Advanced Search+
ZHENG Jinxing(郑金星), SONG Yuntao(宋云涛), YANG Qingxi(杨庆喜), LIU Wandong(刘万东), DING Weixing(丁卫星), LIU Xufeng(刘旭峰), YANG Lei(杨雷). Design of a Wedge-Shaped Toroidal Field Winding for KTX Device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(9): 878-883. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/13
Citation: ZHENG Jinxing(郑金星), SONG Yuntao(宋云涛), YANG Qingxi(杨庆喜), LIU Wandong(刘万东), DING Weixing(丁卫星), LIU Xufeng(刘旭峰), YANG Lei(杨雷). Design of a Wedge-Shaped Toroidal Field Winding for KTX Device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(9): 878-883. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/13

Design of a Wedge-Shaped Toroidal Field Winding for KTX Device

Funds: supported by the National ITER Special Support for R&D on Science and Technology for ITER, “Research on Reversed Field Pinch Magnetic Confinement Configuration”, CN Schedule Task (No. 2011GB106000)
More Information
  • Received Date: February 26, 2013
  • The KTX device is a reversed field pinch (RFP) device currently under construction. Its maximum plasma current is designed as 1 MA with a discharge time longer than 100 ms. Its major radius is 1.4 m and its minor radius is 0.55 m. One of the most important problems in the magnet system design is how to reduce the TF magnetic field ripple and error field. A new wedge- shaped TF coil is put forward for the KTX device and its electromagnetic properties are compared with those of rectangular-shaped TF coils. The error field B n /B t of wedge-shaped TF coils with 6.4 degrees is about 6% as compared with 8% in the case of a rectangular-shaped TF coil. Besides, the wedge-shaped TF coils have a lower magnetic field ripple at the edge of the plasma region, which is smaller than 7.5% at R=1.83 m and 2% at R=1.07 m. This means that the tokamak operation mode may be feasible for this device when the plasma area becomes smaller, because the maximum ripple in the plasma area of the tokamak model is always required to be smaller than 0.4%. Detailed analysis of the results shows that the structure of the wedged-shape TF coil is reliable. It can serve as a reference for TF coil design of small aspect ratio RFPs or similar torus devices.
  • 1 Mao Wenzhe. 2011, 53rd Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics Volume 56, Number 16, November 14-18; Salt Lake City, Utah.
    2 Rostagni G. 1995, Fusion Engineering and Design, 25:301.
    3 Dexter R N, Kerst D W, Lovell T W. 1991, Fusion Technology, 19: 131.
    4 Bellina F, Guarnieri M, Stella A. 1988, IEEE Trans.Magnetics, 2: 1252.
    5 Hirano Y, Yagi Y, Shimada T. 1999, Bulletin of the Electrotechnical Laboratory, 5: 137.
    6 Najmabadi Farrokh, Conn Robert W, Krakowski Robert A. 1993, Fusion Engineering and Design, 23:69.
    7 Stella A, Guarnieri M, Bellina F. 1995, Fusion Engineering and Design, 25: 373.
    8 Taylor J B. 1974, Proc. of the 5th IAEA Int. Conf., Tokyo (Japan), 1: 164.
    9 Richard J Thome, John M Tarrh. 1982, Magnetohy-drodynamic and Fusion Magnets: Field and Force Design Concepts. New York, USA, 108-118.
    10 Weissenburger D W, Christensen U R, Bialek J. 1977, The Pure Tension Shape of a Thick Torus. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Xian CHENG (程显), Peiyuan YANG (杨培远), Guowei GE (葛国伟), Qiliang WU (吴启亮), Wei XIE (谢伟). Dynamic dielectric recovery performance of serial vacuum and SF6 gaps in HVDC interruption and its regulation method[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 74010-074010. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab1720
    [2]ZHANG Junmin (张俊民), LU Chunrong (卢春荣), GUAN Yonggang (关永刚), LIU Weidong (刘卫东). Calculation of Nozzle Ablation During Arcing Period in an SF6 Auto-Expansion Circuit Breaker[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 506-511. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/11
    [3]ZHONG Jianying (钟建英), GUO Yujing (郭煜敬), ZHANG Hao (张豪). Pressure and Arc Voltage Measurement in a 252 kV SF6 Puffer Circuit Breaker[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 490-493. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/08
    [4]ZHANG Renxi (张仁熙), WANG Jingting (王婧婷), CAO Xu (曹栩), HOU Huiqi (侯惠奇). Decomposition of Potent Greenhouse Gases SF6, CF4 and SF5CF3 by Dielectric Barrier Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 388-393. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/10
    [5]ZHAO Xiaoling (赵小令), JIAO Juntao (焦俊韬), LI Bing (李冰), XIAO Dengming (肖登明). The Electronegativity Analysis of c-C4F8 as a Potential Insulation Substitute of SF6 [J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(3): 292-298. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/3/13
    [6]ZHANG Junmin (张俊民 ), CHI Chengbin (迟程缤), GUAN Yonggang (关永刚), LIU Weidong (刘卫东), WU Junhui (吴军辉). Simulation of Arc Rotation and Its Effects on Pressure of Expansion Volume in an Auto-Expansion SF6 Circuit Breaker[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(3): 287-291. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/3/12
    [7]LIN Xin (林莘), WANG Feiming (王飞鸣), XU Jianyuan (徐建源), XIA Yalong (夏亚龙), LIU Weidong (刘卫东). Study on the Mathematical Model of Dielectric Recovery Characteristics in High Voltage SF6 Circuit Breaker[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(3): 223-229. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/3/02
    [8]WEI Linsheng(魏林生), XU Min(徐敏), YUAN Dingkun(袁定琨), ZHANG Yafang(章亚芳), HU Zhaoji(胡兆吉), TAN Zhihong(谭志洪). Electron Transport Coefficients and Effective Ionization Coefficients in SF 6 -O 2 and SF 6 -Air Mixtures Using Boltzmann Analysis[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 941-947. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/07
    [9]LI Fuliang (李付亮), WANG Feng(汪沨), WANG Guoli(王国利), W. PFEIFFER, He Rongtao(何荣涛). Study of Formation and Propagation of Streamers in SF6 and Its Gas Mixtures with Low Content of SF6 Using a One-Dimensional Fluid Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(3): 187-191. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/3/02
    [10]CHANG Jiasen, WANG Hu, ZHANG Qiaogen, QIU Aici. Multichannel Discharge Characteristics of Gas Switch Gap in SF6-N2 or SF6-Ar Gas Mixtures under Nanosecond Triggering Pulses[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(6): 719-723.

Catalog

    Article views (248) PDF downloads (1192) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return