Yizhou JIN (金逸舟). Bended probe diagnostics of the plasma characteristics within an ECR ion source with a rectangular waveguide[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 85402-085402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aabb9f
    [8]CHEN Juanjuan (陈娟娟), ZHANG Tianping (张天平), GENG Hai (耿海), JIA Yanhui (贾艳辉), MENG Wei (孟伟), WU Xianming (吴先明), SUN Anbang (孙安邦). Analysis of Numerical Simulation Results of LIPS-200 Lifetime Experiments[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 611-616. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/06
    [9]REN Junxue (任军学), LI Juan (李娟), XIE Kan (谢侃), TIAN Huabing (田华兵), et al.. Three Dimensional Simulation of Ion Thruster Plume-Spacecraft Interaction Based on a Graphic Processor Unit[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(7): 702-709. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/7/18
    [10]YE Yanlin (叶沿林), LV Linhui(吕林辉). Some Key Problems Related to Radioactive Ion Beam Physics[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 360-363. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/02

Catalog

    Article views (224) PDF downloads (494) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return