
Citation: | Feiyue MAO, Nengchao WANG, Zhuo HUANG, Zhengkang REN, Song ZHOU, Chengshuo SHEN, Xiaoyi ZHANG, Ying HE, Qi ZHANG, Ruo JIA, Chuanxu ZHAO, Yangbo LI, Bo HU, Da LI, Abba Alhaji BALA, Zhipeng CHEN, Zhongyong CHEN, Zhoujun YANG, Yunfeng LIANG, Yonghua DING, Yuan PAN, J-TEXT Team. Study of the spectrum effect on the threshold of resonant magnetic perturbation penetration on J-TEXT[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 124002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9f2e |
The spectrum effect on the penetration of resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) is studied with upgraded in-vessel RMP coils on J-TEXT. The poloidal spectrum of the RMP field, especially the amplitudes of 2/1 and 3/1 components, can be varied by the phase difference between the upper and lower coil rows, ∆ϕ = ϕtop-ϕbottom, where ϕtop and ϕbottom are the toroidal phases of the n = 1 field of each coil row. The type of RMP penetration is found to be related to ∆ϕ, including the RMP penetration of either 2/1 or 3/1 RMP and the successive penetrations of 3/1 RMP followed by the 2/1 RMP. For cases with penetration of only one RMP component, the penetration thresholds measured by the corresponding resonant component are close for various ∆ϕ. However, the 2/1 RMP penetration threshold is significantly reduced if the 3/1 locked island is formed in advance. The changes in the rotation profile due to 3/1 locked island formation could partially contribute to the reduction of the 2/1 thresholds.
Tokamaks confine plasmas with their dominantly axisymmetric magnetic fields. However, there are still asymmetric fields called three-dimensional magnetic perturbations (MPs). MPs arise from imperfect coil fabrications called intrinsic error fields (IEFs) [1], saddle or helical coils [1, 2] and even magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes [3]. These small asymmetric fields can have great effects on plasma performance. For example, MPs can excite the locked mode (LM) and lead to the degradation of confinement and even disruption [2]. On the other hand, MPs can be used or optimized to control MHD instabilities such as the resistive wall mode (RWM) [4] and edge-localized mode (ELM) [5–7]. Mode penetrations (or field penetrations), which are known as forced magnetic reconnection [8] at the resonant surface (RS) in a tokamak plasma, are observed to be highly involved in LM formation [2] and ELM suppression [9–11]. Hence, the study of mode penetration is very important for device operation.
Multiple external saddle coils are available and common for IEF correction and ELM suppression in tokamaks [12–15]. The poloidal Fourier component distribution (also called poloidal spectrum) of MPs, which is determined by the saddle coil configuration, plays a crucial role in IEF correction and ELM control [16–20]. The ultimate goal of MP spectrum research is to find a perfect external coil configuration that suppresses ELMs without bad effects on plasma performance [20–22]. The effects of the MP spectrum on these issues contain the following aspects. First, the MP spectra of saddle coils are wide band. Resonant and non-resonant components are contained, resulting in multiple plasma responses. Second, owing to the complicated plasma responses, more than one component in the MP spectrum plays a part in mode penetration [16, 23, 24]. Third, non-resonant effects such as neoclassical toroidal viscosity (NTV) could affect the mode penetration by changing plasma rotation [25, 26]. Moreover, mode coupling and interactions between resonant surfaces should also be considered. A mode could be destabilized by another mode [27].
J-TEXT is a medium size tokamak equipped with 24 in-vessel saddle coils [28]. Based on these coils, mode penetrations and threshold scaling have been widely studied [29–32]. Recently, an upgrade on RMP coil connection was made to enable spectral modulation on J-TEXT, making it possible to study the spectrum effect on mode penetration. Mode penetrations are achieved with different MP spectra. Multiple mode penetration and the effects during a discharge were studied. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the experimental setup and RMP coil configurations are presented. The typical phenomena, thresholds and IEFs of 2/1 and 3/1 mode penetrations are presented in section 3. The phenomena and effects of multiple mode penetrations will be introduced in section 4. In section 5, a simple discussion on the reduction of the 2/1 mode penetration thresholds is given. Finally, a summary is provided in section 6.
The J-TEXT tokamak is a conventional iron core tokamak with a major radius R0 = 105 cm and a minor radius a = 25–29 cm [28]. J-TEXT usually operates in two configurations: the limiter configuration and the poloidal divertor configuration with an X-point on the high-field side. The current auxiliary heating on J-TEXT is the 105 GHz/500 kW electron cyclotron resonance heating system [33]. In this work, the plasma is operated on an ohmically heated limiter configuration. The plasma parameters are set to have a minor radius of 25.5 cm, a toroidal field of 1.7 T, a plasma current of 160 kA and an edge safety factor of 3.3.
