
Citation: | Xingyu CHEN, Yuhan LI, Mengqi LI, Zilan XIONG. Sterilization mechanism of helium/helium–oxygen atmospheric-pressure pulsed dielectric barrier discharge on membrane surface[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 124015. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca06e |
Pulsed dielectric barrier discharge (PDBD) exhibits several applications in different fields; however, the interaction of its components with substances remains a key issue. In this study, we employed experimental and numerical modeling to investigate the interactions between different PDBD components and substances in pure helium and a helium–oxygen mixture. A membrane comprising a Staphylococcus aureus strain was utilized as the treatment object to demonstrate the trace actions of the evolutions and distributions of certain components on the surface of the substance. The results revealed that the shapes and sizes of the discharging area and inhibition zone differed between groups. Under a pure helium condition, a discharge layer existed along the membrane surface, lying beside the main discharging channel within the electrode area. Further, an annulus inhibition zone was formed at the outer edge of the electrode in the pure helium group at 30 s and 1 min, and this zone extended to a solid circle at 2 min with a radius that was ~50% larger than that of the electrode radius. Nevertheless, the discharging channel and inhibition zone in the helium–oxygen mixture were constrained inside the electrode area without forming any annulus. A 2D symmetrical model was developed with COMSOL to simulate the spatiotemporal distributions of different particles over the membrane surface, and the result demonstrated that the main components, which formed the annulus inhibition zone under the pure helium condition, contributed to the high concentration of the He+ annulus that was formed at the outer edge of the electrode. Moreover, O+ and O2+ were the main components that killed the bacteria under the helium–oxygen mixture conditions. These results reveal that the homogenization treatment on a material surface via PDBD is closely related to the treatment time and working gas.
The detection of reentry vehicles is an important issue in aerospace communications, satellite positioning, and tracking. Military means, such as reconnaissance, anti-reconnaissance, midcourse and terminal interception also need to investigate the electromagnetic characteristics of reentry vehicles. When a vehicle reenters the atmosphere, it will be rubbed and compressed sharply by the surrounding atmosphere, and its surface generates infrared radiation and visible light radiation. A plasma sheath and wake are formed separately on the surface and downstream of the vehicle, which significantly change its electromagnetic characteristics [1–6]. At present, the main detection methods of reentry vehicles include ground-, air- and space-based radar, and space-based infrared systems [7–12]. Most of them use the electromagnetic wave scattering and infrared radiation characteristics of the plasma sheath to achieve target recognition. Compared with the detection method of directly targeting the reentry vehicle, the detection of the wake has the advantages of reducing the speed of the tracking target, increasing the stress time, and decreasing the interference of the stealth coating of the vehicle. The methods of detecting wakes mainly include radar echoes, infrared radiation characteristics [13, 14], laser diagnosis [15], etc. However, the literature on excited electromagnetic radiation based on wakes has not yet been reported in depth. Therefore, the characteristics of excited electromagnetic radiation need to be further explored.
In 1983, Thidé et al discovered the characteristics of the echo spectrum while they used a high-intensity and high-frequency transmitter to irradiate ionospheric plasmas, and called it excited electromagnetic radiation [16]. The research on electromagnetic radiation mainly focused on the fields of ionospheric detection and heating, and the equipment such as the European Incoherent Scatter Radar (EISCAT) and High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) were used to heat the ionosphere for observing nonlinear phenomena in plasmas [17–21]. When an incident electromagnetic wave with frequency
Existing research has established that the plasma densities of both the far wake and the near wake are much larger than that in the ionosphere [23, 24]. As a result, the interference of the ionosphere can be ruled out. These conclusions provide a theoretical possibility for detecting electromagnetic radiation of the plasma wake. Therefore, it is worthy of in-depth research to study the electromagnetic radiation characteristics of the plasma wake and explore its application value in the detection of reentry vehicles.
