Processing math: 100%
Advanced Search+
Nan JIANG, Xuechuan LI, Ju LI, Jie LI, Bing LIAO, Bangfa PENG, Guo LIU. Pulsed gas–liquid discharge plasma catalytic degradation of bisphenol A over graphene/CdS: process parameters optimization and O3 activation mechanism analysis[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 105501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acbde5
Citation: Nan JIANG, Xuechuan LI, Ju LI, Jie LI, Bing LIAO, Bangfa PENG, Guo LIU. Pulsed gas–liquid discharge plasma catalytic degradation of bisphenol A over graphene/CdS: process parameters optimization and O3 activation mechanism analysis[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 105501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acbde5

Pulsed gas–liquid discharge plasma catalytic degradation of bisphenol A over graphene/CdS: process parameters optimization and O3 activation mechanism analysis

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Jie LI, E-mail: lijie@dlut.edu.cn

    Bing LIAO, E-mail: liaobing17@cdut.edu.cn

  • 4The authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Received Date: December 02, 2022
  • Revised Date: February 13, 2023
  • Accepted Date: February 20, 2023
  • Available Online: December 05, 2023
  • Published Date: June 08, 2023
  • In the present work, pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma coupled with graphene/CdS catalyst was evaluated to eliminate bisphenol A (BPA) in wastewater. The optimization of a series of process parameters was performed in terms of BPA degradation performance. The experimental results demonstrated that nearly 90% of BPA (20 mg l−1) in the synthetic wastewater (pH = 7.5, σ = 10 μS m−1) was degraded by the plasma catalytic system over 0.2 g l−1 graphene/CdS at 19 kV with a 4 l min−1 air flow rate and 10 mm electrode gap within 60 min. The BPA removal rate increased with increasing the discharge voltage and decreasing the initial BPA concentration or solution conductivity. Nevertheless, either too high or too low an air flow rate, electrode gap, catalyst dosage or initial solution pH would lead to a decrease in BPA degradation. Moreover, optical emission spectroscopy was used to gain information on short-lived reactive species formed from the pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma system. The results indicated the existence of several highly oxidative free radicals such as ·O and ·OH. Finally, the activation pathway of O3 on the catalyst surface was analyzed by density functional theory.

  • Bisphenol A (BPA) is an organic raw material widely used to synthesize chemical products such as epoxy resin, polycarbonate, pesticides, antioxidants and coatings, but it is also an emerging contaminant [1]. BPA can be discharged into the environment by means of several different channels, including wastewater produced during industrial papermaking, plastics, as well as from landfill leachates [2]. When the human body ingests BPA, it will interfere with hormone activities, causing endocrine disorders, and thus endangering human health. Recently, advanced oxidation processes have been established for contaminant degradation by strong oxidization, including photocatalytic degradation [36], electrocatalytic degradation [7], Fenton and photo-Fenton-like oxidation [8], ozone oxidation [9] and non-thermal plasma degradation [10, 11].

    Among the above techniques, pulsed discharge plasma is particularly promising on account of its environmentally friendly properties, including generation in the gas phase [12], liquid phase [13] or gas–liquid hybrid phase [14]. It is generally believed that a discharge is more easily generated in the gas phase or gas–liquid phase than the liquid phase. During pulsed discharge plasma processes, a mass of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be generated in situ in liquid and gas–liquid environments, such as O3, H2O2, ·OH, ·O, etc, which can uniformly disperse in solution and degrade the organic contaminants. Hydroxyl radical (·OH) is of special concern among the ROS, because the oxidation potential of ·OH is 2.80 V and which is capable of oxidizing a broad range of contaminants non-selectively [15]. Simultaneously, physical effects such as ultraviolet light concomitantly produced in a gas–liquid discharge can also improve the efficiency of contaminant degradation.

