
Citation: | Long MA, Yufan QU, Yuan LUO, Dehao XIE, Yanxi WANG, Shuo WANG, Guofeng QU, Peipei REN, Xiaobing LUO, Xingquan LIU, Jifeng HAN, Roy WADA, Weiping LIN, Linge ZANG, Jingjun ZHU. The research progress of an E//B neutral particle analyzer[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 034002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad0c20 |
An E//B neutral particle analyzer (NPA) has been designed and is under development at Sichuan University and Southwestern Institute of Physics. The main purpose of the {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA is to measure the distribution function of fast ions in the HL-2A/3 tokamak. The {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA contains three main units, i.e. the stripping unit, the analyzing unit and the detection unit. A gas stripping chamber was adopted as the stripping unit. The results of the simulations and beam tests for the stripping chamber are presented. Parallel electric and magnetic fields provided by a NdFeB permanent magnet and two parallel electric plates were designed and constructed for the analyzing unit. The calibration of the magnetic and electric fields was performed using a 50 kV electron cyclotron resonance ion source (ECRIS) platform. The detection unit consists of 32 lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) detector modules arranged in two rows. The response functions of \alpha, hydrogen ions ({ \mathrm{H}}^+ , {\mathrm{H}}^{+}_{2} and {\mathrm{H}}^{+}_{3}) and \gamma for a detector module were measured with ^{241}Am, ^{137}Cs and ^{152}Eu sources together with the 50 kV ECRIS platform. The overall results indicate that the designed {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA device is capable of measuring the intensity of neutral hydrogen and deuteron atoms with energy higher than 20 keV.
The neutral particle analyzer (NPA) [1–9] is one of the critical diagnostic devices in tokamak facilities [10–15]. It can provide the energy distribution function of fast ions, which is of great importance in the frontier physics study of energetic particles [16–22], and the isotope composition by measuring the charge exchange neutral particles (H, D, T and \alpha ) escaping from the hot plasma. Since the first historic NPA was built [1] and applied [23] on an Alpha magnetic confinement system, a large number of different types of NPAs have been successfully developed around the world [1–9]. For example, the {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} spectrometer [6] developed at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory has an energy range of 0.5 < A (amu) E(keV) < 600 and a mass resolution of {\mathrm{H}}^{+} , {\mathrm{D}}^{+} and {\mathrm{T}} ^{+} (or ^{3} {\mathrm{He}}^{+} ) ions. The compact NPA [5] developed for the Wendelstein 7-AS stellarator facility had the main advantage of providing simultaneous analysis for hydrogen (0.8–80 keV) and deuterium (0.8–40 keV) with a more compact structure (size: 169 mm \times 302 mm \times 326 mm, weight: 42.5 kg).
A new {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA is under development at Sichuan University and Southwestern Institute of Physics for the measurement of the fast ion distribution function in the HL-2A/3 tokamak. It is designed to measure H and D atoms in the energy range of 20–200 keV, with energy resolutions of 30% at 20 keV and 10% at 200 keV. It consists of a stripping unit, an analyzing unit and a detection unit. A gas stripping chamber was adopted to ionize the neutral particles [24, 25]. An analyzing unit with tandem-type parallel electric and magnetic fields was designed to realize the designed mass and energy resolutions [25, 26]. A detector array consisting of 32 lutetium–yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) detector modules arranged in two rows was developed to measure the ions with different energies and masses.
In this article, we present the recent progress in the development of the above {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA. The article is organized as follows. The results of the simulations and beam tests for the stripping unit are presented in section 2. The design and calibration of the analyzing unit are given in section 3. The responses and the low energy limit of the LYSO detector module are presented in section 4. A brief summary is given in section 5.
The stripping unit provides a place to ionize the neutral particles escaping from hot plasma. To avoid replacing the damaged stripping foil frequently and for easy maintenance, a gas stripping chamber was adopted as the stripping unit for the {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA. {\mathrm{H}} _2 gas was chosen as the stripping gas to avoid introducing additional elements into the tokamak, which would damage the plasma operation. A cylinder chamber with two identical differential pipes was employed as the stripping chamber. The main purpose of adopting this structure was to maintain a high pressure in the stripping chamber and a high vacuum in the outside vacuum chamber. Figure 1 shows a schematic view of the updated stripping unit, which is a further optimized version of the design in reference [24, 25], where the inner diameter of differential pipes is reduced from 4 mm to 2 mm, and the length of the gas chamber is increased from 56 mm to 82 mm.
