Advanced Search+
Junwei JIA (贾军伟), Hongbo FU (付洪波), Zongyu HOU (侯宗余), Huadong WANG (王华东), Zhibo NI (倪志波), Fengzhong DONG (董凤忠). Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34003-034003. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1
Citation: Junwei JIA (贾军伟), Hongbo FU (付洪波), Zongyu HOU (侯宗余), Huadong WANG (王华东), Zhibo NI (倪志波), Fengzhong DONG (董凤忠). Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34003-034003. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1

Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

  • Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return