
Citation: | Jiaxin LI, Zhengchao DUAN, Feng HE, Ruoyu HAN, Jiting OUYANG. Influence of the pulse polarity on micro-hollow cathode helium plasma jet[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 075401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acb489 |
Helium plasma jets generated by micro-hollow cathode discharge (MHCD) with the square-wave power source of different polarities are investigated in this work. The effects of positive and negative polarity pulses on the MHCD and plasma jet were compared, and the time-resolved optical emission spectra of excited species (N2+ and O) were studied. The results confirm that the electric field is a key factor for the propagation of the jet during the rising edge of the positive current pulse, while the gas expansion is mainly important for the jet propagation during the current stable phase. The time-resolved spectra show that the generation of specie O in the jet-driven by the electric field is more efficient.
In tokamak plasmas, experimental data show that radial transport exceeds the predictions of the neoclassical theory by more than several orders of magnitude, and this anomalous transport phenomenon is widely believed to be caused by turbulence driven by plasma density and temperature gradients. Typical turbulences due to drift wave instabilities are ion temperature gradient mode (ITG), trapped electron mode (TEM), and electron temperature gradient mode (ETG) [1–4]. A key difference among these turbulence types is that they have different wavenumber ranges. In the wavenumber domain, turbulent energy is transferred from lower to higher wavenumbers through cascades, which leads to turbulence that can exhibit complex broad-spectrum characteristics. To gain insight into the fundamental physical properties of turbulent energy cascades, or the interaction mechanisms between different scales of turbulence, a broad wavenumber range density fluctuation diagnosis of multi-scale turbulence is required.
In tokamaks, most diagnostic methods can only detect turbulent signals at low wavenumber, such as Beam Emission Spectroscopy (BES) [5], Gas Puffing Imaging (GPI) [6], Microwave Reflectometry [7]. Far-Infrared Scattering [8] is well developed to diagnose high wavenumber turbulent signal, but it can only measure turbulence with specific wavenumber, limited by scattering angle. Phase Contrast Imaging (PCI) [9] allows simultaneous diagnosis of plasma density fluctuations over a wide wave number range and is a powerful tool for studying multi-scale turbulence in tokamak core or edge regions.
A conventional PCI diagnostic based on a 10.6 μm CO2 laser beam has recently been applied in its entirety on the HL-2A tokamak and it shows its nice promising wavenumber diagnosing upper-limit of 15 cm−1 [10]. For a higher wavenumber, the phase scintillation effect will cause significant response degradation which has an oscillating waveform and is proportional to cosk2pL2k0, where kp stands for plasma wavenumber, k0 stands for the wavenumber of laser beam and L is the plasma integration path [11]. The discussion of this scintillation effect brightens an effective way to broaden the wavenumber diagnosing range of PCI, i.e., applying a laser with a shorter wavelength as the laser probe. In this paper, we present the design of a novel NI-PCI system based on a 1550 nm continuous fiber laser, which is under development on the HL-2A tokamak. Unfortunately, substituting the 10.6 μm CO2 laser of traditional PCI with a 1550 nm laser of NI-PCI brings big technical challenges although great progress in the 1550 nm laser and its related instruments has been achieved in the last decade along with its wide usage in the communication field and industry. These challenges are mainly reflected in the manufacturing difficulty of the phase plate and the weak response of the system, so a good optical design is required to cope with it first.
The rest of this article is organized as follows: section 2 introduces the phase scintillation effect and PCI diagnostics on the HL-2A; section 3 presents the design scheme of the beam expanding optics; section 4 describes the design of the imaging optics, especially the phase plate; section 5 is a brief discussion and conclusion.
PCI diagnosis is a kind of self-interference spectral diagnosis, without the need for an external reference beam, and indirectly realizes the string integral measurement of density by measuring the plasma refractive index. In the PCI diagnosis, both scattered and unscattered lights originate from the same outgoing laser and always pass through the same spatial region, so their relative phase is not affected by plasma or mechanical vibrations of the mirror. This self-interference property of the PCI method makes it an important diagnostic tool in the measurement of fusion plasma density fluctuations.
