
Citation: | Lu ZHANG, Liling LI, Zhiwei LIN, Yunsong DONG, Longfei JING, Jianhua ZHENG, Longyu KUANG, Hang LI, Jinhua ZHENG, Jiyan ZHANG, Tianming SONG, Zhiyu ZHANG, Yang ZHAO, Gao NIU, Dong YANG, Jiamin YANG, Yongkun DING. Tamping the movement of the laser absorption cutoff position using gold foam hohlraum[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 055201. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad1f42 |
In indirect-driven laser fusion experiments, the movement of the laser absorption layer will distort the radiation uniformity on the capsule. The gold foam has advantages in symmetry control and lowering wall plasma blowoff when used in an inertial confinement fusion (ICF) hohlraum. This work investigates the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position using low-density foam gold walls. It is found that the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position can be significantly mitigated through optimal initial low density, tailored to a specific laser shape. For a short square laser pulse, the laser absorption cutoff position remains almost stationary at an initial density of approximately 0.6 g cm−3. For a long-shaped laser pulse, the minimal motion of the laser absorption cutoff position is observed at an initial density of about 0.1 g cm−3. This approach allows for the adjustment of the symmetry of the hohlraum radiation source. The insights gained from this study serve as a crucial reference for optimizing the hohlraum wall density.
In laser indirect-driven inertial confinement fusion (ICF) experiments, laser energy is delivered to a hohlraum and converted to X-rays [1], which drive the capsule to implode. Notably, researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory recently achieved 3.88 MJ of fusion energy using 2.05 MJ of laser energy [2], marking a 20% increase from the December 2022 shot that yielded 3.15 MJ of fusion energy [3]. The subsequent objective is to attain an even higher fusion yield, underscoring the critical importance of further enhancing the hohlraum performance and symmetry [4–6]. In the ICF hohlraum, plasma blowing off from the hohlraum wall influences the radiation symmetry. As plasma blows off the wall, both the laser absorption layer and the X-ray reemission zone shift away from the wall. This changes the angle between the source and the capsule for a fixed pointing direction [7]. Maintaining the laser spot in proximity to the original wall facilitates more accessible symmetry control [8].
There are many approaches to tamping the motion of the laser absorption layer. A low-Z liner on the gold hohlraum, which blows off to fill the hohlraum interior with low-Z plasma, was rejected because of the pressure created on the axis by the stagnation of the liner [7]. Using a low-Z foam-filled hohlraum [9] may cause too many X-rays to be preheated in the capsule. An initial low-Z gas-filled hohlraum [10, 11] of pure He at a density of 0.96 mg cm−3 was chosen [12] because it can reduce laser plasma instability (LPI) [13] effects and improve symmetry. However, these high-gas-fill hohlraum designs had problems with strong time-dependent asymmetries. The classical Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instability occurs at the interface of gas and plasma blowoff [14], as well as significant stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) [15]. As a result, a lower gas-filled hohlraum with 0.3–0.45 g cm−3 He is used at present [17]. Recently, a hollow-walled hohlraum (I-Raum) was designed to reduce the growth of the gold bubble and stabilize the gold–gas interface [18]. Experimental results showed that the implosion core has been more prolate for the I-Raum compared to the cylinder hohlraum [19].
Another way to improve the hohlraum performance is the utilization of a low-density, high-Z foam hohlraum [20–23]. This approach not only yields higher radiation temperatures due to reduced X-ray energy loss in the hohlraum wall [24–26], but also results in less plasma blowoff [27]. Low-density high-Z foam shows unique advantages in improving the hohlraum performance. Experimental results indicate that the X-ray emission fronts moving away from the wall were considerably smaller for 0.3 g cm−3 gold foam compared to 19.3 g cm−3 solid gold [27]. Experiments involving hohlraums lined with a 20 mg cm−3 400 μm thick Ta2O5 aerogel showed an improvement in the capsule performance, but a measurable increase in backscatter [28], a phenomenon suppressed in the solid Ta2O5-lined hohlraum [29]. It is imperative to investigate the hohlraum performance across various foam densities. However, the density dependence of foam on mitigating the motion of the laser absorption layer in a laser-driven hohlraum remains unresolved.
