Advanced Search+
Yemin HU, Liuqing WANG, Shuhang BAI, Zhi YU, Tianyang XIA. Numerical analysis for the free-boundary current reversal equilibrium in the AC plasma current operation in a tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 025102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad0c98
Citation: Yemin HU, Liuqing WANG, Shuhang BAI, Zhi YU, Tianyang XIA. Numerical analysis for the free-boundary current reversal equilibrium in the AC plasma current operation in a tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 025102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad0c98

Numerical analysis for the free-boundary current reversal equilibrium in the AC plasma current operation in a tokamak

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Yemin HU: yeminhu@ipp.ac.cn

  • Corresponding author:

    Yemin HU, yeminhu@ipp.ac.cn

  • Received Date: June 18, 2023
  • Revised Date: September 04, 2023
  • Accepted Date: September 05, 2023
  • Available Online: February 01, 2024
  • Published Date: February 04, 2024
  • In recent decades, tokamak discharges with zero total toroidal current have been reported in tokamak experiments, and this is one of the key problems in alternating current (AC) operations. An efficient free-boundary equilibrium code is developed to investigate such advanced tokamak discharges with current reversal equilibrium configuration. The calculation results show that the reversal current equilibrium can maintain finite pressure and also has considerable effects on the position of the X-point and the magnetic separatrix shape, and hence also on the position of the strike point on the divertor plates, which is extremely useful for magnetic design, MHD stability analysis, and experimental data analysis etc. for the AC plasma current operation on tokamaks.

  • Gyrotrons with MW-level power are indispensable sources for electron cyclotron heating and current drive (ECH&CD) in fusion devices (e.g. ITER, EAST, JT-60SA, DIII-D, W7-X, LHD and ASDEX-U) [13]. Dual/multi-frequency or stepwise-frequency MW gyrotrons can enhance flexibility and performance for ECH&CD systems by providing a larger accessible radial range, a possible replacement of steerable antennas, and higher CD efficiency for stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes [2, 4]. Several MW-level gyrotrons of this type have been applied in fusion devices for two decades [58], e.g. the 105/140 GHz dual-frequency gyrotron of GYCOM, the 104/137/170/203 GHz four-frequency gyrotron of QST, and the stepwise-frequency (111.6–165.7 GHz) gyrotron of KIT. Institute of Applied Electronics, China Academy of Engineering Physics (IAE, CAEP) has recently developed some gyrotrons for fusion devices including a 28 GHz/50 kW/30 s gyrotron and a 28 GHz/400 kW/5 s gyrotron [9, 10]. A 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level continuous-wave (CW) gyrotron is being developed to meet the demand for domestic fusion devices for 105 or 140 GHz gyrotrons. At the end of 2020, a prototype gyrotron was fabricated. In the first quarter of 2021, a preliminary proof-test was conducted under short-pulse conditions. Gaussian beams with powers of 300 kW at 105 GHz and 540 kW at 140 GHz were achieved.

    In this paper, the design of the main components of the gyrotron is introduced in section 2. Test results are presented in section 3, and conclusions are provided in section 4.

    The main design parameters of the 105/140 GHz MW gyrotron are listed in table 1 and its diagram is shown in figure 1. The design goal for the tube is to produce an output power of 1 MW CW at two frequencies of 105 and 140 GHz. Thus, the key elements, i.e. resonant cavity, magnetron injection gun (MIG), quasi-optical (QO) mode converter and output window, must be able to work at both frequency points. Their design details are described below.

    Table  1.  Design parameters of the 105/140 GHz MW gyrotron.
    Frequency 105 GHz/140 GHz
    Power 1 MW
    Pulse width CW
    Total beam voltage -75 kV
    Beam current 40 A
    MIG Triode type
    Cavity mode TE18, 7/TE24, 9
    Working magnetic field 4.1 T/5.5 T
    Output mode Gaussian beam
    Window BN disk for ~500 kW short pulse operation
    CVD diamond disk for CW operation
    Collector single-stage depressed collector
    Total efficiency [11] 30% (45% with SDC)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  1.  Design diagram of the gyrotron and superconducting magnet.

