Processing math: 100%
Advanced Search+
Qianglin HU, Wen HU. A classical relativistic hydrodynamical model for strong EM wave-spin plasma interaction[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac3985
Citation: Qianglin HU, Wen HU. A classical relativistic hydrodynamical model for strong EM wave-spin plasma interaction[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac3985

A classical relativistic hydrodynamical model for strong EM wave-spin plasma interaction

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Qianglin HU: E-mail: 9920070002@jgsu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: July 21, 2021
  • Revised Date: November 13, 2021
  • Accepted Date: November 13, 2021
  • Available Online: January 29, 2024
  • Published Date: March 08, 2022
  • Based on the covariant Lagrangian function and Euler–Lagrange equation, a set of classical fluid equations for strong EM wave-spin plasma interaction is derived. Analysis shows that the relativistic effects may affect the interaction processes by three factors: the relativistic factor, the time component of four-spin, and the velocity-field coupling. This set of equations can be used to discuss the collective spin effects of relativistic electrons in classical regime, such as astrophysics, high-energy laser-plasma systems and so on. As an example, the spin induced ponderomotive force in the interaction of strong EM wave and magnetized plasma is investigated. Results show that the time component of four-spin, which approaches to zero in nonrelativistic situations, can increase the spin-ponderomotive force obviously in relativistic situation.

  • In the last two decades, the spin effect in plasma has attracted a lot of attentions because of its potential applications [13]. Spin effect is an important property of quantum plasma, and researches have shown that it may exist even on a classic scale, which is longer than the thermal de Broglie wavelength [4]. Researches have also shown that under certain conditions, the spin contributions can be more important than the usual quantum plasma corrections [5]. In the nonlinear situation, the spin force appears to be more importance and cannot be ignored even in moderate-density high-temperature plasma, due to the fact that the electrons with different spin eigenstates can be separated by the spin induced ponderomotive force [6].

    Some models have been developed to study the spin plasma. In nonrelativistic regime, a fluid theory is developed from the Pauli Hamiltonian and Madelung decomposition of electron wave function [5, 7]. Based on this fluid theory, some new phenomena, such as new propagation modes [8], magnetosonic solitons [9], instabilities [10], and so on, are revealed. In relativistic regime [1116], the EM wave-spin plasma interactions have been considered on three levels: classical physics, relativistic quantum mechanics, and quantum field theory. On classical physics level, a classical relativistic model is developed directly from the Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equation. However, in this model the spin does not affect the electron dynamics [17]. On relativistic quantum mechanics level, using the Foldy–Wouthuysen ransformation of Hamiltonian for positive energy states of electron, a phase-space scalar kinetic model based on the gauge-invariant Stratonovich–Wigner function [18] and a fluid model based on the Madelung decomposition of electron wave function with two spinor [19] are developed for weakly relativistic spin plasma. On quantum field theory level, a set of fully covariant hydrodynamic equations are obtained based on Dirac theory of electrons [20]. However, the covariant model is very complex and is rather difficult to implement in practical situations, especially for numerical applications [19].

    In addition to these, there are some other works on spin plasma [2123]. In the present work, we developed a classical hydrodynamical model for relativistic spin plasma based on the covariant Lagrangian function and Euler–Lagrange equation. The equations of this model are formally consistent with the equations of the model proposed in [20]. However, this model is mathematically much simpler and is easy to implement in practical situations. Admittedly, as a classical model, some quantum plasma corrections, such as quantum statistic effects and quantum diffraction effects, are not included in this model. Therefore, this model can be applied to discuss the spin effects of strong relativistic plasma in classical regime, such as in astrophysics, high-energy laser-plasma systems and so on. Analysis shows that the relativistic effects may affect the physical processes by three factors: the relativistic factor, the time component of four-spin, and the velocity-field coupling.

