
Citation: | Yu ZHANG, Haozhe WANG, Tao HE, Yan LI, Ying GUO, Jianjun SHI, Yu XU, Jing ZHANG. The effects of radio frequency atmospheric pressure plasma and thermal treatment on the hydrogenation of TiO2 thin film[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 065504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acb24e |
The effects of radio frequency (RF) atmospheric pressure (AP) He/H2 plasma and thermal treatment on the hydrogenation of TiO2 thin films were investigated and compared in this work. The color of the original TiO2 film changes from white to black after being hydrogenated in He/H2 plasma at 160 W (gas temperature ~381 ℃) within 5 min, while the color of the thermally treated TiO2 film did not change significantly even in pure H2 or He/H2 atmosphere with higher temperature (470 ℃) and longer time (30 min). This indicated that a more effective hydrogenation reaction happened through RF AP He/H2 plasma treatment than through pure H2 or He/H2 thermal treatment. The color change of TiO2 film was measured based on the Commission Internationale d'Eclairage L*a*b* color space system. Hydrogenated TiO2 film displayed improved visible light absorption with increased plasma power. The morphology of the cauliflower-like nanoparticles of the TiO2 film surface remained unchanged after plasma processing. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results showed that the contents of Ti3+ species and Ti–OH bonds in the plasma-hydrogenated black TiO2 increased compared with those in the thermally treated TiO2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and Raman spectra indicated that plasma would destroy the crystal structure of the TiO2 surface layer, while thermal annealing would increase the overall crystallinity. The different trends of XRD and Raman spectra results suggested that plasma modification on the TiO2 surface layer is more drastic than on its inner layer, which was also consistent with transmission electron microscopy results. Optical emission spectra results suggest that numerous active species were generated during RF AP He/H2 plasma processing, while there were no peaks detected from thermal processing. A possible mechanism for the TiO2 hydrogenation process by plasma has been proposed. Numerous active species were generated in the bulk plasma region, accelerated in the sheath region, and bumped toward the TiO2 film, which will react with the TiO2 surface to form OVs and disordered layers. This leads to the tailoring of the band gap of black TiO2 and causes its light absorption to extend into the visible region.
Visible light diagnostic is a crucial instrument for monitoring the plasma position, the plasma surface interaction, and especially for the Edge Localized Mode (ELM) eruption process in H-mode plasmas [1, 2]. It is indispensable for researching ELM-filament, which is a common and serious problem in magnetic confinement fusion research. ELM-filaments could cause severe heat and particle localized deposition, leading to material erosion for both the first wall and divertor target plates, impurity sputtering, and high particles recycling, which are particularly serious in International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) [3, 4]. A previous study showed that the pedestal temperature of ITER can be as high as 4 keV. For example, for a 10 MA plasma discharge in ITER, the energy loss due to a single ELM event can be up to 20 MJ [5], and it is far beyond the bearing capacity of the materials in the first wall.
A variety of visible light diagnostics for tokamak have been developed in the past 30 years [6–9]. In the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), the early visible light systems consist mainly of tangential stainless tubes [1]. An industrial camera was fixed at the end of the tube. The disadvantage of this method is that the camera was subjected to strong electromagnetic interference and high-level radiation from high-energy particles and x-rays, which led to a breakdown or even damage to the camera.
Furthermore, high-speed cameras require more space, so transmitting the light from the inside of the device vacuum chamber to the outside of the device is a practical solution. A wide-angle visible light system in visible range has been developed, while this system only can cover one band. This means that the system can only monitor the trajectory of a kind of particle at once. In order to monitor and thus compare the images of different bands and the trajectories of different impurities simultaneously, a more advanced system needs to be designed and developed. To achieve this goal, a new multi-band and high-speed visible light endoscope diagnostic has been developed and successfully tested on the EAST tokamak since 2021.
The results of the experimental test shown in the following contents indicate that this multi-band visible endoscope diagnostic with the high-speed camera of NAC ACS-1 M60/pco.dimax basically could meet its design requirement. This multi-band and high-speed visible light diagnostic will play an important role in image monitoring of different impurities and the identification of plasma boundary position to better achieve plasma feedback control.
