
Citation: | Jia HUANG, Xiang HAN, Kaixuan YE, Tao ZHANG, Fei WEN, Mingfu WU, Kangning GENG, Gongshun LI, Fubin ZHONG, Yukai LIU, Haoming XIANG, Shuqi YANG, Shoubiao ZHANG, Xiang GAO, Ge ZHUANG, the EAST Team. Feasibility of applying the lower cut-off frequency for the density radial coverage extension in EAST reflectometry measurement[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 055104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac52e9 |
The extraordinary mode (X-mode) lower cut-off frequency is proposed for use in the reflectometry diagnostic on ITER for the electron density profile measurement, which is a trade-off between extreme plasma parameters and the accessible probing frequency. In contemporary experiments, the lower cut-off frequency can be identified at the probing frequency below the electron cyclotron frequency (fce) under certain plasma conditions. We provide here, for the first time, the experimental validation of the use of the lower cut-off frequency for the density profiles via the reflectometry measurement on EAST. The corresponding group delay of the lower cut-off frequency evolves continuously with the upper one, revealing a reasonable radial coverage extension of reflectometry measurement toward the plasma core. It is concluded that the lower cut-off frequency can be used as a supplement to the upper one in the density profile inversion process, which is of particular interest in the high magnetic field and/or density discharge to extend the radial coverage of reflectometry measurement.
The high-confinement mode (H-mode) is scheduled to be the base operational scenario in ITER, where the core density is close to or even beyond the Greenwald density nGw to maximize the fusion power [1, 2]. The measurement of the density profile in the high-density operation is important for a better understanding of density control, transport and plasma fueling. In contemporary experiments, microwave reflectometry has been applied in many fusion devices, such as DIII-D [3, 4], JET [5], Tore Supra [6, 7], the ASDEX Upgrade [8] and LHD [9]. The high spatial and temporal measurement of the electron density profile and its associated fluctuation is preferable for plasma physical studies in the fields of, e.g. transport behavior [10], H-mode physics [11] and magneto-hydro-dynamic (MHD) instabilities [12].
Based on the direction of the electric field vector (
X-mode multi-band reflectometry for plasma density profile measurement has been in operation on EAST since 2015 [20–22]. This system involves a probing frequency range of 33 to 110 GHz, and its antenna array is installed on the equatorial plane of the low-field side. The voltage-controlled oscillator is utilized as the source of the probing frequency, whose output waveform and sweeping speed are remotely controlled by a customized field-programmable gate array processor circus, enabling sub-millisecond density profile measurement. The upper cut-off frequency is used; however, in high-density discharges, e.g. H-mode and fueling experiments, the required probing frequency at the upper cut-off layer will exceed the accessibility of the EAST reflectometry. The accessible cut-off layer of the upper cut-off frequency tends to be restricted in the edge region. Nevertheless, when the density and/or magnetic field is satisfied, the lower cut-off reflection layer will be identified in the probing frequency range below the electron cyclotron frequency fce. This enables us to use both the upper and lower cut-off frequencies, and hence expands the density profile measurement.
This paper presents the experimental measurement on the density profile using both the upper and lower cut-off frequencies of X-mode on EAST. The results prove the capability of the X-mode lower cut-off frequency for the radial extension of reflectometry measurement, which is particularly favored in high-density operations, such as H-mode and pellet injection, and can be used for the reflectometry measurement on ITER. In section 2, a brief introduction to the reflectometry architecture and the density profile inversion method is given. The experimental results are presented in section 3, and the work is summarized in section 4.
For an electromagnetic wave propagating in X-mode polarization, the refraction index associated with both the magnetic field and local density is given by
N2x(f,r)=1-f2pe(r)(f2-f2pe(r))f2(f2-f2ce(r)-f2pe(r)) | (1) |
where r is the radial location along the sight line of the beam,
fce(r)=eB(r)2πme | (2) |
fpe(r)=[ne(r)e24π2ϵ0me]1/2 | (3) |
and B(r) is the local magnetic field. For given ne and B values, the incident beam is reflected at the corresponding cut-off layer, where the Nx = 0. The two solutions can be deduced, namely the upper fL and lower fR cut-off frequencies, respectively,
fL=√f2ce(r)4+f2pe(r)-fce(r)2 | (4) |
fR=√f2ce(r)4+f2pe(r)+fce(r)2. | (5) |
In the EAST experiments, the upper cut-off frequency is regularly used during the density profile inversion process because the lower one is rarely observed by reflectometry in EAST's typical operational regimes. In high magnetic field and/or density discharges, the lower cut-off frequency is detected in the delay-time spectrum. The appearance of the lower cut-off frequency can be estimated using equation (4).