In this study, we examine the motion of laser spots with varying wall densities, considering both short square laser pulses and long-shaped laser pulses. Here, we simplify the laser-hohlraum interaction to the 1D cylindrical geometry problem, where the laser is vertically incident from the axis onto the gold hohlraum wall. We investigate the influence of the initial wall density on the movement of the laser absorption cutoff position. Simulations are performed using the 1D Lagrangian radiation hydrodynamics code MULTI [30]. The motion of the laser spot is characterized by the laser absorption cutoff position, representing the point where 1% of the laser energy remains. Simulation results reveal that foam gold can effectively mitigate the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position. Optimal densities differ for various laser pulses in minimizing the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position. For the short square laser pulse, the optimal density is 0.6 g cm−3, whereas for long-shaped laser pulses, it is 0.1 g cm−3.
The optimal choice of the ratio of the hohlraum radius to the capsule radius is strongly influenced by the need to achieve a higher hohlraum temperature and a very high degree of flux uniformity on the capsule [7]. A larger ratio is very effective at smoothing all but the longest-wavelength perturbations. However, an increased hohlraum radius diminishes the hohlraum coupling efficiency. If the laser absorption cutoff position shifts toward the center, mimicking a reduction in the hohlraum radius, the coupling efficiency improves but the symmetry deteriorates. Concurrently, the wall plasma blocks the inner beams from reaching the hohlraum [31] and leads to low mode asymmetry. Maintaining the ratio of the initial hohlraum radius to the capsule radius is crucial by curbing the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position induced by wall plasma blowoff. To enhance the hohlraum symmetry without losing coupling efficiency, low-density gold foam has been used in the ICF hohlraum.
An experimental study on the expanding plasma movement of low-density gold foam (~1% solid density) irradiated by a high-power laser was conducted using an SG-III prototype laser [27]. Compared to solid gold with a density of 19.3 g cm−3, the velocities of X-ray emission fronts moving off the wall are much smaller for gold foam with a density of 0.3 g cm−3. The density of Au foam decreases uniformly after heating, resulting in diminished movement of soft X-ray and M-band emission fronts. These results indicate that the foam wall may have less plasma fill and X-ray emission front movement. Theoretical analysis and MULTI 1D simulation results corroborate these observations, indicating lower plasma blowoff velocities and smaller density contour movement velocities for gold foam compared to solid gold. However, the foam density in this experiment is suboptimal for hohlraum symmetry, and the performance of gold foam under the ignition pulse condition remains unexplored. This study delves into the foam density dependence for mitigating the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position in a laser-driven hohlraum through simulations.
In a 1D cylindrical geometry, we assume a uniform laser heating of the wall from the axis, with consistent effects along the axis, as depicted in figure 1. Our simulations, aimed at evaluating the feasibility of employing low-density foam in an ignition hohlraum, adopt the hohlraum radius and incident laser power parameters based on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) ignition target [7]. The hohlraum radius r is 2.75 mm, and the wall thickness with solid gold is 30 μm. For the low-density foam, the wall thickness is adjusted to maintain an areal density equivalent to that of the solid wall. Here, the absorption position motion for two laser pulses is studied: the short square laser pulse and the long-shaped laser pulse. The power of the short square laser pulse aligns with the peak power of the NIF ignition pulse, as the laser energy deposited in the wall is mainly determined by the peak power of the ignition pulse. The long-shaped laser pulse is the NIF ignition pulse, providing insights for guiding the design of the hohlraum wall density.
The laser power is in J (s cm)−1 units. The opacity of Au is given by SNOP [32], and the equation of state comes from the SESAME library. The flux limiter f is set as 0.08.