An updated stripping unit with a Faraday cup (FC) in the downstream vacuum chamber was constructed. Figure 2 shows a photo of the unit. A needle valve together with an electromagnetic valve controlled by a proportional-integral-derivative controller was connected to the gas inlet flange to maintain the stability of the {\mathrm{H}}_2 gas flow. Two diaphragm vacuum gauges, Pfeiffer CMR362 and CMR365, were used to measure the pressure at the gas inlet ( P_0 ) and the vacuum chamber, respectively. Applying the two measured pressures as the boundary conditions in the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculation using Ansys Fluent [24, 27], the pressure distribution along the path of the incident neutral particles was obtained. Figure 3 shows a typical pressure distribution along the path of the incident neutral particles in the stripping chamber for the gas inlet pressure of P_0 = 40 Pa. A constant pressure of around 31 Pa, which is more than three times that in a previous design [24], in the center of the stripping chamber, and a linear decreasing pressure inside the differential pipe were obtained from the Ansys Fluent calculations.
In our previous work in reference [24, 25], a GEANT4 [28, 29] Monte Carlo simulation code was applied to simulate the global stripping efficiency ( R\times f_{+1} ) of an earlier version of the stripping unit. By changing the structure and the pressure distribution in the code to match the updated stripping unit, updated global stripping efficiencies were obtained for the incident H and D atoms in the energy range of 20–200 keV. Figure 4 shows R\times f_{+1} as a function of the gas inlet pressure P_0 for H and D atoms with incident energies of 20, 100 and 200 keV in (a), (b) and (c), respectively. As the thickness of the stripping gas increases in the updated stripping chamber, a lower P_0 value is obtained to get the same global stripping efficiency, compared to the P_{0} value in the previous unit. The global efficiency increases as the gas inlet pressure P_0 increases and reaches a maximum value at P_0 of around 40 Pa for the maximum designed energy (200 keV) in the updated stripping chamber. The pressure P_0 = 40 Pa, which is four times less than that in the previous design [24], is obtained as the optimum working pressure for the stripping unit.
Since neutral particles are not easy to handle as the incident particles for a precise measurement, it is difficult to make direct verification of the simulated results in the laboratory. However, since the stripping cross-sections from neutrals to ions and the captured cross-sections from ions to neutrals are comparable at a given energy [24], the verification can be performed in a reverse scenario, using the ion beams. In the following part we describe the results in this scenario. The reverse experiments were performed using the 50 kV electron cyclotron resonance ion source (ECRIS) platform at Sichuan University. Figure 5 shows a schematic diagram of the ECRIS platform. A 30° bending dipole magnet was connected to the ECRIS to select different beam species. A collimator with a diameter of 5 mm was installed between the ECRIS and the dipole magnet to limit the beam spot. In the experiment, the stripping unit was connected to the ECRIS platform downstream of chamber B. Proton beams with incident energies of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 keV were delivered to the entrance hole of the stripping unit. After undergoing the charge exchange processes in the stripping chamber filled with {\mathrm{H}}_2 gas, the sum current of the charged particles was measured by the FC in the downstream chamber of the stripping unit. Before and after each measurement, the beam current without the {\mathrm{H}} _2 gas was also measured as a reference. Figure 6 shows the ratio of current with and without {\mathrm{H}} _2 gas as a function of the proton energy for gas inlet pressures of P_0 = 20, 30 and 40 Pa. The current ratio increases rapidly as the proton energy increases for all P_0 values. Above the incident energy of 10 keV, a decreasing trend of less than 30% is found when P_0 increases for a given incident energy. At the lowest incident energy of 5 keV, on the other hand, the current ratio decreases by more than 50% when P_0 increases from 20 Pa to 40 Pa. A further detailed comparison of the measurement and that of the GEANT4 simulation is underway.
