
Citation: | Jianbin LIU, Lingyi MENG, Houyang GUO, Kedong LI, Jichan XU, Huiqian WANG, Guosheng XU, Fang DING, Ling ZHANG, Yanmin DUAN, Bin ZHANG, Lin YU, Ping WANG, Ang LI, Donggui WU, Rui DING, Liang WANG. Divertor detachment operation in helium plasmas with ITER-like tungsten divertor in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 075101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac621d |
Detachment in helium (He) discharges has been achieved in the EAST superconducting tokamak equipped with an ITER-like tungsten divertor. This paper presents the experimental observations of divertor detachment achieved by increasing the plasma density in He discharges. During density ramp-up, the particle flux shows a clear rollover, while the electron temperature around the outer strike point is decreasing simultaneously. The divertor detachment also exhibits a significant difference from that observed in comparable deuterium (D) discharges. The density threshold of detachment in the He plasma is higher than that in the D plasma for the same heating power, and increases with the heating power. Moreover, detachment assisted with neon (Ne) seeding was also performed in L- and H-mode plasmas, pointing to the direction for reducing the density threshold of detachment in He operation. However, excessive Ne seeding causes confinement degradation during the divertor detachment phase. The precise feedback control of impurity seeding will be performed in EAST to improve the compatibility of core plasma performance with divertor detachment for future high heating power operations.
The first non-nuclear operation phase for ITER will be conducted with hydrogen (H) or helium (He) plasmas [1, 2]. During this phase, divertor detachment as an ITER baseline scenario still needs to be evaluated and investigated in existing divertor tokamaks, especially those with ITER-like tungsten (W) divertors. Experimental and modeling studies on detachment in deuterium (D) plasmas have been carried out in many tokamaks, such as ASDEX-Upgrade [3], DIII-D [4, 5], JET [6, 7], JT-60U [8], TCV [9], HL-2A [10] and EAST [11, 12]. However, He plasmas for the investigation of divertor detachment have constituted only a small fraction of discharges [13–15]. Previous experiments have found that the divertor detachment density threshold in He is higher than that in D, which may be due to the difference in atomic and molecular physical processes between deuterium and helium plasmas. A detailed understanding of the detachment behavior and the effect of detachment on the main plasma performance still remain elusive.
For the first time, divertor detachment has been realized in He discharges on EAST with an ITER-like W-divertor configuration. The latest experimental studies on divertor detachment in He plasmas are presented in this paper. Section 2 introduces the dedicated experimental setup and key diagnostics. The basic features of L-mode detachment and the effects of detachment with impurity injection in He plasmas are introduced in section 3. Finally, the experimental summary is given in section 4.
EAST featuring an ITER-like water-cooled W/Cu monoblock divertor configuration was designed for long-pulse operations in an ITER-relevant metal wall environment, providing a unique platform to address the physics and engineering issues for ITER operation [16]. It is a fully superconducting tokamak with a major and minor radius of R~1.9 m and a~0.45 m, respectively [17]. The experiments were obtained mostly in upper single null (USN) discharges with lower hybrid wave (LHW) heating, electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH) and neutral beam injection heating. Helium was adopted as the working gas in the experiments performed for this study, which was puffed from the high-field mid-plane. Due to the higher H-mode power threshold in helium plasma in EAST [18], the detachment experiments presented in this paper were mainly obtained in USN L-mode discharges with the favorable BT direction (the ion ∇B drift direction towards the upper divertor).
The boundary and divertor diagnostics in EAST are shown in figure 1. A total of 54 triple-divertor Langmuir probes (LPs) are embedded in the UI and UO divertor target plates through two horizontal ports, D and O. These probes serve as the main diagnostics for the divertor detachment study, with high spatial and temporal resolutions, i.e. 12–18 mm (poloidally) and 20 μs, respectively. Most of the experimental data presented below were obtained with divertor triple LP arrays, capable of measuring the ion saturation current density (Jsat), positive biased potential (Vp) and floating potential (Vf). The particle flux and electron temperature at the divertor targets can be directly derived from divertor LP measurements, as introduced in [19, 20]. The surface temperatures of the UI and UO divertor targets are obtained by infrared (IR) cameras located in the horizontal port [21]. Absolute extreme ultraviolet (AXUV) detector arrays were installed in the upper-vertical port C and horizontal port P to measure the total radiated power and distributions in the bulk plasma [22]. The line emissions of the He atoms and impurities (such as W) in the mid-plane and the W-divertor are obtained from the ultraviolet (EUV) spectrometer and Div-W diagnostic system [23, 24]. The reflectometry and multi-channel electron cyclotron emission (ECE) diagnostics can provide information on the edge electron density (ne) and temperature (Te) profiles separately [25, 26].
