Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Lili DONG, Mingyuan WANG, Wenjun LIU, Yuejiang SHI, Jiaqi DONG, Dong GUO, Tiantian SUN, Xiang GU, Xianming SONG, Baoshan YUAN, Yueng-Kay Martin PENG, the ENN Team. Experimental confirmation of the linear relation between plasma current and external vertical magnetic field in EXL-50 spherical torus energetic electron plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad4f23
Citation: Lili DONG, Mingyuan WANG, Wenjun LIU, Yuejiang SHI, Jiaqi DONG, Dong GUO, Tiantian SUN, Xiang GU, Xianming SONG, Baoshan YUAN, Yueng-Kay Martin PENG, the ENN Team. Experimental confirmation of the linear relation between plasma current and external vertical magnetic field in EXL-50 spherical torus energetic electron plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085104. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad4f23

Experimental confirmation of the linear relation between plasma current and external vertical magnetic field in EXL-50 spherical torus energetic electron plasmas

More Information
  • A three-fluid equilibrium plasma with bulk plasma and energetic electrons has been observed on the Xuanlong-50 (EXL-50) spherical torus, where the energetic electrons play a crucial role in sustaining the plasma current and pressure. In this study, the equilibrium of a multi-fluid plasma was investigated by analyzing the relationship between the external vertical magnetic field (BV), plasma current (Ip), the poloidal ratio (βp) and the Shafranov formula. Remarkably, our research demonstrates some validity of the Shafranov formula in the presence of multi-fluid plasma in EXL-50 spherical torus. This finding holds significant importance for future reactors as it allows for differentiation between alpha particles and background plasma. The study of multi-fluid plasma provides a significant reference value for the equilibrium reconstruction of burning plasma involving alpha particles.

  • Low-pressure radio-frequency (RF) capacitively coupled plasmas (CCPs) exhibit a nonlinear response to the driving RF voltage, causing high-order harmonics from the applied frequency [1, 2]. The harmonics may cause additional effects that significantly influence the discharge properties. For instance, Berry et al have demonstrated that the change in the harmonic contents significantly affects the ion energy distribution at the electrode [3]. Mussenbrock and Brinkmann proposed that the high-order harmonics may be more effectively excited under the plasma series resonance (PSR) condition, enhancing electron heating [4]. The electron heating effect was then extensively investigated either theoretically [512] or experimentally [1319] by other researchers. Yamazawa found the electron density significantly increased when the high-order harmonics were excited by the PSR [15]. The contribution of the high-order harmonics to the electron density was also observed during a dual-frequency discharge when a harmonic of the lower frequency coincided with the higher frequency [14]. On the other hand, the enhanced high-order harmonics may worsen the discharge uniformity due to the electromagnetic standing wave effect [18, 20].

    Sharma et al used Particle-in-Cell/Monte Carlo Collision (PIC/MCC) technology to simulate a voltage-driven symmetric CCP system [21]. Under very high frequency (VHF) conditions, they observed that high-order harmonics had significant effects on the electron density, electron temperature, and the transformation of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) [21]. Despite the significant effects, most experimental studies of low-pressure RF CCPs seem not to be concerned about the self-excited harmonics, neither the harmonics being measured and analyzed nor the matching network being tuned with consideration for the harmonics. The influences of the harmonics on discharge properties are not well known. In this paper, we present an abnormal transition of the electron energy distribution with the second harmonic excitation in low-pressure RF CCPs. When the second harmonic is significantly excited by tuning the external circuit, the electron energy probability function (EEPF) changes drastically, indicating significant changes in the electron heating and the resultant electron density and electron temperature. We discuss the reason for the phenomena’s importance to practical applications by suggesting that the self-excited high-order harmonics are significant and must be considered in the operation of low-pressure RF CCPs.

