
Citation: | Nan JIANG, Xuechuan LI, Ju LI, Jie LI, Bing LIAO, Bangfa PENG, Guo LIU. Pulsed gas–liquid discharge plasma catalytic degradation of bisphenol A over graphene/CdS: process parameters optimization and O3 activation mechanism analysis[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 105501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/acbde5 |
In the present work, pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma coupled with graphene/CdS catalyst was evaluated to eliminate bisphenol A (BPA) in wastewater. The optimization of a series of process parameters was performed in terms of BPA degradation performance. The experimental results demonstrated that nearly 90% of BPA (20 mg l−1) in the synthetic wastewater (pH = 7.5, σ = 10 μS m−1) was degraded by the plasma catalytic system over 0.2 g l−1 graphene/CdS at 19 kV with a 4 l min−1 air flow rate and 10 mm electrode gap within 60 min. The BPA removal rate increased with increasing the discharge voltage and decreasing the initial BPA concentration or solution conductivity. Nevertheless, either too high or too low an air flow rate, electrode gap, catalyst dosage or initial solution pH would lead to a decrease in BPA degradation. Moreover, optical emission spectroscopy was used to gain information on short-lived reactive species formed from the pulsed gas–liquid hybrid discharge plasma system. The results indicated the existence of several highly oxidative free radicals such as ·O and ·OH. Finally, the activation pathway of O3 on the catalyst surface was analyzed by density functional theory.
Amorphous oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors (TFTs) have attracted interest for their potential applications in displays and sensors owing to their advantages such as high optical transparency and high on/off current ratio (Ion/Ioff) [1–3]. Among the various amorphous oxide semiconductors, amorphous InGaZnO (IGZO) is the most widely used for TFTs because of its high mobility, low leakage current, and scalability for large areas [4–7]. Nevertheless, improving mobility and reducing the processing temperature for applications in high-resolution, large-area, and flexible displays and sensors are still necessary [8–10]. Recently, a new type of thin film, InGaSnO (IGTO), has been the subject of research owing to its potential for high mobility and low-temperature processing [8, 11]. IGTO-based TFTs have demonstrated higher electron mobility in low-temperature processes compared to IGZO-based TFTs [12, 13]. This means that IGTO-based TFTs can deliver current more efficiently, resulting in higher performance due to faster switching. Additionally, IGTO films have a wider bandgap than IGZO films, making them more suitable for high-performance, high-temperature, and high-power applications such as display backplanes and high-voltage switching devices [14].
To fabricate TFTs, either an etch-stop layer or a back-channel etch process is used. The back-channel etching process is widely used because it uses less photopatterning and can shorten the channel length compared to the etch-stop layer process [15, 16]. However, when a TFT is manufactured using the back-channel etch method, the channel layer is exposed to plasma during the patterning process of the source and drain electrodes [15, 17]. Because the plasma process can affect the performance or reliability of TFTs, it is a critical consideration when fabricating TFTs [18–20]. However, there are few studies on the plasma-etching characteristics of IGTO thin films and changes in thin-film characteristics after etching.
In this study, we investigated the etching characteristics of IGTO thin films using plasma and observed the changes in their surface characteristics before and after the etching process under Cl2/Ar plasma. The plasma-etching tendency was evaluated according to various variables such as the Cl2/Ar gas-mixing ratio, upper radio-frequency (RF) power, bottom RF power, and process pressure. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed to understand the etching mechanism and confirm changes in the surface state, such as the residue on the surface after etching, and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) analysis was performed to confirm the change in work function accordingly. Further, changes in surface roughness and wettability according to the etching process were analyzed through atomic force microscopy (AFM) and a contact angle analyzer.
A 100 nm thick IGTO thin film was deposited on a Si substrate (100) using direct-current (DC) magnetron sputtering with a 3 inch IGTO target. The sputtering process was executed with a DC power of 150 W, an Ar/O2 ratio of 35/15 (sccm/sccm), and a deposition pressure of 3 mTorr. The substrate was maintained at room temperature during the sputtering process.