In the analyzing unit, parallel electric and magnetic fields were adopted to realize the designed mass and energy resolution. COMSOL multiphysics simulation software [30] was used to design the electric and magnetic fields. The design of the analyzing unit was presented in our previous work in reference [25, 26]. The magnet is composed of a yoke and two poles, with two pieces of NdFeB magnet placed between them. The residual magnetic field strength of the NdFeB magnet is B_{\rm{r}} = 1.2 T. A maximum magnetic field strength of 0.8 T was obtained at the gap. Two polished copper plates with a space of 2 cm were used as the electric plates, and the electric field was set to 5 kV cm−3. Figure 7 shows the simulation results of the ion trajectories using COMSOL software. The {\mathrm{H}} ^{+} and {\mathrm{D}}^{+} ions in the energy range of 20–200 keV (10–200 keV for {\mathrm{D}} ^{+} ) are clearly separated.
The permanent magnet and the electric plates were constructed according to the design. The ion beam calibration of the magnetic and electric fields was performed at the 50 kV ECRIS platform at Sichuan University. A trapezoid-shape vacuum chamber was constructed to embed the permanent magnet and the electric plates. A collimator with a hole diameter of 3 mm was placed at the entrance flange of the vacuum chamber to limit the beam spot size. In order to record the ion position at the detector plane, a transparent glass plate with a thin Ag/ZnS foil on the entrance surface was placed at the detector plane. The ion position was then recorded by a camera taking photos through the glass window of the vacuum chamber. Figure 8 shows a photo of the vacuum chamber installed on the ECRIS platform in (a) and a photo of the magnet–electrode arrangement inside the vacuum chamber in (b).
Three beam species, i.e. \mathrm{H}^+ , \mathrm{H}_2^+ and \mathrm{H}_3^+ , were produced by the ECRIS when working with \mathrm{H}_2 gas. Since {\mathrm{H}} ^{+}_{2} and {\mathrm{D}} ^{+} have the same charge and a similar mass, they have almost the same trajectory in the magnetic and electric fields, and hit the same position at the detector plane. Therefore, the {\mathrm{H}} ^{+}_{2} cluster beam was used to test the magnetic and electric fields instead of {\mathrm{D}} ^{+} . Figure 9 shows a photo of the 35 keV proton beam position on the detector plane recorded by the camera. The blue rectangle spot is the proton beam position. The spreading of the beam spot in the horizontal direction is about 5 mm, which is caused by different entrance positions in the horizontal direction at the entrance surface of the magnet. The spot size in the vertical direction is about 2 mm, which is smaller than the diameter of the collimator. This indicates that a focusing trajectory of the ions in the vertical direction was achieved for the designed magnetic field. The experimental data of the ion beam test are under further analysis.
Several kinds of detectors have been applied to detect the ionized particles in NPA, such as an ion–electron transformer together with a scintillator counter [1, 4], a scintillator deposited on a photomultiplier tube [2, 3], a channel electron multiplier [5] and a microchannel plate detector [6]. Considering the high neutron background and large stray magnetic fields near the tokamak facility, an inorganic scintillator of LYSO coupled to the Silicon PhotoMultiplier (SiPM) was adopted as the detector module. It has the advantages of fast time response, low operation voltage, insensitivity to the magnetic fields, suitability for bareness use and easy machining. The detection unit was designed to have 32 detector modules arranged into two rows. A prototype detector module was constructed using a bare LYSO crystal with a sensitive surface of 6 mm \times 6 mm and a thickness of 1 mm coupled to a Hamamatsu SiPM [31] with the same sensitive area. According to the COMSOL simulation, the 6 mm \times 6 mm sensitive area can achieve the designed energy resolution. The main function of the detector module is to count the low-energy ions with a high efficiency. The efficiency at the low-energy limit of the module is crucial for the NPA application. On the other hand, the energy measurement is not crucial for this application, since the detector is used as a hit detector. However, the LYSO crystal has a natural background from ^{176} Lu \beta decay. Thus, the energy measurement may be useful to evaluate the background contribution in the actual measured counts.