The phase scintillation effect is the main factor limiting the upper limit of wave number measurement of the PCI system, which is directly related to the detection beam wavelength. After considering the phase scintillation effect and the transmission of unscattered light by the phase plate substrate, the total light intensity of the PCI system collected on the imaging surface is [12]:
IPCI+scin.=RI0[1+2Δ√Rcosπλ0Lλ2pcos(kpx)], | (1) |
where I0 and λ0 represent the light intensity and wavelength of the incident laser, R is the reflectivity of the phase plate substrate and kp and λp mean the wavenumber and wavelength of the plasma density fluctuation, Δ=−λ0re∫˜nedl denotes the phase shift due to plasma density fluctuations, the classical electron radius re=2.8×10−15 m, and ˜ne represents the amplitude of the density fluctuations.
The PCI technique converts the phase change of the probe beam into the light intensity change in the image plane and then applies the Fourier transform to solve the frequency-wave number spectrum of the density fluctuation. As seen from equation (1), the phase scintillation factor is cosπλ0Lλ2p, then when the plasma integration path L is determined, the intensity signal of PCI will rapidly decrease for density fluctuations with high wavenumber; and when the wavenumber exceeds a certain value, the phase change will be equivalent to the period, resulting in a complete failure of the response. Under ideal conditions, the plasma is an infinitely thin scattering layer with L=0 and the phase scintillation effect is neglected; while in reality, the plasma will be distributed on the integration path and the light intensity at different locations is different when the object plane is fixed. For an integral path L of determined length, we define the distance as the depth of field when the signal strength drops to the original √0.5, then the wavelength satisfies λ2p⩾, i.e., the maximum wavenumber is determined.
HL-2A is the first tokamak device with the divertor configuration in China, and PCI diagnosis uses two vertically opposite windows. As shown in figure 1, the inner diameter of the window is 35 mm, located at the small plasma radius of 0.625<r/a<0.7 , labeled as ‘NO, 45’. The length of the plasma region that the laser passes through is about 600 mm, that is, the integration path L . When considering the phase scintillation effect, for PCI diagnosis of 10.6 \mu m, the system response decreases rapidly with the increase of density fluctuation wavenumber, when k_{\mathrm{p}}> 15 cm−1, the wavenumber response function starts to oscillate; while for PCI diagnosis of 1550 nm, even if k_{\mathrm{p}}\sim 30 cm−1, the response function also maintains a good quasi-linearity [13]. Recently, the first acoustic test results based on the NI-PCI system prototype also show that the technical solution can effectively respond to and detect high wavenumber density fluctuations [14].
The 1550 nm wavelength is generally considered to be a better wavelength range for optical interference, which has a small refractive index and absorption in many optical materials, therefore it is widely used in Optical Fiber Communication, Optical Sensing and Interferometric Imaging. For the PCI system, the wavelength accuracy and power stability of the laser are particularly important, so the 1550 nm continuous fiber laser (AT-1550-CW-10-T) with a spectral linewidth \leqslant0.1 nm, output power 10 W (continuously adjustable), and power stability (8 h) \leqslant \pm 1.2 {{\%}} was finally selected.
In the analysis of section 5, it can be obtained that a larger beam diameter implies better wavenumber resolution, however, the beam diameter cannot be increased indefinitely due to the diagnostic window size. On the HL-2A tokamak, the inner diameter of the vertical window for PCI diagnostics is 35 mm. When the beam diameter is comparable to the window diameter, diffraction effects must be considered. At this time, non-negligible diffraction will occur when the edge part of the laser passes through the diagnostic window, and the plasma density fluctuation information it contains is no longer credible. When the window diameter is determined, the range affected by diffraction on the beam profile can be evaluated by solving the ratio of the diffracted field to the undiffracted field under different beam diameters [15]. In general, the shorter the laser wavelength, the weaker the diffraction effect, which implies that the NI-PCI system with 1550 nm is much less affected by diffraction than conventional PCI. Additionally, another important effect comes from the engineering errors of the device. For a large tokamak, offsets on the order of mm in the size of the windows and in the alignment of the upper and lower windows are common. Considering the above two points, the final expansion size of the NI-PCI system is designed to expand the beam from 3 mm diameter to 15 mm diameter.