    The amount of O3 generated during discharge is greater than that of ·OH, but the oxidizing capacity of O3 is much lower than that of ·OH [16]. Therefore, it is critical to boost the conversion of O3 to ·OH. The most promising way to promote the O3 conversion reaction is to introduce a catalyst. Different catalysts have been designed and employed to promote the conversion of O3 either in the gas or liquid phase [17, 18]. As a kind of n-type semiconductor photocatalyst, CdS has the unique advantage of various crystallite phases to enhance activity, a narrow band gap (2.42 eV) to achieve 'pseudo photocatalysis' and a suitable band structure for the reduction of O2/O3 to ·O2/·O3 [1923]. However, pure CdS has several problems such as a high charge recombination rate, serious photocorrosion, and the photogenerated holes are prone to oxidize sulfide ions in CdS, resulting in poor stability and low photocatalytic activity [2426]. Therefore, the photocorrosion and photocatalytic activity of CdS can be improved by doping two-dimensional planar monoatomic layer graphene oxide (GO) with a high specific surface area and carrier mobility. In previous work, we have explored the combination of plasma and a series of reduced GO–CdS (rGO(x)/CdS) catalysts to degrade BPA. Similar to the behavior of photocatalysts in producing ROS, the 'pseudo photocatalytic' effect of catalysts can be induced by the discharge and the production of ·OH enhanced [2729]. Generally speaking, ozonation of contaminants can proceed in two ways: (1) the direct reaction of O3 molecules and (2) the indirect oxidation of ·OH resulting from the decomposition of O3. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few literature reports regarding the mechanism of O3 activation to ·OH on the catalyst surface.

    The present study primarily focused on optimizing the effects of a series of process parameters on the efficacy of pulsed gas–liquid discharge plasma for BPA degradation, including pulse peak voltage, air flow rate, electrode gap, catalyst dosage, initial BPA concentration, initial solution pH, and solution conductivity. Furthermore, the short-lived active species generated during the pulsed gas–liquid plasma discharge was diagnosed by optical emission spectroscopy (OES). Finally, the activation mechanism of O3 on the catalyst surface was analyzed using density functional theory (DFT).

    The following chemicals have been used in this work: BPA, GO, cadmium acetate, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, acetone and ethanol. All reagents in this work were of analytical grade and purchased from Dalian Liaodong Chemical Reagent Factory, China. The solutions used in the experiment were all prepared with deionized water.

    The GO/CdS nanoparticles were synthesized by a hydrothermal method. The synthesis procedure is as follows. First, rGO was fabricated by the Hummers method [30], and then different weight ratios of rGO with Cd(AC)2·2(H2O) were dispersed into DMSO solution to obtain respective contents of 0%, 1%, 5%, 9% and 13% rGO nanocomposites, represented as CdS and rGO(x)/CdS (x = 1, 5, 9, 13), respectively. The preparation process of the rGO(x)/CdS catalyst is described in detail in the Supplementary Information. As described in our previous work [27], the highest BPA degradation efficiency was achieved over rGO(5)/CdS catalyst. Therefore, the experiments in this work were carried out over rGO(5)/CdS catalyst.

    The pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma (PHDP) for BPA degradation was ignited in a multi-needle to plate electrode, as shown in figure 1. 0.10‒0.30 g l−1 rGO(5)/CdS nanocomposites were added into wastewater for BPA degradation. The initial concentration of BPA varies from 20 to 80 mg l−1 and the solution volume for each experiment was 150 ml. The pH values of solution were adjusted to acidic (pH = 3, 6), neutral (pH = 7.5) and alkaline (pH = 9) for the study, and the solution conductivities were 10, 50, 75 and 100 μS m−1, respectively. The high-voltage electrode consisted of several needles with a 4:1 length to diameter ratio. A steel plate with a 1:3 thickness to diameter ratio served as the ground electrode. The distances between the high-voltage electrode and the ground electrode were 8, 10, and 12 mm. The electric characteristics were measured by a voltage probe, a current monitor, and an oscilloscope. The voltage and current waveforms during the discharge process are demonstrated in figure S1. The gas is pumped into the aeration tank through an air pump and a flowmeter, and then enters the solution tank via the hollow needle electrode to excite the pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma. The optical emission spectra (OES) emitted from the pulsed gas-liquid discharge plasma were identified by a spectroscopy (Princeton, Action SP2750). The BPA concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The methods for calculation of BPA degradation efficiency and the detection of active species are provided in the Supplementary Information.

    Figure  1.  Diagram of the experimental system.

    Contaminant degradation is affected by the generation rate and quantity of energetic electrons, active species and UV, which are related to the input voltage [31]. Generally, a higher peak discharge voltage will produce more high-energy electrons, thereby accelerating the formation of active species. Hence, the effect of the pulse voltage on the catalytic degradation of BPA by the plasma synergistic rGO(5)/CdS catalyst was first investigated (figure 2(a)). The degradation of 20 mg l−1 BPA solution was conducted at three pulse peak voltages (15, 17 and 19 kV).