    The following descriptions are major considerations for the candidate modes of MW-level gyrotrons [11]: (1) maximum wall loss power density below 2.0 kW cm-2; (2) quality factor Q of the cavity at ~1100; (3) for the dual-frequency gyrotron, the two working modes should have similarity in caustic radius and beam-wave coupling radius.

    After comprehensive comparison, the matched mode pair TE18, 7 and TE24, 9 was selected to work at 105 and 140 GHz, respectively. The calculated parameters of the cavity are listed in table 2. The cavity consists of three classical sections, namely, a cut-off taper, a straight interaction midsection (interaction cavity), and an output taper. Structural optimization and beam-wave interaction analysis were iteratively performed using an in-house calculation code based on the nonlinear method [12]. Figure 2 shows the dependences of the starting currents of the neighboring modes on the magnetic field for the two working modes under beam voltage, beam radius, and velocity ratio of -75 kV, 8.678 mm and 1.2, respectively. Dense modes with similar starting current and magnetic field B were found near the working modes and classified as potential competition.

    Table  2.  Design parameters of the cavity.
    Mode TE18, 7 TE24, 9
    Frequency 105 GHz 139.33 GHz
    Eigenvalues 44.178 13 58.624 15
    Cavity radius 20.089 mm 20.089 mm
    Beam radius 8.687 mm 8.678 mm
    Caustic radius 8.185 mm 8.224 mm
    Surface roughness 0.8 μm 0.8 μm
    Wall loss power density 0.68 kW cm-2 1.74 kW cm-2
    Quality factor 1198 2066
    Magnetic field strength 4.14 T 5.46 T
    Output power 1.03 MW 1.17 MW
    Electron efficiency 34.3% 37.3%
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  Calculated starting currents of TE18, 7 mode TE24, 9 and their neighboring modes.

    The most possible competitions for the working modes are those with similar eigenvalues and coupling factors. On the basis of starting current analysis, these modes were selected to evaluate their influence on the working mode by using multi-mode time-domain calculation [12]. Figure 3 illustrates the simulated evolutions of radio frequency (RF) power and beam voltage over time under the magnetic field of B=4.14 T and B=5.46 T as follows. (1) At the initial rising of the beam voltage, several competing modes are excited, and the powers of these modes alternately fluctuate due to inherent mode competition. At this moment, the power of the working mode is growing slowly. (2) When the beam voltage continues to increase and reaches a stable condition (-75 kV), the power of the working mode increases rapidly, eventually becomes dominant, and reaches a steady output. The competing modes are suppressed, and their powers drop rapidly and eventually can be ignored. Hereto, the working mode wins the mode competition.

    Figure  3.  Evolution of the produced power of the working mode and its competing modes calculated by the multi-mode time-domain method.

    For successful application at the two frequencies, the MIG was designed to be a triode-type MIG consisting of a cathode, a modulation anode, and an anode. The modulation anode was employed to adjust a matched electrode voltages difference to keep the velocity ratio within 1.1–1.3 and velocity spread below 5%. Owing to the interaction cavity calculation, the design parameters of triode MIG were set as ~40 A emission current, ~-75 kV beam voltage, and 8.687 mm beam radius. The electrode structure, beam trajectory and magnetic field profile were iteratively optimized via PIC simulation code. Finally, the central radius and width of the emitter ring were set as 47.7 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The emission current was 42.4 A, which corresponded to a current density of 2.36 A cm-2. Owing to the voltage depression of 7.3 kV, the total beam voltage was -81 kV, and the kinetic energy of the beam at the cavity inlet was 73.7 keV.

    Figure 4 shows the MIG structure and beam trajectories, and figure 5 displays the changes in the velocity ratio and axial velocity spread of the cyclotron beam as a function of the potential difference of the cathode and modulation anode (Vck). For the low working frequency of 105 GHz (B=4.1 T) or high working frequency of 140 GHz (B=5.5 T), an optimal range of Vck was obtained to satisfy velocity ratio ~1.2 and axial velocity spread ~3%.