The theory of excited electromagnetic radiation is nonlinear coupling between plasma waves and electromagnetic waves, such as second harmonic generation (SHG), third harmonic generation (THG), stimulated electromagnetic emission (SEE), etc. So far, there is plenty of research on excited electromagnetic radiation. The Particle In Cell (PIC) method starts from the low-frequency decay and particle cyclotron theory and then presents the SEE spectra [25]. The Vlasov and Maxwell equations (VME) could be coupled to observe the burst process of SEE by detecting the electronic phase space vortex [26–28]. The PIC and VME methods are kinetic theories based on the motion of electrons and ions in plasmas. The Zakharov system of equations (ZSE) gives the electric field, as well as the low frequency oscillation, by dividing the three-wave coupling into global and local parts [29, 30]. ZSE is an important component in a THG system, and plays a key role in the research of dynamic collision-free stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and the attenuation of Langmuir waves in ionized plasmas [31–33]. Both the VME and the PIC methods aim to simulate nonlinear effects in plasmas by using the motion of microscopic particle populations. As a complex plasma environment, the excited electromagnetic radiation of the plasma wakes has not been dealt with. If the detected target transfers from the reentry vehicle to the plasma wake by means of excited electromagnetic radiation, the detected target will become larger and longer, and more response time will be obtained. Therefore, the study of excited electromagnetic radiation is extremely interesting. The calculation of excited electromagnetic radiation by ZSE is based on wave-wave interactions, which is suitable for the study of the plasma wake.
This work investigates the excited electromagnetic radiation characteristics of plasma wakes by ZSE in detail. The rest of the paper is as follows. Section 2 simulates the density distribution of plasma wakes by using the typical sphere-cone model and the Arrhenius chemical reaction model, and analyzes the effects of both flight speed and angle of attack. Section 3 evaluates the excitation conditions of electromagnetic radiation, and discusses the effects of both flight speed and escape angle on the radiation power spectra. Finally, some conclusions are presented in section 4.
In this section, the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical method is used to simulate plasma wakes of reentry vehicles in an atmospheric environment. As shown in figure 1, a geometric model of a typical sphere-cone reentry vehicle is established. The radius of the sphere is set to 0.5 m, the axial angle of the sphere is 79.6°, the length of the model is 1.5 m, and its bottom radius is 0.6 m.
As the flow field changes dramatically at the head, the grid is densified as shown in figure 2. The quality of 98% grid, which is responsible for the simulation results, is in the range of 0.95–1.
Considering the calculation of both the plasma wake and the flow around the wall, the k-ω equation is selected as the fluid governing equation. The diffusion equation of substances is used to estimate the mass fraction of each substance [34]:
\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\left( {\rho {Y_i}} \right) + \nabla \cdot\left( {\rho \vec v{Y_i}} \right) = - \nabla {\vec J_i} + {R_i} + {S_i}, | (1) |
where
When equation (1) is the mass diffusion equation in advection,
The velocity boundary will cause the reflection of a shock wave at the simulation boundary, thus the far-field pressure boundary condition is used at the inlet and the pressure outlet boundary condition is used at the outlet.
The fluid of a reentry vehicle has a series of complex chemical processes, such as vibrational excitation, dissociation, ionization and chemical reaction at the molecular energy level, thus it must be analyzed by thermochemical non-equilibrium theory. The thermochemical non-equilibrium process includes two aspects: first, the temperature is non-equilibrium and changes with time; second, the chemical reaction and the mass fraction of fluid components are non-equilibrium. Therefore, the two-temperature model is chosen to simulate the nonequilibrium in hypersonic flow, which can provide a better flow field prediction than the single temperature model.