    Figure  2.  (a) Effect of pulse peak voltage on BPA degradation and (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, pH value = 7.5, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    Notably, BPA degradation was an increasing function of processing time regardless of the pulse peak voltage applied to the reaction system. It is clear from figure 2(a) that the percentage degradation efficiency of BPA is promoted by increasing the discharge peak voltage, and better degradation performance can be achieved at a higher peak voltage. For target concentrations < 1.0 mM, the reaction rate is proportional to the initial concentration based on the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model [32, 33]. Hence, the first-order rate constants (r = dc/dt = kKC = k1C or ln C0/Ct = k1t) were calculated and are displayed in figure 2(b). When the peak voltages were 15, 17 and 19 kV, the kinetic constants reached 0.016, 0.025 and 0.037 min−1, respectively. That is because the number of active species will increase as the voltage increases. The increase in active species can increase the probability of collision with contaminant molecules, which will result in higher BPA degradation. Meanwhile, the intensity of the electric field and ultraviolet light generated in the reactor will also increase [3436]. Guo et al [37] studied BPA degradation in aqueous solution by plasma combined with activated carbon under different voltages and came to similar conclusions. Considering various factors comprehensively, 19 kV was selected as the discharge voltage in subsequent experiments.

    The air flow rate can significantly affect the physical and chemical effects in plasma system, such as the number of active species. When air is pumped into the system during the discharge process, many active species including O·, O3, ·OH, H·, N·, etc can be generated in the reaction system. Figure 3(a) shows the effect of air flow rate on BPA degradation. It can be seen from figure 3(a) that BPA degradation efficiency increases first and then decreases as the air flow rate increases from 2 to 6 l min−1. The highest degradation efficiency was achieved when the air flow rate was 4 l min−1. That is because the number of oxygen molecules increases with the air flow rate, which increases the O3 concentration. Zhang et al [38] reported that an increase in air flow rate favored the transfer of O3 from the gas phase to the liquid phase. In addition, the residence time of active species in the reactor can also be affected by the air flow rate. As the air flow rate increases, the residence time of active substances in the solution will be shortened, and thus the active particles cannot effectively dissolve into the solution and participate in the degradation of organic pollutants [39]. In contrast, a higher air flow rate will cause a large number of fine bubbles to merge into coarse bubbles, which will destroy the transfer balance and lead to a reduction in the gas–liquid mass transfer of active species [40]. In addition, as shown in figure 3(b), it can be concluded that the highest kinetic constant (0.036 min−1) can be obtained when the air flow rate is 4 l min−1.

    Figure  3.  (a) Effect of air flow rate on BPA degradation and (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, electrode gap = 10 mm, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, pH value = 7.5, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    In a discharge plasma system, the discharge mode will alter with the change in the electrode gap, which will affect the production of active species as well as the degradation performance. Figure 4(a) shows the effect of electrode gap on BPA degradation. As shown in figure 4(a), the BPA degradation efficiency increases as the electrode gap increases from 8 to 10 mm. With further increase in the electrode gap to 12 mm, the BPA degradation efficiency decreases. Generally speaking, the electric field is enhanced with a decrease in the electrode gap, which facilitates the formation of reactive species. Nevertheless, when the discharge gap is further reduced to 8 mm, the discharge mode transforms into an unstable spark discharge. Zhan et al [41, 42] also reported that the discharge mode transferred from a corona discharge to a spark discharge when the electrode gap was decreased, which resulted in a rapid decrease in voltage and an increase in current. Furthermore, the kinetic analysis also demonstrates that the maximum kinetic constant can be acquired with an electrode gap of 10 mm (figure 4(b)). Therefore, the optimal electrode gap is 10 mm.

    Figure  4.  (a) Effect of electrode gap on BPA degradation and (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, pH value = 7.5, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    The effect of rGO(5)/CdS catalyst dosage on BPA degradation efficiency was studied. As exhibited in figure 5(a), as the dosage of rGO(5)/CdS catalyst increased from 0.1 to 0.3 g l−1, the degradation efficiency first increased and then decreased. The highest degradation efficiency was achieved at 0.2 g l−1. A significant inhibitory effect appeared when the catalyst dosage continued to increase. We speculated that when the dosage of rGO(5)/CdS is increased within a certain range, the plasma can activate 'pseudo photocatalytic' behavior of the catalyst and generate more photogenerated e–h+ pairs, which is conducive to the production of ·OH, thereby improving the degradation BPA. However, adding too much catalyst not only leads to a higher cost but also reduces the number of reactive active sites due to the aggregation of solid particles, which is not conducive to contaminant degradation [43, 44]. Figure 5(b) displays the effect of catalyst dosage on the kinetic constants. It can be seen from figure 5(b) that the pseudo-first-order kinetic curve and the kinetic constants are consistent with those of the catalyst dosage. Therefore, the addition of 0.2 g l−1 of catalyst was considered to be the optimal dosage for BPA elimination in this work.

