
Citation: | Wei YANG, Fei GAO, Younian WANG. Conductivity effects during the transition from collisionless to collisional regimes in cylindrical inductively coupled plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 055401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac56ce |
A numerical model is developed to study the conductivity effects during the transition from collisionless to collisional regimes in cylindrical inductively coupled argon plasmas at pressures of 0.1–20 Pa. The model consists of electron kinetics module, electromagnetics module, and global model module. It allows for self-consistent description of non-local electron kinetics and collisionless electron heating in terms of the conductivity of homogeneous hot plasma. Simulation results for non-local conductivity case are compared with predictions for the assumption of local conductivity case. Electron densities and effective electron temperatures under non-local and local conductivities show obvious differences at relatively low pressures. As increasing pressure, the results under the two cases of conductivities tend to converge, which indicates the transition from collisionless to collisional regimes. At relatively low pressures the local negative power absorption is predicted by non-local conductivity case but not captured by local conductivity case. The two-dimensional (2D) profiles of electron current density and electric field are coincident for local conductivity case in the pressure range of interest, but it roughly holds true for non-local conductivity case at very high pressure. In addition, an effective conductivity with consideration of non-collisional stochastic heating effect is introduced. The effective conductivity almost reproduces the electron density and effective electron temperature for the non-local conductivity case, but does not capture the non-local relation between electron current and electric field as well as the local negative power absorption that is observed for non-local conductivity case at low pressures.
Water-electrode discharges can normally operate at atmospheric pressure and at a glow discharge mode [1], because the water electrode limits discharge current, and water evaporation has a cooling effect [2]. They are attracting more and more attentions due to abundance in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [2, 3]. Accordingly, water-electrode glow discharges at atmospheric pressure have broad potentials in diversified application fields, including water purification and activation [4–8], nanomaterials synthesis [9, 10], catalysis [11, 12], and medicine [13, 14].
The plasma attachment to a water electrode is apt to be uniform, presenting a disk shape in the interface between the glow plasma and the water electrode [15]. Other than the uniform disk, some discrete spots can also be formed above a water electrode [16]. Under proper conditions, some self-organized patterns appear, especially above a water anode [17, 18]. A single ring is formed if the electrical conductivity of water anode is higher than 17.3 μS·cm-1 [19, 20]. The single ring is attributed to the distinctive rotating motion of a micro-discharge channel, resulting from the generated electronegative species during the discharge that poison the discharge [21]. Diameter of the single ring increases until reaching a maximum, and then decreases with the increase of discharge current [18]. Besides, the single-ring pattern varies and may transit to other discharge patterns with adjusting gas flow rate, discharge current, and gap width [22]. Although various parameters can affect pattern transitions, the determining factor is related to electrode and gas temperatures [22]. In fact, the formation mechanism of pattern is still not understood very well [23]. With a reaction–diffusion mechanism, patterns above a water anode are initiated with an autocatalytic reaction of electrons, which is dictated by discharge current and ionic strength [24].
More complex ring patterns have been observed above a water anode. For example, a double-ring pattern is formed with 1.0% NaCl solution used as a water anode [25]. Excited by an alternating-current (AC) sinusoidal voltage, the double-ring pattern has also been found under a low conductivity of 55 nS·cm-1 [26]. Compared to the double ring, a triple-ring pattern is only formed with a conductivity higher than several hundred μS·cm-1, which can be excited by a direct-current (DC) voltage [27], an asymmetric sine [28], or a square wave [29]. Up to now, concentric-ring patterns more than quadruple rings have not been reported in the literature.
In this work, concentric-ring patterns up to five rings are formed in the interface between the water anode and the glow discharge plasma. The ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with increasing ionic strength (electrical conductivity) and discharge current. These concentric-ring patterns are numerically reproduced based on the model of the autocatalytic reaction.