    In the end, this model is used to examine the spin contribution to the ponderomotive force of strong EM wave interacting with magnetized plasma, which has been discussed by some authors [6, 24, 25] in nonrelativistic regime. Results show that the time component of four-spin, which approaches to zero in nonrelativistic situations, can increase the spin-ponderomotive force obviously in relativistic situation.

    The Lagrangian function of electron in electromagnetic (EM) field can be written as

    =0+F+S, (1)

    where 0=-mc2/˜γ is the Lagrangian function of free electron, m, c, ˜γ are the rest mass of electron, the light speed in vacuum and the relativistic factor of electron, respectively, F=-e˜γcuαAα is the ordinary electron-EM field interaction Lagrangian [26], e is the electric quantity of an electron, uα is the 4-velocity of electron and Aα is the 4-vector potential, S=σμ(˙σμ-αFμνσν) is the spin-EM field interaction Lagrangian [27], α=e/mc, and the Landé factor g=2 is presumed, σμ is the 4-vector spin, and Fμν is Maxwell electromagnetic field tensor. The ions are viewed as a uniformly positive back-ground.

    To obtain the motion equation from equation (1), we use Lagrange equations

    ddτ˙q-q=0, (2)

    where τ is the proper time, and q is the generalized coordinates. From equations (1) and (2), we obtain

    mduαdτ=ecFαβuβ+xα(ασμFμνσν), (3)

    and

    dσαdτ=αFανσν. (4)

    Equations (3) and (4) are the motion equations of single electron. Considering ddτ=˜γddt=˜γ[t+(u·)], equations (3) and (4) can be rewritten as

    muββuα=ecFαβuβ+xα(ασμFμνσν), (5)

    and

    uββσα=αFανσν, (6)

    where β(/ct,/xi) is the 4-gradient operator.

    Assuming that the electron distribution function is f(x,p,σ), the fluid density n in the rest frame of fluid can be written as

    n(x)=fd4pd4σ. (7)

    The statistical average of any physical quantity Rμ is defined as

    Rμ=1nRμfd4pd4σ. (8)

    Therefore, the fluid four-velocity is Uμ=uμ and the four-spin density is Sμ=σμ. The microscopic four dimensional velocity and spin density in the rest frame are also defined as vμ=uμ-Uμ and Σμ=σμ-Sμ, respectively. It is easy to obtain that vμ=0=Σμ.

    Taking the ensemble average of equations (5) and (6), we obtain

    UββUα=emcFαβUβ+em2cxα(SμFμνSν)-vββvα+em2cxα(ΣμFμνΣν)-Uββvα, (9)

    and

    UββSα=emcFανSν-vββΣα-UββΣα. (10)

    Moreover, if the creation of electron pairs can be neglected, the conservation of electron number gives

    μ(nUμ)=0. (11)

    Equations (9)–(11), plus the macroscopic Maxwell equations

    μFμν=enUν, (12)

    form a complete and covariant description of relativistic spin plasma.

    It is useful to put equations (9)–(11) into the general three-dimensional vector forms. To do this, we use the usual procedure [20] and rewrite the four-velocity of fluid as

    Uμ=γf[c,U], (13)

    where U is the spatial component of the fluid velocity, γf is the average relativistic factor. Considering the constraint uμuμ=c2 and the definition of vμ, it is easy to obtain

    γf=γ(1-vμvμ)1/2, (14)

    where γ=(1-U2/c2)-1/2. The macroscopic four-spin density is

    Sμ=(S0,S). (15)

    Considering the covariant constraint UμSμ=0, the time component can be obtained as S0=(1/c)U·S.