In the 2019 EAST experimental campaign, detachment with the ITER-like W-divertor was firstly performed by ramping up the plasma density in USN L-mode helium discharges [27]. As commonly used in D detachment studies, the onset of the detachment in He plasma can be marked by the rollover in the ion saturation current density (Jsat) near the strike point [28]. Here, the line-averaged electron density (ne) corresponding to the beginning of the rollover is defined as the divertor detachment threshold. Figure 2 shows the characteristics of a density ramp-up helium discharge with BT~2.4 T and Ip~0.4 MA in the favorable BT direction. During the density ramp-up phase, the intensity of the He Ⅰ emission keeps increasing with ne. The peak Jsat at the UO divertor shows a clear rollover at ne~4.8×1019 m-3, i.e. at the Greenwald density fraction (ne/nG)~0.76. The electron temperature (Te, div) of~10 eV corresponds to the rollover of peak Jsat, which is different from that in D plasma. Compared to the electron temperature, the peak surface temperature measured by the IR camera also exhibits a similar downward trend. This discharge was mainly heated by LHW (PLHW~2 MW) and ECRH (PECRH~0.8 MW). In the discharge #87173 with a high plasma edge safety factor (pitch of the magnetic field lines) q95~6, the plasma stored energy, WMHD, did not experience a noticeable reduction during the detachment phase. It is also noted that the threshold of helium detachment onset is significantly higher than that in deuterium discharges with similar plasma configuration and parameters [11].
Figure 3 shows the evolutions of peak Jsat and electron temperature at the UI and UO divertor targets, measured by the divertor LPs, as a function of the Greenwald density fraction. The data are obtained from three He discharges with different SOL power (PSOL) levels, together with a D discharge (#85094) closely matched to the He discharge (#87165) as a reference. More detailed information on the plasma parameters can be found in table 1. Note that PSOL represents the power entering the SOL and is defined as
PSOL=POhm+Paux-Prad-dW/dt, | (1) |
Shot number | Ip (MA) | BT (T) | ne/nG at onset of detachment @ UO | PSOL (MW) | L/H mode | Main fuel particle |
87165 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.58 | ~0.75 | L | He |
87173 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.76 | ~1.95 | L | He |
87174 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.81 | ~2.15 | L | He |
87175 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.97 | ~2.5 | L | He |
94359 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.7 | ~1.5 | L | He |
94363 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.73 | ~1.73 | L | He |
85094 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.52 | ~0.9 | L | D |
87702 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.56 | ~0.95 | L | D |
87706 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.57 | ~1.08 | L | D |
87707 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.6 | ~1.3 | L | D |
87716 | 0.37 | ~2.4 | 0.62 | ~1.65 | L | D |
75074 | 0.45 | ~2.4 | 0.58 | ~1.8 | H | D |
75075 | 0.45 | ~2.4 | 0.62 | ~1.85 | H | D |
79343 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.83 | ~2.85 | H | D |
79344 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.72 | ~2.15 | H | D |
where POhm and Paux are the ohmic power and the absorbed auxiliary heating power, respectively. Prad is the total radiated power in the core plasma measured by the AXUV system in EAST, and dW/dt is the rate of change in the plasma stored energy. Similar to D plasmas, detachment at the inner divertor occurs at much lower densities than that at the outer divertor. Te, div at the inner target in He plasmas appears to be relatively low at all densities for all the power levels, as shown in figure 3(c). Figures 3(b) and (d) show the evolutions of Jsat and Te, div on the UO divertor target with increasing density for the different SOL powers in He and D plasmas. The onset of the detached divertor operation is indicated by the rollover of Jsat at the target as the plasma density increases, which is associated with a significant reduction in Te, div, i.e. ~10 eV or below. As can be seen in figure 3 and table 1, the density threshold for the onset of detachment is sensitive to the level of the SOL power and increases with the input power. The density threshold of divertor detachment at the UI target is significantly lower than that at the UO divertor.
