Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Xianzu GONG, Liqing XU, Jinping QIAN, Juan HUANG, Rui DING, A M GAROFALO, Annika EKEDAHL, Long ZENG, Erzhong LI, Bin ZHANG, Shiyao LIN, Biao SHEN, Mao WANG, Handong XU, Xinjun ZHANG, Miaohui LI, Guizhong ZUO, Qing ZANG, Haiqing LIU, Bo LYU, Liang WANG, Youwen SUN, Guosheng XU, Jiansheng HU, Damao YAO, Yu WU, Liqun HU, Bingjia XIAO, Nong XIANG, Kun LU, Yuntao SONG, Baonian WAN, Jiangang LI, the EAST Team. Realization of Te0 > 10 keV long pulse operation over 100 s on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 022001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9cc6
Citation: Xianzu GONG, Liqing XU, Jinping QIAN, Juan HUANG, Rui DING, A M GAROFALO, Annika EKEDAHL, Long ZENG, Erzhong LI, Bin ZHANG, Shiyao LIN, Biao SHEN, Mao WANG, Handong XU, Xinjun ZHANG, Miaohui LI, Guizhong ZUO, Qing ZANG, Haiqing LIU, Bo LYU, Liang WANG, Youwen SUN, Guosheng XU, Jiansheng HU, Damao YAO, Yu WU, Liqun HU, Bingjia XIAO, Nong XIANG, Kun LU, Yuntao SONG, Baonian WAN, Jiangang LI, the EAST Team. Realization of Te0 > 10 keV long pulse operation over 100 s on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 022001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9cc6

Realization of Te0 > 10 keV long pulse operation over 100 s on EAST

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Liqing XU, E-mail: lqxu@ipp.ac.cn

  • Received Date: August 17, 2022
  • Revised Date: October 19, 2022
  • Accepted Date: October 22, 2022
  • Available Online: December 05, 2023
  • Published Date: January 05, 2023
  • In 2021, EAST realized a steady-state long pulse with a duration over 100 s and a core electron temperature over 10 keV. This is an integrated operation that resolves several key issues, including active control of wall conditioning, long-lasting fully noninductive current and divertor heat/particle flux. The fully noninductive current is driven by pure radio frequency (RF) waves with a lower hybrid current drive power of 2.5 MW and electron cyclotron resonance heating of 1.4 MW. This is an excellent experimental platform on the timescale of hundreds of seconds for studying multiscale instabilities, electron-dominant transport and particle recycling (plasma-wall interactions) under weak collisionality.

  • The development of a high core electron temperature Te0 of over 8.6 keV (~100 million degrees Celsius) has been set up as one of the EAST main goals since the campaign in 2018, and the plan is to extend the duration of the scenario to the thousand-second timescale in the future [13]. This is a platform for investigating electron thermal transport under weak collisionality, which is close to ITER dimensionless parameters [4]. The study of electron-dominant heating is a crucial issue because the sustaining of fusion power at a steady output requires controlling the electron thermal transport in low collisionality, and thus heating fueling ions for self-consistent burning [57]. The collisionality parameter νe*~0.02 in EAST in the high-Te0 scenario is close to the dimensionless value in ITER [1, 3]. This is also a platform to investigate the particle balance [811], which is an integrated issue related to plasma-wall interaction and radio frequency (RF) wave heating.

    In 2018, EAST realized this scenario of a normalized collisionality parameter νe*~0.02 under pure RF heating with a pulse length of t=10s [1]. In the 2019 campaign, the EAST group made great progress in developing the scenario and the underlying physics, especially in studying multiscale instabilities and interactions. The discharge pulse was extended to 20 s, which is ten times as long as the plasma current diffusion timescale [3]. In the 2021 campaign, the RF-driven fully noninductive current and Te0>10keV discharge have been extended to 105 s with several engineering upgrades and novel techniques. First, a newly upgraded lower divertor is equipped with an excellent water-cooling system for heat flux and particle exhaust control. Second, a novel technique of injecting a lithium (Li) aerosol into the edge plasma is developed for density control [8].