A short square laser pulse has a 2 ns pulse with 0.351 μm wavelength. The peak power is PL, and the laser linear power in 1D cylindrical geometry is PL×2πr = 3.35×1014 W cm−1, with a hohlraum radius of 2.75 mm. Plasma blowing off from the wall absorbs the laser energy. The absorption cutoff position is referred to as rlacp. Figure 2 shows the motion of rlacp with time. When the initial density is lower than 0.6 g cm−3, rlacp moves into the wall with time, and rlacp remains almost unchanged at the density of 0.6 g cm−3, shown as the red-dotted line in figure 2. However, rlacp moves off the wall when the wall’s initial density is higher than 0.6 g cm−3.
The spatial distributions of electron density with initial densities of 19.3 g cm−3 and 0.6 g cm−3 are shown in figure 3, where rlacp is denoted by green hollow spots. The electron density at the absorption cutoff position is defined as ne_lacp. When the laser irradiates the hohlraum wall, the plasma moves from the wall toward the hohlraum axis. The electron density distributions are self-similar with the time increasing. The critical density nc is about 8.9×1021 cm−3 for a laser with λ = 0.351 μm. In figure 3(a), for the solid Au case, the absorption cutoff position moves toward the center, causing ne_lacp to decrease over time. At 2 ns, the laser absorption cutoff position moves by about 130 μm, and ne_lacp is reduced from the critical density to ~0.57nc. In figure 3(b), for the 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold case, ne_lacp decreases from the critical density to ~0.53nc at 2 ns, but the laser absorption cutoff position is almost unchanged.
The laser intensity follows IL∝exp(−Kx) when propagating in plasma, where K is the absorption coefficient and K ∝ ne3 [33]. x is the absorption length. As the plasma expands over time, the absorption length x increases, leading to a decrease in the coefficient K and, consequently, a decline in ne_lacp. For the 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold case, the absorption length x precisely corresponds to the plasma expanding distance, resulting in a decrease in ne_lacp, while the laser absorption cutoff position remains stationary.
Figure 3(c) shows the electron density and temperature distribution for solid gold and 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold at 2 ns. The laser absorption cutoff position is defined as rlacp, and the density at this position is denoted as ρlacp. The laser absorption typically occurs when r < rlacp, and the energy transporting into the wall up to the laser ablative wavefront is mainly carried by electron conduction [33]. The heated material can be divided into the corona, conduction zone and shocked material. The density distribution depends on the rarefaction wave after the ablative front. A double-rarefaction model is proposed to describe the approximate density profile [27]. It satisfies ρ(x,t)=ρ0[2γ+1+γ−1γ+1xc0t]2/(γ−1) for the conduction zone (rarefaction 1) and the corona (rarefaction 2). In the conduction zone, the initial densities ρ0 correspond to the shocked material densities, while in the corona, the coefficient ρ0 is equivalent to ρlacp.
As shown in figure 3(c), the ablative heat wavefront of the 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold is closer to the initial wall compared to solid gold. This is caused by the disparity of the ablative heat wave speed, which satisfies Vf∝1/ρ1.03 [24]. The heat wave in low-density matter propagates faster and travels further into the wall at the same time. The density distribution in the conduction zone follows the density formula. The initial densities ρ0 differ for solid gold and 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold. However, the distinction between the constant γ and c0 can be ignored for the solid and foam gold, resulting in a similar density distribution.