Figure 4 shows a direct comparison between D and He plasmas with favorable BT. The magnetic equilibria were kept as uniform and stable as possible. In particular, the position of the strike point on the UO target is well matched during the density ramp-up. The discharges presented here have plasma current Ip=0.4 MA, toroidal field BT=2.4 T, and total heating power Ptotal~1.1 MW, with ne increasing from ~2.5×1019 to ~4.2×1019 m-3. The edge plasma density (nedge, ρ ~ 0.9 at ρ~0.9) shown in figure 4(c) was kept nearly consistent during the density ramp-up phase. Figures 4(d) and (f) show that the electron temperature (at ρ~0.8) and the plasma stored energy (WMHD) in the He plasma have a marginally higher level than that in the D plasma, which is a general phenomenon, as observed in previous He plasma experiments in EAST. It is often found that there is a slight increase in radiation power (Prad) for He plasmas, as shown in figure 4(e). From figure 4(b) and table 1, with similar heating power, the SOL power in the He plasma (PSOL~0.75 MW) is lower than that in the D plasma (PSOL~0.9 MW). However, the divertor detachment (#87165, ne/nG~0.58, nedge, ρ~0.9~1.6×1019 m-3) occurs at a marginally higher density in the He plasmas, relative to the D reference case (#85094, ne/nG~0.52, nedge, ρ~0.9~1.5×1019 m-3). It is not yet clear why the density at the detachment onset at the outer divertor in He discharge is slightly different from that in the D plasma. The underlying reason responsible for the difference in the divertor detachment onset may be associated with the different atomic/molecular processes. Comparisons with SOLPS simulations for matched EAST helium discharges are underway to further clarify this.
Initial studies on the relationship between the detachment threshold density and SOL power have also been done in D and He plasmas. Figure 5 shows the statistical results of the divertor detachment threshold in the upper outer divertor versus the power entering the SOL (PSOL) for EAST USN discharges with favorable BT direction. Detailed information on the statistics can be found in table 1. The plasma current and the toroidal field of the statistic discharges are around 0.4 MA and 2.2–2.4 T, respectively. As shown in figure 5, the detachment threshold of normalized density in D plasmas ranges between 0.5 and 0.65 for L-mode, and between 0.6 and 0.85 for H-mode, increasing with power in both cases. The detachment density threshold in He plasmas also increases with power, but is slightly higher than that in D plasmas for L-mode, i.e. at relatively low PSOL. Note that the detachment density threshold in He plasmas continuously increases until much higher PSOL, but still in L-mode. Therefore, it is very difficult to achieve H-mode detachment simply by density ramp-up, due to the higher power threshold of L–H transition for He discharges.
For future fusion devices with hot core confinement and long pulses, strong divertor detachment is required to mitigate excessive particle and heat fluxes at the divertor target. Detachment can be achieved in L- and H-mode discharges by ramping up the plasma density. However, it requires a high Greenwald density fraction (i.e. a relatively high plasma density) to achieve cold, highly detached divertor conditions [29] in the case of high heating power (see figures 3 and 5). Such high upstream density may not be compatible with high core confinement scenarios [30]. As found in EAST and other tokamaks, the H-mode threshold power in the He plasma is higher than that in D plasma; thus, the density threshold to maintain the detachment is higher in He H-mode plasmas. It is also found that divertor detachment in most present tokamaks significantly reduces the plasma confinement at high densities [31]. Thus, it is difficult to maintain divertor detachment in He plasmas by simply helium fueling in high-power steady-state H-mode discharges. Therefore, one effective solution is to seed impurities to achieve divertor detachment at relatively lower densities. Argon (Ar) and neon (Ne) are possible impurity seeding candidates to induce strong radiation in the divertor and edge plasma regions for promoting detachment.