The laser beam expanding system can be divided into the transmissive type and reflective type according to the propagation form of the laser. Compared to the reflective type, the transmissive beam expansion system is more compact and has less aberration. However, due to the heat-absorbing properties of optical materials, the system aberration tends to change with temperature, which can affect the normal use of the system and may even cause damage to the lens when the temperature continues to rise. The commonly used reflective beam expansion systems can be broadly classified into two types: Cassegrain and Gregorian systems, which can be further divided into axisymmetric and off-axis configurations. In the axisymmetric configuration, the light from the center of the laser returns in the original direction and the laser loses this part of the energy; while in the off-axis configuration, the laser energy is completely retained. After comprehensive consideration, the off-axis Gregorian system was selected as the initial beam expansion solution for NI-PCI.
In an off-axis reflective beam expansion system, the ideal solution is to choose two confocal parabolic mirrors, where a beam of light emitted from the parabolic focus and reflected by the mirrors will be perfectly parallel to the optical axis. However, considering the difficulty of machining and commissioning of off-axis parabolic mirrors, spherical mirrors were finally chosen instead in this system. Inevitably, spherical mirrors introduce additional spherical aberration compared to parabolic mirrors, but this aberration is acceptable for PCI systems. The overall design of the final NI-PCI system beam expansion scheme is given in figure 2, in which HeNe laser is used to debug the optical path. According to simple geometric optical calculations, when the beam expansion ratio is 5 times, the ratio of the focal lengths of the two concave mirrors placed in confocal should also be 5, meanwhile, the two plane mirrors are used to increase the spatial compactness of the front optical path.
In general, the light wave emitted by a laser will not be an ideal parallel beam, but a more natural Gaussian beam, which is the solution of the wave equation in a cylindrical coordinate system. The propagation of a Gaussian beam in an optical system is more complicated than that of a parallel beam. On one hand, rigorous physical-optical calculations can be made; on the other hand, under near-axis conditions, the near-axis Gaussian equation can be used for calculations. In this paper, the full optical path is optimized based on the Zemax OpticStudio® optical design tool. Zemax can handle the propagation of Gaussian beams in optical systems well, and can automatically find the approximate optimal optical path settings to meet the requirements by setting a reasonable number of operators and evaluation functions.
The key to optical path optimization is to obtain a Gaussian beam with a specified diameter (15 mm) and good collimation. This means that within the scale range of HL-2A plasma (m order), the diameter of the Gaussian beam should have a small variation to ensure the rationality of PCI diagnosis. In this optical path, the main optimization parameters are the focal length, tilt angle, and relative distance of the two concave mirrors. After the Zemax simulation, the effect of the tilt angle of the concave mirror proved to be weak, so we chose an angle suitable for the optical path commissioning, i.e., an angle of 10 degrees with the laser incidence direction. Based on this, the first step of the simulation is to determine the relative distances of the two concave mirrors. When the relative distance is set to 1000 mm, the focal lengths of the two concave mirrors are f_1 = 168 mm and f_2 = 832 mm after Zemax optimization. At this time, the sum of the focal lengths is almost equal to the relative distance, which indicates that the two concave mirrors are placed in a confocal state and the beam expansion ratio is the ratio of focal lengths f_2 /f_1 = 4.96\approx 5 . This almost overlaps with the inference of geometrical optics, and the subtle differences may come from the Gaussian beam. In fact, for a fixed beam expansion ratio, the relative distance of a concave mirror is essentially determined by its focal length, and thus for the convenience of lens processing, the focal length is generally determined first.
For a long optical path, when considering the propagation of a Gaussian beam, focusing lenses should generally be properly added to the optical path to collimate the Gaussian beam. In practical engineering applications, this scheme is regularly used. However, the addition of such focusing lenses is usually empirical and rarely analyzed quantitatively. In this section, the beam expansion and collimation effects of three different optical path design schemes are compared and analyzed, corresponding to the three design schemes of no focusing lens, one focusing lens and two focusing lenses respectively. It should be emphasized that under each scheme, the parameters of the concave mirror were optimized using the Zemax tool to obtain the best optical path. The results are shown in figure 3. The blue line indicates that no focusing lens is arranged, the red line indicates that only one focusing lens is arranged, and the yellow line indicates that two focusing lenses are arranged. The positions of the focusing lenses are marked with vertical dotted lines of corresponding colors, and the focal lengths of the lenses are calculated by Zemax. To highlight the effect of the focusing lens on the beam size, the part of the optical path from 0 to 4 m is uniformly enlarged. As can be seen in figure 3, no matter whether the focusing lens is added or not, the ideal beam expansion and collimation effect can be obtained by optimizing the parameters of the concave mirror, that is, the beam size in the plasma region is guaranteed to be 15 mm and remains basically unchanged. In this case, the divergence half-angle of the outgoing beam after the front beam expansion system is less than 3.3\times 10−5 rad, that is, the Rayleigh length is greater than 4.5\times 10^{2} m, which fully meets the design requirements. This result will be briefly discussed below.