The visible light diagnostic is designed for the identification and feedback control of the tokamak plasma boundary, the transport law of plasma impurity, and other related transient processes, such as plasma breakdown and dust plasma. Configuration reconstruction based on electromagnetic measurement diagnosis is difficult to adapt to the harsh working environment of the vacuum chamber in future fusion reactor. Therefore, it is necessary to look for alternative diagnostic methods for the reconstruction of plasma boundary. The most important application of the EAST visible light diagnostic is to identify and control the plasma boundary through visible camera, and provide a viable control scheme for future fusion devices. By comparing the difference in visible light radiated by different impurities at the boundary, the most suitable identification spectral line can be found to obtain the most ideal plasma boundary position. Therefore, the optical system is required to include different bands, covering the entire plasma cross-section and having a high spatial resolution. Combining the above factors and requirements, the endoscope is designed to cover the spectral range from 380 to 750 nm with a high spatial resolution, which is < 5 mm near the object distance. The resolution here refers to the spatial resolution corresponding to each pixel. The endoscope should be coupled to a set of three visible light cameras to monitor three different bands (corresponding to different impurities) at the same time. In addition, the system should be reasonably protected against the coating of the first mirror from wall cleaning and/or lithiation.
The filter is installed by plugging, which can be replaced manually without affecting the imaging quality of the optical path. The vacuum glass shall be easily replaced without dismantling the optical path. In case of accident, it can also be sealed by connecting the manual vacuum baffle valve with the standby KF40 vacuum flange to prevent vacuum leakage of the device. The position constraint relationship of each flange of the optical path is shown in figure 1 to ensure that the endoscope system can be built into the device smoothly. After the optical path being installed in place, the baffle connecting rod is located below the lens barrel. When standing outside of the window and looking in the window, the cylinder rotates clockwise to open the baffle, and the reverse rotation can close the baffle. The maximum rotatable angle of the baffle is 90°. The camera support connection interface flange shall be reserved in the optical path. The camera support shall be firmly connected with the optical path. The support can be adjusted in XYZ three-direction to ensure that the center of the camera sensor can be aligned with the center of the image plane of the optical path.
Coordinate system needs to be established for FOV simulation analysis. Taking the center of the EAST device as the origin of the coordinate system, as shown in figure 2, X direction passes through the origin and is perpendicular to the large flange surface of the window J, and Z direction is perpendicular to the horizontal plane and points to the top of EAST tokamak.
As shown in figure 3, the basic parameters for FOV simulating include viewpoint P, observation direction PC, horizontal FOV ∠B1PB2 and vertical direction FOV ∠D1PD2. It should be noted that PC is perpendicular to B1B2 and D1D2, and B1B2 parallels to the horizontal plane. The observation direction PC is defined by the azimuth (θ, φ) of the unit vector n on line CP. Figure 4 shows the specific parameter values of the corresponding horizontal FOV.
The first wall of EAST can be approximately obtained by rotating the polar section of the first wall around the Z-axis, as shown in figure 5. The last closed magnetic surface of the plasma is calculated by EFIT, which is also a rotation surface around the Z-axis. These two rotation surfaces can be drawn by the RevolutionPlot3D function of Mathematica (version 11.3). With the two graphic display options of ViewVector and ViewAngle, the observation effect of the light path along the PC direction at the viewpoint P can be simulated. In order that the horizontal FOV and the vertical FOV can be designed independently, the ImageCrop function is further chosen to cut the 3D graphics obtained by the RevolutionPlot3D function, to obtain the final simulation effect.
The viewpoint P and the observation direction
Based on the above design requirements and basic parameters for FOV, the FOV simulation diagram is obtained, as shown in figure 6. The FOV can cover the whole section of small circular, and the blind spot is located outside the plasma, which provides an important means for boundary identification and comparative study of the spatial distribution of different impurities.