In conclusion, the following chemical reaction rate model is selected:
\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^N v_{i, r}^\prime {M_i}\:\mathop \leftrightarrow \limits_{{k_{{\rm{f}}, r}}}^{{k_{{\rm{b}}, r}}} \:\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^N v_{i, r}^{M_i}\:, | (2) |
where N stands for the number of chemical reaction substances, v_{i, r}^\prime and v_{i, r}^{\prime\prime} are the stoichiometric coefficient of chemical reactants and the stoichiometric number of products, respectively, {M_i} is substance of i. {k_{{\rm{f}}, r}} and {k_{{\rm{b}}, r}} indicates the positive and reverse reaction rate of the reaction r. Ultimately, the 7-component chemical reaction model is selected for simulation and is shown in table 1 (N2, O2, NO, O, NO+, e−) [32].
Equation number | Reaction equation |
1 | {{\rm{N}}_2} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {\rm{N}} + {\rm{M}} |
2 | {{\rm{O}}_2} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{O}} + {\rm{O}} + {\rm{M}} |
3 | {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {\rm{O}} + {\rm{M}} |
4 | {{\rm{N}}_2} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{N}} |
5 | {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {{\rm{O}}_2} |
6 | {\rm{N}} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}^ + } + {{\rm{e}}^ - } |
Figure 3 describes the distribution (
Figure 3 depicts that the plasma wake forms a narrow 'neck' downstream of the vehicle. As the Mach number increases, the electron number density increases and the 'neck' gradually moves away from the bottom of the vehicle and becomes longer. Considering the great kinetic energy of the hypersonic flow, in the boundary layer, when the viscosity effect slows down the flow rate, part of the lost kinetic energy is converted into the internal energy of the gas. This part of the energy is enough to excite the vibration energy in the molecule, and finally causes the dissociation and ionization of the gas in the boundary layer. For these reasons, chemical reactions produce more ions. The electron number densities of the wake decrease with the increase of the distance away from the vehicle.
Figure 4 illustrates the electron number densities along the central axis of the plasma wake at various velocities. x stands for the range away from the bottom of the reentry vehicle. The reduction rate of the electron number density slows down as x increases. The electron number density first increases and then decreases, where x = 2 m is the demarcation point. There is a negative correlation between the velocity of the vehicle and the reduction rate of the electron number density.
Figures 5(a) and (b) are the cloud diagrams of the electron number density distribution of the plasma wake when the angles of attack are 10° and 5°, respectively. The wake structures are similar to the case with the zero angle of attack. Figures 3 and 5 show that the plasma wake structures with different angles of attack are all cylindrical. The electron number density along the axial direction decreases with the range away from the vehicle, and the distribution of the electron number densities is basically consistent with the existing research [23, 24].
Thus, a plasma wake model applied to the following section is constructed by utilizing the cylindrical layers, that is, the wake is divided into several cylinders of finite length along the axial direction, and the distribution of plasma parameters in the radial direction is non-uniform. Figure 6 depicts the schematic of an incident wave acting on a plasma wake.
The coordinate system is established with the midpoint of the vehicle tail as the origin, the longitudinal direction of the wake is along the z-axis, and the x-axis is perpendicular to the z-axis.
Excited electromagnetic radiation originates from the nonlinear interaction between electromagnetic waves and plasmas. In other words, the generation of radiation is due to the vibration of plasmas caused by the incident electromagnetic wave, for example, ion vibration produces ion acoustic wave. The coupling of both the excited radiation and the incident wave makes the particles oscillate in an orderly manner, and then produces electric fields and currents. It is worth noting that the incident frequency of the electromagnetic wave must be higher than the plasma frequency {\omega _{\rm{p}}} = \sqrt {{n_0}{e^2}/({m_{\rm{e}}}{\varepsilon _0})}, and the amplitude of the incident wave needs to be higher than the given threshold Considering the plasma wake of a reentry vehicle, there are a large number of electrons and ions generated by chemical reactions and ionization in the plasma wake. As a result, the excited electromagnetic radiation in the plasma wake is feasible.