    Figure  5.  (a) Effect of catalyst dosage on BPA degradation. and (b) pseudo-first-order kinetic curves of BPA degradation (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm, pH value = 7.5, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    Figure 6(a) exhibits the evolution of BPA degradation efficiency over time at different initial BPA concentrations. It is obvious that BPA degradation efficiency and initial concentration demonstrate a negative correlation. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh pointed out that increasing the number of molecules per unit volume helps to increase the probability of collision with active particles, which is conducive to improving the degradation efficiency [45, 46]. However, we found that the reactive species is not enough to react with contaminants, resulting in a lower BPA degradation efficiency at the same time [47]. More time was needed for a higher concentration of BPA. Nevertheless, a higher degradation rate does not mean that more contaminants are decomposed. With initial concentrations of 20, 50 and 80 mg l−1, the absolute mass of BPA removed was 2.63 mg, 5.55 mg and 7.27 mg respectively. The absolute mass of BPA removed showed an opposite trend to degradation efficiency. The main reason for this phenomenon was that the collision probability between active species and BPA molecules was greatly increased. The higher initial concentration means that there is intense competition between reactant molecules for reactive species. Correspondingly, a maximum kinetic constant of about 0.036 min−1 can be achieved at 20 mg l−1, which is 1.6 and 2.3 times that for the 50 mg l−1 and 80 mg l−1 solutions (see figure 6(b)).

    Figure  6.  (a) Effect of initial concentration on BPA degradation and (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation (pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, pH value = 7.5, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    The initial solution pH can affect the number of active substances and the species of the organic compounds during the discharge plasma process [48]. There are two plausible reasons to analyze the effect of pH on the degradation of any organic compound: (1) pH affects the availability of reactive species and (2) pH affects the organic compound, which undergoes structural variations [49]. It has been reported that the structure of organic compounds changes due to protonation and deprotonation with variations in solution pH [5052]. Hence, it is vital to evaluate the effect of pH on BPA degradation by changing the solution pH between 3 and 9.

    The BPA degradation efficiency and reaction rate constant as a function of initial concentration are presented in figures 7(a) and (b). It can be clearly observed from figure 7(a) that a higher BPA degradation efficiency was acquired under neutral conditions (initial pH 7.5), followed by alkaline and weak acidic conditions. Meanwhile, kinetic constants also follow the same rule. This can be attributed to the fact that BPA is present in molecular form in aqueous solution when the initial solution pH is lower than the BPA dissociation constant (4.9). Conversely, BPA is present as in anion form at pH levels higher than 4.9 [53]. It has been reported that pollutants in anion form are react more easily with ROS produced from plasma [53, 54]. Secondly, H+ in the acidic solution will consume many electrons, which is not conducive to the formation of the active species ·OH [55].

    Figure  7.  (a) Effect of initial solution pH on BPA degradation, (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation and (c) effect of pH on zeta potential (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, solution conductivity = 10 mS cm−1).

    In addition, zeta potentials in different pH solutions were measured, as displayed in figure 7(c). Zeta potential is used to analyze the charge of rGO(5)/CdS catalyst. As shown in figure 7(c), the zeta potential of rGO(5)/CdS decreases with the increase of pH. The zeta potential was located between pH 9‒10 (~9.7), which is characterized as the point of zero charge (PZC). When the pH value of the solution is less than PZC, the catalyst surface is positively charged, while when the pH value of the solution is greater than PZC, the catalyst surface is negatively charged [56, 57]. Hence, there is non-interaction between rGO(5)/CdS and BPA at pH < 4.9. As pH begins to increase (4.9 < pH < 9.7), the surface of the catalyst has positively charged that attracts the BPA anion, and increases the degradation efficiency. At pH > 9.7, the negatively charged catalyst repels BPA anion and the degradation efficiency tends to decrease. Furthermore, Ren et al [58] reported that the surface of CoOOH was protonated or deprotonated when solution pH was lower or higher than its PZC. At PZC 3.1, the surface of CoOOH was mostly zero charged, and the trans-ferulic acid degradation became the maximum. However, the experimental results indicate that the highest removal effect is achieved under neutral conditions. This is because OH will annihilate the ·OH free radicals generated during the discharge process in alkaline environment [59], and then the BPA degradation would be restrained. Herein, the initial solution pH is controlled as 7.5 in the following experiment.