Through FOV simulation and analysis, the parameters of the optical system are designed as follows: horizontal FOV (H):
The final performance parameters of the optical path shall be compatible with the alternative cameras given in table 1, mainly involving the size of the image plane and spatial resolution. It is required that the size of the image plane is not larger than the sensor size of NAC ACS-1 M60, and the optimal spatial resolution is designed to be less than 5 mm at object distance
Camera | Resolutions | Pixel size ( |
Frame rate (fps) |
pco.dimax | 1279 | ||
NAC ACS-1 M60 | 54 000 |
Fully superconducting tokamak EAST is the first fusion device with modern divertor configurations in the world [10–12]. The major radius and minor radius of the EAST device are 1.7 m and 0.4 m respectively. According to system requirements, the FOV of the endoscope is designed to be
The overall structure of the optical system is shown in figure 7. In the optical path, the first one is the front-end reflection system, which includes a parabolic mirror and a plane mirror. After passing through the reflection system, the optical axis rotated 180°–65°=115°, as shown in the partial enlarged detail of the optics header in figure 7 (the header in this figure should be turned
The main mirror is a paraboloid mirror, R= -133.533 mm, k=-1; luminous aperture: 86×64 mm2, off-axis: 20.1406 mm. The size of the plane mirror is 82×68 mm2. A small irregular cone is opened on the plane mirror. The results show that the aperture of the system is as small as 4 mm. In order to ensure a certain margin, the diameter of the small hole is set as 5.2 mm. According to the hole diameter of 5.2 mm, the FOV occupied by the blind spot is about 4.3°.
The turning angle of the plane mirror is determined according to the installation position and observation position of the lens. The turning angle of the plane mirror in the figure is 32.5°. After passing through the reflection system, the optical axis rotated 180°–65°=115°. In the front-end reflection system, the distance between the paraboloid mirror and the plane mirror is 70 mm. The distance between the small hole (plane mirror) and the collimating lens is 1277.238 mm; the luminous aperture of the collimating lens is 83.5 mm. After passing through the collimating lens, the beam is a parallel light. The distance between the small hole and the sealing window is 1664.351 mm; the diameter of the sealing window is 72.5 mm, the thickness is 12 mm, and the material is fused quartz. After passing through the sealed window, it is the color splitter for light splitting and the imaging mirror group of B, G and R bands. The optical structure of the three mirror groups is the same, the length of the lens barrel (front film to rear film) is 617.801 mm, and the focal length is about 182.99 mm. The structures of B, G and R bands are shown in figure 7.
The main technical specification data of the NAC ACS-1 M60 for visible light diagnostic applications are as follows. The resolution (H
Since the Nyquist frequency of the camera NAC ACS-1 M60 is 22 c mm-1, the 22 c mm-1 system transfer function is investigated for the MTF curve [13–15]. The MTF of the designed optical system for each band are analyzed with ZEMAX and shown in figures 8–10.
The maximum distortion of the system is 22.5% and the relative illuminance of the system for 0.55 μm is shown in figure 11.
The designed object distance of the system is 1750 mm. At 800 and 4800 mm object distances, the B band MTF curves are shown in figures 12 and 13 separately.
45° dichroic mirror SP1: the footprint of dichroic mirror SP1 is shown in figure 14 below. It can be seen that the luminous aperture is oval and the size is 70 mm × 100 mm.
45° dichroic mirror SP2: the footprint of dichroic mirror SP2 is shown in figure 15. It can be seen that the luminous aperture is oval and the size is 77 mm × 103 mm.
After the light passes through two 45° color separation plates, it will be offset. Based on the fused quartz material and thickness of 10 mm, the offset dt=3.15 mm.
The optical system was installed and tested on the EAST tokamak device during the April 2021 experimental campaign. There are only two NAC ACS-1 M60 cameras in hand. They were employed to image the optical red and green channels for the testing, and the blue channel was mounted with a pco.dimax high-speed camera instead of M60. The pixels size of pco.dimax is half of M60, i.e.
Based on the dichroic mirrors, the system is divided into three imaging mirror groups with the same structure and different bands, which are B (380–500 nm), G (500–580 nm) and R (580–750 nm) bands. The different wave bands correspond to different impurities radiation. On EAST device, R band corresponds to Dα, G band corresponds to Li Ⅱ and B band corresponds to C Ⅲ and He Ⅱ primarily. It can be seen from the figure 16 that there are significant differences on the low field side of different wave bands.
Figure 16 shows a visible transient image of shot #111 798 from 2021 campaign. For the image acquisition, the region of interest is 1200×1704 for blue channel with a frame rate of 2 kfps and 592×848 for green and red channels with frame rates of 10 kfps, respectively. The exposure times for blue, green and red channels are 80 μs, 15 μs, and 10 μs, respectively. It should be noted that the red channel is equipped with a filter of
In fact, various interesting and complex phenomena will be observed using this high-speed camera system, such as the spatial distribution and evolution of different impurities in the same FOV. Another phenomenon is the identification of plasma boundary. It should be noted that although the boundary on the low field side is not very clear to our naked eyes sometimes, the outermost boundary has been sufficiently identified through image recognition and machine learning. We have compared it with the EFIT data at the same time and found a good agreement which will be presented detailed in a separate paper in the future. The optical system will be used to contrastively study the spatial distribution of different impurities and related physics, including the recognition of plasma boundary.