In the corona, based on the density formula, for the solid gold and the 0.6 g cm−3 foam gold, the initial density ρ0 = ρlacp, resulting in a comparable spatial density distribution with r < rlacp. In figure 3(c), the electron temperature Te exhibits similarity in both density cases with r < rlacp, and the electron density ne has the same distribution as the density ρ. The ne distributions with r < rlacp are similar too. Consequently, despite variations in the initial wall density, the laser traverses similar plasma states. Initially, ne_lacp = nc. Over time, the plasma expands toward the center, and due to the analogous density distribution, the laser–plasma interaction remains almost identical across various initial wall density scenarios. Thus, the electron density distributions in the conduction zone and the corona are analogous with different initial wall densities. The ablative heat wavefront at a lower wall density is closer to the initial wall, as is the rarefaction front in the corona. Consequently, rlacp is also closer to the hohlraum wall for a lower-density foam gold.
The implosion symmetry retains the original design when rlacp remains unchanged, which can maintain a better implosion symmetry performance. Considering the symmetry and coupling efficiency, keeping rlacp at the original position is the optimal choice. An initial density of 0.6 g cm−3 should be chosen for the 2 ns square laser condition in our simulation.
The dynamic compression driven by high-power beam pulses leads to strong shock waves. The gas dynamics show that the compression across a shock front is limited, typically to factors 4–6. To attain a higher deuterium-tritium (DT) fuel density, nearly isentropic compression is essential. Fast and nearly isentropic compression, however, can be achieved by superimposing a sequence of shocks. Each shock in the sequence has a speed larger than its predecessor and will therefore catch it up after a certain time. In ICF, the required time-shaped driving pressure is generated by appropriately time-shaping the pulse of the drive beam, as shown in figure 4, designed for the NIF ignition target [7]. This laser pulse is delivered to the hohlraum and heats the wall. Figure 5 illustrates the motions of the laser absorption cutoff position for cases with various initial wall densities and those with a gas-filled solid hohlraum. The absorption cutoff position moves to the center before ~13 ns and turns back later. This motion is influenced by the increasing input laser intensity, requiring a longer distance for laser energy absorption. At the density of 0.3 g cm−3, the distance between the wall and the absorption cutoff position is approximately half that at 19.3 g cm−3, indicating that a low-density wall effectively restrains the motion of the absorption cutoff position in the shaped pulse condition. The movement of the gas-filled solid hohlraum is illustrated by the solid line with diamond markers. Compared with the low-density lines, it moves further before ~10.6 ns during lower laser intensity duration and then returns. Before 8 ns, the gas-filled solid hohlraum with 0.3 mg cm−3 He is almost identical to the solid gold hohlraum. Between 8 ns and 11.8 ns, the laser absorption cutoff position under the gas-filled case is even further away from the hohlraum wall. This is mainly because the 0.3 mg cm−3 gas inhibits the expansion of rare low-density plasmas in the coronal region to the axis. When the gas pressure is balanced with the rare Au plasma pressure, it will cause the Au plasma density to accumulate. So, the laser cannot travel further distances. After ~13 ns, the distance between the wall and the absorption cutoff position is close to that at the density of 2 g cm−3. According to the above analysis, a low-density wall may be better than a gas-filled hohlraum for restraining plasma expansion. The optimal foam density is 0.1 g cm−3, ensuring optimal symmetry and coupling efficiency during the laser pulse.
Figures 6(a) and (b) present the spatial distribution of electron density at various times for initial densities of 19.3 g cm−3 and 0.1 g cm−3, respectively. Notably, the plasma expands slower in the case of 0.1 g cm−3 foam gold compared to 19.3 g cm−3 solid gold. In figure 6(a), plasma blows off from the hohlraum wall, and then the blowoff is damped at r ≈ 0.16, forming a density spike. The laser absorption cutoff position is marked with a solid dot on the spike, which is heated to expand. The density of plasma fill is higher at 15 ns than at 13 ns, and the spike moves toward the wall. Despite the increasing laser intensity leading to a rise in the laser absorption length, the absorption cutoff position remains on the spike. Initially moving toward the axis, it later shifts back toward the wall. The expanding of plasma blowoff and the motion patterns of the absorption cutoff position in figure 6(b) mirror those in figure 6(a). However, in figure 6(b), the density spike appears smoother, and the absorption cutoff position is situated near the wall. This positioning offers an advantage for symmetry control.