    Solution conductivity may affect the discharge characteristic as well as the generation of active species. Hence, it is essential to explore the effect of solution conductivity on BPA degradation in the plasma catalysis process. The effect of solution conductivity on BPA degradation efficiency is presented in figure 8(a). It is clear that the greater the solution conductivity, the worse the removal efficiency of BPA solution. That is because higher conductivity will be accompanied by more intensive UV light and higher plasma temperature, which may have a negative effect on reactive species production [50, 60]. Correspondingly, the kinetic constant also decreases from 0.035 to 0.014 min−1 when increasing the solution conductivity from 10 to 100 μS m−1, as shown in figure 8(b). Therefore, the following experiment was carried out at the initial conductivity of 10 mS cm−1.

    Figure  8.  (a) Effect of solution conductivity on BPA degradation and (b) kinetic curves of BPA degradation (BPA concentration = 20 mg l−1, pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm, catalyst dosage = 0.2 g l−1, pH value = 7.5).

    As is well known, ·OH is a vital oxidant that dominates plasma oxidations in water treatment, and ·O plays an important role in the formation of O3. Hence, the OES ranging from 200 to 850 nm were diagnosed to investigate the types of reactive species generated (including ·O and ·OH) in the pulsed gas–liquid plasma system, as shown in figure 9. The results show that the peaks located in the short-wave region belong to the spectrum of OH· emission, which is mainly the energy transition A2+ → X2Π. The peaks in visible range are the emission line of the hydrogen atom H (n = 3, 4, 5) → H (n = 2). The Balmer spectrum of H corresponds to Hα (656.3 nm), Hβ (486.1 nm) and Hγ (434.0 nm), respectively. The peaks in the infrared range belong to the spectrum of the oxygen atom O, corresponding to the energy state transitions of O 3p5P0 → 3s5S0 (777.1 nm) and 3p3P → 3s3S0 (844.6 nm), respectively. As in the air gas–liquid discharge, the active oxygen atoms are preferentially generated from O2. The formation of active species can be explained by equations (1)–(8) [14, 61]:

    O2+e2O·+e (1)
    H2O+e·OH+H·+e (2)
    H2O+e2e+H2O+ (3)
    H2O++H2O·OH+H3O+ (4)
    H2O+eH2O*+e (5)
    H2O+H2O*H2O+·OH+H· (6)
    H2O+H2O*H2O+·O+H2 (7)
    H2O+H2O*H2O+·O+2H·. (8)
    Figure  9.  OES of the air gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma (pulse peak voltage = 19 kV, frequency = 50 Hz, air flow rate = 4 l min−1, electrode gap = 10 mm).

    The contribution of various chemically reactive species to BPA degradation and plasma catalytic processes over the catalyst was investigated by the free radical capture test (figure 10). Benzoquinone (BQ), monopotassium phosphate (MP), iso-propyl alcohol (IPA) and sodium oxalate (SO) were acted as ·O2 (k = 2 × 109 M−1 s−1), e (k = 1.9 × 107 M−1 s−1), ·OH (k = 1.9 × 1010 M−1 s−1) and h+ (k > 4.7 × 107 M−1 s−1) scavengers, respectively [6265]. The plasma treatment time was 60 min. As presented in figure 10, after adding MP and SO, the degradation efficiency was reduced by about 41.4% and 53.6%, respectively, which was 1.39 and 2.16 times that of the plasma alone. These results indicate that e and photogenerated h+ play an important role in BPA degradation. In our previous work, the 'pseudo photocatalytic' mechanism of plasma-induced rGO(5)/CdS catalysts was elucidated. These results show that the adsorption range of visible light is widened and the separation of e–h+ pairs is accelerated when rGO is added to CdS [27].

    Figure  10.  The capture testing of active species in PHDP and PHDP catalytic systems at 60 min.

    In the case of plasma alone, the presence of BQ had almost no effect on BPA degradation (0.62%). However, the removal rate was decreased by 28.8% after introducing BQ, indicating that the derived reactive species produced by ·O2 play an important role in reaction process. In a plasma catalytic system, ·O2 can also be converted to ·OH (·O2 e HO2·/H2O2 O3 ·OH or ·O2e HO2·/H2O2 e ·OH) to participate in the BPA degradation reaction. Moreover, after the addition of IPA, the BPA degradation efficiency is also reduced to a certain extent, indicating that the presence of ·OH in the reaction system would also have an impact on BPA degradation.