The new high-speed and multi-band visible endoscope diagnostic has been implemented on the EAST tokamak to contrastively investigate the spatial distribution and evolution of different impurity spectrums in the same wide-angle FOV. The FOV of the optical system includes the inner and outer walls, the upper and lower divertors of EAST. The spatial resolution is less than 5 mm near the object distance
This research was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12075054, 12205040, 12175036 and 11875104).
[1] |
Fujishima A Honda K 1972 Nature 238 37 doi: 10.1038/238037a0
|
[2] |
Yang H G et al 2008 Nature 453 638 doi: 10.1038/nature06964
|
[3] |
Jiu J T et al 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 2087 doi: 10.1021/jp055824n
|
[4] |
Khan S U M, Al-Shahry M and Ingler W B Jr 2002 Science 297 2243 doi: 10.1126/science.1075035
|
[5] |
Liu B and Aydil E S 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 3985 doi: 10.1021/ja8078972
|
[6] |
Zuruzi A S et al 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 102904 doi: 10.1063/1.2185247
|
[7] |
Armstrong A R et al 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 862 doi: 10.1002/adma.200400795
|
[8] |
Ni M et al 2007 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 401 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009
|
[9] |
Bach U et al 1998 Nature 395 583 doi: 10.1038/26936
|
[10] |
Law M et al 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 22652 doi: 10.1021/jp0648644
|
[11] |
Liu J W et al 2009 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1 1645 doi: 10.1021/am900316f
|
[12] |
Wang X D et al 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 9346 doi: 10.1021/cr400633s
|
[13] |
Kang X L et al 2019 Catalysts 9 191 doi: 10.3390/catal9020191
|
[14] |
Leary R and Westwood A 2011 Carbon 49 741 doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.010
|
[15] |
Li H Y et al 2015 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 172–173 37 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.008
|
[16] |
Li M Y et al 2017 Mater. Charact. 124 136 doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.12.011
|
[17] |
Xing M Y et al 2011 Chem. Commun. 47 4947 doi: 10.1039/c1cc10537j
|
[18] |
Chen X B et al 2011 Science 331 746 doi: 10.1126/science.1200448
|
[19] |
Wang G M et al 2011 Nano Lett. 11 3026 doi: 10.1021/nl201766h
|
[20] |
Wang Z et al 2013 Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 5444 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201300486
|
[21] |
Yan Y et al 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 12708 doi: 10.1039/C4TA02192D
|
[22] |
Zhu Y M, Liu D S and Meng M 2014 Chem. Commun. 50 6049 doi: 10.1039/C4CC01667J
|
[23] |
Lu H Q et al 2014 RSC Adv. 4 1128 doi: 10.1039/C3RA44493G
|
[24] |
Ren S X et al 2018 Mater. Lett. 228 212 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.009
|
[25] |
Sener M E et al 2022 Green Chem. 24 2499 doi: 10.1039/D1GC03646G
|
[26] |
Zhang Y et al 2021 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 41 1313 doi: 10.1007/s11090-021-10185-4
|
[27] |
Haerudin H, Bertel S and Kramer R 1998 J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94 1481 doi: 10.1039/a707714i
|
[28] |
Liu H et al 2003 Chemosphere 50 39 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00486-1
|
[29] |
Wu H et al 2013 Nanotechnology 24 455401 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/45/455401
|
[30] |
Vázquez-Robaina O et al 2021 J. Phys. Chem. C 125 14366 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00124
|
[31] |
Liu N et al 2016 Chem. Eur. J. 22 13810 doi: 10.1002/chem.201602714
|
[32] |
Liu N et al 2014 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 14201 doi: 10.1002/anie.201408493
|
[33] |
Liu N et al 2014 Nano Lett. 14 3309 doi: 10.1021/nl500710j
|
[34] |
Wang C C and Chou P H 2016 Nanotechnology 27 325401 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/32/325401
|
[35] |
Chahrour K M et al 2020 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 22674 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.078
|
[36] |
Xu Y et al 2019 J. Power Sources 410-411 59 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.079
|
[37] |
Mohajernia S et al 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 1432 doi: 10.1039/C9TA10855F
|
[38] |
Wang X D et al 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1900725 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900725