    The experiments were conducted with a multi-purpose setup [2227], which is shown pictorially diagram in figure 1(a). The vacuum chamber was a stainless-steel cylinder measuring 60 cm in diameter and 80 cm in length. The electrodes were made of circular stainless-steel plates of about 12 cm in diameter. The electrodes were parallel to each other and located at the center of the chamber, a 6 cm distance between the electrodes. The upper electrode was driven through a matcher by a wideband power source capable of outputting RF power at frequencies between 25 and 60 MHz, while the lower electrode was grounded. A variable capacitor of 7–100 pF was connected between the upper electrode and ground to tune the harmonics. Similar techniques have been employed by Yamazawa [15] and Lim et al [20]. A homemade Langmuir single probe [28] was extended horizontally into the discharge region for plasma diagnostics. The probe was made of a 0.2 mm thick tungsten wire, insulated by a 1 mm thick alumina tube, except for a 5 mm long tip of the wire exposed to the plasma. An RF choke was inserted in the probe circuit just outside the discharge region to eliminate the RF perturbations [29]. In addition, the waveforms of the discharge voltage (V) and current (I) were measured by an oscilloscope (Tektronics 2022B) through a high-voltage probe (Tektronics P5100A) and a current sensor (Pearson 2877), respectively as shown in figure 1(a).

    Figure  1.  (a) Pictorial diagram of the experimental setup, and (b) equivalent schematic circuit for the RF discharge.

    The equivalent circuit for the whole electric network can be sketched as shown in figure 1(b), in which Csh, Lp, and Rp represent the sheath capacitance, plasma inductance, and plasma resistance; Cstr and Cv are the stray capacitance and the variable capacitor; and Vrf and Vhmc are the RF power source and the source of the self-excited harmonics, respectively. The harmonic source is drawn in the plasma branch because it is generated there due to the nonlinear response of the sheath capacitance to the RF driving voltage. In addition, the 50 Ω resistor connected in series with Vrf represents the impedance of the RF power source and the transmission cable.

    In the experiments, pure argon gas was discharged at a lower pressure of 3 Pa and a higher pressure of 16 Pa for comparison. The RF power source was fixed at an output of 36 MHz and 20 W. By tuning the variable capacitor, the harmonics were excited to different amplitudes to investigate their influence on the discharge. In all cases, the discharge voltage and current waveforms, as well as the Langmuir probe characteristics, were recorded simultaneously. The waveforms were analyzed by fast Fourier transform (FFT) to extract the harmonic components. The amplitudes and phases of the voltage and current of each harmonic were obtained. The waveforms were also used to calculate the active power by integrating the product of voltage and current. On the other hand, the EEPF was calculated from the second derivative of the Langmuir probe characteristics by the Druyvesteyn formula [30], which is

    f(E)=(8m)1/2e3Ad2IdV2, (1)

    where f(E) is the EEPF, e and m are electron charge and mass, and V, I, and A are the probe voltage, current, and surface area, respectively. The electron energy E equals e(VsV), where Vs is the plasma space potential. The electron density ne and electron temperature Te were obtained by integrating f(E) that

    ne=0E1/2f(E)dE, (2)
    Te=1ne0E3/2f(E)dE. (3)

    A typical waveform of the discharge voltage and current between the two electrodes in the presence of the argon gas and their FFT spectra are shown in figures 2(a) and (b), respectively. The voltage waveform contains apparent harmonics up to the fourth order. We focus on the first and second harmonics because the higher ones are negligibly weak. Figure 3 shows the amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of the voltage and current changing as a function of the capacitance change from capacitor Cv in the 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa. The subtle change of Cv between 20 and 30 pF excited significant second harmonics in both voltage and current, with a maximum being attained at Cv26pF. The phenomenon we are describing is different from what is caused by the plasma series resonance (PSR) effect [15], in which the harmonics are excited significantly only in current and not in voltage due to the low impedance of PSR. We suggest that the enhancement of harmonics in our experiment was due to improved matching between the external circuit and the plasma at the harmonic frequency.

    Figure  2.  (a) The representative voltage and current waveform and (b) their FFT spectra, containing self-excited high-order harmonics.
    Figure  3.  The amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of (a) voltage and (b) current versus Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    Figure 4 shows the active power and the self-bias voltage changing with Cv. The decrease in the trend of the active power and the self-bias (less negative) was possibly due to some mismatching induced by the adjustment of Cv. We did not tune the matcher during the process to avoid artificial influence. With an enhanced second harmonic, the active power slightly oscillated while the self-bias drastically decreased to be less negative. The decrease in the self-bias was possibly due to the electrical asymmetric effect (EAE), in which the self-bias varies with the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics [3133]. Figure 5 shows the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics of the voltage and current changing with Cv. An apparent phase shift occurs between the Cv values of 24 and 28 pF with the excitation of the second harmonic (see figure 3), which provides evidence for the occurrence of EAE.