The ZSE gives the condition that the amplitude of the incident wave must meet by analyzing the THG system, and the threshold value
\begin{array}{l} {E_{th}^2 = 2{\nu _{\rm{i}}}{\nu _{\rm{e}}}\left( {{k_1}} \right), }\\ {{k_1}({\rm{\Delta \Omega }}) = \pm \frac{1}{2}\left[ {{{\left( {4{\rm{\Delta \Omega }} + 1} \right)}^{1/2}} - 1} \right], {\rm{\Delta \Omega }} = {\omega _0} - {\omega _{\rm{p}}}, }\\ {{\nu _{\rm{i}}} = {{\left( {\frac{\pi }{8}} \right)}^{1/2}}\left[ {{{\left( {\frac{m}{M}} \right)}^{1/2}} + {{\left( {\frac{{{T_{\rm{e}}}}}{{{T_{\rm{i}}}}}} \right)}^{3/2}}\exp \left( { - \frac{{{T_{\rm{e}}}}}{{2{T_{\rm{i}}}}} - \frac{3}{2}} \right)} \right], }\\ {{\nu _{\rm{e}}}\left( {{k_1}} \right) = \frac{{{\nu _{coll}}}}{2} + {{\left( {\frac{\pi }{8}} \right)}^{1/2}}{{\left( {\frac{3}{2}} \right)}^4}{{\left( {\frac{M}{{\eta m}}} \right)}^{5/2}}}\\ {\qquad \quad \;\: \times \:\frac{1}{{{k_1}k_1^2}}\exp \left( { - \frac{9}{8}\frac{M}{{\eta m}}\frac{1}{{k_1^2}} - \frac{3}{2}} \right), } \end{array} | (3) |
where △Ω stands for the difference between the angular frequency of the incident electromagnetic wave
According to equation (3), figure 7 shows the distribution of the electric field threshold of the plasma wake at x = 10 m.
As the Mach number increases, the threshold decreases and the maximum of thresholds exists at all three speeds. It can be seen from equation (3) that
After the incident electromagnetic wave acts on the plasma wake, the incident wave couples to the plasmas and decays into a low-frequency acoustic wave and a reverse electromagnetic wave. Based on the plasma wake model of the reentry vehicle as shown in figure 6, ZSE describes the parametric instability process in the plasma wake. ZSE is constructed from the two-fluid equation, which describes the coupling process of both the incident wave and the low-frequency sound wave [36]. The ZSE of the plasma wake supports the following assumptions: (1) the high-frequency electromagnetic wave and the low-frequency acoustic wave in the plasma wake can be well separated; (2) the particle motion in the low frequency part is in a quasi-neutral state; (3) the electron velocity in the plasma wake is much smaller than the ion velocity. The ZSE is as follows [37]:
\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left[ {{\rm{i}}\left( {\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}} + \frac{{{v_{\rm{e}}}}}{2}} \right) + {\rm{\Delta \Omega }} + \frac{3}{2}\frac{{v_{\rm{e}}^2}}{{{\omega _{\rm{p}}}}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right]E\left( {x, t} \right)}\\ {\: = \:\frac{{{\omega _{\rm{p}}}}}{2}\frac{n}{{{n_0}}}E\left( {x, t} \right) - \frac{{{\omega _{\rm{p}}}}}{{2{n_0}}}nE\:, } \end{array} | (4) |
\left[ {\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {v_{\rm{i}}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}} - {v_{\rm{s}}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right]n(x, t) = \frac{{{\varepsilon _0}}}{{4M}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}E{(x, t)^2}\:. | (5) |
Equations (4) and (5) are the one-dimensional ZSE. indicates the imaginary unit, is the total high frequency electric field, stands for the density perturbation of the ions, represents the total number of ions, is the ionic speed of sound, and means the dielectric constant. \left\langle {} \right\rangle and || stand for the spatial mean and absolute value, respectively.