The RMP coils on J-TEXT consist of 24 in-vessel saddle coils, half of which are in single-turn [34] with the others being double [28, 35], named DRMP-1 and DRMP-2. Figure 1 shows (a) the layout of the in-vessel RMP coils on J-TEXT [28] and (b) the diagram of the connection between coils. Initially, the connections of the top, low-field side and bottom coils at the same toroidal phase were fixed, such as in the experiments carried out in [30–32]. With this connection, a rotational RMP cam be conveniently achieved but the poloidal spectrum of the MP field will be hard to adjust. In 2019, the connections of DRMP-2 coils were changed from poloidal connections of three coils on the same toroidal location to toroidal connections of the same poloidal location but opposite toroidal locations, making the double-turn coils into six groups. The two coils in each group are fed current with either the opposite or the same direction to produce MP field with toroidal number n being odd or even, respectively. By controlling the current ratio in the two group at the same row, the toroidal phase (ϕtop, ϕmiddle, ϕbottom, ) of n = 1 MP can be set at any value from 0° to 360°. With the new connection, the poloidal spectrum of MP can be adjusted easily. Further details about this spectral adjustment are shown in [36]. In this work, the top and bottom coils of DRMP-2 are used to adjust the poloidal spectrum by coil phasing. Figure 2 shows the typical coil configurations of four different coil phasings. By feeding appropriate current in the coils, the phase difference between the upper and lower coil rows, ∆ϕ = ϕtop-ϕbottom, where ϕtop and ϕbottom are the toroidal phases of n = 1 field of each coil rows, can be set at any value from 0° to 360° and then the poloidal spectrum varies.
The RMP penetrations can be confirmed and distinguished in several aspects with various diagnostics on J-TEXT [30, 31, 37]. Here we show the diagnostics used in the RMP penetration experiments. The multichannel polarimeter-interferometer (POLARIS) [38] is used for electron density (ne) measurement. The electron temperature (Te) is measured by a multichannel electron cyclotron emission (ECE) radiometer [39]. A spectrometer filtered for carbon Ⅴ viewing the plasma in the toroidal direction is used to give the toroidal velocity of plasma rotation (Vϕ) [40]. Magnetic perturbations including static and oscillating perturbations are detected by the MHD magnetic diagnostic on J-TEXT [41]. Details of these measurements during mode penetrations are presented in section 3.
Despite only a few coils being used, RMP penetration occurs in all of the phase differences ∆ϕ with the plasma parameters mentioned above and core line-average electron density ne ~ 1 × 1019 m-3. Table 1 shows the m/n = 2/1 and 3/1 RMP components at the corresponding RS calculated with the vacuum assumption and the results of RMP penetration with varying ∆ϕ. The positions of RSs are given by the equilibrium and fitting code (EFIT) [42], rq=2 ≈ 19 cm ≈ 0.74a, rq=3 ≈ 23 cm ≈ 0.9a (a is the minor radius). It can be found that the type of RMP penetration depends on ∆ϕ. RMP penetrations of m/n = 2/1 [30] and 3/1 [31] have been reported on J-TEXT. Various phenomena related to locked islands are helpful to confirm and distinguish RMP penetrations [37, 39, 43, 44]. The details of the 2/1 and 3/1 RMP penetrations are as follows.