    Figure  4.  The active power and the self-bias voltage are plotted with the change in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).
    Figure  5.  The phase is given in radians (rad) of the second harmonic of the voltage and current relative to the first, with the change in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The EEPFs for different Cv quantities are shown in figure 6. With increasing Cv up to 25.6 pF, the low-energy electron population increases continuously, suggesting increasing stochastic heating [34]. At Cv=26.4 pF, the low-energy electron population drops abruptly, indicating a drastic decrease in stochastic heating. While at Cv=27.1 pF, the high-energy electron population in EEPF also reduces, indicating a reduction in ohmic heating [34]. At Cv=27.9 pF, the ohmic heating recovers, and with further increasing Cv, the stochastic heating also gradually recovers. You et al found that stochastic heating was inefficient at high frequencies [35]. The decrease of stochastic heating in our experiment may be due to the increase of the high-frequency component (the second harmonic of the base frequency).

    Figure  6.  Change in EEPF with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The changes in electron heating caused drastic variations in the electron density and electron temperature, as shown in figure 7. These variations were related to the excitation of the second harmonic. However, it can be noted that the abrupt changes in the electron density and electron temperature do not occur at the second harmonic’s maxima (see figure 3), which suggests that the harmonic amplitude was not the unique factor affecting the discharge. In addition, neither the active power nor the self-bias behaviors can be explained because their behaviors (shown in figure 4) are not consistent with those of the electron density and electron temperature. We proposed that the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics, in addition to the harmonic amplitude, played an important role in the discharge. Comparing figures 7 with 5, the electron density decreases where the relative phase difference decreases toward zero. The influence of the relative phase difference on the electron density has also been observed by Bienholz et al [36], which was qualitatively consistent with our observation.

    Figure  7.  Changes of the electron density and the electron temperature with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The above experiments were repeated under a higher chamber pressure of 16 Pa, with the other conditions being kept the same. Figure 8 shows the amplitudes and phases of the first and second harmonics for both voltage and current, changing with Cv. All behaviors shown in the figure are quite similar to what is observed at the lower pressure of 3 Pa. However, their influences on the discharge are different — the changes in EEPFs as well as the electron density and temperature are insignificant in the 16 Pa case, as shown in figure 9. The difference is due to the different electronic heating mechanisms at the pressure of 3 Pa and 16 Pa. At the pressure of 16 Pa, the plasma heating was dominated by the ohmic (collisional) heating occurring in the bulk plasma, while at 3 Pa, the plasma heating includes stochastic heating in addition to ohmic heating, which was related to the sheath motion [34]. We propose that the harmonics influenced the cause of the discharge via stochastic heating. This is reasonable because the harmonics are excited over the sheath (see figure 1(b)) due to its nonlinear feature. The discharge at higher pressure was therefore less affected by the harmonics due to its lack of stochastic heating.

    Figure  8.  Changes of the amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of (a) voltage and (b) current, and (c) relative phase measured in radians (rad) of voltage and current with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 16 Pa).
    Figure  9.  Changes in (a) the EEPF and (b) the electron density and temperature with the increase in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 16 Pa).

    To the best of our knowledge, there has not been a theory elucidating how the harmonics affect the electron heating with their relative phase difference. A detailed investigation into the phenomena causing the physical behaviors we observed in this experiment is needed to understand the theoretical aspects causing these behaviors. However, for practical applications, our observations suggest that self-excited high-order harmonics must be considered in the operation of low-pressure RF CCPs.

    The self-excitation of the second harmonic was significantly enhanced in the RF CCPs while tuning an external variable capacitor. At the lower pressure of 3 Pa, an abnormal transition of EEPF was observed with changes in the amplitude and relative phase of the harmonics, resulting in abrupt changes in the electron density and temperature. In contrast, the changes in EEPF as well as the electron density and temperature were insignificant at the higher pressure of 16 Pa under similar changes in the harmonics. The phenomena were related to the influence of the second harmonic on stochastic heating which was caused by both the amplitudes and the relative phase of the harmonics. Our results are meaningful to practical applications where self-excited high-order harmonics must be sufficiently considered utilizing low-pressure RF CCPs.