As the ZSE is dimensionless, the Fourier transform is used to solve it in the frequency domain [38]. The definition of the source spectrum is obtained by the two-scale model [39]:
\overline {nE} {\left( \omega \right)^2} = \frac{1}{K}\mathop \sum \limits_{J = 0}^{K - 1} {S_J}\left( \omega \right), | (6) |
where means the number of segments in the simulation area, and each segment contains microelements, and thus, constitutes the entire simulation area. There is a nonlinear current source {S_J}\left( \omega \right) = {\rm{| }}{\left\{ {nE} \right\}_J}{\rm{|}}{{\rm{ }}^2},J = 0 \ldots K - 1 in each segment of the simulation region. Equation (6) describes the average current source term for the simulation region. It can be seen that the current source term is an analysis of the nonlinear current in a certain simulation area. According to the current source definition, denotes the current source spectrum for the entire simulation area.
The power spectrum reflects the total power on the escape path of the excited electromagnetic radiation in the plasma wake, the source spectrum only describes the intensity of the current source term of the localized plasmas. With reference to the layered structure of figure 6, when the local size of the plasmas meets
{P_\omega } = - K\mathop \smallint _{ - \infty }^\infty {(Ai)^2}\left( {\frac{z}{l} - {\delta _\omega }} \right)S\left( {\omega , z} \right){\rm{d}}z. | (7) |
Here,
Excited electromagnetic radiation in the descending sideband of the wake cannot escape, which can be seen from equation (7) that
When excited radiation escapes obliquely, the escaping angle θ is no longer zero. As shown in figure 6, these plasma layers have different x-coordinate values. The formula of the power spectrum is the same as that of equation (7), where
{\delta _{\omega , \theta }} = \left( {\frac{{2\omega }}{{{\omega _0}}} - {{\sin }^2}\theta } \right){\left( {\frac{{{\omega _0}}}{c}L} \right)^{2/3}}. | (8) |
Figure 8 shows the effects of the incident frequencies of electromagnetic waves on the excited electromagnetic radiation source spectra. The range of the plasma wake is 100 m away from the tail of the vehicle. The distribution of electron densities along the z-axis is given in section 2, where the maximum of electron number densities is
The three curves in figure 8 are envelope spectra without characteristic peaks at the angular frequency
Choosing the locations separately as
As shown in figure 9, the frequency shifts of the peaks in curves (a), (b) and (c) are consistent. The sharp peaks of the cascade in the source spectra are the embodiments of current sources. The peak structures of curves (b) and (c) are more abundant than that of curve (a) due to the higher electron number density in the wake closer to the bottom of the vehicle. It is interesting to note that there are no more peaks in curve (c) than in curve (b), which indicates that
In this section, the power spectra are selected to analyze excited electromagnetic radiation in the plasma wake of the reentry vehicle.
According to the model given in figure 6 and the results of section 2, figures 10 (a)–(c) show the power spectra at 25 m, 75 m and 150 m away from the bottom of the vehicle at M6, M9 and M13. The corresponding incident frequencies are selected as
The distributions of secondary peaks in figure 10 are presented in table 2. In the case of the same incident wave, there is
x (m) | |||||||
M6 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 | |||||||
M9 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 | |||||||
M13 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 |
In the power spectra shown in figure 10, compared with the up-shifted sidebands, the down-shifted sidebands still have more cascade peaks, which is consistent with the law of the source spectra as presented in section 3.1. The magnitudes of the power spectra increase with the increase of Mach number. According to the conclusion in section 2.2, incident waves with higher frequency are needed to excite the electromagnetic radiation of the vehicle at a higher speed. As a result, such incident waves generate a higher electromagnetic radiation under the action of three-wave coupling. Therefore, higher speeds produce higher power spectra, and this feature also exists in source spectra at different speeds.
Figure 6 describes the path model, where the plasma parameters along the path of electromagnetic wave propagation are different. It emerges that the distribution of electron densities is the most important factor, horizontal layering is then carried out. Figure 6 shows the model of the escape wave from point A through two points I and E.