Every time a Gaussian beam passes through a lens or a concave mirror, its radius and position of the beam waist will change [16]:
\left\{ \begin{split}& l{ {\text{'}}} = \pm \left(f - \dfrac{f^2 (l+f)}{(l+f)^2 + z_0^2}\right) \\ & w{\text{'}}_0^2 = \dfrac{f^2 w_0^2}{(l+f)^2 + z_0^2} \end{split} \right. , | (2) |
where f is the focal length, w_0 is the initial beam waist radius, z_0 = \dfrac{ {\text{π}} w_0^2}{\lambda} is the Rayleigh length, l denotes the initial beam waist position, and w{\text{'}} _0 and l{\text{'}} denote the transformed radius and position of the beam waist, where the positive and negative signs of the first term correspond to the lens and the concave mirror, respectively. In the collimation of Gaussian beams, the so-called telescopic collimation scheme is generally used, that is, firstly, a short-focus lens is used to focus the Gaussian beam to obtain a very small beam waist radius; then a long-focus lens is used to improve the directionality of the beam, and finally achieve collimation. Through equation (2), considering the continuous transformation of Gaussian beams by two lenses, the collimation magnification of this collimation system can be obtained as:
M_{\theta} = \frac{\theta_1}{\theta_2} = \frac{f_2}{f_1} \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{\lambda l}{ {\text{π}} w_{01}^2}\right)^2} , | (3) |
where \theta = \dfrac{\lambda}{ {\text{π}} w_0} represents the half-angle of divergence, f_1 and f_2 are the focal lengths of the short-focus and long-focus lenses respectively, and w_{01} represents the beam waist radius before the first lens. In the NI-PCI system of this paper, two concave mirrors have actually constituted this telescopic collimation system, and thus the collimation of the beam has been ensured without introducing any focusing lens, and the collimation magnification of the system M_{\theta} > {f_2}/{f_1} \approx 5 .
The main purpose of imaging optics is twofold: focusing the Gaussian beam to generate the position of the phase plate that can distinguish the scattered beam from the unscattered beam; amplifying the density fluctuations signal to make the image match the size of the detector at the image plane. To achieve these two points, at least two lenses or reflectors can meet the requirements. On the HL-2A, the optical platform can be placed on the top of the device after a special design. Considering the influence of electromagnetic interference and device vibration, the optical path should be designed to be compact and simple. Fortunately, with the development of laser technology, the power stability of 1550 nm continuous fiber laser with high beam quality can reach more than 0.5\%; meanwhile, the InGaAs semiconductor infrared detector with high sensitivity and fast response in the 1–3 \mu m band has also been developed rapidly. In addition, advances in ultra-precision processing and detection technology have also made it possible to manufacture the phase plate with a reflective coating with nanoscale precision.
The size of the infrared detector unit is generally on the order of mm. When measuring plasma fluctuations on the order of cm, it is necessary to design the imaging optical path to obtain a suitable magnification. The design of the magnification M needs to take into account the area of the detector, the distance between the centers of the detection units is d_0 = 0.25 mm, and the corresponding projection distance in the plasma is {\text{Δ}} x = d_0 / M . The number of units in the one-dimensional detector array is N , if the enlarged laser cross-section covers the entire detector, D = N {\text{Δ}} x = d_0 / M is satisfied. If the number of detector units is N = 32 , the design magnification M = 0.53 can be calculated.