    Figure  4.  Triode MIG structure and beam trajectory.
    Figure  5.  Calculated dependence of velocity ratio and axial velocity spread on the potential difference between the cathode and modulated anode.

    A built-in QO mode converter was used to separate the spent electron beam from the RF beam and achieve the horizontal output of the latter. This mode converter was designed to operate at the two frequencies by ensuring similar parameters including helical cut length, Brillouin length, Brillouin width and Brillouin angle of the two modes (table 3). The waist radius of the Gaussian beam was 25 mm.

    Table  3.  Transmission parameters of the QO converter transmission.
    Mode TE18, 7 TE24, 9
    Waveguide radius 22.5 mm 22.5 mm
    Helical cut length 47 mm 47 mm
    Brillouin length 56.8 mm 58.1 mm
    Brillouin width 132° 131.6°
    Brillouin angle 63.1° 62.6°
    Caustic radius 9.20 mm 9.21 mm
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The QO mode converter consisted of a launcher and three reflection mirrors, as shown in figure 6. The launcher was connected to the end of the output taper of the cavity with an identical radius. The taper between cavity and launcher was a nonlinear taper. The first mirror was a quasi-parabolic reflector, and the second and third reflectors were used for phase correction. The launcher adopted the pre-bunching launcher scheme to improve the conversion efficiency of the RF beam [13]. The surface irregular perturbation structure on the launcher wall was calculated and optimized by solving the scalar diffraction integral equation combined with the Katsenelenbaum–Semenov iterative optimization algorithm [14, 15]. The complete mode converter was modeled and simulated by CST microwave studio. The electric field contours at the cross-section of the QO converter at 105/140 GHz are shown in figure 7. The calculated overall conversion efficiency and the scalar Gaussian mode content were 97.3% and 98% at 105 GHz, respectively, and 99.1% and 99.7% at 140 GHz, respectively. The distributions of the power density on the window surface are shown in figure 8.

    Figure  6.  Structure of the quasi-optical converter.
    Figure  7.  Calculated contour of the relative electric field (dB) at the cross-section of the quasi-optical converter.
    Figure  8.  Calculated contour of the electric field distribution at the window surface.

    For long-pulse/CW MW-level gyrotrons, the window must adopt CVD-diamond material [11, 16]. However, at the initial proof-test phase, a single-disk boron nitride (BN) window was planned and designed for 500 kW short-pulse operations. Compared with other materials except for CVD diamond, hexagonal pyrolytic BN material presents the advantages of higher thermal conductivity, lower thermal expansion coefficient, excellent high-temperature stability, good thermal shock resistance and good flexural strength [17]. Tests of MW-level gyrotrons with BN windows revealed that single-disk BN windows can withstand a power capability of 930 kW for 2 s at 110 GHz and 960 kW for 1.2 s at 140 GHz under the quasi-uniform distribution of RF power [18]. During the test of the 110 GHz BN-window gyrotron for DIII-D tokamak, the temperature increase of the BN disk was up to 930 ℃ as observed by the infrared monitoring at the end of an 800 kW/2 s operation [19].

    The parameters of the BN window were 90 mm diameter and 1.93 mm thickness. The thickness of the BN disk was just three half-wavelengths at 105 GHz and four half-wavelengths at 140 GHz to ensure that the window can work at the two frequencies. The calculated reflection coefficient and transmission coefficient as a function of frequency are shown in figure 9. The curves were derived using the dependence of loss tangent on frequency in [17], where tanδ=78×10-5 at 105 GHz and tanδ=105×10-5 at 140 GHz. For an output RF power of 500 kW, the predicted absorbed power of the window disk was 4.88 kW at 105 GHz and 8.7 kW at 140 GHz. The output RF beam was designed to be a fundamental Gaussian beam with a waist radius of 25 mm. Under the assumption that the thermal breakdown temperature of BN is 1000 ℃ from previous rest results [18], the thermo-mechanical analysis code Workbench predicted that the BN-window gyrotron can operate for up to ~1.3 s at 105 GHz and ~0.7 s at 140 GHz.