According to the path in figure 6, by calculating the source spectra of the ABIH and IDEF regions and reckoning the overall power spectra, figure 11 plots the escaping excited radiation along the 45° direction. The curve (a) selects the plasma wake of the vehicle with M13 and
In curve (b), the Mach number of the vehicle is M13 and the axial position is
The results reveal that both power spectra have the similar peaks and produce some small protrusions next to the secondary peaks. The phenomena can be observed at
Furthermore, the effects of the escape angles are shown by the curves in figure 12. The parameters of the plasma wake at x = 100 m are selected, where the central electron density of the trail axis is
Figure 12 shows the distribution of power spectra obtained at different escape angles. It indicates that the effects of the escape angle on the magnitudes of the power spectra are slight. However, under the four selected angles, the magnitudes of both the main and secondary peaks at
This paper proposes a new method for detecting reentry targets through the excited electromagnetic radiation phenomenon of the plasma wake. The following main conclusions are drawn through the numerical analysis under different conditions.
(1) Due to the conservation of energy
(2) When the frequency of the incident wave satisfies the excitation conditions, the incident frequency affects both the number of sub-peaks and the shape of the spectral lines, and these peaks present a cascade structure, whose frequency shifts satisfy
(3) The greater the Mach number, the more obvious and stronger the excited electromagnetic radiation spectra are.
(4) While under the incident wave with the same frequency, the spectra on the far wake have 6 peaks, nevertheless, there are only 4 peaks at 25 m.
At present, early warning radar can only search and track long-distance targets. If the research in this area is combined with early warning radar, this work may provide a certain reference for the speed measurement and maneuvering monitoring of the vehicle.
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51907076) and the Interdisciplinary Fund of the Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center (No. WHMFC202101).
[1] |
Xiong Z L et al 2021 Plasma Process Polym. 18 e2000204 doi: 10.1002/ppap.202000204
|
[2] |
Wu S et al 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 09LT01 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aa856d
|
[3] |
Lee K et al 2006 J. Microbiol. 44 269
|
[4] |
Kim B et al 2011 Food Microbiol. 28 9 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.022
|
[5] |
Lu Y et al 2011 Biochem. Eng. J. 55 17 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.02.020
|
[6] |
Khoja A H, Tahir M and Amin N A S 2019 Energy Convers. Manage. 183 529 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.112
|
[7] |
Liu R Q et al 2021 Chemosphere 263 127893 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127893
|
[8] |
Brandenburg R 2017 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 053001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aa6426
|
[9] |
Shao T et al 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 215203 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/12/125408
|
[10] |
Obradović B M, Sretenović G B and Kuraica M M 2011 J. Hazard. Mater. 185 1280 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.043
|
[11] |
Massima Mouele E S et al 2021 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 105758 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105758
|
[12] |
Niu Z et al 2013 Surf. Coat. Technol. 228 S578 doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.007
|
[13] |
Huang Y F et al 2016 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44 938 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2016.2559802
|
[14] |
Von Woedtke T et al 2013 Phys. Rep. 530 291 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.005
|
[15] |
Wei L S et al 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 147 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/2/09
|
[16] |
Hamilton W A and Sale A J H 1967 Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 148 789 doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(67)90053-0
|
[17] |
Laroussi M, Richardson J P and Dobbs F C 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 772 doi: 10.1063/1.1494863
|
[18] |
Heinlin J et al 2011 J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 25 1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03702.x
|
[19] |
Reuter S et al 2015 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24 054001 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/24/5/054001
|