|
[39] |
Junior A G et al 2020 Catalysts 10 282 doi: 10.3390/catal10030282
|
[40] |
Teng F et al 2014 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 148–149 339 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.015
|
[41] |
Islam S Z et al 2018 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 261 35 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.10.036
|
[42] |
Mohammadizadeh M R et al 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 350 43 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.196
|
[43] |
Xu Y et al 2019 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 39 937 doi: 10.1007/s11090-019-09961-0
|
[44] |
Huang X J, Yuan Q H and Ning Z Y 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073501
|
[45] |
Huang X J et al 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 113504
|
[46] |
Kato K, Xin Y Z and Shirai T 2020 Scr. Mater. 177 157 doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.021
|
[47] |
Xu Y et al 2019 Plasma Sci. Technol. 21 065501 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab033a
|
[48] |
Chen J Y et al 2022 Chemosphere 288 132664 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132664
|
[49] |
Safeen K et al 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 295201 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/29/295201
|
[50] |
Kuznetsov M V, Zhuravlev J F and Gubanov V A 1992 J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 58 169 doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(92)80016-2
|
[51] |
Sellappan R et al 2011 J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 335 136 doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.11.025
|
[52] |
Hannula M et al 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 1199 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02938
|
[53] |
Xu Y et al 2019 Coatings 9 357 doi: 10.3390/coatings9060357
|
[54] |
Miao L et al 2004 J. Cryst. Growth 260 118 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.010
|
[55] |
Zhang W F et al 2000 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 912 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/33/8/305
|
[56] |
Xiang Q J et al 2019 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 556 376 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.033
|
[57] |
Vandevelde T et al 1999 Thin Solid Films 340 159 doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01410-2
|
[58] |
Wennberg P O et al 1994 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65 1858 doi: 10.1063/1.1144835
|
[59] |
Hasegawa M 2014 Thermodynamic basis for phase diagrams
Treatise on Process Metallurgy ed S Seetharaman
(Amsterdam: Elsevier) Ch. 3.3 507
|
[60] |
Kubaschewski O and Alcock C B 1979 Metallurgical Thermochemistry 5th edn (Oxford: Pergamon) 378
|
[1] | Ming CHEN, Biao SHEN, Shinichiro KADO, Bihao GUO, Dalong CHEN, Furui CAI, Bingjia XIAO. Development of Dα band symmetrical visible optical diagnostic for boundary reconstruction on EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 025104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad0d4e |
[2] | Xiang HE (何湘), Chong LIU (刘冲), Yachun ZHANG (张亚春), Jianping CHEN (陈建平), Yudong CHEN (陈玉东), Xiaojun ZENG (曾小军), Bingyan CHEN (陈秉岩), Jiaxin PANG (庞佳鑫), Yibing WANG (王一兵). Diagnostic of capacitively coupled radio frequency plasma from electrical discharge characteristics: comparison with optical emission spectroscopy and fluid model simulation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 24005-024005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9a31 |
[3] | Heng LAN (兰恒), Guosheng XU (徐国盛), Kevin TRITZ, Ning YAN (颜宁), Tonghui SHI (石同辉), Yongliang LI (李永亮), Tengfei WANG (王腾飞), Liang WANG (王亮), Jingbo CHEN (陈竞博), Yanmin DUAN (段艳敏), Yi YUAN (原毅), Youwen SUN (孙有文), Shuai GU (顾帅), Qing ZANG (臧庆), Ran CHEN (陈冉), Liang CHEN (陈良), Xingwei ZHENG (郑星炜), Shuliang CHEN (陈树亮), HuanLIU (刘欢), YangYE (叶扬), Huiqian WANG (汪惠乾), Baonian WAN (万宝年), the EAST Team. Analysis of electron temperature, impurity transport and MHD activity with multi-energy soft x-ray diagnostic in EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8cbf |