Figure 1 shows the density coverage ability for the lower and upper cut-off, respectively, under different magnetic fields. The so-called zero electron density ne0 occurs when the probing frequency equals fce, as indicated by the black slash. The probing frequency is below fce on the left side, where the microwave is reflected at the lower cut-off layer. In contrast, on the right side, when f > fce, the microwave is reflected at the upper cut-off layer. It is clear that with the increasing magnetic field and plasma density, the range of the upper cut-off frequency becomes narrower. Furthermore, the influence of the second harmonic of the electron cyclotron frequency (f2ce) needs to be taken into account when fR and/or fL exceed the f2ce at the plasma boundary (ne = 0). As shown by the white slashed line in figure 1, at the relatively low magnetic field (Bt < 1.8 T), the location of f2ce moves toward the low probing frequency, which will significantly limit the coverage of the probing frequency in the X-mode upper cut-off reflectometry as the probing beam could be absorbed at fprob = f2ce. With the increase in the magnetic field, the range of detection frequency affected by f2ce gradually decreases. Typically, the pedestal density covers a range up to 3.5 × 1019 m-3 [23] and the density coverage is up to ~7.0 × 1019 m-3 at fprob = fR = 110 GHz. In the experimental measurement, the raw signal in the probing frequency beyond 95 GHz becomes rather weak and is close to the noise level due to the influence of f2ce. Thus, the typical accessible density by the upper cut-off frequency is around 5 × 1019 m-3. However, when the plasma parameters meet the requirements, the lower cut-off frequency can be observed in the probing frequency range of 33–50 GHz, which can be identified at fprob < fce. With the supplementary lower cut-off frequency, the X-mode reflectometry on EAST can potentially extend its radial coverage of high-density operations, e.g. the high-density H-mode or fueling experiments [24].
The group delay time (τg) is calculated using τg = fbeat/(dfprob/dt), where fbeat is the beat frequency and dfprob/dt is the sweeping rate of the probing wave frequency. The phase delay associated with the detected frequency, as derived from the group delay spectrum, is used for the determination of microwave reflectometry electron density profiles [15, 25]. Figure 2 compares the time-delay spectra of the X-mode reflectometry measurements at different magnetic fields and plasma densities. The probing starts of the upper cut-off frequency are indicated by the vertical line. As shown in figures 2 (a) and (c), the higher magnetic field (Bt = 2.3 T) requires higher probing frequency at zero density, which is consistent with the results in figure 1. Furthermore, the lower cut-off frequency is visible in the Q-band (33–50 GHz) spectrum in figures 2(a), (b) and (d) in high plasma electron density cases. With the increase in the magnetic field and/or the plasma density, the lower cut-off reflection region extends gradually.
Figure 3 shows the delay-time spectra of the reflectometry signals at 5.62 s in a typical L-mode EAST discharge (# 90330, BT = 2.47 T) and at 4.9622 s in a typical H-mode EAST discharge (# 88004, BT = 2.32 T). The line-integrated density is measured by the 11-channel POlarimeter-INTerferometer (POINT) [27]; the values at the center chord are ne, line ≈ 4.23 × 1019 m-3 and 4.64 × 1019 m-3, respectively. As shown in figure 3, the lower cut-off reflection emerges at the incident frequency below 50 GHz, and the appearance is attributed to the high plasma density, regardless of the L-mode or H-mode regime. The transition between the lower and upper cut-off frequencies occurs at 53 GHz and 51 GHz. Note that τg ≈ 13–14 ns at the probing frequency ranging from 41 GHz to 53 GHz in the discharge #90330 is caused by the back wall reflection. The corresponding τg of both upper and lower cut-off frequencies can be distinguished in the frequency range beyond and below the fce, respectively, which is indicated by the vertical dashed line in figure 3.
Figure 4 shows the group delays measured by the lower cut-off frequency (red dotted lines) and the equivalent group delay via the upper one (black solid lines). By assuming the density profile of the upper cut-off frequency, its equivalent group delay of the lower cut-off frequency can be simultaneously deduced (the black solid lines in figure 4). This equivalent τg, lower is then compared with the experimental measurement (the red line in figure 4). The confidence interval of the group delay is estimated to be the 1/e bandwidth of τg in figure 3. It would make sense if the τg, lower was overlapped or continued with the equivalent τg, upper that is calculated using the upper cut-off frequency. Thus, the group delays of the upper and lower cut-off frequencies can be combined to reveal the overall density profile. In the reflection signal of the upper cut-off frequency, only a fraction of signals is reasonable in the probing frequency below 95 GHz, which restricts the measurable density profile in the plasma edge region. It is clearly seen that in both L-mode (figure 4 left) and H-mode (figure 4 right), a continuous τg is obtained in the overlapped frequency range of 35–48 GHz, yielding validation of the density profile inversion using the overall τg. It is also worth noting that the frequency coverage of the lower cut-off is much higher than the equivalent group delay that is obtained from the upper cut-off, which indicates that the density coverage can be further extended by supplementing the upper cut-off frequency with the lower cut-off frequency.