The overall design of the imaging optical path is shown in figure 4. Regardless of the Gaussian beam, it can be calculated from geometric optics:
L_2 = \left[ \frac{1}{F_2} + \frac{L_0-F_1}{F_1^2-L_1(L_0-F_1)} \right]^{-1} . | (4) |
Considering imaging twice, the vertical axis magnification M = \left|\dfrac{S_0}{L_0} \cdot \dfrac{L_2}{S_1}\right| can be substituted into equation (4):
M = \frac{F_1 F_2}{(L_0 - F_1)(L_1 - F_2) - F_1^2} . | (5) |
Generally speaking, L_0 and F_1 in the system are fixed and cannot be changed. In this system, L_0 = 4600 mm and F_1 = 1250 mm. If the magnification is determined, according to equation (5), the system parameters have the only degree of freedom. In addition, in the system construction, it is necessary to keep the position of the detector and the phase plate unchanged, that is, L_1+L_2 is determined. At this time, if the lens focal length F_2 is changed, then L_1 and L_2 satisfy:
\left\{ \begin{aligned} & L_1 = F_2 + \dfrac{(MF_1 + F_2)F_1}{M(L_0 - F_1)} \\ & L_2 = F_2 + \dfrac{MF_2(L_0 - F_1)}{F_1} \end{aligned} \right. . | (6) |
It can be seen from figure 5 that as the lens focal length F_2 increases, the length of the system increases rapidly. Due to the space limitation of the test bench, we do not want the distance between the phase plate and the detector L_1+L_2 to be too large. After comparison, the focal length of the lens is finally selected as F_2 = 20 cm. At this time, L_1 = 80.6 cm, L_2 = 48.6 cm, and the distance between the phase plate and the detector is L_1+L_2 = 129.2 cm.
Finally, the above design parameters are substituted into the Zemax program for further optimization, considering the propagation of the paraxial Gaussian beam. Combined with the beam expansion optical part in section 3, the overall optical path design of the NI-PCI system has been completed, please refer to figure 6 for the complete optical path.
The phase plate is the most important optical component of phase contrast imaging technology, and the parameter design of the phase plate significantly determines the quality of phase contrast imaging. According to the propagation mode of light through the phase plate, it can be divided into two design schemes: reflective and transmissive. This system adopts the reflective design shown in figure 7, with fused silica as the substrate, the upper surface is covered with a silver film of \lambda_0/8 , a groove of a certain width is opened in the middle of the silver film, and the lower surface is coated with an anti-reflective coating. At a wavelength of 1550 nm, the substrate material needs to have extremely high transmittance. According to equation (1), the higher the substrate transmittance, the higher the light intensity contrast between the scattered component and the unscattered component, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio. Fused silica has a transmittance greater than 95\% at 1550 nm and is the best choice for the substrate material. In addition, the reflectivity of silver at 1550 nm is greater than 99\% , which can preserve the intensity of the scattering component to the greatest extent. The lower surface is further coated with an anti-reflection coating, and a power meter is used to detect the transmitted light intensity to ensure that the unscattered component is in the center of the groove and minimize interference.
A Gaussian beam with a diameter of D is reflected by a concave mirror to form a spot with a diameter of d = \dfrac{4F\lambda_0}{ {\text{π}} D} on the focal plane. According to the Bragg scattering condition, the center distance s (see figure 7(b)) between the scattered beam spot and the unscattered beam spot at the phase plate can be obtained from the scattering angle as:
s = \frac{\lambda_0}{\lambda_{\mathrm{p}}}F . | (7) |
For the PCI system to obtain a good response, the unscattered beam spot should be located in the groove of the phase plate as much as possible, and the scattered beam spot should be located outside the groove as much as possible, which means that the central groove width w needs to satisfy:
d \ll w \ll 2s . | (8) |
Obviously, too large or too small groove width w is inappropriate, and the selection of a suitable groove width w often depends on actual needs. Generally, the groove width is designed as w = \dfrac{2F\lambda_0}{D} . If the system requires better response and linearity, a larger w can be used, and if the density fluctuations at long wavelengths are of interest, w should be decreased. For the NI-PCI system of HL-2A, D = 15 mm, \lambda_0 = 1550 nm, F = 1250 mm, calculated to get w = 258.3 \mu m.