∆ϕ (°) | 2/1 RMP penetration | 3/1 RMP penetration | ||
0 | 1.42 | 0.94 | √ | × |
30 | 1.46 | 0.73 | √ | × |
60 | 1.39 | 0.46 | √ | × |
90 | 1.24 | 0.16 | √ | × |
120 | 0.99 | 0.15 | √ | × |
150 | 0.68 | 0.45 | × | √ |
180 | 0.33 | 0.72 | × | √ |
210 | 0.05 | 0.93 | × | √ |
240 | 0.43 | 1.09 | √ | √ |
270 | 0.77 | 1.17 | √ | √ |
300 | 1.07 | 1.17 | √ | √ |
330 | 1.29 | 1.10 | √ | √ |
Figure 3 shows the time evolution of a discharge with 2/1 RMP penetration. The RMP coil current (blue line in figure 3(a)) is programmed to ramp up slowly in a tearing stable plasma. In this discharge, the phase difference ∆ϕ is set as
Figures 3(c) and (d) show the line integrated density neL and electron temperature
Figures 3(e) and (f) show one channel of the Mirnov probes and its time–frequency spectrum. The waveform of the Mirnov signal (dbθ/dt) can be divided into three different states: no island state before 0.46 s, locked island state from 0.46 to 0.561 s, rotating island and fading stage after 0.561 s. During the rotating island stage, the oscillation on the Mirnov signal increases suddenly. A mode with an increasing frequency from zero to several kilohertz arises on the spectrogram. These Mirnov signal and spectrogram phenomena indicate that the island unlocks and spins up. The contour plot (g) is from the signals of the toroidal Mirnov probe array and is filtered with a frequency range lower than 10 kHz. The contour plot (g) shows that the island unlocks and propagates in the counter-Ip direction with several kilohertz. There is a frequency of approximately 30–40 kHz during locked island stage. This mode splits into two branches with a higher frequency fH and a lower frequency fL. According to previous studies [37, 43, 45, 46], this mode is recognized as a beta-induced Alfvén eigenmode (BAE). Due to the strong correlation with the magnetic island, this mode is named m-BAE. It has the following features: the existence of the m-BAE is always related to the magnetic island; the m-BAE has two branches that propagate in opposite directions in the island frame and form a standing wave in the island frame; the frequencies of the m-BAE and the island have the relationship fH-fTM = fTM-fL (fTM = +5 kHz, fH = +38 kHz, fL =-28 kHz in the rotating island phase here). When the island is stationary, the two branches show a standing wave structure in the lab frame. Figure 3(h) show the standing wave structure during the locked island stage. Figures 3(i) and (j) show the traveling wave structures that propagate in opposite directions during the rotating island stage.
In every single discharge, the RMP coil current and plasma density at the moment of penetration are recorded for the database of penetration thresholds. The threshold
Compared with 2/1 RMP penetration, the signal changes due to 3/1 RMP penetration are weaker and need careful confirmation. Figure 5 presents typical signals during 3/1 RMP penetration with ∆ϕ = 210°, which has a 3/1 dominant RMP. The RMP coil current is ramped up to a maximum of 6 kA, and hence produces a maximum 3/1 RMP field at 5.6 G. During the early ramp-up phase of RMP, the pick-up field and plasma response measured by brn=1 increases linearly with Icoil. When the 3/1 RMP is increased to a critical value at approximately 0.39 s, brn=1 shows a clear variation deviating from the linear increase, i.e. a decrease for this case with ∆ϕ = 210°. In addition, the plasma rotation around q = 3 RS (yellow line in figure 5(b)) changed towards the co-current direction, which is similar to the variation of 2/1 RMP penetration.
In figure 5(c), 3/1 mode penetration causes few changes in the ECE signals around the core and sawtooth behavior. The ECE signal around q = 3 RS shows a different tendency when 3/1 mode penetration occurs. The electron temperature Te will decrease when an edge 3/1 island is excited [31]. Sometimes, the decrease can be observed in the ECE signal around q = 3 RS. This depends on the phase relation between the 3/1 locked island and the ECE location. Figure 5(d) shows the emission of carbon Ⅲ (CⅢ) around the last closed flux surface (LCFS). The sudden increase in the CⅢ emission indicates a stronger interaction between the plasma and the limiters, which can support the formation of the edge 3/1 locked island.
Similar to the appearance of the 2/1 m-BAE, a 3/1 m-BAE is also observed from the time–frequency spectrum (figure 5(f)) at around 34 kHz and has a standing wave structure (figure 5(g)), indicating the formation of a 3/1 locked island. Therefore, the appearance of a 3/1 m-BAE can be used as an indicator for rapid confirmation of 3/1 mode penetration on J-TEXT. After the removal of the RMP field, there is no clear signature of the unlocking of a 3/1 island, which is different from the unlocking of a 2/1 island. The absence of 3/1 island unlocking might be related to the stability of the 3/1 island and that the 3/1 island decays very fast before it spins up to a few kHz.