    EAST is a medium-size non-circular tokamak with a major radius R0=1.80±0.05m and a typical minor radius a=0.45m [12]. The maximum torodial axial magnetic field is B0=2.5T. In 2021, the electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH) was upgraded, allowing a total power of up to 1.4 MW for the central electron heating. The infrared radiation (IR) camera system was also upgraded in 2021, which covers all RF antennas and over 70% of divertor targets, to monitor the surface temperature of key plasma-facing materials. The integrated optical system provides an identical view of IR and visible light to ensure safe operation. An algorithm processing method is used in deducting and correcting linear drift of the integrator for magnetic diagnostic data in the EAST plasma control system.

    Repeatable plasmas with Te0>10keV have been achieved by a combination of ECRH and a low hybrid current drive (LHCD) in EAST. Figure 1 shows the primary measurements in a typical steady-state long pulse with high Te0. The plasma current Ip=0.5M, and Vloop~0V in figure 1(a) indicate the Ohmic current Joh~0kAm-2 and a fully non-inductive current driven by pure RF powers in plasma. Figure 1(b) shows the measurements of line-averaged electron density ˉne0=1.8×1019m-3 and the density feedback by supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI). Figure 1(c) shows that the values of Te0 in the current flat top are over 10 keV and the βp~0.8,H98~0.9. The duration of high-Te0 plasmas in EAST can reach 100 s. Figure 1(d) shows the RF wave power PLH=2.5MW and PEC=1.4MW, and the maximum temperature of the tungsten lower divertor measured by the tangential IR camera [13] is less than 250 ℃ and approaches saturation in 2 s, keeping nearly flat during current flat-top, because the lower divertor has been newly upgraded with an excellent water-cooling system.

    Figure  1.  Time histories of EAST high-Te0 long-pulse discharge #98958. (a) Plasma current Ip and loop voltage Vloop, (b) line-integrated electron density ˉne0 and the feedback signal of SMBI, (c) central electron temperature Te0,H98 and βp, (d) radio frequency wave power PLH and PEC and lower-outer flat type divertor temperature measured with an infrared (IR) camera.

    Figure 2(a) shows the new ITER-like lower tungsten divertor with flat structure, which enhanced particle and power exhaust capability during 100 s high Te0 operation. A careful operational optimization between the plasma shape (e.g., X-point) and the outer gap in lower single null (LSN) configuration was carried out for the maintenance of the high-RF power coupling and for the avoidance of the formation of hot spots on the 4.6 GHz LHCD antenna with a power up to 2 MW. The LSN magnetic configuration uses the iso-flux control [14] scheme based on the high performance of the newly upgraded ITER-like tungsten lower divertor in heat flux control. Figure 2(b) shows the LSN magnetic configuration and excellent shaping control (which matches very well with the shape control points at all of 20 s, 40 s and 60 s) during long-pulse operation.

    Figure  2.  (a) The new lower divertor picture with flat structure, (b) LSN magnetic configuration and red star control points, (c) clear green color in the CCD frame at t=40s, showing the injection of the Li aerosol into the plasma edge, traces of the position of X-point (d) and recycling parameter (e).

    Because the RF coupling is very sensitive to the plasma density, the density control in long-pulse plasma operation is very important [15]. The EAST group made a big effort to achieve plasma density control with a timescale over 100 s. By means of the novel technique of injecting a Li aerosol into the edge plasma continuously and in real time combined with SMBI feedback [9, 16], the plasma density is well controlled in the long-pulse operation, as shown in figure 1. The green color in figure 2(c) indicates that a Li aerosol is injected into the edge plasma.