Figure 1 shows a structural diagram of a high-density plasma (HDP) system for the etching process. This system uses a combined plasma source with inductively coupled plasma coil and capacitively coupled plasma flat electrodes. A source electrode above the main chamber is connected to a 13.56 MHz RF generator to induce an HDP. The electrode for bias voltage located at the bottom is connected to a 2 MHz RF generator to control the energy of ions moving from the plasma to the substrate.
The IGTO thin film was etched under Cl2-based plasma, and the standard etching conditions were fixed as follows: gas flow rate of 100 sccm, source power of 500 W, bias power of 100 W, and process pressure of 15 mTorr.
The etch rate was measured using a surface profiler (Alpha-step 500, Tencor). After the etching process, XPS (NEXSA, Thermo-Fisher Scientific) analysis was performed to elucidate the etching mechanism by confirming the chemical bonding state of the surface of the IGTO thin film, and UPS (NEXSA, Thermo-Fisher Scientific) analysis was performed to measure the variation of work function. Additionally, an AFM (NX-10, Park system) and a contact angle analyzer (Phoenix 300, SEO) were employed to investigate the changes in surface roughness and surface energy before and after etching.
The process was performed using Cl2/Ar plasma to evaluate the etch rate of the IGTO thin film. The total gas flow rate was 100 sccm, with a source power of 500 W, bias voltage of 100 W, and process pressure of 15 mTorr being maintained. Figure 2 shows the etch rate of the IGTO thin film and the selectivity to PR and Al according to the flow rate of Cl2 in Cl2/Ar mixed gas. Figure 2 reveals that as the flow rate of Cl2 increases from 0 to 100 sccm, the etch rate of the IGTO thin film increases from 9 to 69 nm min−1. This result indicates that the chemical reaction with Cl or Cl2 radicals rather than the physical reaction with Ar ions is the primary etching mechanism in the etching of the IGTO thin film [21, 22]. When the IGTO thin film is etched using Cl2/Ar mixed gas, the by-products generated on the surface of the IGTO thin film are a combination of Cl and metals such as InClx, GaClx, and SnClx. These by-products are easily removed from the surface of the thin film owing to its low boiling point [23, 24]. Therefore, as the flow rate of Cl2 increases, the etch rate of the IGTO thin film increases. Table 1 lists the boiling and melting points of the by-products. The etching selectivities to PR and Al were the highest at 0.31 and 0.75, respectively, under the pure Ar plasma condition. This is considered to be because PR and Al films also scarcely react with Ar plasma. When Cl2 gas was added, the selectivity dropped drastically to 0.02 and 0.065. Then, the selectivity gradually increased as the amount of Cl2 gas increased.
By-products | Melting point (℃) | Boiling point (℃) |
InCl | 225 | 608 |
InCl3 | 586 | 800 |
GaCl2 | 172.4 | 535 |
GaCl3 | 77.9 | 201 |
SnCl2 | 247 | 623 |
SnCl4 | −34.07 | 114.15 |
Figure 3 shows the etch rate of an IGTO thin film depending on various process parameters such as upper RF power, bottom RF power, and process pressure. When the upper RF power was increased, the etch rate of the IGTO thin film also increased continuously from 39.25 to 75.75 nm min−1. Increasing the upper RF power increases the density of Cl radicals in the plasma, which means more radicals can reach the IGTO thin film, thereby increasing the chemical reaction with the thin film [25, 26]. Figure 3(b) shows the correlation between the bottom RF power and the etch rate of the IGTO thin film, which was measured by increasing the bias power from 0 to 200 W while keeping the Cl2/Ar ratio at 100/0 (sccm/sccm), RF power at 500 W, and process pressure at 15 mTorr. The etch rate was found to rapidly increase with the bottom RF power and reached its highest value of 106.25 nm min−1 at a bottom RF power of 200 W. In Cl2 plasma, the Cl2 molecules are dissociated into Cl radicals and Cl+ ions. The Cl+ ions are positively charged and can be attracted to the substrate negatively charged by the bottom RF power, where they can chemically react with and bombard the IGTO surface [27, 28]. In addition, increasing the RF bias power increase the amplitude of the oscillating electric field and can lead to a higher self-bias voltage, resulting in an improved etch rate [29]. The combination of these effects can cause a rapid increase in the etch rate. Figure 3(c) presents the correlation between process pressure and etch rate. The etch rate was evaluated by varying the process pressure from 10 to 20 mTorr while maintaining the Cl2/Ar flow rate at 100/0 (sccm/sccm), RF power at 500 W, and bias power at 100 W. The results revealed an increase in the etch rate with increasing pressure up to a maximum value of 62 nm min−1 at a process pressure of 10 mTorr, followed by a decrease at higher pressures. At extremely low pressures, the etch rate is limited owing to a reduced concentration of ions and radicals in the plasma, which results in limited surface reaction. At certain intermediate pressures, the plasma is dominated by high-energy ions and radicals that can cause significant physical and chemical damage to the substrate surface, leading to high etch rates. However, at high pressures, ion and radical species as well as gas molecules undergo frequent collisions with each other and with the chamber walls, resulting in a shortened mean free path and reduction in collision energy and reactivity [30, 31]. This can lead to a reduction in the etch rate owing to reduced surface reaction between the species and the substrate, as the ion and radical species become less energetic and less likely to react with the substrate.