As shown in figure 1, a 3.0 mm diameter rod is made from tungsten, which has a flat end. The rod electrode is placed above a glass reservoir, which has a diameter (inner diameter) of about 75 mm. The reservoir with a depth of 75 mm is full of water, whose initial electrical conductivity is 330 μS·cm-1. The electrical conductivity of the water anode is measured by a conductivity tester (Inesa DDSJ-308F). The water reservoir is cooled by being placed in a water tank at a constant temperature of about 25 ℃. Water in the reservoir serves as the anode through electrical ground via an immersed metal mesh, and the rod acts as the cathode through being connected to a DC power source (Glassman EK15R40). In the circuit, a ballast resistor (R=50 kΩ) is used to restrict the discharge current. The gap width (d) is 5.0 mm. The gas discharge in the gap is carried out in atmospheric environment. Hence, the working gas is room air at a pressure of 1.013×105 Pa, with a temperature of 300 K and a humidity of 35%. A single-lens-reflex camera (Canon EOS 5D Mark IV) with variable exposure time (texp) is used to obtain water-anode discharge patterns at an oblique angle (45°). After being focused by a lens, light emission is transmitted by an optical fiber into the entrance slit of a spectrometer (PI ACTON SP2750) with a grating of 2400 grooves mm-1, thus optical emission spectrum can be collected. A voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A) is used to detect applied voltage (Va), and a current coil (Pearson 8600) is employed to measure discharge current (I). Waveforms of Va and I are monitored by a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO4104). Typical waveforms of Va and I are presented in figure 1(b). It can be seen that no pulse can be found in Va and I, which means that the discharge operates in a continuous mode.
After atmospheric pressure glow discharge is initiated in the air gap, a radial-stripe pattern is formed at once above the water anode with I of 30.0 mA, as illustrated in figure 2. The radial-stripe pattern is surrounded by a ring as time elapses, leading to a single-ring pattern at 10 min. The ring number continuously increases from 15 to 25 min. That is to say, the concentric-ring pattern undergoes a scenario from a double ring (15 min), a triple ring (20 min), to a quadruple ring (25 min). For these concentric-ring patterns, the center is luminous. At last (30 min), a quintuple ring is time-invariantly stabilized above the water anode. Different to other concentric-ring patterns, the quintuple-ring pattern has a dark center. In a word, the ring number of the concentric-ring patterns increases with time elapsing, and up to five rings have been observed under the constant current of 30.0 mA. It is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in atmospheric pressure water-anode glow discharge.
As mentioned above, pattern becomes time-invariant after about half an hour operation of the discharge. However, the final time-invariant pattern evolves with varying discharge current, as presented in figure 3. At a low discharge current (5.0 mA), the pattern seems like a diffuse spot. Its diameter slightly increases with increasing discharge current. With a current of 10.0 mA, the diffuse-spot pattern transits to a single ring (the center is dark), which is similar to that reported by Shirai et al [30, 31]. When discharge current is increased to 14.0 mA, a diffuse spot appears in the center of the single-ring pattern. The diameter of the single ring increases and the central spot grows as discharge current is further elevated (16.0 mA). When discharge current reaches 20.0 mA, the central spot evolves into a new ring, resulting in a double-ring pattern. In a word, it seems that as discharge current increases, newcomer tends to appear in the center, which then transits to a new ring under a proper current. Interestingly, the pattern obeys this rule with further increasing discharge current, as can be seen for the transitions from the double-ring pattern (20.0 mA) to the triple ring (24.0 mA), from the triple-ring pattern (25.0 mA) to the quadruple ring (27.0 mA), and from the quadruple ring (28.0 mA) to the quintuple ring (30.0 mA). During these transitions, the ring number increases with increasing discharge current. Up to five concentric rings have been formed, and there is a central spot in the center of the quintuple ring at 31.0 mA. With further increasing discharge current, the concentric-ring patterns cannot be sustained above the water surface, and some discrete spots can be seen above the water anode (32.0 mA).