  • [1]
    Shafranov V D Plasma equilibrium in a magnetic held In: Leontovich M A Reviews of Plasma Physics New York: Consultants Bureau 1966
    [2]
    Swain D W and Neilson G H 1982 Nucl. Fusion 22 1015 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/22/8/002
    [3]
    Shafranov V D 1971 Plasma Phys. 13 757 doi: 10.1088/0032-1028/13/9/006
    [4]
    Ferron J R et al 1998 Nucl. Fusion 38 1055 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/38/7/308
    [5]
    Lao L L et al 2005 Fusion Sci. Technol. 48 968 doi: 10.13182/FST48-968
    [6]
    Lao L L et al 1990 Nucl. Fusion 30 1035 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/30/6/006
    [7]
    Dory R A and Peng Y K M 1977 Nucl. Fusion 17 21 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/17/1/003
    [8]
    Hofmann F and Tonetti G 1988 Nucl. Fusion 28 1871 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/28/10/014
    [9]
    Feneberg W and Lackner K 1973 Nucl. Fusion 13 549 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/13/4/008
    [10]
    Turnbull A D et al 1998 Nucl. Fusion 38 1467 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/38/10/305
    [11]
    Zheng S B, Wootton A J and Solano E R 1996 Phys. Plasmas 3 1176 doi: 10.1063/1.871772
    [12]
    Maekawa T et al 2005 Nucl. Fusion 45 1439 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/026
    [13]
    Kubo S et al 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 1994 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1994
    [14]
    Zheng S B et al 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 155 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/40/2/301
    [15]
    Uchida M et al 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 065001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.065001
    [16]
    Tashima S et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 023010 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/2/023010
    [17]
    Yoshinaga T et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 125005 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.125005
    [18]
    Battaglia D J et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 225003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.225003
    [19]
    Ono M et al 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2165 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2165
    [20]
    Battaglia D J et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 073029 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073029
    [21]
    Raman R et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 175002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.175002
    [22]
    Thomas P R et al 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5548 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5548
    [23]
    JET Team 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1619 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/11Y/301
    [24]
    Nocente M et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 076016 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa6f7d
    [25]
    Eriksson L G and Helander P 2003 Comput. Phys. Commun. 154 175 doi: 10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00293-5
    [26]
    Harvey R W et al 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 4590 doi: 10.1063/1.1312816
    [27]
    Ishida A, Peng Y K M and Liu W J 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 032503 doi: 10.1063/5.0027718
    [28]
    Ishida A et al 2015 Plasma Fusion Res. 10 1403084 doi: 10.1585/pfr.10.1403084
    [29]
    Shi Y J et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 086047 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac71b6
    [30]
    Guo D et al 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 055009 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac5a08
    [31]
    Wang M Y et al 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 075006 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac70fb
    [32]
    Wang M Y et al 2023 J. Plasma Phys. 89 905890603 doi: 10.1017/S0022377823001216
    [33]
    Wang M Y et al 2023 Nucl. Fusion 63 076024 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/acd4d2
    [34]
    Wang M Y et al 2023 Plasma Sci. Technol. 25 045104 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca373
    [35]
    Wang M Y et al 2024 Phys. Plasmas 31 032105 doi: 10.1063/5.0195750
    [36]
    Ikegami H et al 1973 Nucl. Fusion 13 351 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/13/3/005
    [37]
    Cheng S K et al 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 043513 doi: 10.1063/5.0040636
    [38]
    Li H Y et al 2022 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93 053504 doi: 10.1063/5.0088785
    [39]
    Harvey R W and McCoy M G The cql3d fokker-planck code. In Proceedings of the IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Simulation and Modeling of Thermonuclear Plasmas (pp. 489–526) 1992
    [40]
    Petrov Y V and Harvey R W 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 115001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/11/115001
    [41]
    Petrov Y V, Parks P B and Harvey R W 2021 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63 035026 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/abdacc
    [42]
    Takase Y et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 063006 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/6/063006
    [43]
    Jones I R 1999 Phys. Plasmas 6 1950 doi: 10.1063/1.873452
    [44]
    Moret J M, Buhlmann F and Tonetti G 2003 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74 4634 doi: 10.1063/1.1614856
    [45]
    Tonetti G, Christiansen J P and de Kock L 1986 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57 2087 doi: 10.1063/1.1138747
    [46]
    Lazzaro E and Mantica P 1988 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 30 1735 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/30/12/008
    [47]
    Pinches S D et al 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 021807 doi: 10.1063/1.4908551
    [48]
    Uckan N A et al 1988 Fusion Technol. 13 411 doi: 10.13182/FST88-A25117
    [49]
    Sharapov S E et al 2008 Fusion Sci. Technol. 53 989 doi: 10.13182/FST08-A1745
    [50]
    Heidbrink W W and White R B 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 030901 doi: 10.1063/1.5136237
    [51]
    Ishida A and Steinhauer L C 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 102512 doi: 10.1063/1.4762846
  • Related Articles