[20] |
Winter J et al 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 385201 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/38/385201
|
[21] |
Nikiforov A Y et al 2015 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24 034001 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/24/3/034001
|
[22] |
Hübner S et al 2015 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24 054005 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/24/5/054005
|
[23] |
Wu S et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 103506 doi: 10.1063/1.4964280
|
[24] |
Shu Z et al 2021 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 30 055001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/abf36a
|
[25] |
Wei L S et al 2016 Vacuum 125 123 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.12.011
|
[26] |
Jiang N et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 350 12 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.154
|
[27] |
Takana H and Nishiyama H 2014 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3 034001 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/3/034001
|
[28] |
Wang J et al 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 043501 doi: 10.1063/1.5135973
|
[29] |
Liao X Y et al 2018 J. Food Sci. 83 401 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14045
|
[30] |
Shi H, Wang Y H and Wang D Z 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 122306 doi: 10.1063/1.3033754
|
[31] |
Sigmond R S 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 56 1355 doi: 10.1063/1.334126
|
[32] |
Rauf S and Kushner M J 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 3460 doi: 10.1063/1.369703
|
[33] |
Wang Q, Economou D J and Donnelly V M 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 023301 doi: 10.1063/1.2214591
|
[34] |
Deloche R et al 1976 Phys. Rev. A 13 1140 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.1140
|
[35] |
Gadri R B 1999 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 27 36 doi: 10.1109/27.763018
|
[36] |
Léveillé V and Coulombe S 2005 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 14 467 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/14/3/008
|
[37] |
Gudmundsson J T et al 2001 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 1100 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/34/7/312
|
[38] |
Stafford D S and Kushner M J 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 2451 doi: 10.1063/1.1768615
|
[39] |
Atkinson R et al 1997 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26 1329 doi: 10.1063/1.556010
|
[40] |
Lee D et al 2005 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 33 949 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2005.845266
|
[41] |
Lu X P et al 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 053309 doi: 10.1063/1.2977674
|
[42] |
Dobrynin D et al 2011 New J. Phys. 13 103033 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/10/103033
|
[43] |
Laroussi M and Leipold F 2004 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 233 81 doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2003.11.016
|
[44] |
Ricard A, Décomps P and Massines F 1999 Surf. Coat. Technol. 112 1 doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00797-X
|
[45] |
Liu Y G, Hao Y P and Zheng B 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 093506 doi: 10.1063/1.4754516
|
[46] |
Nersisyan G and Graham W G 2004 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 13 582 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/13/4/005
|
[47] |
Simeni M S et al 2021 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 30 055004 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/abf320
|
[48] |
Pan G S et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 043508 doi: 10.1063/1.4946777
|
[49] |
Graves D B 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 263001 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/26/263001
|
[1] | Xin AI, Qiuyue NIE, Zhonglin ZHANG, Peiqi CHEN, Shulei ZHENG, Changshi YAN, Guoqiang WEI. Effect of attack angle on the electromagnetic wave transmission characteristics in the hypersonic plasma sheath of a re-entry vehicle[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 125301. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad7786 |
[2] | Lu MA (马璐), Xiaodong WANG (王晓东), Jian ZHU (祝健), Shun KANG (康顺). Effect of DBD plasma excitation characteristics on turbulent separation over a hump model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aacdf0 |
[3] | Xiangyang LIU (刘向阳), Siyu WANG (王司宇), Yang ZHOU (周阳), Zhiwen WU (武志文), Kan XIE (谢侃), Ningfei WANG (王宁飞). Thermal radiation properties of PTFE plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 64012-064012. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa65e8 |