    An excellent plasma shape control within a few millimeters is important not only to the RF coupling but also to the constant density control. Figure 2(d) indicates that the major radius of X-point is controlled within a range of a few millimeters. The recycling parameter below unity (figure 2(e)) during 100 s reflects a good maintenance of the plasma wall condition. The global recycling coefficient Rglobal is evaluated by equation [17]:

    dNedt=(Rglobal-1)·Neτp+f·qQinjection,

    where Ne is the electron density, τp is particle confinement time, f is the fueling efficiency of external gas injection and qQinjection is the external gas injection rate.

    The plasma current density consists of the Ohmic part (Joh), the low hybrid wave-driven part (JLH), the electron cyclotron-driven one JEC and the gradient-driven bootstrap one (Jbs) [1820]. The Ohmic part is given by Joh=Vloop/ηsp, where Vloop is the surface loop voltage and ηsp is the Spitzer resistivity; Joh=0kAm-2 for our fully-noninductive case because Vloop=0V, as shown in figure 1. The electron cyclotron wave in high-Te0 discharges is mostly manifested in the role of heating, and JEC is very low. The current components are modeled using the code ONETWO [2, 21] with experimental inputs such as the Te profile, ion temperature Ti profile and electron density Ne profile, as shown in figure 3. The q0 is about 0.75 in the selected time as shown in figure 3(a). In this case, JRF=0.75Jtotal, and JBS=0.25Jtotal at the location of ρ=0.25, where the gradient of pressure peaks. The region of enhanced temperature profile and broadened current profile only limits within the q=1 surface. The off-axis peak of the current profile is evidenced by the hard x-ray (HXR) profile (figure 3(c)).

    Figure  3.  (a) Te, Ti and q profiles at 6 s, (b) Ne profile at 6 s, (c) the HXR profile with energy range of 20–40 keV, (d) modeled current profiles. The vertical dashed line indicates the location of the q=1 surface.

    Previous observations with EAST suggest that the existence of the m/n = 1/1 mode plays a key role in sustaining stationary high-Te0 long-pulse plasmas [1]. The sawtooth replaced by a saturated MHD mode [22] is important to high performance plasma with high Te0. Because the presence of sawtooth instabilities will reduce performance and might trigger deleterious instabilities. In agreement with the observations in 2018 and 2019, the helical m/n = 1/1 mode is also present in the plasma core in long-pulse high-Te0 discharge #98958 in 2021, as shown in figure 4. As shown in figure 4(b), the m/n = 1/1 mode can interact with small-scale turbulence, which is driven by electron temperature gradient, hence a decrease the turbulence intensity. In [3], a turbulence driven current has been confirmed, and it could be a candidate explanation of multiscale interaction between turbulence and m/n = 1/1 mode. Saturated interchange mode around the magnetic axis of plasma drives a near-helical flow pattern [22] and then mitigates the core turbulence level, which could be another reason for multiscale interaction. Multiscale interaction provided a new mechanism for turbulence mitigation under low torque.

    Figure  4.  An m/n = 1/1 helical mode is observed in the core of a high-Te0 discharge with a duration over 100 s. (a) Windowed frequency spectrum of soft x-ray measurement, (b) competition of m/n = 1/1 mode and small-scale turbulence measured by Doppler backscattered diagnostic. The growing of m/n = 1/1 mode decreases the intensity of turbulence.

    A steady-state long-pulse discharge with high-Te0, lasting longer than 100 s, which is aided by an ITER-like tungsten divertor, has been obtained with a fully noninductive plasma current driven by LHCD and ECRH. This newly achieved steady-state long-pulse high-Te0 scenario demonstrates the progress of physics related to multiscale instabilities under weak collisionality. EAST plans to demonstrate the steady-state high confinement (H mode) operation with Te0>8.5keV and maintain it over 1000 s (wall-plasma equilibrium time) in the future. Furthermore, a newly developed novel Vloop feedback control technology will be applied for MHD control in future.