    [1]Hanyu ZHANG, Lina ZHOU, Yueqiang LIU, Guangzhou HAO, Shuo WANG, Xu YANG, Yutian MIAO, Ping DUAN, Long CHEN. Deep learning approaches to recover the plasma current density profile from the safety factor based on Grad–Shafranov solutions across multiple tokamaks[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 055101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad13e3
    [2]Yifeng FU (傅一峰), Cheng ZHOU (周成), Peng WU (吴鹏), Zhongkai ZHANG (张仲恺), Zun ZHANG (张尊), Haibin TANG (汤海滨). A plasma equilibrium model for rapid estimation of SF-MPDT performance[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 104005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac199e
    [3]Bin WU (武斌), Chao GAO (高超), Feng LIU (刘峰), Ming XUE (薛明), Yushuai WANG (王玉帅), Borui ZHENG (郑博睿). Reduction of turbulent boundary layer drag through dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuation based on the Spalding formula[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 45501-045501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf2e2
    [4]Kai ZHAO (赵凯), Baigang SUN (孙佰刚), Yongji LU (卢永吉), Feng LI (李锋), Yongbo LIU (刘永波), Xiangbin LIU (刘祥彬), Kefu WANG (王可夫). Experimental investigation on plasma jet deflection with magnetic fluid control based on PIV measurement[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 25503-025503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae09b
    [5]Yinan WANG (王一男), Shuaixing LI (李帅星), Li WANG (王莉), Ying JIN (金莹), Yanhua ZHANG (张艳华), Yue LIU (刘悦). Effects of HF frequency on plasma characteristics in dual-frequency helium discharge at atmospheric pressure by fluid modeling[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 115402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac71e
    [6]M S CHU (朱名盛), Yemin HU (胡业民), Wenfeng GUO (郭文峰). Generalization of Solovev’s approach to finding equilibrium solutions for axisymmetric plasmas with flow[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35101-035101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9841
    [7]Xiang HE (何湘), Chong LIU (刘冲), Yachun ZHANG (张亚春), Jianping CHEN (陈建平), Yudong CHEN (陈玉东), Xiaojun ZENG (曾小军), Bingyan CHEN (陈秉岩), Jiaxin PANG (庞佳鑫), Yibing WANG (王一兵). Diagnostic of capacitively coupled radio frequency plasma from electrical discharge characteristics: comparison with optical emission spectroscopy and fluid model simulation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 24005-024005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9a31
    [8]Hailong GAO (高海龙), Tao XU (徐涛), Zhongyong CHEN (陈忠勇), Ge ZHUANG (庄革). Plasma equilibrium calculation in J-TEXT tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa7f26
    [9]Le Chi KIEN. Analyses on the Ionization Instability of Non-Equilibrium Seeded Plasma in an MHD Generator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 674-679. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/15
    [10]LUO Bing (罗兵), LUO Zhengping (罗正平), XIAO Bingjia (肖炳甲), YOU Wei (尤玮), TAN Mingsheng (谭名昇), GUO Yong (郭勇), BAI Wei (白伟), MAO Wenzhe (毛文哲), LI Hong (李弘), LIU Adi (刘阿娣), LAN Tao (兰涛), XIE Jinlin (谢锦林), LIU Wandong (刘万东). Capability Assessment of the Equilibrium Field System in KTX[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(1): 90-96. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/1/16

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article views (41) PDF downloads (21) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return