The density and temperature profiles for initial densities of 19.3 g cm−3 and 0.1 g cm−3 under the long-pulse condition exhibit self-similarity, akin to the ablation heat wave propagation observed under short-pulse conditions. In figure 6(c), the density profile of the expansion toward the axis appears almost identical. Consequently, the electron density at the laser absorption cutoff position remains consistent. Under the condition of the shaped pulse, the hohlraum wall density of the laser absorption cutoff position can be kept lower.
In this study, we conducted simulations involving two scenarios of laser pulse interactions with a foam gold hohlraum wall. The results show that a low-density foam gold wall can restrain the movement of the laser absorption cutoff position. Due to the expansion of the heated plasma, the electron density at the laser absorption cutoff position remains below the critical density nc, diminishing further with the increased plasma expansion. In the case of the low-density wall, the expansion of the heated plasma is slowed down. The optimal initial density for the short square laser pulse is about 0.6 g cm−3. The laser absorption cutoff position's motion for the long-shaped laser pulse is minimal when the initial density is about 0.1 g cm−3. The results show that the wall density can be optimized in different laser conditions. A low-density foam gold wall could be another way to restrain the motion of the laser absorption cutoff position for symmetry control. A foam gold hohlraum with a density of ~0.3 g cm−3 could be prepared. With the development of foam Au fabrication [34], the engineering application of foam Au is possible. In the future, more precise research needs to consider the natural interaction of the laser and hohlraum, including three-dimensional effects, laser oblique incidence, the foam structure [37] and other issues, which will be further incorporated.
This work was supported by the Presidential Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics (No. YZJJLX2018011) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11775204, 11734013, 12105269 and 12004351).
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
[1] |
Lan K et al 2016 Matter Radiat. Extremes 1 8 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2016.01.003
|
[2] |
Kramer D 2023 National Ignition Facility earns its name for a second time Physics Today, AIP Publishing (11 August 2023
|
[3] |
Hurricane O A et al 2023 Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 025005 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025005
|
[4] |
Lan K 2022 Matter Radiat. Extremes 7 055701 doi: 10.1063/5.0103362
|
[5] |
Jing L F et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 842 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/10/06
|
[6] |
Dong Y S et al 2020 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 084003 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab9804
|
[7] |
Lindl J 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 3933 doi: 10.1063/1.871025
|
[8] |
Gu J F et al 2017 Matter Radiat. Extremes 2 9 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2016.09.002
|
[9] |
Borisenko N G et al 2008 Laser Part. Beams 26 537 doi: 10.1017/S0263034608000578
|
[10] |
Haan S W et al 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 051001 doi: 10.1063/1.3592169
|
[11] |
Lindl J D et al 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 339 doi: 10.1063/1.1578638
|
[12] |
Meezan N B et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 056304 doi: 10.1063/1.3354110
|
[13] |
Froula D H et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 056302 doi: 10.1063/1.3304474
|
[14] |
Li C K et al 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 025001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.025001
|
[15] |
Kritcher A L et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 052709 doi: 10.1063/1.4949351
|
[16] |
Kritcher A L et al 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 052710 doi: 10.1063/5.0004221
|
[17] |
Kritcher A L et al 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 072706 doi: 10.1063/5.0047841
|
[18] |
Vandenboomgaerde M et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 012713 doi: 10.1063/1.5008669
|
[19] |
Robey H F et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 012711 doi: 10.1063/1.5010922
|
[20] |
Lan K and Song P 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 052707 doi: 10.1063/1.4983329
|
[21] |
Ren G L et al 2017 Matter Radiat. Extremes 2 22 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2016.11.002
|
[22] |
Shang W L, Yang J M and Dong Y S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 094105 doi: 10.1063/1.4794845