A ^{241} Am source was used to measure the response of the detector module. The signal was recorded using a CAEN DT5724B digitizer. By changing the distance between the source and the LYSO surface of the module in the air, the response function for the \alpha particles was obtained. The \alpha energy deposit inside the LYSO crystal was obtained using SRIM [32]. Figure 10 shows the spectra of the ^{241} Am source measurements. The background mainly comes from the \beta decay of ^{176} Lu in the LYSO crystal. The counting rate of the background is \sim 10 Hz, which can be further reduced by reducing the thickness of the LYSO. The peaks around the 40 channel and 200 channel are the two low-energy \gamma rays of 13.9 and 59.5 keV from the ^{241} Am source. One can see in figure 10 that the \alpha peak position decreases as the distance increases. The ^{137} Cs and ^{152} Eu sources were also used together with the ^{241} Am source to obtain the response of low-energy \gamma rays in the module in separate runs. \gamma rays of 32.19 keV and 661.66 keV from ^{137} Cs, and of 40.12 keV, 89.85 keV and 121.78 keV from ^{152} Eu, were also measured to evaluate the response of the \gamma rays.
In the \alpha response measurements, low-energy \alpha particles were obtained by passing through a certain thickness of air. The straggling in the air causes large uncertainty in the \alpha energy, especially at the low-energy end. More accurate measurements were performed at the 50 kV ECRIS platform. Figure 11 shows the detector setup in the ECRIS platform. A collimator with a very small hole of 0.05 mm diameter was installed upstream of the 5 mm collimator shown in figure 5 to reduce the beam intensity. Another 3 mm collimator was installed 40 mm in front of the LYSO to restrict the beam spot. The {\mathrm{H }}^+ , {\mathrm{H}} _2^+ and {\mathrm{H}}_3^+ beams were delivered to the detector module through the collimators. The counting rate was limited below 2000 Hz during the experiments. Figure 12 shows the spectra of {\mathrm{H}}^+ beams with energies of 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40 keV in the black, red, green, blue and pink histograms, respectively. The solid curves are the Gaussian fit around the peaks. A threshold around the 10 channel cuts off more than half the peak for 2.5 and 5 keV H ^+ , and about 10% for 10 keV, which is acceptable and can be corrected for the NPA application. {\mathrm{H}} _2^+ and {\mathrm{H}} _3^+ give similar results. These results indicate that a low-energy limit of 10 keV is achieved for the detector module in hydrogen ion measurement.
The responses of \alpha , \mathrm{H}^+ , {\mathrm{H}}_2^+ , {\mathrm{H}}_3^+ and \gamma are summarized in figure 13. The error bars of the data points are the full width at half maximum of the Gaussian fits. The solid, dashed and long dashed curves are the linear fit of \alpha , hydrogen ions ( \mathrm{H}^+ , {\mathrm{H}} _2^+ and {\mathrm{H}} _3^+ ) and \gamma , respectively. One can see in figure 13 that three clearly separate curves indicate different response functions for \alpha , hydrogen ions and \gamma in the module. A larger pulse height is obtained for the lighter charged particles ( \gamma is equivalent to its secondary electrons). Due to the large errors for the low-energy \alpha particles and \gamma rays, and the lack of lower energy measurement, the extrapolated zero points show some deviations among the different particles. The linear changes in the energy as a function of the channel number for \alpha , hydrogen ions and \gamma indicate good responses for these particles in the module.
The energy range designed for the {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA is 20–200 keV. As shown in figure 12, about 90% of 10 keV protons were detected by the detector module and nearly 100% of the 20 keV protons were detected. This indicates that the detector module has sufficient efficiency for protons in the designed energy range. The {\mathrm{H}}_2^+ particles have similar results, which indicates that the detector module also has nearly 100% efficiency for {\mathrm{D}} ^+ particles. As presented in figure 13, the responses of the \gamma rays are almost 10 times larger than those of \alpha particles at \gamma energies higher than 10 keV and a few times larger than those of hydrogen ions at hydrogen energies below 50 keV. These high \gamma responses could be a potential problem when using the LYSO detector array in a high gamma ray background. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the \gamma sensitivity and the background \gamma rays from the tokamak facility. To reduce the \gamma sensitivity, the thickness of the LYSO detector is reduced to 0.08 mm for the updated unit from the one with 1 mm used in the test experiments. For the background \gamma rays, sufficient additional shielding outside the vacuum chamber of the {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA device may be required.