[4] | ZHANG Weiwei (张卫卫), DENG Baiquan (邓柏权), ZUO Haoyi (左浩毅), ZHENG Xianjun (曾宪俊), CAO Xiaogang (曹小岗), XUE Xiaoyan (薛晓艳), OU Wei (欧巍), CAO Zhi (曹智), GOU Fujun (芶富均). Analysis of Power Model for Linear Plasma Device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 844-847. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/09 |
[5] | LIU Zhiwei (刘智惟), BAO Weimin (包为民), LI Xiaoping (李小平), SHI Lei (石磊), LIU Donglin (刘东林). Influences of Turbulent Reentry Plasma Sheath on Wave Scattering and Propagation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 617-626. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/07 |
[6] | LI Mei (李美), ZHANG Junpeng (张俊鹏), HU Yang (胡杨), ZHANG Hantian (张含天), WU Yifei (吴益飞). Simulation of Fault Arc Based on Different Radiation Models in a Closed Tank[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 549-553. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/18 |
[7] | ZHOU Suyun (周素云), CHEN Hui (陈辉), LI Yanfang (李艳芳). The Effect of Ion Motion on Laser-Driven Plasma Wake in Capillary[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(1): 86-89. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/1/15 |
[8] | SHI Lei (石磊), ZHAO Lei (赵蕾), YAO Bo (姚博), LI Xiaoping (李小平). Telemetry Channel Capacity Assessment for Reentry Vehicles in Plasma Sheath Environment[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(12): 1006-1012. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/12/05 |
[9] | JI Xiang (戢翔), SONG Yuntao (宋云涛), WU Songtao(武松涛), WANG Zhibin(王志滨), SHEN Guang (沈光), LIU Xufeng (刘旭峰), CAO Lei (曹磊), ZHOU zibo (周自波), PENG Xuebing(彭学兵), WANG Chenghao(王成昊). Electromagnetic Modeling of the Passive Stabilization Loop at EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(9): 855-858. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/9/16 |
[10] | XI Yanbin (奚衍斌), LIU Yue (刘悦). FDTD Simulation on Power Absorption of Terahertz Electromagnetic Waves in Dense Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 5-8. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/02 |
1. | Esposito, S., Scarabosio, A., Vecchi, G. et al. Non-equilibrium plasma distribution in the wake of a slender blunted-nose cone in hypersonic flight and its effect on the radar cross section. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2024.109699 |
2. | Bao, Y., He, X., Su, W. et al. Study on the generation of terahertz waves in collision plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 2024, 31(9): 093302. DOI:10.1063/5.0219947 |
3. | Tong, J., Li, H., Xu, B. et al. Inversion of electron densities in plasma wakes of hypersonic targets. Results in Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107714 |
4. | Zhang, H., Li, J., Qiu, C. et al. Electromagnetic scattering characteristics of a hypersonic vehicle with a microrough surface in the millimeter wave band. AIP Advances, 2023, 13(9): 095215. DOI:10.1063/5.0160916 |
1. | Esposito, S., Scarabosio, A., Vecchi, G. et al. Non-equilibrium plasma distribution in the wake of a slender blunted-nose cone in hypersonic flight and its effect on the radar cross section. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2024.109699 |
2. | Bao, Y., He, X., Su, W. et al. Study on the generation of terahertz waves in collision plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 2024, 31(9): 093302. DOI:10.1063/5.0219947 |
3. | Tong, J., Li, H., Xu, B. et al. Inversion of electron densities in plasma wakes of hypersonic targets. Results in Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107714 |
4. | Zhang, H., Li, J., Qiu, C. et al. Electromagnetic scattering characteristics of a hypersonic vehicle with a microrough surface in the millimeter wave band. AIP Advances, 2023, 13(9): 095215. DOI:10.1063/5.0160916 |
Equation number | Reaction equation |
1 | {{\rm{N}}_2} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {\rm{N}} + {\rm{M}} |
2 | {{\rm{O}}_2} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{O}} + {\rm{O}} + {\rm{M}} |
3 | {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{M}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {\rm{O}} + {\rm{M}} |
4 | {{\rm{N}}_2} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{N}} |
5 | {\rm{NO}} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}} + {{\rm{O}}_2} |
6 | {\rm{N}} + {\rm{O}} \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}} {\rm{N}}{{\rm{O}}^ + } + {{\rm{e}}^ - } |
x (m) | |||||||
M6 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 | |||||||
M9 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 | |||||||
M13 | 25 | ||||||
75 | |||||||
150 |