Choosing a material with low reflectivity for the phase plate substrate can reduce the light intensity of the unscattered part, increase the contrast during imaging, and improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Obtained from equation (1), the imaging contrast is \delta I/I = 2 \dfrac{ {\text{Δ}}}{\sqrt{R}} \cos \left(\dfrac{ {\text{π}} \lambda_0 L}{\lambda_{\mathrm{p}}^2}\right) \cos(k_{\mathrm{p}} x) , where the phase shift amplitude {\text{Δ}} = -\lambda_0 r_{\mathrm{e}} \int \tilde{n}_{\mathrm{e}} {\mathrm{d}}l , the laser wavelength \lambda_0 = 1550 nm, and the classical electron radius r_{\mathrm{e}} = 2.8\times 10−15 m. For the HL-2A device, the plasma integration length L = 600 mm, the typical value of the plasma density is n_{\mathrm{e}} = 10^{19} m−3, then the peak value of the density fluctuation can be taken as \tilde{n}_{\mathrm{e}} = 10^{17} - 10^{18} m−3. Substituting into the calculation, the phase shift amplitude {\text{Δ}} = 2.6 \times 10−4−2.6\times 10−3, and the imaging contrast amplitude |\delta I/I| = 0.3{\%} - 2.9 {{\%}}.
Through imaging optics, the beam is designed to just completely cover the detector array. Since this system uses a one-dimensional 32-channel InGaAs detector array (Hamamatsu, G12430-032D), only a small part of the center of the beam can irradiate the detector. The total laser power P_{\text{laser}} = 5 \; \text{W} , approximately, the effective power irradiated to a single detector unit is P_{\text{eff}} = 0.02 \; \text{W} . The phase plate substrate is made of fused silica, and its typical reflectance R = 3\% for the laser wavelength \lambda_0 = 1550 nm. The laser light intensity is proportional to its power. It can be seen from equation (1) that the PCI signal is finally composed of two parts, the baseline signal amplitude P_{\text{DC}} = R \cdot P_{\text{eff}} = 655 \; \mu\text{W} , and the fluctuation signal amplitude P_{\text{AC}} = 2 {\text{Δ}} \sqrt{R} \cdot P_{\text{eff}} = 1.9 - 18.8 \; \mu\text{W} .
The detector converts the optical signal into an electrical signal. For the InGaAs detector, at the wavelength \lambda_0 = 1550 nm, its typical responsivity is 0.95\; \text{A W}^{-1} , then the corresponding DC baseline signal I_{\text{DC}} = 622 \; \mu\text{A} , and the AC signal I_{\text{AC}} = 1.8 - 17.9 \; \mu\text{A} . The typical value of the dark current of the detector G12430-032D is 250 \; \text{pA} , and this signal can be well responded by the detector. Then, through the preamplifier circuit, the baseline signal is filtered out, and the AC signal is collected and transmitted to the computer. At present, the design of the preamplifier circuit has been completed and production has begun, with a transimpedance gain of Z_{\mathrm{T}} = 60 \; \text{k}\Omega and a bandwidth of 2 MHz.
NI-PCI diagnostic is to infer string-integrated plasma density fluctuations by measuring the phase shift of the 1550 nm laser beam in tokamak plasma. Compared with other plasma density diagnostics in tokamaks, the main benefit of a PCI system is its ability of calculating wide-range wavenumber spectra which is very important to study multi-scale turbulence. For the traditional PCI system on HL-2A, the measured wavenumber ranges from 2 cm−1 to 15 cm−1. This wavenumber range covers the wavenumber from ITG ( k\rho_{\mathrm{i}} < 1 , where \rho_{\mathrm{i}} stands for ion gyration radius) to TEM ( k\rho_{\mathrm{i}} \geqslant 1 ) and it almost reaches lower wavenumber limit of ETG ( k\rho_{\mathrm{i}} > 20 and k\rho_{\mathrm{e}} < 1 , where \rho_{\mathrm{e}} stands for electron gyration radius). This novel NI-PCI diagnostic, whose wavenumber measurement range is significantly improved comparing with traditional PCI, provides a potential way to investigate ETG physics.