XPS analysis was conducted to investigate the etching mechanism of IGTO thin films on their surface. Figure 4(a) shows the O 1s peak of the IGTO thin film before etching, while figures 4(b) and (c) show the O 1s peak of the IGTO thin film after etching in Cl2 and Ar plasmas, respectively, under standard etching conditions. The raw data of the O 1s peak were deconvoluted into two components, OI and OⅡ, which represent the metal–oxygen bond and oxygen-deficient and O–H bonds, respectively [32, 33]. Upon etching with pure Cl2 plasma, the OI peak decreased in comparison to the pre-etched state, as observed in figure 4(b). This indicates that Cl or Cl2 radicals and ions react with the metals in IGTO films to generate volatile by-products such as InClx, GaClx, and SnClx, leading to etching. Additionally, the OⅡ peak increased, as the Cl radicals combined with oxygen (Clx–Oy) and were volatilized. By contrast, the O 1s peak did not significantly change upon etching with pure Ar plasma as shown in figure 4(c). The OI peak was reduced and OⅡ peak slightly increased compared to the pre-etched state, indicating that the oxygen atoms in metal oxide bonds are removed as the bond is broken because of the influence of Ar ion sputtering. However, the peak change of OI and OⅡ is quite insignificant compared to the etching result in Cl2 plasma. Thus, chemical reactions have a greater effect on the etching of IGTO thin films than the physical sputtering of Ar ions. Overall, the results suggest that the etching of IGTO thin films under Cl2/Ar mixed gas is primarily driven by chemical reactions. In particular, the Cl-based radicals and ions combine with the metal and oxygen to induce etching, as highlighted in figure 2.
Figure 5 shows the peak shift and differences in In 3d, Ga 2p, and Sn 3d spectra before and after the Cl2 plasma etching as well as after the Ar plasma etching. The largest shift in all three spectra (In 3d, Ga 2p, and Sn 3d) occurred after etching in pure Cl2 plasma. In 3d exhibited a shift to a higher binding energy of ~0.5 eV for pure Cl2 and ~0.3 eV for pure Ar plasma. Similarly, Ga 2p shifted to a higher binding energy of ~0.6 eV for pure Cl2 and ~0.4 eV for pure Ar. Further, Sn 3d shifted to a higher binding energy of ~0.5 eV for Cl2 and ~0.3 eV for pure Ar. Peak shifts in XPS spectra indicate changes in the binding energy of the emitted electrons, which may occur when the element is in a different chemical or structural state than the initial state. The XPS peak shift of the thin film surface etched in pure Cl plasma was higher than that of the sample etched in pure Ar plasma, possibly because Cl-based radicals and ions combined with the metals (In, Ga, and Sn) during the etching process, with some remaining as residues. This is expected to result in a larger peak shift.
The surface composition of the IGTO thin film was changed by the plasma process used during etching, as shown in figures 4 and 5. A change in the surface composition of the thin film changes the various physical properties of the thin film, e.g. the work function, which is an essential parameter in the design of devices and systems. Therefore, the change in the work function of the IGTO thin film according to the type of etching gas was investigated. Figure 6 shows the difference in the work function of the IGTO thin film according to the Cl and Ar plasma etching determined by UPS analysis. The work function was calculated using the following formula
Ø=hv−|Ecutoff−EF|, |
where
The corresponding work function of the as-deposited IGTO thin film was 4.19 eV. The work functions of the IGTO thin film increased to 4.65 and 4.63 eV after pure Cl and pure Ar plasma etching, respectively. Although significant changes in the work function were observed before and after etching, a difference of only ~0.02 eV could be observed under different plasmas. This could be attributed to the fact that the plasma-etching process causes defects on the surface of the thin film, and the presence of these defects increases the energy required to capture electrons and remove them from the surface [34, 35].