Divertor detachment in He plasmas with Ne seeding was performed during the 2019 EAST experimental campaign. Figure 6 shows the time evolution of the main parameters for a typical He L-mode discharge with Ne seeding (#94382) under the USN magnetic configuration. It was achieved at plasma current Ip=0.5 MA and toroidal magnetic field BT~2.4 T with favorable BT. The total heating power was approximately 4.8 MW including LHCD of 4.0 MW and ECRH of 0.8 MW, with the plasma stored energy WMHD~145 kJ and edge safety factor q95~5.4. Pure neon was injected into the plasma from the gas valve in the UO divertor SOL region with a pulse width of 75 ms and an interval of 125 ms between ~5.1 and 6.4 s, as shown in figure 6(a). The line-averaged electron density (ne) increased from 4.0×1019 m-3 (ne/nG~0.51) before neon seeding to ~5.0×1019 m-3 (ne/nG~0.64) after seeding, as shown in figure 6(b). With Ne gas puffing, the Ne radiation measured by the EUV spectrometer keeps increasing. Meanwhile, the total radiated power in the bulk plasma calculated by AXUV also significantly increases, i.e. from ~0.6 MW at 5.4 s to ~1.2 MW at 6.3 s. As shown in figure 6(c), it was also found that the radiated power did not increase immediately after Ne seeding until 5.4 s. A possible reason is that there is around 100–200 ms delay from the valve opening to the gas entering into the vacuum [32]. As clearly shown in figures 6(a) and (f), Jsat in the UO divertor is significantly decreased when the neon gas is injected from the UO divertor, and is further reduced when the divertor plasma enters the detachment phase, with Te, div being reduced below 10 eV. The evolution of the peak surface temperature (TIR) at the UO divertor target shows a similar trend to that of the divertor electron temperature. Therefore, it should be beneficial to reduce the density threshold of detachment in He operation, consistent with the result in the D plasma. Note that the plasma stored energy is slightly degraded from ~145 to ~130 kJ upon detachment.
In addition, the experiment in H-mode plasmas was also studied by utilizing a small amount of pure Ne puffing from the UO target in EAST. This was performed at Ip=0.45 MA and BT=2.4 T with favorable BT under the USN magnetic configuration, with ne~5.0×1019 m-3, Ptotal~6.0 MW, WMHD~165 kJ, and q95~6.0. As shown in figure 7, Jsat and Te, div decreased significantly with Ne seeding. Meanwhile, the plasma stored energy, WMHD, was also reduced by about 30%. Due to the high threshold power in helium plasma and relatively open divertor geometry, too much core radiation due to the injection of Ne may adversely influence the core plasma performance and even result in H–L transition or disruptions. Therefore, accurate feedback control of impurity seeding rates is essential to maintain stable detachment for long-pulse high-performance operation in EAST and ITER.
Divertor detachment in helium plasmas has been demonstrated on EAST for the first time with pure RF heating and an ITER-like tungsten divertor. Jsat and Te, div on the outer divertor target show a downward trend with the density ramping up in He plasmas, while the inner divertor plasma detaches at very low density, similar to the observations in deuterium plasmas. The density threshold for divertor detachment access in He L-mode plasmas is slightly higher than that in D L-mode plasmas for a given input power, and increases with the heating power. However, a much higher density is needed to achieve detachment in He H-mode due to the much higher power threshold for L–H transition in He than in D plasmas. The divertor detachment experiments with Ne seeding were also performed in L- and H-mode discharges with USN divertor configuration in EAST, and showed great prospects for reducing the density threshold of detachment in He operation. However, impurity seeding tends to contaminate core plasma and degrade confinement under strongly detached divertor conditions. These results will inform further investigations for the first phase of ITER operation in helium.
The authors would like to acknowledge the support and contributions of the EAST team. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFA0301300, 2017YFE0402500 and 2019YFE03030000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11905255, 12005004, 12022511, U1867222 and U19A20113), the Institute of Energy, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center (No. GXXT-2020-004), AHNSF (No. 2008085QA38), the CASHIPS Director's Fund (No. BJPY2019B01) and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS (No. ZDBS-LY-SLH010).