    As a long-lived species, O3 can diffuse into the liquid phase and react with aqueous contaminants in air or oxygen discharge. At the gas–liquid interface, strongly oxidative compounds such as ·OH radicals and O atoms can be generated and dissolved in water, and organic pollutants can be removed through a series of oxidation reactions [66]. Variations in the concentrations of O3 and ·OH in PHDP and PHDP catalytic systems at different treatment times (30 min and 60 min) are exhibited in figure S3. As can be seen from that figure, the presence of rGO(5)/CdS catalyst reduces the O3 concentration in the PHDP system and promotes the generation of ·OH, which facilitates BPA degradation. Some of dominant reactions for O3 and ·OH production are presented in equations (9)‒(13) [6668]:

    O2+O·O3 (9)
    O3+·H·OH+O2 (10)
    O3+·OHHO2·+O2 (11)
    O3+HO2··OH+2O2 (12)
    ·O+H2O2·OH. (13)

    There are few studies on the mechanism of how O3 is activated and converted to ·OH on the catalyst surface gas-liquid discharge. Therefore, it is also necessary to study the evolution process of active species in the plasma catalytic system, especially the activation of O3 on the surface of rGO(5)/CdS nanocomposite catalyst. The activation pathway of O3 on the catalyst surface was therefore analyzed in detail by DFT. The method of theoretical simulation is described in text S4.

    Based on DFT calculations, the activation path of O3 adsorbed on the surface of rGO(5)/CdS is exhibited in figure 11. First, O3 binds to the C atom in rGO (figure 11(a)). The adsorption energy of this interaction is 0.72 eV, which effectively weakens the O1–O2 bond with a length of 1.98 Å (figure 11(b)), indicating that O3 adsorbed on the surface of rGO(5)/CdS is activated. Meanwhile, the O2–O3 bond with a length of 1.28 Å is enhanced, which means that O2–O3 can be desorbed into free O2 with a desorption energy of 0.04 eV (figure 11(b)). Subsequently, an O1 atom binds to H2O to form adsorbed ·OH. Finally, ·OH is desorbed, and this step determines the rate of the reaction, for which the energy barrier is 1.82 eV.

    Figure  11.  (a) The O3 activation pathway on the rGO(5)/CdS surface and (b) the corresponding energy profile. In free O3 and O2, the O–O bonds have lengths of 1.31 Å and 1.27 Å, respectively.

    The projected density of states (PDOS) of O atoms in O3 further confirms the activation mechanism of O3, as shown in figure 12(a). After the adsorption of O3 on the rGO(5)/CdS surface, the 2p state of the O1 atom is located below the Fermi level, indicating that electrons are clustered in the O1 atom. However, some 2p states of O2 and O3 atoms are above the Fermi level and not occupied by electrons. Therefore, the above results indicate that the electrons in rGO(5)/CdS are mainly concentrated in the O1 atom, which is directly bound to the C atom. This is further illustrated by the charge density difference mapping of O3 and rGO(5)/CdS (figure 12(b)). The sky blue and yellow isosurfaces represent negative and positive charges, respectively. The charge density isosurfaces in all figures are set as 0.002 e Å−3. The calculated results show that the electrons in rGO(5)/CdS (sky blue region) are mainly located between O1 atoms and rGO, which proves that O3 is activated.

    Figure  12.  (a) The calculated projected density of state plots of O3 on rGO(5)/CdS and (b) the charge density difference mapping between O3 and rGO(5)/CdS.

    Evaluation and optimization of the PHDP system over rGO(5)/CdS were performed in terms of BPA degradation performance in aqueous solution. The results indicated that increasing discharge voltage and decreasing initial BPA concentration and solution conductivity were found to be favorable for BPA degradation. With the increase of other process parameters (air flow rate, electrode gap, catalyst dosage and initial solution pH), the BPA degradation rate increased first and then decreased. The short-lived and long-lived active species generated from pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma were detected by optical emission spectroscopy, and their contribution to BPA degradation was evaluated by the free radical capture test. Finally, DFT calculation was used to analyze the activation mechanism of O3 on the catalyst surface. The O3 adsorbed on the surface of rGO(5)/CdS is activated and desorbed into free O2, and the step of desorption to ·OH is the rate-determining step of the reaction. The projected density of states of O atoms in O3 further confirmed the activation mechanism of O3.