|
[23] |
Dong Y S et al 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123102 doi: 10.1063/1.4841315
|
[24] |
Rosen M D and Hammer J H 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 056403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056403
|
[25] |
Young P E et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 035001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.035001
|
[26] |
Li GL et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 033301 doi: 10.1063/1.3310840
|
[27] |
Zhang L et al 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 110703 doi: 10.1063/1.4935381
|
[28] |
Moore A S et al 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 051201(R doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.051201
|
[29] |
Ralph J E et al 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 072704 doi: 10.1063/5.0044404
|
[30] |
Ramis R, Schmalz R and Meyer-Ter-Vehn J 1988 Comput. Phys. Commun. 49 475 doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(88)90008-2
|
[31] |
Ralph J E et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 082701 doi: 10.1063/1.5023008
|
[32] |
Tsakiris G D and Eidmann K J 1987 J. Quant. Spectosc. Radiat. Transfer 38 353 doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(87)90030-6
|
[33] |
Atzeni S and Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2004 The Physics of Inertial Fusion: Beam Plasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Matter, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
[34] |
Tan X L et al 2013 Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 42 162 (in Chinese)
|
[35] |
Qian F et al 2020 Nano Lett. 20 131 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03445
|
[36] |
Cipriani M et al 2018 Laser Part. Beams 36 121 doi: 10.1017/S0263034618000022
|
[37] |
Tikhonchuk V T et al 2021 Matter Radiat. Extremes 6 25902 doi: 10.1063/5.0023006
|
[1] | Jung-Hwan IN, Youngmin MOON, Jang-Hee CHOI, Sungho JEONG. Consistency of intensity ratio between spectral lines with similar self-absorption characteristics during ungated laser induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 34010-034010. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaed60 |
[2] | Xuyang CHEN (陈旭阳), Fangfang SHEN (沈方芳), Yanming LIU (刘彦明), Wei AI (艾炜), Xiaoping LI (李小平). Study of plasma-based stable and ultra-wideband electromagnetic wave absorption for stealth application[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 65503-065503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaaa18 |
[3] | Kerong HE (何科荣), Hui CHEN (陈辉), Sanqiu LIU (刘三秋). Effect of plasma absorption on dust lattice waves in hexagonal dust crystals[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45001-045001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaaadb |
[4] | Jiafeng JIANG (蒋佳峰), Jiangang LI (李建刚), Yuanhua DONG (董元华). Effect of cold plasma treatment on seedling growth and nutrient absorption of tomato[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 44007-044007. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa0bf |
[5] | Mohsen AFSHARMANESH, Morteza HABIBI. Directional power absorption in helicon plasma sources excited by a half-helix antenna[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(10): 105403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8030 |
[6] | F. PETERS, J. HIRSCHBERG, N. MERTENS, S. WIENEKE, W. VI¨OL. Comparison of Nitric Oxide Concentrations in μs-and ns-Atmospheric Pressure Plasmas by UV Absorption Spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 406-411. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/13 |
[7] | LU Jianxin (路建新), LAN Xiaofei (兰小飞), WANG Leijian (王雷剑), XI Xiaofeng (席晓峰), et al. Proton Acceleration Driven by High-Intensity Ultraviolet Laser Interaction with a Gold Foil[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(9): 863-865. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/9/05 |
[8] | Ali Akbar ASHKARRAN. Seed Mediated Growth of Gold Nanoparticles Based on Liquid Arc Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(4): 376-381. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/4/12 |
[9] | XI Yanbin (奚衍斌), LIU Yue (刘悦). FDTD Simulation on Power Absorption of Terahertz Electromagnetic Waves in Dense Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 5-8. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/02 |
[10] | LI Bin, LI Hong, CHEN Zhipeng, XIE Jinlin, FENG Guangyao, LIU Wandong. Experimental and Simulational Studies on the Theoretical Model of the Plasma Absorption Probe[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2010, 12(5): 513-518. |