[1] |
ITER Physics Basis Editors 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2137 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301
|
[2] |
Shimada M et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S1 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01
|
[3] |
Reimold F et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 033004 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033004
|
[4] |
Leonard A W et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 086033 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa778c
|
[5] |
Guo H Y et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 086054 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab26ee
|
[6] |
Huber A et al 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 438 S139 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.022
|
[7] |
Field A R et al 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 095003 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa764c
|
[8] |
Asakura N et al 1996 Nucl. Fusion 36 795 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/36/6/I10
|
[9] |
Theiler C et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 072008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa5fb7
|
[10] |
Yan L W et al 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 390–391 246 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.075
|
[11] |
Liu J B et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 126046 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab4639
|
[12] |
Meng L Y et al 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62 065008 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ab877f
|
[13] |
Wischmeier M et al 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 313–316 980 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01427-7
|
[14] |
Pitts R A et al 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 313–316 777 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01429-0
|
[15] |
Canik J M et al 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 056116 doi: 10.1063/1.4982057
|
[16] |
Wan B N et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112003 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0396
|
[17] |
Guo H Y et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 013002 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/1/013002
|
[18] |
Zhang B et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 092001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab9be6
|
[19] |
Xu J C et al 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 083504 doi: 10.1063/1.4960181
|
[20] |
Xu J C et al 2018 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46 1331 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2018.2794533
|
[21] |
Zhang B et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 831 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/10/04
|
[22] |
Duan Y M et al 2011 Plasma Sci. Technol. 13 546 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/13/5/07
|
[23] |
Zhang L et al 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 123509 doi: 10.1063/1.4937723
|
[24] |
Mao H M et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 043502 doi: 10.1063/1.4979406
|
[25] |
Zhang S B et al 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 311 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/02
|
[26] |
Han X et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 073506 doi: 10.1063/1.4891040
|
[27] |
Wan B N et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 042010 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac2993
|
[28] |
Loarte A et al 1998 Nucl. Fusion 38 331 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/38/3/303
|
[29] |
Mayer M et al 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 390–391 538 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.087
|
[30] |
Ryter F et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 113003 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113003
|
[31] |
Wang H Q et al 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 052507 doi: 10.1063/5.0048428
|
[32] |
Li K D et al 2021 Nucl. Mater. Energy 26 100867 doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2020.100867
|
[1] | Feng XU (徐峰), Fang DING (丁芳), Xiahua CHEN (陈夏华), Liang WANG (王亮), Jichan XU (许吉禅), Zhenhua HU (胡振华), Hongmin MAO (毛红敏), Guangnan LUO (罗广南), Zhongshi YANG (杨钟时), Jingbo CHEN (陈竞博), Kedong LI (李克栋). Electron density calculation based on Stark broadening of D Balmer line from detached plasma in EAST tungsten divertor[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aad226 |
[2] | Pengfei ZHANG (张鹏飞), Ling ZHANG (张凌), Zhenwei WU (吴振伟), Zong XU (许棕), Wei GAO (高伟), Liang WANG (王亮), Qingquan YANG (杨清泉), Jichan XU (许吉禅), Jianbin LIU (刘建斌), Hao QU (屈浩), Yong LIU (刘永), Juan HUANG (黄娟), Chengrui WU (吴成瑞), Yumei HOU (侯玉梅), Zhao JIN (金钊), J D ELDER, Houyang GUO (郭后扬). OEDGE modeling of plasma contamination efficiency of Ar puffing from different divertor locations in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45104-045104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa7e8 |