In figure 7, the surface roughness of the IGTO thin film is shown as a function of the Cl2/Ar gas ratio. The as-deposited IGTO thin film had a surface roughness of 6.91 nm, which significantly increased to 13.23 nm after etching in pure Ar plasma. However, when Cl2 gas was introduced, the surface roughness immediately decreased to 3.92 nm. This is attributed to the excessive physical collisions between Ar ions and the thin-film surface, which resulted in surface roughening. As Cl2 gas is added, the physical energy of the plasma decreases, while the chemical reaction between Cl-based radicals and ions and the surface of the IGTO thin film increases. Consequently, the surface roughness decreases owing to the formation of a more uniform and smoother surface.
In conclusion, we investigated the etching characteristics of IGTO thin films using Cl2/Ar plasma and analyzed the changes in surface properties before and after etching. The results indicated that the etch rate of the IGTO thin films increased with an increase in the ratio of Cl2 in the Cl2/Ar mixture gas, with the highest etch rate observed at 69 nm min−1 in pure Cl2 plasma with a gas flow rate of 100 sccm. Additionally, an increase in upper and bottom RF power led to an increase in the etch rate, and a process pressure of 15 mTorr was optimal. From etch rate measurements and XPS surface analysis, we could conclude that the primary etching mechanism for IGTO thin films under Cl2 plasma is a chemical reaction, and a significantly increased work function indicates the occurrence of defects on the surface. The etching process reduced surface roughness in Cl2-containing plasma, whereas the etching process in pure Ar plasma increased surface roughness. This indicates that etching conditions significantly affect the surface properties of IGTO thin films.
Overall, our results provide important data for the practical application of IGTO thin films in TFT devices. As there are limited studies on the plasma-etching characteristics of IGTO thin films and changes in their properties after etching, these results offer valuable insights for various IGTO-based applications.
This work is supported by the Open Fund for State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Synergetic Control and Joint Remediation for Soil & Water Pollution (No. GHBK-2020-006) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21876070).
Supplementary material for this article is available https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-6272/acbde5
[1] |
Mao D N et al 2021 Chemosphere 262 128073 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128073
|
[2] |
Chakma S and Moholkar V S 2014 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 6855 doi: 10.1021/ie500474f
|
[3] |
Huang J X et al 2020 J. Hazard. Mater. 392 122355 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122355
|
[4] |
Soori F and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2018 J. Mol. Liq. 255 250 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.169
|
[5] |
Omrani N and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 389 112223 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112223
|
[6] |
Rahmani-Aliabadi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2018 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 357 1 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.006
|
[7] |
Yang S M et al 2021 J. Hazard. Mater. 407 124361 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124361
|
[8] |
Costa-Serge N D M et al 2022 Appl. Catal. B 315 121537 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121537
|
[9] |
Saeid S et al 2018 Appl. Catal. B 230 77 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.021
|
[10] |
Jiang N et al 2020 J. Hazard. Mater. 393 122365 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122365
|
[11] |
Jiang N et al 2013 Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 9898 doi: 10.1021/es401110h
|
[12] |
Shang K F et al 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 065201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab538d
|
[13] |
Patinglag L et al 2021 Water Res. 201 117321 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117321
|
[14] |
Guo H et al 2018 Vacuum 156 402 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.07.044
|
[15] |
Sun H et al 2023 Sep. Purif. Technol. 305 122406 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122406
|
[16] |
Wei Y et al 2022 Chem. Eng. J. 431 133360 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133360
|
[17] |
Ren J Y et al 2021 J. Hazard. Mater. 402 123772 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123772
|
[18] |
Cheng J et al 2020 Chemosphere 253 126595 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126595
|
[19] |
Mirsalari S A, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Massah A R 2022 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 33013 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17569-1
|
[20] |
Mirsalari S A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 122 105455 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105455
|
[21] |
Hemmatpour P and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2022 Chemosphere 307 135925 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135925
|
[22] |