An {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA was designed and is under development for the HL-2A/3 facility to study the frontier physics of fast ions. A gas stripping chamber with two differential pipes was adopted as the stripping unit. An updated stripping unit with an FC was constructed. The pressure distribution inside the stripping chamber was studied using Ansys Fluent with the measured boundary pressures. A GEANT4 Monte Carlo code was applied to study the stripping efficiency of the stripping unit, and an optimum gas inlet pressure of P_0 = 40 Pa was obtained. The ion beam tests of the stripping efficiency were carried out at the 50 kV ECRIS platform at Sichuan University. An increasing trend of the measured current ratio was observed as the incident energy increased. Further comparison of the GEANT4 simulations and the experiments is currently in progress. The analyzing unit with the parallel electric and magnetic fields was designed using COMSOL multiphysics software. A permanent magnet with a maximum magnetic field strength of 0.8 T was designed and constructed to provide the magnetic field. Two parallel electric plates made of copper were used to provide the 5 kV cm ^{-1} electric field. The calibration of the analyzing unit was also performed at the 50 kV ECRIS platform. The particle position was recorded by the Ag/ZnS foil placed at the detector plane. The detection unit consisted of 32 LYSO detector modules arranged in two rows. The response functions of \alpha , hydrogen ions ( \mathrm{H}^+ , { \mathrm{H}}^{+}_{2} and {\mathrm{H}} ^{+}_{3} ) and \gamma in the detector module were measured with ^{241} Am, ^{137} Cs and ^{152} Eu sources together with the 50 kV ECRIS platform. The overall results indicate that the designed {\boldsymbol{{E}} }// {\boldsymbol{{B}}} NPA device is capable of measuring the intensity of neutral hydrogen and deuteron atoms with energy higher than 20 keV.
[1] |
Afrosimov V V et al 1960 Zhur. Tekh. Fiz. 30 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4055215
|
[2] |
Afanasyev V I et al 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 2338 doi: 10.1063/1.1542664
|
[3] |
Afanasyev V I et al 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 621 456 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.201
|
[4] |
Petrov M P et al 2021 Eur. Phys. J. H 46 5 doi: 10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00009-6
|
[5] |
Chernyshev F V et al 2004 Instru. Exp. Tech. 47 214 doi: 10.1023/B:INET.0000025204.01783.1a
|
[6] |
Medley S S and Roquemore A L 1998 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 2651 doi: 10.1063/1.1148994
|
[7] |
Zhu Y B et al 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 10D304
|
[8] |
Li W et al 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 10D702
|
[9] |
Polosatkin S et al 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 720 42 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.12.039
|
[10] |
Liu D Q et al 2003 Fusion Eng. Des. 66–68 147
|
[11] |
Wan Y X et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 102009 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa686a
|
[12] |
Wu S and The EAST team 2007 Fusion Eng. Des. 82 463
|
[13] |
Bell M G The tokamak fusion test reactor In: Neilson G H Magnetic Fusion Energy Woodhead Publishing 2016: 119
|
[14] |
Horton L et al 2016 Fusion Eng. Des. 109 925
|
[15] |
Shimada M et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S1 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01
|
[16] |
Chen W and Wang Z X 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 125001 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/37/12/125001
|
[17] |
Chen L and Zonca F 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 015008 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015008
|
[18] |
Shi P W, Chen W and Duan X R 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 035202 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/3/035202
|
[19] |
Chen Y et al 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 095201 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/37/9/095201
|
[20] |
Madsen B et al 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62 115019 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/abb79b
|
[21] |
Gorelenkov N N, Pinches S D and Toi K 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 125001 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/12/125001