[4] | Jianqiang HU (胡健强), Ahdi LIU (刘阿娣), Chu ZHOU (周楚), Xiaohui ZHANG (张小辉), Mingyuan WANG (王明远), Jin ZHANG (张津), Xi FENG (冯喜), Hong LI (李弘), Jinlin XIE (谢锦林), Wandong LIU (刘万东), Changxuan YU (俞昌旋). An accurate automated technique for quasi-optics measurement of the microwave diagnostics for fusion plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(8): 84002-084002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6794 |
[5] | FU Chao (付超), ZHONG Fangchuan (钟方川), HU Liqun (胡立群), YANG Jianhua (杨建华), YANG Zhendong (仰振东), GAN Kaifu (甘开福), ZHANG Bin (张斌), EAST Team. The Calibration of High-Speed Camera Imaging System for ELMs Observation on EAST Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(9): 884-889. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/9/02 |
[6] | ZHU Yilun (朱逸伦), ZHAO Zhenling (赵朕领), TONG Li (仝丽), CHEN Dongxu (陈东旭), XIE Jinlin (谢锦林), LIU Wandong (刘万东). Optics System Design of Microwave Imaging Reflectometry for the EAST Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 449-452. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/20 |
[7] | SHENG Liang(盛亮), LI Yang(李阳), SUN Tieping(孙铁平), CONG Peitian(丛培天), ZHANG Mei(张美), PENG Bodong(彭博栋), ZHAO Jizhen(赵吉祯), YUE Zhiqin(岳志勤), WEI Fuli(魏福利), YUAN Yuan(袁媛). Optical Diagnostics of Multi-Gap Gas Switches for Linear Transformer Drivers[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(7): 677-682. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/7/08 |
[8] | ZHU Yabin(朱亚滨), WANG Zhiguang(王志光), SUN Jianrong(孙建荣), YAO Cunfeng(姚存峰), WEI Kongfang(魏孔芳), GOU Jie(缑洁), MA Yizhun(马艺准), SHEN Tielong(申铁龙), PANG Lilong(庞立龙), SHENG Yanbin. Modification of Optical Band-gap of Si Films after Ion Irradiation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(7): 632-635. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/7/15 |
[9] | LIU Gongye (刘弓冶), LI Li (李黎), LI Xianfeng (李险峰), MA Yingjun (马英君), ZHAO Yanxin(赵延新), YANG Dong (杨东), LI Congbo (李聪博), MA Keyan (马克岩), YU Deyang (于德洋), YANG Yanji (杨彦佶), LU Jingbin (陆景彬), ZHU Lihua, et al. Yrast Band in 122I and Band Termination[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 412-414. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/17 |
[10] | MA Keyan (马克岩), YANG Dong (杨东), LU Jingbin (陆景彬), WANG Lielin (王烈林), WANG Huidong (王辉东), LIU Yunzuo (刘运祚), LIU Gongye (刘弓冶), LI Li (李黎), MA Yingjun (马英君), YANG Sen (杨森), LIU Shan (刘珊), et al. Magnetic dipole band in 113In[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 399-401. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/13 |
1. | Chen, M., Zhang, Q., Guo, B. et al. Real-time plasma boundary shape reconstruction using visible camera on EAST tokamak. Nuclear Fusion, 2025, 65(1): 016027. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad933e |
2. | Hou, J., Hu, J., Han, X. et al. Deep Learning–Based Plasma Optical Boundary Recognition and Reconstruction on EAST Tokamak. Fusion Science and Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1080/15361055.2024.2431783 |
3. | Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Shen, B. et al. Optical plasma boundary detection using improved YOLOv8 segmentation network on EAST tokamak. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.net.2024.103411 |
4. | Hu, J., Hou, J., Han, X. et al. Novel identification algorithm for plasma boundary gap based on visible endoscope diagnostic on EAST tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2024, 66(9): 095010. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ad6709 |
1. | Chen, M., Zhang, Q., Guo, B. et al. Real-time plasma boundary shape reconstruction using visible camera on EAST tokamak. Nuclear Fusion, 2025, 65(1): 016027. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad933e |
2. | Hou, J., Hu, J., Han, X. et al. Deep Learning–Based Plasma Optical Boundary Recognition and Reconstruction on EAST Tokamak. Fusion Science and Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1080/15361055.2024.2431783 |
3. | Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Shen, B. et al. Optical plasma boundary detection using improved YOLOv8 segmentation network on EAST tokamak. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.net.2024.103411 |
4. | Hu, J., Hou, J., Han, X. et al. Novel identification algorithm for plasma boundary gap based on visible endoscope diagnostic on EAST tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2024, 66(9): 095010. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ad6709 |
Camera | Resolutions | Pixel size ( |
Frame rate (fps) |
pco.dimax | 1279 | ||
NAC ACS-1 M60 | 54 000 |