Omrani N and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 Photochem. Photobiol. A 400 112726 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112726
|
[23] |
Mirsalari S A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 41651 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13601-6
|
[24] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2011 Desalination 279 146 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.006
|
[25] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2012 Desalination 284 157 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.050
|
[26] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Banan Z 2014 Desalin. Water Treat. 52 3328 doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.797627
|
[27] |
Jiang N et al 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 412 128627 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128627
|
[28] |
Yousefi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2021 Iran. J. Catal. 11 247
|
[29] |
Soleimani F and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 16237 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.091
|
[30] |
Park S and Ruoff R S 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 217 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.58
|
[31] |
Sang W H et al 2021 J. Water. Process. Eng. 41 101997 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101997
|
[32] |
Noruozi A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2020 Chem. Phys. Lett. 752 137587 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137587
|
[33] |
Omrani N, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Alizadeh M 2019 Desalin. Water Treat. 162 290 doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24352
|
[34] |
Wang C et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 346 159 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.149
|
[35] |
Guo H et al 2019 Sep. Purif. Technol. 218 206 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.001
|
[36] |
Guo H et al 2020 Sep. Purif. Technol. 253 117540 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117540
|
[37] |
Guo H et al 2018 Sep. Purif. Technol. 190 288 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.002
|
[38] |
Zhang Y Z et al 2008 Chemosphere 70 1518 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.013
|
[39] |
Duan L J et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 054009 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaab42
|
[40] |
Tang S F et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 337 446 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.117
|
[41] |
Zhan J X et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 334 2124 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.093
|
[42] |
Zhan J X et al 2019 Sci. Total Environ. 661 266 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.183
|
[43] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Shahriari E 2014 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 2719 doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.10.060
|
[44] |
Pourtaheri A and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2015 Spectrochim. Acta A 137 338 doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.08.058
|
[45] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Hushmandrad S 2010 Appl. Catal. A 388 149 doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.042
|
[46] |
Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A and Salimi Z 2011 Desalination 280 281 doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.021
|
[47] |
Zhou J et al 2020 Appl. Catal. B 277 119221 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119221
|
[48] |
Li H et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 395 125091 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125091
|
[49] |
Singh R K, Philip L and Ramanujam S 2016 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 7201 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01191
|
[50] |
Jose J and Philip L 2019 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 7 103476 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103476
|
[51] |
Jiang B et al 2014 Chem. Eng. J. 236 348 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.090
|
[52] |
Li J, Sato M and Ohshima T 2007 Thin Solid Films 515 4283 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.02.070
|
[53] |
Yang J R et al 2022 Chemosphere 286 131627 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131627
|
[54] |
Hoigné J Bader H 1983 Water Res. 17 173 doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90098-2
|
[55] |
Sang W J et al 2019 Chemosphere 223 416 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.029
|
[56] |
Rezaei M and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieha A 2020 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 24749 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.258
|
[57] |
Derikvandi H and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A 2017 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 490 314 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.069
|
[58] |
Ren J Y et al 2019 Chem. Eng. J. 372 321 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.147
|
[59] |
Singh R K, Philip L and Ramanujam S 2017 Water Res. 121 20 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.006