Electronegative species generated in the discharge, such as O, O3, H, OH, NO, NO2, NO3, NH, and NH2, can attach free electrons [21]. Resultantly, negative ions, mainly O-, H-, OH-, NO-, etc, will be deposited on the water surface [15, 32]. The deposited negative ions enhance the electric field in the interface between the bulk plasma and the water anode, resulting in a layer near the water surface, which is brighter than the plasma above it [15, 33]. When these negative ions are distributed nonuniformly, the region with more negative ions is brighter due to a higher enhanced field. In the bulk plasma, electrons are mainly produced near the axis of the discharge due to the high α (the first Townsend ionization coefficient) resulting from the maximal electric field in the center. In turn, more electrons will generate more electronegative species near the discharge axis. After generation, electrons and electronegative species near the axis diffuse to the rim. Hence, compared with the discharge rim, more electrons and electronegative species are abundant in the center. As a result, more negative ions tend to be deposited above the central region of the pattern. Therefore, newcomer is inclined to appear in the center of the concentric-ring patterns with increasing current.
As pointed out by Rumbach P et al [24], ionic strength (IS) and discharge current (I) mutually dictate the autocatalytic reaction of electrons. Hence, IS and I should be responsible for the pattern evolution mentioned before. Between them, IS is positively related with electrical conductivity. Hence, the electrical conductivity of the water anode is studied, as indicated in figure 4. Resulting from the generation of HNO3 and HNO2 [34, 35], the conductivity of the water anode increases with time, which reaches saturation after about 30 min operation. Moreover, the conductivity increases with increasing discharge current. In combination with figures 2 and 3, it can be deduced from figure 4 that pattern type varies with the variation of electrical conductivity (related with IS).
Figure 5 presents 300–800 nm scanned optical spectrum emitted from the discharge above the water anode. Besides the second positive system of N2(C3Πu→B3Πg) [32], spectral lines of Ar I (4p→4s) [36], and O I (3p3P→3s3S) at 844 nm [37], the first negative system of
The aforementioned concentric-ring patterns are simulated by the same method explored by Rumbach P et al [24]. From the Turing reaction–diffusion mechanism [43], it is believed that electrons are used as activators. Through the collision ionization of electrons, the autocatalytic reaction is realized, which is dictated by discharge current (I) and ionic strength (IS). With this model, the discharge patterns are given by the eigenfunctions (harmonics) of the cylindrical Laplacian (
Ylmn(r,z,θ)=Jm(κmlr)[Amlcos(mθ)+Bmlsin(mθ)]sin(knz), | (1) |
where Jm(kmlr) corresponds to the mth Bessel function of the first kind. (r, z, θ) are cylindrical coordinates.
The relationship between the l value and discharge current is listed in table 1. From table 1, one can see that the integer (l) increases with increasing discharge current. However, discharge current has a small variation range for a specific l value. Hence, all of the concentric-ring patterns formed in experiments have been numerically reproduced in simulations. However, at most five rings have been observed in experiments, which transit to discrete spots with current higher than 32 mA. This can be explained from the criteria for stability, which is related with the first Townsend ionization coefficient (α) [24]. α in the interfacial layer between the bulk plasma and the water anode is influenced by Tg. With a current higher than 32 mA, Tg is so high that stability criteria cannot be satisfied any more, resulting in the disappearance of the concentric-ring patterns. As a result, at most five concentric rings have been observed in our experiment. However, the maximal number of concentric rings is not limited according to formula (1). Hence, we believe that more rings could be obtained if the onset of thermal instability are restrained. Therefore, we will try our best to reduce the gas temperature in our future work through the usage of liquid nitrogen as a refrigerant, similar to that reported in the [44–46].
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |
In summary, various concentric-ring patterns have been formed above the water anode of a glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. The results reveal that the ring number of the patterns increases with time elapsing. Moreover, it increases with increasing discharge current. Among these concentric-ring patterns, it is the first time that the quadruple-ring and the quintuple-ring patterns are observed in water-anode glow discharge operated in atmospheric pressure air. For both the quadruple ring and the quintuple ring, the center is either luminous or dark, depending on the discharge current. It has been found that the electrical conductivity of the water anode, electron temperature, electron density, and gas temperature vary as a function of time elapses and increasing discharge current. At last, the various concentric-ring patterns are reproduced in simulations based on the autocatalytic reaction model dictated by ionic strength and discharge current.