Again, the thresholds of 3/1 mode penetration are shown by the full symbols in figure 6 for various RMP spectra, i.e. blue circles for ∆ϕ =180°, red squares for ∆ϕ = 225°, yellow diamonds for ∆ϕ = 270°. For ∆ϕ = 270°, 3/1 RMP succeeds in achieving 3/1 mode penetration in all discharges. The thresholds of 3/1 mode penetration also have a non-monotonic dependence on density, which is similar to the 2/1 case shown in figure 4. Further studies will be needed to reveal the cause of this dependence. For ∆ϕ = 180°, 3/1 mode penetration is achieved with ne < 1.7 × 1019m-3, and the threshold increase is almost the same as the case of ∆ϕ = 270°. At higher ne, the maximal 3/1 RMP field with ∆ϕ = 180° is below the mode penetration threshold, and the corresponding data are marked by blue stars in figure 6. For ∆ϕ = 225°, the maximal 3/1 RMP field is larger and 3/1 RMP penetration can be achieved at ne < 2.0 × 1019 m-3. Above 2.0 × 1019 m-3, no penetration is obtained for ∆ϕ = 225° except a higher density discharge (4.8 × 1019 m-3), although the available 3/1 RMP amplitude is at the same level of threshold for the ∆ϕ = 270°. For the higher density (4.8 × 1019 m-3), successful penetration with ∆ϕ = 225° also supports that the 3/1 RMP penetration threshold non-monotonically depends on the density. These features of the 3/1 thresholds at various RMP spectra indicate that the vacuum 3/1 RMP at the q = 3 RS (
To evaluate the effect of the IEF on the mode penetration threshold, both 2/1 and 3/1 IEFs were measured by the 'compass scan' technique [24], as shown in figure 7. The data in figure 7(a) come from four discharges with the same plasma parameters and ∆ϕ = 0°. The amplitude of the 2/1 IEF is
Before the major disruption induced by locked modes, it is generally assumed and observed that several LMs emerge due to the penetration of external RMP fields or IEFs [47, 48]. Those locked islands are likely to form subsequently. However, there has been little study on the thresholds of the latter formed island. Previous experiments on J-TEXT also show the 2/1 mode penetration following 3/1 locked island formation [31, 37], with limited poloidal spectra of the external RMP field. In this work, the ratio between 2/1 and 3/1 RMP fields can be varied flexibly with various ∆ϕ. This provides a good opportunity for studying the penetration of multiple modes.
With a flexible poloidal spectrum, the successive penetrations of the 3/1 RMP followed by the 2/1 RMP have been observed with ∆ϕ ∈ [240°, 330°], as already summarized in table 1. Figure 8 displays a typical example of such a case with ∆ϕ = 270°, with the RMP amplitudes being 1.17 G kA-1 and 0.77 G kA–1 for 3/1 and 2/1 components, respectively. With the ramp-up of Icoil, 3/1 mode penetration appears at 0.381 s (yellow vertical dashed line), as observed from the change in the brn=1 signal (red line in figure 8(a)) and the 31 kHz m-BAE (figure 8(f)). After the formation of 3/1 LM, the RMP is further ramped and 2/1 mode penetration is clearly identified at 0.458 s (red vertical dashed line), as seen by the sudden increase in brn=1, the disappearance of sawtooth oscillations and the variation of toroidal rotation towards co-Ip direction. Those features are more or less similar to the case with only a 2/1 locked island. However, the m-BAE behaviors are different, i.e. mode frequency (figure 8(f)) increases from 31 to 44 kHz and the strength becomes weaker after 2/1 mode penetration.
At ∆ϕ = 270°, 3/1 mode penetration always appears first; the corresponding thresholds have already been displayed in figure 6. With the distinct identification of subsequent 2/1 mode penetration, the 2/1 thresholds can be measured with a pre-formed 3/1 locked island, as shown by the yellow diamonds in figure 9. These 2/1 thresholds increase with ne, and when ne > 1.5 × 1019 m-3, no 2/1 mode penetration is observed even with maximal RMP amplitude, as marked by the yellow crosses. A significant feature is revealed by comparing to the 2/1 thresholds with ∆ϕ = 0° (red full squares), i.e. the case with only 2/1 mode penetration. The thresholds of 2/1 mode penetration in ∆ϕ = 270° are significantly lower than those in ∆ϕ = 0° in the available density range (< 1.5 × 1019 m-3). This indicates that the pre-existing 3/1 locked mode could significantly reduce the 2/1 mode penetration threshold.
The reduction of the 2/1 mode penetration threshold due to an edge locked island is important for the suppression of ELMs by using RMPs. During the ELM suppression the locked islands are believed to form at the pedestal top [9, 11]. According to the observations in this work, such pedestal top islands might significantly reduce the penetration thresholds at the inner rational surfaces and hence lead to the risk of exciting core locked islands. It is hence important to understanding why the 2/1 threshold can be significantly reduced by a pre-existing 3/1 locked island.