    This work is supported by the Open Fund for State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution (No. GHBK-2020-006) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21876070).

    Supplementary material for this article is available https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-6272/acbde5

  • [1]
    Mao D N et al 2021 Chemosphere 262 128073 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128073
    [2]
    Chakma S and Moholkar V S 2014 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 6855 doi: 10.1021/ie500474f
    [3]
    Huang J X et al 2020 J. Hazard. Mater. 392 122355 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122355
    [4]
    Soori F and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2018 J. Mol. Liq. 255 250 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.169
    [5]
    Omrani N and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 389 112223 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112223
    [6]
    Rahmani-Aliabadi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2018 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 357 1 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.006
    [7]
    Yang S M et al 2021 J. Hazard. Mater. 407 124361 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124361
    [8]
    Costa-Serge N D M et al 2022 Appl. Catal. B 315 121537 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121537
    [9]
    Saeid S et al 2018 Appl. Catal. B 230 77 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.021
    [10]
    Jiang N et al 2020 J. Hazard. Mater. 393 122365 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122365
    [11]
    Jiang N et al 2013 Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 9898 doi: 10.1021/es401110h
    [12]
    Shang K F et al 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 065201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab538d
    [13]
    Patinglag L et al 2021 Water Res. 201 117321 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117321
    [14]
    Guo H et al 2018 Vacuum 156 402 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.07.044
    [15]
    Sun H et al 2023 Sep. Purif. Technol. 305 122406 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122406
    [16]
    Wei Y et al 2022 Chem. Eng. J. 431 133360 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133360
    [17]
    Ren J Y et al 2021 J. Hazard. Mater. 402 123772 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123772
    [18]
    Cheng J et al 2020 Chemosphere 253 126595 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126595
    [19]
    Mirsalari S A, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Massah A R 2022 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 33013 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17569-1
    [20]
    Mirsalari S A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 122 105455 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105455
    [21]
    Hemmatpour P and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2022 Chemosphere 307 135925 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135925
    [22]
    Omrani N and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 Photochem. Photobiol. A 400 112726 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112726
    [23]
    Mirsalari S A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 41651 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13601-6
    [24]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2011 Desalination 279 146 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.006
    [25]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2012 Desalination 284 157 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.050
    [26]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2014 Desalin. Water Treat. 52 3328 doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.797627
    [27]
    Jiang N et al 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 412 128627 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128627
    [28]
    Yousefi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Iran. J. Catal. 11 247
    [29]
    Soleimani F and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 16237 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.091
    [30]
    Park S and Ruoff R S 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 217 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.58
    [31]
    Sang W H et al 2021 J. Water. Process. Eng. 41 101997 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101997
    [32]
    Noruozi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 Chem. Phys. Lett. 752 137587 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137587
    [33]
    Omrani N, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Alizadeh M 2019 Desalin. Water Treat. 162 290 doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24352
    [34]
    Wang C et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 346 159 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.149
    [35]
    Guo H et al 2019 Sep. Purif. Technol. 218 206 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.001
    [36]
    Guo H et al 2020 Sep. Purif. Technol. 253 117540 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117540
    [37]
    Guo H et al 2018 Sep. Purif. Technol. 190 288 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.002
    [38]
    Zhang Y Z et al 2008 Chemosphere 70 1518 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.013
    [39]
    Duan L J et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 054009 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaab42
    [40]
    Tang S F et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 337 446 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.117
    [41]
    Zhan J X et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 334 2124 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.093
    [42]
    Zhan J X et al 2019 Sci. Total Environ. 661 266 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.183
    [43]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Shahriari E 2014 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 2719 doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.10.060
    [44]
    Pourtaheri A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2015 Spectrochim. Acta A 137 338 doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.08.058
    [45]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Hushmandrad S 2010 Appl. Catal. A 388 149 doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.042
    [46]
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Salimi Z 2011 Desalination 280 281 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.021
    [47]
    Zhou J et al 2020 Appl. Catal. B 277 119221 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119221
    [48]
    Li H et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 395 125091 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125091
    [49]
    Singh R K, Philip L and Ramanujam S 2016 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 7201 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01191
    [50]
    Jose J and Philip L 2019 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 7 103476 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103476
    [51]
    Jiang B et al 2014 Chem. Eng. J. 236 348 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.090
    [52]
    Li J, Sato M and Ohshima T 2007 Thin Solid Films 515 4283 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.02.070
    [53]
    Yang J R et al 2022 Chemosphere 286 131627 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131627
    [54]
    Hoigné J Bader H 1983 Water Res. 17 173 doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90098-2
    [55]
    Sang W J et al 2019 Chemosphere 223 416 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.029
    [56]
    Rezaei M and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieha A 2020 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 24749 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.258
    [57]
    Derikvandi H and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2017 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 490 314 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.069
    [58]
    Ren J Y et al 2019 Chem. Eng. J. 372 321 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.147
    [59]
    Singh R K, Philip L and Ramanujam S 2017 Water Res. 121 20 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.006
    [60]
    Wang J et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 385 123732 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123732
    [61]
    Sarangapani C et al 2017 Chem. Eng. J. 326 700 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.178
    [62]
    Wang T C et al 2018 J. Hazard. Mater. 357 279 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.014
    [63]
    Rao P S and Hayon E 1975 J. Phys. Chem. 79 397 doi: 10.1021/j100571a021
    [64]
    Rong S P and Sun Y B 2015 J. Hazard. Mater. 287 317 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.003
    [65]
    Buxton G V et al 1988 J. Phys. Chem. Refer. Data 17 513 doi: 10.1063/1.555805
    [66]
    Lukes P, Appleton A T and Locke B R 2004 IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 40 60 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2003.821799
    [67]
    Bruggeman P and Schram D C 2010 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 045025 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/19/4/045025
    [68]
    Lukes P et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 409 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/3/010
  • Related Articles