This work was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12105041, 11935005 and 12035003), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2232020D-40) and Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 20YF1401300).
[1] |
Lieberman M A and Lichtenberg A J 2005 Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing 2nd edn (Hoboken: Wiley)
|
[2] |
Chabert P and Braithwaite N 2011 Physics of Radio-Frequency Plasmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
[3] |
Kolobov V I and Godyak V A 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 060601 doi: 10.1063/1.5093199
|
[4] |
Godyak V A and Kolobov V I 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 369 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.369
|
[5] |
Godyak V A, Piejak R B and Alexandrovich B M 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11 525 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/11/4/320
|
[6] |
Godyak V A and Kolobov V I 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 4589 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4589
|
[7] |
Ding Z F, Sun B and Huo W G 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 063504 doi: 10.1063/1.4922080
|
[8] |
Kolobov V I and Arslanbekov R R 2006 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 895 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2006.875850
|
[9] |
Mouchtouris S and Kokkoris G 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 025007 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/25/2/025007
|
[10] |
Mouchtouris S and Kokkoris G 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 123 023301 doi: 10.1063/1.5002653
|
[11] |
Kaganovich I D et al 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 124003 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/51/12/124003
|
[12] |
Kaganovich I D and Polomarov O 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 026411 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026411
|
[13] |
Kaganovich I D, Startsev E and Shvets G 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 3328 doi: 10.1063/1.1723461
|
[14] |
Yoon N S et al 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 757 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.757
|
[15] |
Yoon N S, Hwang S M and Choi D I 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 7536 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.7536
|
[16] |
You K I and Yoon N S 1999 Phys. Rev. E 59 7074 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.7074
|
[17] |
Ramamurthi B, Economou D J and Kaganovich I D 2003 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 12 170 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/12/2/308
|
[18] |
Ramamurthi B, Economou D J and Kaganovich I D 2003 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 12 302 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/12/3/302
|
[19] |
Han J et al 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 103503 doi: 10.1063/1.5115415
|
[20] |
Yang W and Wang Y N 2021 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63 035031 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/abd9e2
|
[21] |
Li H et al 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 233302 doi: 10.1063/1.4986495
|
[22] |
Godyak V A, Piejak R B and Alexandrovich B M 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 3081 doi: 10.1063/1.369646
|
[23] |
Shkarovsky P, Johnson T W and Bachinski M P 1966 The Particle Kinetics of Plasmas (Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley)
|
[24] |
Vahedi V et al 1995 J. Appl. Phys. 78 1446 doi: 10.1063/1.360723
|
[25] |
Wang D Z, Ma T C and Guo B H 1993 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26 62 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/26/1/010
|
[26] |
Thorsteinsson E G and Gudmundsson J T 2009 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 045001 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/18/4/045001
|
[27] |
Phelps A V and Petrovic Z L 1999 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 8 R21 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/8/3/201
|
[28] |
Tachibana K 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 1007 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.34.1007
|
[29] |
McFarland R H and Kinney J D 1965 Phys. Rev. 137 A1058 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.137.A1058
|
[30] |
Monahan D D and Turner M M 2009 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 045024 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/18/4/045024
|
[31] |
Averkin S N, Gatsonis N A and Olson L 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 1926 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2015.2429313
|
[32] |
Denysenko I et al 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 046403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046403