From a previous study on J-TEXT [32], plasma rotation is found to be the key factor in the mode penetration threshold. Plasma rotation profiles at different times for #1070409 are shown in figure 9: 0.3 s, 0.36 s, 0.44 s and 0.5 s are the times before RMP is applied, the linear response stage, during 3/1 locked island and after 2/1 mode penetration, respectively. The rotation profile during the linear response is almost the same as the profile without RMP. The rotation profile changes to the co-current direction when a 3/1 locked island exists. The profile increases to a higher level after 2/1 mode penetration. Therefore, the reduction in the 2/1 mode penetration thresholds with a pre-existing 3/1 locked island is thought to be related to the changes in the rotation profile induced by the 3/1 locked island.
The effect of rotation variation is simply evaluated based on previous work. The scaling law of the 2/1 mode penetration threshold on MHD frequency is
In summary, the recent upgrade of the RMP coil connection on J-TEXT has enabled the study of the spectrum effects on RMP penetration. The poloidal spectrum is controlled by the coil phase differences ∆ϕ in the experiment. Two kinds of effects on RMP penetration are found to be related to the poloidal spectrum. First, ∆ϕ decides the type of RMP penetration, i.e. 2/1 RMP penetration, 3/1 RMP penetration or successive penetrations of 3/1 RMP followed by the 2/1 RMP, as shown in table 1. Second, the RMP penetration thresholds are not consistent in all of the RMP spectra. For cases with penetration of only one RMP component, the penetration thresholds measured by the corresponding resonant component are close for various ∆ϕ. But for the cases with successive penetrations of 3/1 RMP followed by 2/1 RMP, the 2/1 RMP penetration threshold is significantly reduced. The reduction of the 2/1 RMP penetration threshold should be partly attributed to the variation in plasma rotation around q = 2 RS caused by the 3/1 locked mode. In addition, the non-monotonic dependence of 3/1 mode penetration thresholds on density is observed on J-TEXT for the first time. This point provides confidence for the formation of an edge island in high-density operation for island divertor configuration.
Although, the mode penetration thresholds can be well described by the vacuum RMP components for cases with only one penetration in this work, the plasma response has been demonstrated to play a crucial role [16, 17, 24]. Next we plan to study the spectral effects will be studied in consideration of the plasma response. The plasma responses on the basis of the MARS-F code [49] are under research and further results are on the way.
This work was supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Energy R & D Program of China (Nos. 2019YFE03010004, 2018YFE0309100), the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0301100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11905078, 12075096 and 51821005).
[1] |
Scoville J T et al 1991 Nucl. Fusion 31 875 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/31/5/006
|
[2] |
Hender T C et al 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 2091 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/32/12/I02
|
[3] |
Snipes J A et al 1988 Nucl. Fusion 28 1085 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/28/6/010
|
[4] |
Garofalo A M et al 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 1491 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/40/8/307
|
[5] |
Evens T E et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 235003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.235003
|
[6] |
Evens T E et al 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 419 doi: 10.1038/nphys312
|
[7] |
Liang Y et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 265004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.265004
|
[8] |
Tetsuya S and Takaya H 1979 Phys. Fluids 22 1189 doi: 10.1063/1.862721
|
[9] |
Nazikian R et al 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 105002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105002
|
[10] |
Sun Y et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 115001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.115001
|
[11] |
Hu Q et al 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 045001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.045001
|
[12] |
Buttery R J et al 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1827 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/11Y/323
|
[13] |
Boozer A H 2011 Fusion Sci. Technol. 59 561 doi: 10.13182/FST11-A11697
|
[14] |
Callen J D 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 094026 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/9/094026
|
[15] |
Strait E J 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 021803 doi: 10.1063/1.4902126
|
[16] |
Park J K et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 195003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.195003
|
[17] |
Park J K et al 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 045006 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/48/4/045006
|
[18] |
Reimerdes H et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 115001 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/49/11/115001
|
[19] |
Paz-Soldan C et al 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 105001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105001
|
[20] |
Park J K et al 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1223 doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0268-8
|
[21] |
Park J K et al 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 125001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.125001
|
[22] |
Logan N C et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 076010 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abff05
|
[23] |
Scoville J T and La Haye R J 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 250 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/4/305
|
[24] |
Wang H H et al 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 066011 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/56/6/066011