    Therefore, equation (9) can be written in the vectorial form

    d(γfmc2)dt=eU·E+eγfmtΨs+Pcγf, (16)

    and

    d(γfmU)dt=e(E+Uc×B)+eγfmcΨs-1γfn·Π+Fcγf, (17)

    where

    Ψs=γfS·(B-Uc×E)-2γf2γf+1S0(Uc·B), (18)
    Πij=mnvivj, (19)
    Pc=emt(ΣμFμνΣν)-mcβ(vβv0)-(βvβ)v0-mcUββv0, (20)
    Fic=emcxi(ΣμFμνΣν)-m0v0vi+m(βvβ)vi-mUββvi. (21)

    Equations (16) and (17) are the time and special components of equation (9), respectively. Ψs is the spin potential (the derivation is shown in appendix), and in the nonrelativistic limit, it is equivalent to the corresponding item in [5]. Π is the pressure tensor. Pc and Fc are the nonlinear corrections of the power and force caused by the microscopic four dimensional velocity and spin density in the rest frame of fluid.

    Equation (10) can be written as

    dS0dt=eγfmcS·E+PSγf, (22)

    and

    dSdt=eγfmc(S0E+S×B)-1γfmn·K+ΞSγf, (23)

    where

    Kij=mnviΣj, (24)
    PS=-β(vβΣ0)-(βvβ)Σ0-UββΣ0, (25)
    ΞiS=-0v0Σi+(βvβ)Σi-UββΣi. (26)

    Equations (22) and (23) are the time and special components of equation (10), respectively. K is the coupling tensor of thermal-spin. PS and ΞS are the nonlinear corrections to the spin evolution caused by the microscopic four dimensional velocity and spin density in the rest frame of fluid.

    The continuity equation (11) becomes

    t(nγf)+·(nγfU)=0. (27)

    Equations (16), (17), (22), (23), and (27) form a full set of macroscopic hydrodynamical equations. Comparing with the nonrelativistic limit results, it is easy to know that the relativistic effects mainly affect the interaction processes by three factors: firstly, the relativistic factor γf; secondly, the time component of four-spin S0, as shown in equations (18) and (23); and lastly, the velocity-field coupling, as shown in equation (18). This set of equations can be used to discuss the spin effects of relativistic plasma, which exist widely in astrophysics, high-energy laser-plasma systems and so on.

    As an example, we will illustrate how the time component of four-spin S0 affects the EM wave-spin plasma interaction process in the following part. In order to do this, we apply the formalism developed in the present work to discuss the spin induced ponderomotive force in magnetized plasma, which has been studied by some authors [6, 24, 25] in nonrelativistic regime. Take the assumption that the back-ground magnetic field is B0=B0ˆz. The electrons have two eigenstates, i.e. spin-up and -down relative to B0. Though the spin states of electrons can be disturbed by the EM waves, the differentiation of spin-up and -down electrons is still well defined provided the physics associated with spin flips can be neglected [4, 6]. Therefore, the electrons are treated as two kinds of populations in the present work, and equations (17) and (23) are reduced to

    md(γfαUα)dt=e(E+Uαc×B)+emc[Sα·(B-Uαc×E)-2γfαγfα+1S0α(Uαc·B)], (28)
    dSαdt=eγfαmc(S0αE+Sα×B), (29)

    in the cold plasma, where the subscript α=or, denotes spin-up or spin-down. In the nonrelativistic limit, i.e. |Uα|c, equations (28) and (29) reduced to the equations which have been used in [6].

    In the present work, the derivation of the spin-ponderomotive force is also based on the perturbative analysis [6]. In the following part, we assume a slowly varying plane circularly polarized EM wave E=(1/2)˜Eexp[i(kz-ωt)]+c.c., where c.c. denotes complex conjugate, and define the variables E±=Ex±iEy, U±=Ux±iUy, S±=Sx±iSy. Separating the EM wave magnetic field and the back-ground magnetic field by letting B=B0+B, and writing Sα into Sα=Sα0+Sα, the 1ω -frequency component of equation (29) can be written as

    (t-iω)Sα=eγfαmc(S0αE+Sα0×B+Sα×B0), (30)

    where S0=(ħ/2)ˆz=-S0. Considering that S0=(1/c)U·S, we have

    S0α=1cU·Sα=1c(U*±Sα±). (31)