[3] | Yuqing YANG (杨宇晴), Xinjun ZHANG (张新军), Yanping ZHAO (赵燕平), Chengming QIN (秦成明), Yan CHENG (程艳), Yuzhou MAO (毛玉周), Hua YANG (杨桦), Jianhua WANG (王健华), Shuai YUAN (袁帅), Lei WANG (王磊), Songqing JU (琚松青), Gen CHEN (陈根), Xu DENG, (邓旭), Kai ZHANG (张开), Baonian WAN (万宝年), Jiangang LI (李建刚), Yuntao SONG (宋云涛), Xianzu GONG (龚先祖), Jinping QIAN (钱金平), Tao ZHANG (张涛). Recent ICRF coupling experiments on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45102-045102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa599 |
[4] | Guozhong DENG (邓国忠), Liang WANG (王亮), Xiaoju LIU (刘晓菊), Yanmin DUAN (段艳敏), Jiansheng HU (胡建生), Changzheng LI (李长征), Ling ZHANG (张凌), Shaocheng LIU (刘少承), Huiqian WANG (汪惠乾), Liang CHEN (陈良), Jichan XU (许吉禅), Wei FENG (冯威), Jianbin LIU (刘建斌), Huan LIU (刘欢), Guosheng XU (徐国盛), Houyang GUO (郭后扬), Xiang GAO (高翔), the EAST team. Achieving temporary divertor plasma detachment with MARFE events by pellet injection in the EAST superconducting tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 15101-015101. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015101 |
[5] | CHEN Gen (陈根), QIN Chengming (秦成明), MAO Yuzhou (毛玉周), ZHAO Yanping (赵燕平), YUAN Shuai (袁帅), ZHANG Xinjun (张新军). Power Compensation for ICRF Heating in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 870-874. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/14 |
[6] | LU Xiaofei (陆小飞), FU Peng (傅鹏), ZHUANG Ming (庄明), QIU Lilong (邱立龙), HU Liangbing (胡良兵). Process Modeling and Dynamic Simulation for EAST Helium Refrigerator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 693-698. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/18 |
[7] | LI Changzheng(李长征), HU Jiansheng(胡建生), CHEN Yue(陈跃), LIANG Yunfeng(梁云峰), LI Jiangang(李建刚), LI Jiahong(李加宏), WU Jinhua(吴金华), HAN Xiang(韩翔). First Results of Pellet Injection Experiments on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 913-918. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/03 |
[8] | WANG Fuqiong(王福琼), CHEN Yiping(陈一平), HU Liqun(胡立群). DIVIMP Modeling of Impurity Transport in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(7): 642-649. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/7/03 |
[9] | ZHANG Shoubiao(张寿彪), GAO Xiang(高翔), LING Bili(凌必利), WANG Yumin(王嵎民), ZHANG Tao(张涛), HAN Xiang(韩翔), LIU Zixi(刘子奚), BU Jingliang(布景亮), LI Jiangang(李建刚), EAST team. Density Profile and Fluctuation Measurements by Microwave Reflectometry on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 311-315. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/02 |
[10] | YANG Yao, GAO Xiang, the EAST team. Energy Confinement of both Ohmic and LHW Plasma on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(3): 312-315. |
1. | Liu, X., Gao, S., Shi, Q. et al. Simulation studies of tungsten impurity behaviors in helium plasma in comparison with deuterium plasma via SOLPS-ITER. Physics of Plasmas, 2024, 31(6): 062502. DOI:10.1063/5.0191960 |
2. | Rees, D., Groth, M., Aleiferis, S. et al. Characterisation of the scrape-off layer in JET-ILW deuterium and helium low-confinement mode plasmas. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2024.101657 |
3. | Rees, D., Sissonen, J., Groth, M. et al. Comparison of the scrape-off layer two-point model for deuterium and helium plasmas in JET ITER-like wall low-confinement plasma conditions. Contributions to Plasma Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1002/ctpp.202300108 |
4. | He, Z., Lyu, Y., Wu, D. et al. Quantitative characterization of helium in the ITER-like co-deposition layer by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2023.101493 |
Shot number | Ip (MA) | BT (T) | ne/nG at onset of detachment @ UO | PSOL (MW) | L/H mode | Main fuel particle |
87165 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.58 | ~0.75 | L | He |
87173 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.76 | ~1.95 | L | He |
87174 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.81 | ~2.15 | L | He |
87175 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.97 | ~2.5 | L | He |
94359 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.7 | ~1.5 | L | He |
94363 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.73 | ~1.73 | L | He |
85094 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.52 | ~0.9 | L | D |
87702 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.56 | ~0.95 | L | D |
87706 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.57 | ~1.08 | L | D |
87707 | 0.4 | ~2.2 | 0.6 | ~1.3 | L | D |
87716 | 0.37 | ~2.4 | 0.62 | ~1.65 | L | D |
75074 | 0.45 | ~2.4 | 0.58 | ~1.8 | H | D |
75075 | 0.45 | ~2.4 | 0.62 | ~1.85 | H | D |
79343 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.83 | ~2.85 | H | D |
79344 | 0.4 | ~2.4 | 0.72 | ~2.15 | H | D |