The overall ne profiles in the H- and L-modes obtained by the X-mode lower (red solid and dotted line) and upper (black and blue dots) cut-off frequencies are compared and depicted in figure 5. The error bars are calculated from the delay-time spectra in figure 3 and are mainly contributed by the bandwidth of the delay-time spectra. The method used for error calculation of the density profiles is taken from [20]. The consistent evolution of two density profiles with the line-integrated densities yields a reliable validation of the lower cut-off reflection in the measurement of density profiles. In the weak signal level of τg, upper in the high-density region, e.g. in the plasma core region, the profile resolution can be significantly improved by utilizing the τg, lower indirectly. Density profiles during L-mode measured by reflectometry are further compared with the inversed profile of POINT. As shown by the green line in figure 5, the inversed density profile in the L-mode is overlapped for a benchmark. The agreement of the ne profiles from POINT and the reflectometry measurements, especially at the core region, implies that the lower cut-off frequency is capable of supplementing the density profile measurement via reflectometry.
To summarize our work, the density profile inversion process, using both the lower and upper cut-off frequencies, enables radial coverage expansion of reflectometry measurement with the emergence of the lower cut-off frequency. On the EAST tokamak, the lower and upper cut-off reflections have been simultaneously obtained in the X-mode polarized multi-band reflectometry diagnostic in high-density experiments, e.g. the H-mode and/or fueling discharges. The feasibility of the density profile measurements shown in this paper indicates that the application of the lower cut-off frequency is successfully accessible for the density profile inversion process and the radial coverage expansion. This experimental validation of density profile inversion by the lower cut-off frequency is of great importance for the measurement accessibility when developing the high-field side reflectometry system in ITER. Although the fprob, lower range is limited by the system bandwidth, the use of both lower and upper cut-off frequencies in the density profile inversion process can significantly extend the radial coverage of the reflectometry measurement, which provides a reference for the ITER reflectometry system in the radial coverage of the density profile in the high-density discharge.
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. S. X. Wang for helping to analyze the POINT data. This work has been supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Nos. 2017YFE0301205 and 2019YFE03040002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11875289, 11975271, 11805136, 12075284, and 12175277) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M703256).
[1] |
Greenwald M et al 1988 Nucl. Fusion 28 2199 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/28/12/009
|
[2] |
Lang P T et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 036001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aaa339
|
[3] |
Zeng L et al 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 320 doi: 10.1063/1.1319607
|
[4] |
Wang G et al 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 1525 doi: 10.1063/1.1527251
|
[5] |
Sips A C C and Kramer G J 1993 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 35 743 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/35/6/008
|
[6] |
Sabot R et al 2006 Nucl. Fusion 46 S685 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/46/9/S04
|
[7] |
Clairet F et al 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 1481 doi: 10.1063/1.1530359
|
[8] |
Silva A et al 1996 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67 4138 doi: 10.1063/1.1147517
|
[9] |
Tokuzawa T et al 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 328 doi: 10.1063/1.1326900
|
[10] |
Xiao W W et al 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 215001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.215001
|
[11] |
Manso M et al 1998 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 40 747 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/40/5/036
|
[12] |
Doyle E J et al 2001 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 43 A95 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/43/12A/307
|
[13] |
Vayakis G et al 1997 Rev. Sci. Instrum 68 435 doi: 10.1063/1.1148220
|
[14] |
Vayakis G et al 2006 Nucl. Fusion 46 S836 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/46/9/s20
|
[15] |
Aguiam D E et al 2017 Fusion Eng. Des. 123 816 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.019
|
[16] |
Shelukhin D A et al 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 094708 doi: 10.1063/1.5039151
|
[17] |
Varela P, Manso M and (ASDEX Upgrade Team) 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 10E315 doi: 10.1063/1.4732805
|
[18] |
Lau C et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 11D815 doi: 10.1063/1.4889739
|
[19] |
Wang G et al 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 3800 doi: 10.1063/1.1788849
|
[20] |
Qu H et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 985 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/12/01