    The lowest order of Uα can be obtained from equation (28) as

    Uα±=ieγfαm(ω±Ω)E±. (32)

    Equation (32) shows that in the lowest order of approximation, the velocity of electron is not influenced by the spin, and from now on, the subscript α in Uα and γfα will be dropped. Thus, the lowest order of Sα can be obtained from equation (30) as

    Sα±=eSα0γfmc(ω±Ω)[1-|a|2/γ2f(1±Ω/ω)2]B±, (33)

    where Ω=|e|B0/(γfmc) is the cyclotron frequency, and |a|=|eE|/(mωc) is the normalized potential of EM wave. Using γ2f=1+|a|2/(1±Ω/ω)2, equation (33) reduced to

    Sα±=γfeSα0mc(ω±Ω)B±. (34)

    Therefore, substituting equation (34) into the correction term of equation (30) gives

    Sα±=γfeSα0mc(ω±Ω)[B±±i(ω±Ω)B±t]. (35)

    The spin induced ponderomotive force can be written as [6]

    Ƒαz=emcΨs=emc(S·B)=emc(Sα±zB*±+S*±zBα±). (36)

    Substitution of equations (34) and (35) into equation (36) gives

    Ƒαz=γfe2Sα0(mc)2(ω±Ω)[z-k(ω±Ω)t]|B|2. (37)

    It is easy to verify that in the nonrelativistic limit, equation (37) is the same with the result in [6]. Equation (37) shows that in the relativistic situation, the spin-ponderomotive force increased with the relativistic factor, i.e. increased with the EM wave intensity. Letting ξ=z-vgt, equation (37) can be transformed to the commoving frame

    Ƒαz=γfe2Sα0(mc)2(ω±Ω)[1+kvg(ω±Ω)]ξ|B|2. (38)

    The ratio of the spin-ponderomotive force in relativistic and nonrelativistic situation is

    R=ƑαzFαzγf. (39)

    where Fαz is the spin-ponderomotive force for nonrelativistic situation, i.e. Equation (13) in [6]. Generally, the ponderomotive force is decreased with the increase of the effective mass of the particle. Equation (39) implies that in relativistic situation, in spite of the electron effective mass is increased, the spin-ponderomotive force is γf times larger than the spin-ponderomotive force in nonrelativistic situation due to the influence of the time component of four-spin. Figure 1 shows the variation of R versus a for left-hand and right-hand circularly polarized (LCP, RCP) waves, where the EM wave length λ=1.06μm and the back-ground magnetic field B0=1000T are presumed. Figure 1 obviously shows that R increased with the increase of a. Researches [6] have shown that in the EM wave-spin plasma interaction, the spin-ponderomotive force can separates the spin-up and spin-down electrons. The reason is that the spin-ponderomotive forces acting on the two species of electrons are in opposite direction [6, 24]. Equation (39) means that in the relativistic situation, the time component of four-spin can increase the degree of the separation of these two kinds of electrons.

    Figure  1.  The variation of R versus a. EM wave length λ=1.06μm, B0=1000T.

    Spin effect is an important property of quantum plasma and several models have been proposed on it. In this work, we developed a classical hydrodynamical model for relativistic spin plasma based on the covariant Lagrangian function of electrons. This model can be used to discuss the spin effects of strong relativistic plasma. Analysis shows that the relativistic effects may affect the interaction processes through three aspects: firstly, the relativistic factor γf; secondly, the time component of four-spin S0; and lastly, the velocity-field coupling. However, it needs further research to know what phenomenon can be triggered by these factors.