The phase plate is the most critical component of the NI-PCI system. The groove width of the phase plate actually restricts the lower limit of the wavenumber measurement of the PCI system. From equation (8), substituting the groove width w = \dfrac{2F\lambda_0}{D} , we can get \lambda_{\mathrm{p}} < D , namely k_{\mathrm{p}} > \dfrac{2 {\text{π}} }{D} = 4.2 cm−1. On the other hand, it is known from the analysis in the section 2 that the phase scintillation factor \cos \left(\dfrac{ {\text{π}} \lambda_0 L}{\lambda_{\mathrm{p}}^2}\right) will limit the high wavenumber response capability of the PCI system. When the plasma integration path L is constant, the density fluctuations wavelength satisfies \lambda_{\mathrm{p}}^2 \geqslant 4\lambda_0 L , that is, k_{\mathrm{p}} < \dfrac{ {\text{π}} }{\sqrt{\lambda_0 L}} = 32.6\ \text{cm}^{-1} .
It must be mentioned that, limited by the size of the HL-2A window, the diameter of the beam entering the plasma from the beam expanding optics is also restricted. On one hand, this limitation increases the lower limit of wavenumber measurement, and on the other hand, it also weakens the wavenumber resolution capability of the system. This NI-PCI diagnostic will be moved to HL-3 tokamak soon and two vertical vacuum ports with a diameter of D = 80 mm are chosen for NI-PCI, which means wavenumber resolution {\text{Δ}} k_{\mathrm{p}} = 2 {\text{π}} /D = 0.8 cm−1. Meanwhile, the increase in window size will significantly mitigate the influence of the diffraction effect on wave number responsiveness.
In this paper, a novel NI-PCI system based on a 1550 nm wavelength laser is proposed, and the design of the optical path and the parameter selection of the key optical components are discussed in detail. The complete schematic of the optical path is given in figure 6. In the future, this system will soon be applied to HL-2A and HL-3 devices, respectively, and become a keen tool for studying multi-scale turbulence in core or edge tokamak plasma.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11975047).
[1] |
Lu X et al 2016 Phys. Rep. 630 1 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.03.003
|
[2] |
Penkov O V et al 2015 J. Coat. Technol. Res. 12 225 doi: 10.1007/s11998-014-9638-z
|
[3] |
Norberg S A et al 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 475203 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/47/475203
|
[4] |
Viegas P et al 2022 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 31 053001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ac61a9
|
[5] |
Jin S H et al 2022 Front. Phys. 10 928402 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.928402
|
[6] |
Heneral A A and Avtaeva S V 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 195201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab7354
|
[7] |
Pei X K et al 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 384001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aad4e9
|
[8] |
Remigy A et al 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 113508 doi: 10.1063/5.0110318
|
[9] |
Teschke M et al 2005 IEEE. Trans. Plasma Sci. 33 310 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2005.845377
|
[10] |
Lu X P and Laroussi M 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 063302 doi: 10.1063/1.2349475
|
[11] |
Mericam-Bourdet N et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 055207 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055207
|
[12] |
Shao T et al 2014 Europhys. Lett. 107 65004 doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/107/65004
|
[13] |
Shi J J et al 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 013504 doi: 10.1063/1.2828551
|
[14] |
Chen Z Q et al 2020 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 085403 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab8d1b
|
[15] |
Lietz A M et al 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 128 083301 doi: 10.1063/5.0020264
|
[16] |
Jiang C et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 232002 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/23/232002
|
[17] |
Wang R X et al 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 123303 doi: 10.1063/1.4931668
|
[18] |
Qian M Y et al 2017 Plasma Sci. Technol. 19 064015 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6154
|
[19] |
Joh H M et al 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 053509 doi: 10.1063/1.5090556
|
[20] |
Xiong Z et al 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 103303 doi: 10.1063/1.3511448
|
[21] |
Wang R X et al 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 015020 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/25/1/015020