    Figure  9.  Calculated reflection and transmission factors of the window versus frequency.

    For the next phase, the BN window will be substituted by a CVD-diamond window for 1 MW, long-pulse or CW operation.

    The beam tunnel of the gyrotron has an arbitrary non-axisymmetric conical metallic structure to suppress the parasitic oscillations [2]. A single-stage depressed collector (SDC) was employed to improve the total efficiency. A longitudinal-field sweeping coil was installed outside of the collector jacket. A programmable current supply was planned to provide a periodic programmable current to the coil to ensure the time-averaged heat dissipation from the spent electron beam at the collector below 0.5 kW cm-2 [11]. A cryogen-free superconducting magnet (SCM) with a 7.0 T magnetic field and a 220 mm diameter room temperature bore hole was accordingly developed The ceramic insulator was placed above the SCM.

    The prototype gyrotron of the first version (figure 10) was fabricated at the end of 2020. The length and weight of the tube were 2.53 m and 300 kg, respectively. Proof-test was performed in the first quarter of 2021, and the test stand is shown in figure 11. The power supply system included a negative high voltage supply for the cathode, a positive supply for the anode and a filament supply. Owing to the lack of an extra source applied for the modulation anode, the modulation anode was grounded when conditioning at 105 GHz and was applied with voltage through a resistor divider connected with the anode supply when conditioning at 140 GHz.

    Figure  10.  Photo of the 105/140 GHz MW prototype gyrotron.
    Figure  11.  Test scene of the dual-frequency MW gyrotron.

    Operating points at the two frequencies were first determined through single short-pulse conditioning. Images of the outgoing RF beam at the window aperture at 105 and 140 GHz were obtained on thermal paper during a 20 ms pulse-length operation. The thermal patterns in figure 12 qualitatively illustrate the Gaussian-like distribution, thus confirming the oscillations of the designed working mode at the two frequencies. The oscillation frequencies tested by the mixer method were 105.06 and 139.36 GHz. A typical oscilloscope trace of the electrode voltages and microwave signals of 1 ms single pulse operation is shown in figure 13(a).

    Figure  12.  Thermal patterns of RF beams at the window aperture at 105 GHz (left) and at 140 GHz (right) obtained by 30 ms short pulses.
    Figure  13.  Oscillograph traces of the electrode voltages, microwave signals or beam current derived from (a) a single pulse operation and (b) a continuous 1 ms 5 Hz pulse burst operation.

    With aging, the tube can steadily work at pulse-burst mode with a low duty cycle. The RF power of the gyrotron was measured by a dummy water-load under a continuous pulse burst operation mode. After the operation at 5 Hz repetitive rate, 1 ms pulse-width, and 2000 pulse number (i.e. duty cycle of 5%, 400 s), the power of the RF beam was 300 kW at 105 GHz and 540 kW at 140 GHz. The corresponding operation parameters are listed in table 4. The repetitive-rate traces of the electrode voltages and beam current are shown in figure 13(b). The transient power curves measured by the water load are displayed in figure 14.

    Table  4.  Experimental result of the preliminary pulse test.
    Mode TE18,7 TE24,9
    Frequency 105.06 GHz 139.36 GHz
    Cathode voltage -52 kV -50 kV
    Modulation anode voltage 0 10.4 kV
    Anode voltage 26 kV 16.4 kV
    Beam current 30 A 30 A
    output power 300 kW 540 kW
    Pulse width 1 ms 1 ms
    Repetitive rate 5 Hz 5 Hz
    Total efficiency (efficiency with SDC) 19% 36%
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  14.  Transient power versus time obtained by the water load.

    Given the limitation of the cathode high-voltage power supply, the cathode voltage could not be increased further, the beam current could not be above 30 A, and pulse extension could cause instability. Thus, RF power upgrade and pulse-width extension were hampered, and the preliminary proof-test of the gyrotron was ended. The instability was mainly manifested by the current surge at the modulation anode when the pulse width was extended. One probable cause is the plasma discharging due to the poor vacuum level at the MIG region.