    The present model is different from the previous models [5, 7, 1720]. (1) The present model can be used for strong relativistic cases. The existing models developed from quantum mechanics are mainly applied to non-relativistic [5, 7] or weakly relativistic [18, 19] cases. (2) The present model is mathematically simple and is easy to implement in practical situations. Though the model developed from quantum field theory [20] is a covariant model and includes as many quantum effects as possible, it is very complex and is rather difficult to implement in practical situations, especially for numerical applications [19]. (3) The present model naturally includes the main spin effects. The model proposed in [17] is also a relativistic model, but some crucial spin effects, such as the spin potential, thermal-spin coupling, and so on, are ignored. However, the equations of the present model are formally consistent with the model proposed in [20]. Admittedly, as a classical model, some quantum effects, such as quantum statistic effects and quantum diffraction effects, are not included in the present model. Therefore, it is applicable for the conditions that the plasma temperature is much higher than the Fermi temperature and the force induced by Bohm potential is much smaller than the spin force. Actually, these conditions are satisfied in numerous cases such as astrophysics, high-energy laser-plasma systems and so on.

    The model has been applied to examine the spin contribution to the ponderomotive force of strong EM wave interacting with magnetized plasma in this work. Results show that the time component of the four-spin can increase the spin-ponderomotive force obviously in relativistic situation.

    Considering that SμFμνSν fulfills the requirements of covariance, we have

    Ψs=SμFμνSν=S'μF'μνS'ν=B'·S', (A1)

    where the quantities with prime denote the quantities in the electron rest frame and S'0=0. In the last equality, the commutation relation [S'i,S'j]=ϵijkS'k is used. Using the general Lorentz transformation, one can obtain [26]

    B'=γf(B-Uc×E)-γf2γf+1Uc(Uc·B), (A2)
    S'=S-γfγf+1S0Uc. (A3)

    Therefore,

    Ψs=γfS·(B-Uc×E)-2γf2γf+1S0(Uc·B), (A4)

    where the term including (U/c)3 is neglected.

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12065011), and Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (No. GJJ170642).

  • [1]
    Wu Y T et al 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 044064 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044064
    [2]
    An X Y et al 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 123106 doi: 10.1063/1.5118710
    [3]
    Sahu B, Choudhury S and Sinha A 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 022304 doi: 10.1063/1.4907658
    [4]
    Brodin G, Marklund M and Manfredi G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 175001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.175001
    [5]
    Marklund M and Brodin G 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 025001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.025001
    [6]
    Brodin G, Misra A P and Marklund M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 105004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.105004
    [7]
    Brodin G and Marklund M 2007 New J. Phys. 9 277 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/277
    [8]
    Misra A P 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 064501 doi: 10.1063/1.2737765
    [9]
    Marklund M, Eliasson B and Shukla P K 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 067401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.067401
    [10]
    Misra A P and Shukla P K 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 052105 doi: 10.1063/1.2913265
    [11]
    Hafez M G et al 2020 AIP Adv. 10 065234 doi: 10.1063/5.0011086
    [12]
    Hafez M G 2020 Astrophys. Space Sci. 365 78 doi: 10.1007/s10509-020-03791-9
    [13]
    Hafez M G 2019 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 47 5314 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2019.2949254
    [14]
    Alam M S et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 072904 doi: 10.1063/1.5037788
    [15]
    Hafez M G et al 2017 Plasma Sci. Technol. 19 015002 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015002
    [16]
    Hafez M G, Talukder M R and Hossain Ali M 2016 Pramana 87 70 doi: 10.1007/s12043-016-1275-x
    [17]
    Melrose D B and Mushtaq A 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 056404 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056404
    [18]
    Asenjo F A et al 2012 New J. Phys. 14 073042 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073042
    [19]
    Morandi O et al 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 013103 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.013103
    [20]
    Asenjo F A et al 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 012107 doi: 10.1063/1.3533448
    [21]
    Hakim R and Heyvaerts J 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1250 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.18.1250
    [22]
    Sivak H D 1985 Ann. Phys. 159 351 doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(85)90117-4
    [23]
    Kowalenko V, Frankel N E and Hines K C 1985 Phys. Rep. 126 109 doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90097-3
    [24]
    Hu Q L et al 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126261 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126261
    [25]
    Stefan M et al 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 036410 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036410
    [26]
    Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics3rd ednNew YorkWiley 555
    [27]
    Fontana A Q 2011 Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 5 406
  • Related Articles