|
[22] |
Jiang Y Y et al 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 130 233301 doi: 10.1063/5.0070830
|
[23] |
Liu Z J et al 2018 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 38 953 doi: 10.1007/s11090-018-9920-4
|
[24] |
Schoenbach K H et al 1997 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 6 468 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/6/4/003
|
[25] |
He S J et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 054006 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aab54b
|
[26] |
Hong Y C and Uhm H S 2007 Phys. Plasmas. 14 053503 doi: 10.1063/1.2736945
|
[27] |
Mohamed A A H et al 2010 Eur. Phys. J. D 60 517 doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2010-00220-7
|
[28] |
Duan Z C et al 2021 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 025001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/abdaa2
|
[29] |
Li P Z et al 2021 Plasma Sci. Technol. 23 085401 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac0719
|
[30] |
Duan Z C et al 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 065201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa31a
|
[31] |
Wei H C et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 123513 doi: 10.1063/1.5063450
|
[32] |
Zhu P et al 2018 Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 405202 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aadb12
|
[33] |
Nersisyan G and Graham W G 2004 Plasma Source Sci. Technol. 13 582 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/13/4/005
|
[1] | Shaobo GONG, Yi YU, Min XU, Aiping SUN, Tao LAN, Lin NIE, Rui KE, Ting LONG, Hao LIU, Yifan WU, Boda YUAN, Huajie WANG, Jinbang YUAN, Zhongbing SHI, Wulv ZHONG, Shifeng MAO, Minyou YE, Xuru DUAN. Progress of plasma density fluctuation measurements with phase contrast imaging on HL-2A tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 84001-084001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0054 |
[2] | Qiyun CHENG (程启耘), Yi YU (余羿), Shaobo GONG (龚少博), Min XU (许敏), Tao LAN (兰涛), Wei JIANG (蒋蔚), Boda YUAN (袁博达), Yifan WU (吴一帆), Lin NIE (聂林), Rui KE (柯锐), Ting LONG (龙婷), Dong GUO (郭栋), Minyou YE (叶民友), Xuru DUAN (段旭如). Optical path design of phase contrast imaging on HL-2A tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8d64 |
[3] | Min JIANG (蒋敏), Zhongbing SHI (石中兵), Yilun ZHU (朱逸伦). Optimization of the optical system for electron cyclotron emission imaging diagnostics on the HL-2A tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(8): 84001-084001. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa62f7 |
[4] | Kai GAO (高凯), Nasr A M HAFZ, Song LI (李松), Mohammad IRZAIE, Guangyu LI (李光宇), Quratul AIN. Online plasma diagnostics of a laser-produced plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 15506-015506. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015506 |
[5] | GAO Jinming (高金明), LI Wei (李伟), LU Jie (卢杰), XIA Zhiwei (夏志伟), YI Ping (易萍), LIU Yi (刘仪), YANG Qingwei (杨青巍), HL-A Team. Infrared Imaging Bolometer for the HL-2A Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 590-594. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/02 |
[6] | LIU Xiaoliang(刘小亮), CAO Yu(曹瑜), WANG Xiaoshan(王小山), LIU Zuoye(刘作业), GUO Zeqin(郭泽钦), SHI Yanchao(史彦超), SUN Shaohua(孙少华), LI Yuhong(李玉红), HU Bitao(胡碧涛). Optical Emission Spectroscopy Analysis of the Early Phase During Femtosecond Laser-Induced Air Breakdown[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(9): 815-820. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/02 |
[7] | XU Tao(徐涛), MEI Yu(梅雨), WEI Huiyue(魏惠月), PENG Xiaoshi(彭晓世), WANG Feng(王峰), YANG Dong( 杨冬), LIU Shenye(刘慎业), YAN Yadong(闫亚东). A Full Aperture Backscattering Light Diagnostic System Installed on the Shenguang-III Prototype Laser Facility[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(6): 567-570. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/6/05 |
[8] | M. HANIF, M. SALIK, M. A. BAIG. Diagnostic Study of an Fe-Ni Alloy Plasma Generated by the Fundamental (1064 nm) and Second (532 nm) Harmonics of an Nd: YAG Laser[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(5): 397-402. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/5/01 |
[9] | CHENG Li (程立), SHI Jia-ming(时家明), XU Bo (许波). Analytical Expressions of Dual-Frequency Plasma Diagnostic Theory[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 37-39. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/09 |
[10] | SHI Nan (史楠), GAO Xiang (高翔), JIE Yinxian (揭银先), ZHANG Shoubiao (张寿彪), ZENG Long (曾龙), WANG Erhui (王二辉), YANG Yao (杨耀), LIU Zixi (刘子奚). Far-Infrared Laser Diagnostics in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(3): 347-351. |