|
[22] |
Ding X T and Chen W 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 094008 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aad27a
|
[23] |
Afrosimov V V et al 1962 Nuclear Fusion (Austria) Suppl. 2, Pt. 3 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4695507
|
[24] |
Luo Y et al 2021 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32 69 doi: 10.1007/s41365-021-00909-8
|
[25] |
Zang L G et al 2022 Plasma Sci. Technol. 24 064002 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac6090
|
[26] |
Zang L G et al 2020 Plasma Fusion Res. 15 2402036 doi: 10.1585/pfr.15.2402036
|
[27] |
ANSYS https://www.ansys.com/
|
[28] |
Agostinelli S et al 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506 250 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
|
[29] |
Allison J et al 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 835 186 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125
|
[30] |
COMSOL https://cn.comsol.com/
|
[31] |
MPPC (multi-pixel photon counter) https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/s13360_series_kapd1052e.pdf
|
[32] |
SRIM – The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter http://www.srim.org/
|
[1] | Linge ZANG, Yufan QU, Yuan LUO, Weiping LIN. Design of the stripping unit and the electromagnetic analysis unit for the E//B NPA on HL-2A/2M tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 064002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac6090 |
[2] | Yahong XIE (谢亚红), Chundong HU (胡纯栋), Sheng LIU (刘胜), Yuanlai XIE (谢远来), Yongjian XU (许永建), Lizhen LIANG (梁立振), Caichao JIANG (蒋才超), Peng SHENG (盛鹏), YumingGU(顾玉明), Jun LI (李军), Zhimin LIU (刘智民). R&D progress of high power ion source on EAST-NBI[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(1): 14023-014023. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8c6c |
[3] | Gerhard FRANZ, Ralf MEYER, Markus-Christian AMANN. Correlation of III/V semiconductor etch results with physical parameters of high-density reactive plasmas excited by electron cyclotron resonance[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa89e0 |
[4] | Yizhou JIN (金逸舟), Juan YANG (杨涓), Jun SUN (孙俊), Xianchuang LIU (刘宪闯), Yizhi HUANG (黄益智). Experiment and analysis of the neutralization of the electron cyclotron resonance ion thruster[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(10): 105502. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa76d9 |
[5] | Doo-Hee CHANG, Seung Ho JEONG, Min PARK, Tae-Seong KIM, Bong-Ki JUNG, Kwang Won LEE, Sang Ryul IN. Discharge Characteristics of Large-Area High-Power RF Ion Source for Positive and Negative Neutral Beam Injectors[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(12): 1220-1225. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/12/13 |
[6] | WEI Jianglong (韦江龙), XIE Yahong (谢亚红), LIANG Lizhen (梁立振), GU Yuming (顾玉明), YI Wei (邑伟), LI Jun (李军), HU Chundong (胡纯栋), XIE Yuanlai (谢远来), JIANG Caichao (蒋才超), TAO Ling (陶玲), SHENG Peng (盛鹏), XU Yongjian (许永建). Design of the Prototype Negative Ion Source for Neutral Beam Injector at ASIPP[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(9): 954-959. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/9/13 |
[7] | JIN Yizhou (金逸舟), YANG Juan (杨涓), TANG Mingjie (汤明杰), LUO Litao (罗立涛), FENG Bingbing (冯冰冰). Diagnosing the Fine Structure of Electron Energy Within the ECRIT Ion Source[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(7): 744-750. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/7/08 |
[8] | Tae-Seong KIM, Seung Ho JEONG, Doo Hee CHANG, Kwang Won LEE, Sang-Ryul IN. Performance of a New Ion Source for KSTAR Tokamak Plasma Heating[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(6): 620-624. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/6/15 |
[9] | XIE Yahong(谢亚红), HU Chundong(胡纯栋), LIU Sheng(刘胜), JIANG Caichao(蒋才超), LIANG Lizhen(梁立振), LI Jun(李军), XIE Yuanlai(谢远来), LIU Zhimin(刘智民). The Arc Regulation Characteristics of the High-Current Ion Source for the EAST Neutral Beam Injector[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 429-432. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/24 |
[10] | JIANG Lina(姜丽娜), WANG Hongyu(王虹宇), SUN Peng(孙鹏). The Single Particle Theory of Backward-Wave Amplifications Based on Electron Cyclotron Maser with a Rectilinear Beam[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(1): 12-16. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/1/03 |