    Analysis of test results provides the following summary. (1) Owing to the limitation of high-voltage supply, the operating point was not optimized compared with the design parameters. Hence, the output RF power has not reached 1 MW full power. (2) The total efficiency was low, especially at 105 GHz because the status of the cyclotron beam was greatly affected due to the non-optimal operating point. (3) The design of the gyrotron was basically validated through check-calculation with the present test results.

    A 105/140 GHz MW-level gyrotron was designed, successfully fabricated and proof-tested in IAE, CAEP. At the preliminary pulse test, the gyrotron generated an output power of 300 kW at 105.06 GHz and 540 kW at 139.36 GHz during the 1 ms 5 Hz continuous pulse burst operation. Power upgrade and pulse length extension were hampered by the limitation of the high-voltage power supply and the output window. Given the non-optimal operating point, the current output power has not yet achieved 1 MW full power, and the efficiency is low. The proposed gyrotron design was basically validated. The work has laid a good foundation for power upgrade to MW-level and pulse-width extension to second-level at the next phase.

  • [1]
    Mitarai O et al 1987 Nucl. Fusion 27 604 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/27/4/007
    [2]
    Mitarai O, Hirose A and Skarsgard H M 1991 Fusion Technol. 20 285 doi: 10.13182/FST91-A29669
    [3]
    Tubbing B J D et al 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 967 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/32/6/I06
    [4]
    Mitarai O, Hirose A and Skarsgard H M 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 1801 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/32/10/I08
    [5]
    Mitarai O et al 1993 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 35 711 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/35/6/005
    [6]
    Mitarai O et al 1996 Nucl. Fusion 36 1335 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/36/10/I06
    [7]
    Yang X Z et al 1996 Nucl. Fusion 36 1669 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/36/12/I07
    [8]
    Mitarai O et al 1997 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68 2711 doi: 10.1063/1.1148184
    [9]
    Cabral J A C et al 1997 Nucl. Fusion 37 1575 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/37/11/I07
    [10]
    Huang J G et al 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 2023 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/40/12/306
    [11]
    Li J G et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 1071 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/001
    [12]
    Wang S J 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 155007 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.155007
    [13]
    Wang S J and Yu J 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 062501 doi: 10.1063/1.1924554
    [14]
    Rodrigues P and Bizarro J P S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 015001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.015001
    [15]
    Martynov A A, Medvedev S Y and Villard L 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 085004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.085004
    [16]
    Strumberger E et al 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 464 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/44/3/012
    [17]
    Hu Y M 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 022505 doi: 10.1063/1.2839032
    [18]
    Johnson J L et al 1979 J. Comput. Phys. 32 212 doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90129-3
    [19]
    Hagenow K V and Lackner K Computation of Axisymmetric MHD Equilibrium In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Numerical Simulation of Plasmas New York 1975: 140
    [20]
    Jardin S 2010 Computational Methods in Plasma Physics (Boca Raton: CRC Press) 111
    [21]
    Lackner K 1976 Comput. Phys. Commun. 12 33 doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(76)90008-4
    [22]
    Jackson J D 1975 Classical Electrodynamics 2nd ed (New York: Wiley
    [23]
    Coleman M and McIntosh S 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 154 111544 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111544
    [24]
    Jeon Y M 2015 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 67 843 doi: 10.3938/jkps.67.843
    [25]
    Zakharov L E 1973 Nucl. Fusion 13 595 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/13/4/012
    [26]
    Lao L L et al 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611
    [27]
    Crotinger J A et al 1997 CORSICA: a comprehensive simulation of toroidal magnetic-fusion devices. Final report to the LDRD program (Livermore: Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
    [28]
    Guo Y et al 2012 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54 085022 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/54/8/085022