    [1]Liping ZHANG, Jiani LI, Jiangxu FENG, Junyan SU. Effect of spin on the instability of THz plasma waves in field-effect transistors under non-ideal boundary conditions[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 125002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ace677
    [2]Haifeng ZHANG (章海锋), Hao ZHANG (张浩). The features of band structures for woodpile three-dimensional photonic crystals with plasma and function dielectric constituents[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aacf87
    [3]Xuyang CHEN (陈旭阳), Fangfang SHEN (沈方芳), Yanming LIU (刘彦明), Wei AI (艾炜), Xiaoping LI (李小平). Study of plasma-based stable and ultra-wideband electromagnetic wave absorption for stealth application[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 65503-065503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaaa18
    [4]H SOBHANI, H R SABOUHI, S FEILI, E DADAR. Mode filtering based on ponderomotive force nonlinearity in a plasma filled rectangular waveguide[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(10): 105504. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8089
    [5]CHEN Jiale (陈佳乐), GAO Zhe (高喆). Tokamak Plasma Flows Induced by Local RF Forces[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(10): 809-816. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/10/01
    [6]Moses E. EMETERE. Investigations of the Sheath Effect on the Resultant Magnetic Field of a Cylindrical Monopole Plasma Antenna[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(2): 153-158. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/2/10
    [7]KONG Erhua (孔二华), DING Bojiang (丁伯江), ZHANG Ting (张霆), et al.. Experimental Investigation of Lower Hybrid Wave Coupling in HT-7[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(10): 989-995. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/10/06
    [8]Heinrich HORA, George H. MILEY, HE Xiantu, ZHENG Wudi, Paraskevas LALOUSIS, Istvan F?OLDES, Sandor SZATMARI, Stavros MOUSTAIZIS, Reynaldo CASTILLO. Ultrahigh Acceleration of Plasma Blocks by Nonlinear Forces for Side-On Laser Ignition of Solid Density Fusion Fuel[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(5): 420-424. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/5/05
    [9]Yu Beibei (于蓓蓓), Zhu Lihua (竺礼华), He Chuangye (贺创业), Wu Xiaoguang (吴晓光), Zheng Yun (郑云), Li Guangsheng (李广生), Wang Lielin (王烈林), Yao Shunhe (姚顺和), Zhang Biao (张彪), Xu Chuan (徐川), Hao Xin, et al. High Spin Structure in 106Pd[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 531-533. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/22
    [10]ZHU Shengjiang(朱胜江), GU Long(顾龙), WANG Jianguo(王建国), XIAO Zhigang(肖志刚), Yeoh Eingyee(杨韵颐), ZHANG Ming(张明), LIU Yu(刘宇), DING Huaibo(丁怀博), ZHU Lihua(竺礼华), WU Xiaoguang(吴晓光), HE Chuangy, et al. High-Spin States in 141Pm[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 496-498. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/13
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. Hu, Q.-L., She, Y.-C., Hu, W. et al. Propagation of circularly polarized electromagnetic wave in magnetized spin plasma. High Energy Density Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.hedp.2024.101155
    2. Hu, Q.-L., She, Y.-C., Hu, W. et al. Comparison of Spin Force and Bohm Potential Force in Laser Pulse–Magnetized Spin Plasma. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2024, 93(3): 034501. DOI:10.7566/JPSJ.93.034501
    3. Hu, Q.-L., Hu, W., Xiao, J.-P. Spin effects on the relativistic strong EM wave modes in magnetized plasma* * The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 12065011, and the PhD Starting Fund program of TongRen University under Grant No. trxyDH2223.. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023, 75(6): 065502. DOI:10.1088/1572-9494/acd3dc

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(1)

    Article views (125) PDF downloads (97) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return