|
[25] |
Cole A J et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 065001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.065001
|
[26] |
Yang S M et al 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 095001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.095001
|
[27] |
Ren J et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 056007 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abea57
|
[28] |
Liang Y et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112016 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab1a72
|
[29] |
Hu Q et al 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 092502 doi: 10.1063/1.4820800
|
[30] |
Wang N et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 064014 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/6/064014
|
[31] |
Hu Q et al 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 092009 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/56/9/092009
|
[32] |
Huang Z et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 064003 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab8859
|
[33] |
Wang N et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 042016 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac3aff
|
[34] |
Rao B et al 2014 Fusion Eng. Des. 89 378 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.038
|
[35] |
Wang N et al 2022 Rev. Modern Plasma Phys. 6 26
|
[36] |
Ren Z et al 2022 Plasma Sci. Technol Doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca45f
|
[37] |
Liu L Z et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 126022 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab4090
|
[38] |
Chen J et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 11D303 doi: 10.1063/1.4891603
|
[39] |
Yang Z J et al 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 10E313 doi: 10.1063/1.4732069
|
[40] |
Cheng Z F et al 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 073508 doi: 10.1063/1.4815824
|
[41] |
Han D L et al 2021 Plasma Sci. Technol. 23 055104 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/abeeda
|
[42] |
Wang Y H et al 2022 Plasma Sci. Technol. 24 064001 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac64ef
|
[43] |
Liu L Z et al 2015 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57 065007 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/57/6/065007
|
[44] |
Yan W et al 2018 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 035007 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa9c14
|
[45] |
Buratti P et al 2005 Nucl. Fusion 45 1446 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/027
|
[46] |
Chen W et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 063010 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/6/063010
|
[47] |
Du X D et al 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 042505 doi: 10.1063/1.5085329
|
[48] |
Hu Q et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 016005 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aaeb57
|
[49] |
Liu Y Q et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 122502 doi: 10.1063/1.3526677
|
1. | Xie, W., Liang, Y., Jiang, Z. et al. Application of three-dimensional MHD equilibrium calculation coupled with plasma response to island divertor experiments on J-TEXT. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 115104. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad70e1 | |
2. | Ding, Y., Wang, N., Chen, Z. et al. Overview of the recent experimental research on the J-TEXT tokamak. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(11): 112005. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad336e | |
3. | Li, Y., Rao, B., Mao, F. et al. The design of the external rotational transform coil on the J-TEXT tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114591 | |
4. | Huang, Z., Zhou, S., Fan, J. et al. Design of new resonant magnetic perturbation coils on the J-TEXT tokamak. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 115601. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/acd997 | |
5. | Zhang, Q., Wang, N., Huang, Z. et al. Reduction of the external resonant magnetic perturbation threshold for 2/1 locked mode excitation by the pre-excited mode on J-TEXT. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2023, 65(9): 095017. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/acea40 | |
6. | Huang, Z., Mao, F., Ding, Y. et al. An application of the shortest path algorithm for the identification of weak MHD mode. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 085101. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/acc055 | |
7. | Pan, S.-S., Duan, Y.-M., Xu, L.-Q. et al. Influence of resonant magnetic perturbation on sawtooth behavior in experimental advanced superconducting Tokamak | [EAST 托卡马克上共振磁扰动对锯齿行为的影响]. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 135203. DOI:10.7498/aps.72.20230347 | |
8. | He, Y., Wang, N., Li, D. et al. Prevention of mode coupling by external applied resonant magnetic perturbation on the J-TEXT tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2023, 65(6): 065011. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/acd20f | |
9. | He, Y., Wang, N., Ding, Y. et al. Disruption avoidance by stabilizing coupled MHD modes using resonant magnetic perturbations on J-TEXT. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2023, 65(3): 035012. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/acb00f | |
10. | Ren, Z., Li, D., Wang, N. et al. The spectrum analysis of RMP coils with multiple connection modes and the design of high field side coils on J-TEXT. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 124020. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/aca45f |
∆ϕ (°) | 2/1 RMP penetration | 3/1 RMP penetration | ||
0 | 1.42 | 0.94 | √ | × |
30 | 1.46 | 0.73 | √ | × |
60 | 1.39 | 0.46 | √ | × |
90 | 1.24 | 0.16 | √ | × |
120 | 0.99 | 0.15 | √ | × |
150 | 0.68 | 0.45 | × | √ |
180 | 0.33 | 0.72 | × | √ |
210 | 0.05 | 0.93 | × | √ |
240 | 0.43 | 1.09 | √ | √ |
270 | 0.77 | 1.17 | √ | √ |
300 | 1.07 | 1.17 | √ | √ |
330 | 1.29 | 1.10 | √ | √ |