    [29]
    Li H et al 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 152 111447 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111447
    [30]
    Huysmans G T A et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 245002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.245002
    [31]
    Hawkes N C et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 115001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115001
    [32]
    Fujita T et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 245001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.245001
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yue MING (明玥), Deng ZHOU (周登), Wenjia WANG (王文家). Geodesic acoustic modes in tokamak plasmas with anisotropic distribution and a radial equilibrium electric field[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 85101-085101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aabc5c
    [2]Zhen ZHENG (郑振), Nong XIANG (项农), Jiale CHEN (陈佳乐), Siye DING (丁斯晔), Hongfei DU (杜红飞), Guoqiang LI (李国强), Yifeng WANG (王一丰), Haiqing LIU (刘海庆), Yingying LI (李颖颖), Bo LYU (吕波), Qing ZANG (臧庆). Kinetic equilibrium reconstruction for the NBI-and ICRH-heated H-mode plasma on EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 65103-065103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aab262
    [3]H R MIRZAEI, R AMROLLAHI. Design, simulation and construction of the Taban tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 45103-045103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaa669
    [4]Rui MA (马瑞), Fan XIA (夏凡), Fei LING (凌飞), Jiaxian LI (李佳鲜). Acceleration optimization of real-time equilibrium reconstruction for HL-2A tokamak discharge control[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 25601-025601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9432
    [5]Hailong GAO (高海龙), Tao XU (徐涛), Zhongyong CHEN (陈忠勇), Ge ZHUANG (庄革). Plasma equilibrium calculation in J-TEXT tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa7f26
    [6]GAO Hailong (高海龙), XU Tao (徐涛), ZHANG Fan (张帆), JIAN Xiang (简翔), ZHANG Xiaoqing (张晓卿), YANG Zhoujun (杨州军), GAO Li (高丽), JIANG Zhonghe (江中和), ZHUANG Ge (庄革). Equilibrium Reconstruction and Integration of EFIT with Diagnoses in J-TEXT Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(12): 1225-1230. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/12/14
    [7]LIU Chao(刘超), LIU Yue(刘悦), MA Zhaoshuai(马照帅). Effect of Equilibrium Current Profiles on External Kink Modes in Tokamaks[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(8): 726-731. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/8/02
    [8]LI Li(李莉), LIU Yue (刘悦), XU Xinyang(许欣洋), XIA Xinnian(夏新念). The Effect of Equilibrium Current Profiles on MHD Instabilities in Tokamaks[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 14-19. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/04
    [9]HE Zhixiong, DONG Jiaqi, HE Hongda, JIANG Haibin, GAO Zhe, ZHANG Jinhua. MHD Equilibrium Configuration Reconstructions for HL-2A Tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(4): 424-430.
    [10]GUO Wei, WANG Shaojie, LI Jiangang. Vacuum Poloidal Magnetic Field of Tokamak in Alternating-Current Operation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2010, 12(6): 657-660.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. Zheng, P.W., Feng, J.L., Lu, L.F. et al. Impact of hot plasma effects on electron cyclotron current drive in tokamak plasmas. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(12): 126059. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8667
    2. Hu, L., Huang, Q., Zhuo, T. et al. Achieving prolonged continuous operation of a self-designed 28 GHz/50 kW gyrotron | [自研 28 GHz/50 kW 回旋管实现长时间连续运行*]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202436.240049
    3. Hu, L., Sun, D., Huang, Q. et al. Design and experimental progress of a 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron | [105/140 GHz 双频兆瓦级回旋管的设计与实验进展]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(8): 083004. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.230114
    4. Hu, L., Sun, D., Huang, Q. et al. 1.0 MW pulse power achieved in 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron | [105/140 GHz 双频兆瓦回旋管实现 1.0 MW 脉冲输出]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(2): 023001. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.220388
    5. Sun, D., Huang, Q., Hu, L. et al. Recent Results of a 50 GHz High Power Gyrotron for ECRH at XL-50 Tokamak. 2023. DOI:10.1109/IVEC56627.2023.10156980
    6. Hu, L., Ma, G., Sun, D. et al. Recent Development of a 105/140GHz MW-level Gyrotron at IAE. International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, IRMMW-THz, 2022. DOI:10.1109/IRMMW-THz50927.2022.9895711

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

    Article views (32) PDF downloads (20) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return