|
[60] |
Wang J et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 385 123732 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123732
|
[61] |
Sarangapani C et al 2017 Chem. Eng. J. 326 700 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.178
|
[62] |
Wang T C et al 2018 J. Hazard. Mater. 357 279 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.014
|
[63] |
Rao P S and Hayon E 1975 J. Phys. Chem. 79 397 doi: 10.1021/j100571a021
|
[64] |
Rong S P and Sun Y B 2015 J. Hazard. Mater. 287 317 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.003
|
[65] |
Buxton G V et al 1988 J. Phys. Chem. Refer. Data 17 513 doi: 10.1063/1.555805
|
[66] |
Lukes P, Appleton A T and Locke B R 2004 IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 40 60 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2003.821799
|
[67] |
Bruggeman P and Schram D C 2010 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 045025 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/19/4/045025
|
[68] |
Lukes P et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 409 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/3/010
|
[1] | Jing QI (齐婧), Siqi ZHANG (张思齐), Tian LIANG (梁田), Ke XIAO (肖珂), Weichong TANG (汤伟冲), Zhiyuan ZHENG (郑志远). Ablation characteristics of carbon-doped glycerol irradiated by a 1064 nm nanosecond pulse laser[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35508-035508. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9faa |
[2] | Dongye ZHAO (赵栋烨), Cong LI (李聪), Yong WANG (王勇), Zhiwei WANG (王志伟), Liang GAO (高亮), Zhenhua HU (胡振华), Jing WU (吴婧), Guang-Nan LUO (罗广南), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Temporal and spatial dynamics of optical emission from laser ablation of the first wall materials of fusion device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(1): 14022-014022. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa96a0 |
[3] | Nader MORSHEDIAN. Specifications of nanosecond laser ablation with solid targets, aluminum, silicon rubber, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(9): 95501-095501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa74c5 |
[4] | LIANG Tian (梁田), ZHENG Zhiyuan (郑志远), ZHANG Siqi (张思齐), TANG Weichong (汤伟冲), XIAO Ke (肖珂), LIANG Wenfei (梁文飞), GAO Lu (高禄), GAO Hua (高华). Influence of Surface Radius Curvature on Laser Plasma Propulsion with Ablation Water Propellant[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(10): 1034-1037. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/10/11 |
[5] | HE Yuchen (何雨辰), Satoshi UEHARA, Hidemasa TAKANA, Hideya NISHIYAMA. Numerical Modelling and Simulation of Chemical Reactions in a Nano-Pulse Discharged Bubble for Water Treatment[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(9): 924-932. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/9/09 |
[6] | HU Guanghai (胡广海), JIN Xiaoli (金晓丽), YUAN Lin (袁林), ZHANG Qiaofeng (张乔枫), XIE Jinlin (谢锦林), LI Hong (李弘), LIU Wandong (刘万东). Oxide Coated Cathode Plasma Source of Linear Magnetized Plasma Device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(9): 918-923. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/9/08 |
[7] | LI Mei (李美), ZHANG Junpeng (张俊鹏), HU Yang (胡杨), ZHANG Hantian (张含天), WU Yifei (吴益飞). Simulation of Fault Arc Based on Different Radiation Models in a Closed Tank[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 549-553. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/18 |
[8] | ZHENG Zhiyuan(郑志远), GAO Hua(高华), GAO Lu(高禄), XING Jie(邢杰). Experimental Investigation of the Properties of an Acoustic Wave Induced by Laser Ablation of a Solid Target in Water-Confined Plasma Propulsion[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(11): 1032-1035. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/11/06 |
[9] | Constantine L. XAPLANTERIS, Loukas C. XAPLANTERIS, Dimitris P. LEOUSIS. An Attempt to Study on the Growth and Damping Rates with Approximate Solutions by Using Mathematical Models[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 897-906. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/01 |
[10] | V. SIVAKUMARAN, AJAI KUMAR, R. K. SINGH, V. PRAHLAD, H. C. JOSHI. Atomic Processes in Emission Characteristics of a Lithium Plasma Plume Formed by Double-Pulse Laser Ablation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(3): 204-208. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/3/02 |
1. | Hajilooei, B., Seyfi, P., Ghomi, H. Achieving high-pressure pulsed avalanche homogeneous discharges through surface plasma pre-ionization: A study of optimization and characterization to improve CO2 laser performance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics, 2025, 19(1): 192510. DOI:10.57647/j.jtap.2025.1901.10 |
1. | Hajilooei, B., Seyfi, P., Ghomi, H. Achieving high-pressure pulsed avalanche homogeneous discharges through surface plasma pre-ionization: A study of optimization and characterization to improve CO2 laser performance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics, 2025, 19(1): 192510. DOI:10.57647/j.jtap.2025.1901.10 |
By-products | Melting point (℃) | Boiling point (℃) |
InCl | 225 | 608 |
InCl3 | 586 | 800 |
GaCl2 | 172.4 | 535 |
GaCl3 | 77.9 | 201 |
SnCl2 | 247 | 623 |
SnCl4 | −34.07 | 114.15 |