    The authors would like to acknowledge all of the EAST contributors and collaborators both domestic and international. The list of names can be found in the appendix at https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ac2993. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFE03010003) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12275309).

  • [1]
    Xu L Q et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 106027 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abadab
    [2]
    Huang Y H et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 096026 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac1199
    [3]
    Li E Z et al 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 085003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.085003
    [4]
    Nishizuka N and Shibata K 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 051101 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.051101
    [5]
    Qiu Z et al 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 135001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.135001
    [6]
    Loureiro N F and Boldyrev S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 245101 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.245101
    [7]
    Diamond P H et al 2005 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47 R35 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5/R01
    [8]
    Hu J S et al 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 055001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.055001
    [9]
    Gong X Z et al 2017 Plasma Sci. Technol. 19 032001 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/3/032001
    [10]
    Wang H Q et al 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 185004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.185004
    [11]
    Wang L et al 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1365 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21645-y
    [12]
    Wan B N et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 104006 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/10/104006
    [13]
    Gan K F et al 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 438 S364 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.069
    [14]
    Yuan Q P et al 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 154 111557 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111557
    [15]
    Qian J P et al 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 457 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/01
    [16]
    Zheng X W et al 2013 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55 115010 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/55/11/115010
    [17]
    Yu Y W et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 126036 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab3ead
    [18]
    Spitzer L 1962 Physics of Fully Ionized Gases 2nd edn (New York: Interscience)
    [19]
    Fisch N J 1987 Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 175 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.175
    [20]
    Rosenbluth M N et al 1972 Phys. Fluids 15 116 doi: 10.1063/1.1693728
    [21]
    Qian J P et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 036008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa4e58
    [22]
    Jardin S C, Ferraro N and Krebs I 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 215001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.215001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. Liu, J., Liang, Y., Huang, J. et al. Research on stiff transport in electron heating dominated plasmas in EAST. Nuclear Fusion, 2025, 65(5): 056011. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/adc4f8
    2. Yu, Y., Sun, H., Wang, C. et al. Removal of deuterium retention by various helium discharge cleanings under strong magnetic field in EAST superconducting tokamak. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2024.101834
    3. Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Zuo, G. et al. Fuel recycling feedback control via real-time boron powder injection in EAST with full metal wall. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 125105. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad811f
    4. Ding, F., Zhang, Q., Hu, Z. et al. Divertor tungsten source monitoring by A visible spectroscopy diagnostic on EAST. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2024.101770
    5. Wang, S., Sun, Z., Qian, X. et al. Preliminary Design of Water-Cooling System for Liquid Metal Divertor Target Test Module in EAST. Journal of Fusion Energy, 2024, 43(1): 16. DOI:10.1007/s10894-024-00412-z
    6. Liu, J., Zang, Q., Liang, Y. et al. Impact of T i/T e ratio on ion transport based on EAST H-mode plasmas. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 045103. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad1195
    7. Xu, W., Xu, H., Wu, D. et al. Advances and Prospects of ECRH System on EAST. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2024, 52(10): 5159-5172. DOI:10.1109/TPS.2024.3493092
    8. Wang, C., Yu, Y., Sun, H. et al. Design and implementation of intelligent control system for non-evaporable getter pumps. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2816(1): 012069. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/2816/1/012069
    9. Zhang, Y., Zuo, G., Chen, Y. et al. Machine learning-based system for vacuum leakage detection in EAST fusion device. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.114070
    10. Hu, J., Xi, W., Zhang, J. et al. All superconducting tokamak: EAST. AAPPS Bulletin, 2023, 33(1): 8. DOI:10.1007/s43673-023-00080-9
    11. Li, M., Xu, H., Wang, X. et al. Plasma heating by electron cyclotron wave and the temperature effects on lower hybrid current drive on EAST. Nuclear Fusion, 2023, 63(4): 046019. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/acbec9

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(4)

    Article views (94) PDF downloads (382) Cited by(11)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return