|
[21] |
Wang Y M et al 2013 Fusion Eng. Des. 88 2950 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.06.004
|
[22] |
Zhang S B et al 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 402 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/02
|
[23] |
Gao X et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 083015 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/8/083015
|
[24] |
Huang J et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 082008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab945b
|
[25] |
Mazzucato E et al 1998 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 2201 doi: 10.1063/1.1149121
|
[26] |
Wang Y M et al 2019 Fusion Eng. Des. 148 111286 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111286
|
[27] |
Zou Z Y et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 11D409 doi: 10.1063/1.4890400
|
[1] | Rennan B MORALES, Stéphane HEURAUX, Roland SABOT, Sébastien HACQUIN, Frédéric CLAIRET, the Tore Supra Team. Reconstruction of hollow areas in density profiles from frequency swept reflectometry[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 64005-064005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab7b5a |
[2] | Linghan WAN (万凌寒), Zhoujun YANG (杨州军), Ruobing ZHOU (周若冰), Xiaoming PAN (潘晓明), Chi ZHANG (张弛), Xianli XIE (谢先立), Bowen RUAN (阮博文). Design of Q-band FMCW reflectometry for electron density profile measurement on the Joint TEXT tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(2): 25602-025602. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/2/025602 |
[3] | GAO Yu (高宇), WANG Yumin (王嵎民), ZHANG Tao (张涛), ZHANG Shoubiao (张寿彪), QU Hao (屈浩), HAN Xiang (韩翔), WEN Fei (文斐), KONG Defeng (孔德峰), HUANG Canbin (黄灿斌), CAI Jianqing (蔡剑青), SUN Youwen (孙有文), LIANG Yunfeng (梁云峰), GAO Xiang (高翔), EAST Team. Preliminary Study of the Magnetic Perturbation Effects on the Edge Density Profiles and Fluctuations Using Reflectometers on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(9): 879-883. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/9/01 |
[4] | QU Hao (屈浩), ZHANG Tao (张涛), ZHANG Shoubiao (张寿彪), WEN Fei (文斐), WANG Yumin (王嵎民), KONG Defeng (孔德峰), HAN Xiang (韩翔), YANG Yao (杨曜), GAO Yu (高宇), HUANG Canbin (黄灿斌), CAI Jianqing (蔡剑青), GAO Xiang (高翔), the EAST team. Q-Band X-Mode Reflectometry and Density Profile Reconstruction[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(12): 985-990. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/12/01 |
[5] | ZHANG Shoubiao(张寿彪), GAO Xiang(高翔), LING Bili(凌必利), WANG Yumin(王嵎民), ZHANG Tao(张涛), HAN Xiang(韩翔), LIU Zixi(刘子奚), BU Jingliang(布景亮), LI Jiangang(李建刚), EAST team. Density Profile and Fluctuation Measurements by Microwave Reflectometry on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 311-315. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/02 |
[6] | ZHANG Chongyang (张重阳), LIU Ahdi (刘阿娣), LI Hong (李弘), LI Bin (李斌), et al.. X-Mode Frequency Modulated Density Profile Reflectometer on EAST Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(9): 857-862. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/9/04 |
[7] | JIA Hua (贾华), LIU Fukun (刘甫坤), LIU Liang (刘亮), CHENG Min (程敏), et al.. Design and Test of an Antenna Module Mock-Up for the EAST 4.6 GHz LHCD Launcher[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(8): 834-839. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/8/23 |
[8] | WANG Fumin (王福敏), GAN Kaifu (甘开福), GONG Xianzu (龚先祖), EAST team. Temperature Distribution and Heat Flux on the EAST Divertor Targets in H-Mode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(3): 225-229. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/3/07 |
[9] | YU Yiqing(虞一青), XIN Yu(辛煜), LU Wenqi(陆文琪), NING Zhaoyuan(宁兆元). Abnormal Enhancement of N2+ Emission Induced by Lower Frequencies in N2 Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled Plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(3): 222-226. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/3/07 |
[10] | WANG Liang, XU Guosheng, CHANG Jiafeng, ZHANG Wei, YAN Ning, DING Siye..... Study of Scrape-Off-Layer Width in Ohmic and Lower Hybrid Wave Heated Double-Null Divertor Plasma in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(4): 435-439. |
1. | Zhou, Z., Huang, J., Zhang, T. et al. A convolutional neural network approach to extract the beat frequency of reflectometry for real-time profile inversion on EAST. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114843 |
2. | Liu, Z., Huang, Y., Wu, M. et al. Plasma electron density profile tomography for EAST based on integrated data analysis. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(12): 126006. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad7b58 |
3. | Huang, J., Zhang, T., Zhang, J. et al. Observation of local density increase during pellet homogenization on EAST. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(1): 016031. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad0efa |
4. | Lin, Z.C., Zhang, H.M., Wang, F.D. et al. Preliminary observation of tungsten-impurity suppression using on-axis ECRH by X-ray crystal spectroscopy in EAST. Physics of Plasmas, 2023, 30(3): 032505. DOI:10.1063/5.0131596 |