    [1]Pan LU, Dong-Wook KIM, Dong-Wha PARK. Simple reactor for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles with the assistance of ethanol by gas–liquid discharge plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 44005-044005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaeada
    [2]Yang CAO (曹洋), Guangzhou QU (屈广周), Tengfei LI (李腾飞), Nan JIANG (姜楠), Tiecheng WANG (王铁成). Review on reactive species in water treatment using electrical discharge plasma: formation, measurement, mechanisms and mass transfer[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 103001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aacff4
    [3]Ying CAO (曹颖), Jie LI (李杰), Nan JIANG (姜楠), Yan WU (吴彦), Kefeng SHANG (商克峰), Na LU (鲁娜). The structure optimization of gas-phase surface discharge and its application for dye degradation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(5): 54018-054018. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa3d5
    [4]Shuling XU (徐淑玲), Mingzhun LEI (雷明准), Sumei LIU (刘素梅), Kun LU (陆坤), Kun XU (徐坤), Kun PEI (裴坤). Neutronic investigation and activation calculation for CFETR HCCB blankets[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125603. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8bfe
    [5]Hailong GAO (高海龙), Tao XU (徐涛), Zhongyong CHEN (陈忠勇), Ge ZHUANG (庄革). Plasma equilibrium calculation in J-TEXT tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa7f26
    [6]LIU Yan (刘燕), YANG Li (杨丽), YANG Gang (杨刚), ZHANG Yanzong (张延宗), ZHANG Xiaohong (张小洪), DENG Shihuai (邓仕槐). Degradation of Dye Wastewater by Pulsed High-Voltage Discharge Combined with Spent Tea Leaves[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(12): 1135-1140. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/12/09
    [7]WANG Xianwei(汪献伟), XIE Fei(谢飞), JIN Huan(金环). Calculation and Optimization of ITER Upper VS Feeder Under an Electromagnetic Load[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(11): 1063-1067. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/11/12
    [8]WANG Zhaojun(王兆均), JIANG Song(姜松), LIU Kefu(刘克富). Treatment of Wastewater with High Conductivity by Pulsed Discharge Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(7): 688-694. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/7/10
    [9]V. PRYSIAZHNYI. Plasma Treatment of Aluminum Using a Surface Barrier Discharge Operated in Air and Nitrogen: Parameter Optimization and Related Effects[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(8): 794-799. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/8/15
    [10]LU Na(鲁娜), LI Jie(李杰), WU Yan(吴彦), Masayuki Sato(佐藤正之). Treatment of Dye Wastewater by Using a Hybrid Gas/Liquid Pulsed Discharge Plasma Reactor[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(2): 162-166. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/2/15
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. Liu, Y., Wu, X., Sun, Y. et al. Enhancing conversion and selectivity control in liquid-film dielectric barrier discharge plasma for bio-oil upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107738
    1. Liu, Y., Wu, X., Sun, Y. et al. Enhancing conversion and selectivity control in liquid-film dielectric barrier discharge plasma for bio-oil upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107738

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(12)

    Article views (24) PDF downloads (9) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return