|
[33] |
Bassett N L and Economou D J 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 75 1931 doi: 10.1063/1.356340
|
[34] |
Kolobov V I, Lymberopoulos D P and Economou D J 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 3408 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.3408
|
[35] |
Godyak V A and Piejak R B 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 82 5944 doi: 10.1063/1.366496
|
[36] |
Cunge G et al 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 3580 doi: 10.1063/1.1316791
|
[37] |
DiPeso G et al 1994 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12 1387 doi: 10.1116/1.579326
|
[38] |
Godyak V A, Alexandrovich B M and Kolobov V I 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 026406 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026406
|
[1] | Caixia LI, Jianyu FENG, Shuchang WANG, Cheng LI, Junxia RAN, Yuyang PAN, Lifang DONG. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a |
[2] | Xiaoxi DUAN (段晓溪), Benqiong LIU (刘本琼), Huige ZHANG (张惠鸽), Ben LI (李犇), Jiting OUYANG (欧阳吉庭). Various patterns in dielectric barrier glow discharges simulated by a dynamic model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 85401-085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0d51 |
[3] | Songru XIE (谢松汝), Yong HE (何勇), Dingkun YUAN (袁定琨), Zhihua WANG (王智化), Sunel KUMAR, Yanqun ZHU (朱燕群), Kefa CEN (岑可法). The effects of gas flow pattern on the generation of ozone in surface dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 55505-055505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aafc50 |
[4] | Yaqi YANG (杨亚奇), Weiguo LI (李卫国). Self-organized pattern on the surface of a metal anode in low-pressure DC discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35402-035402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa997f |
[5] | Xingwei WU (吴兴伟), Cong LI (李聪), Chunlei FENG (冯春雷), Qi WANG (王奇), Hongbin DING (丁洪斌). Time-resolved measurements of NO2 concentration in pulsed discharges by high-sensitivity cavity ring-down spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55506-055506. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6473 |
[6] | Jianyu FENG (冯建宇), Lifang DONG (董丽芳), Caixia LI (李彩霞), Ying LIU (刘莹), Tian DU (杜天), Fang HAO (郝芳). Hollow hexagonal pattern with surface discharges in a dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 55401-055401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa594a |
[7] | WANG Lijun(王立军), HUANG Xiaolong(黄小龙), JIA Shenli(贾申利), ZHOU Xin(周鑫), SHI Zongqian(史宗谦). Modeling and Simulation of Deflected Anode Erosion in Vacuum Arcs[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(3): 226-231. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/3/10 |
[8] | HONG Yi (洪义), LU Na (鲁娜), PAN Jing (潘静), LI Jie (李杰), WU Yan (吴彦). Discharge Characteristics of an Atmospheric Pressure Argon Plasma Jet Generated with Screw Ring-Ring Electrodes in Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(8): 780-786. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/8/12 |
[9] | ZHENG Na (郑娜), ZHONG Chunlai (钟春来), FAN Tieshuan(樊铁栓). The Calculation of Prompt Fission Neutron from 233U(n, f) Reaction by Multi-Modal Los Alamos Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 521-525. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/19 |
[10] | JIANG Songsheng (蒋崧生), HE Ming (何明). Anomalous nuclear reaction in Earth’s interior: a new field in physics science?[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(5): 438-441. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/5/25 |
1. | Li, J., Zhang, X., Tian, S. et al. Temporal evolution of self-organized spiral patterns formed in a liquid-electrode discharge sustained in atmospheric pressure air. Physics of Plasmas, 2025, 32(3): 032107. DOI:10.1063/5.0249081 | |
2. | Zhang, J., Zhu, M., Zhang, C. Dynamic of mode transition in air surface micro-discharge plasma: reactive species in confined space. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad862c | |
3. | Li, C., Feng, J., Wang, S. et al. Formation mechanism of bright and dark concentric-ring pattern in dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085401. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad386a | |
4. | Zhang, X.-X., Jia, P.-Y., Ran, J.-X. et al. Discharge characteristics and parameter diagnosis of brush-shaped air plasma plumes under auxiliary discharge | [辅助放电下刷状空气等离子体羽的放电特性和参数诊断]. Wuli Xuebao/Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 085201. DOI:10.7498/aps.73.20231946 | |
5. | Wu, J., Li, X., Ran, J. et al. Discharge aspects of a snake-like plasma plume generated by an atmospheric pressure plasma jet with variable argon flow rate. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2023, 20(8): 2200188. DOI:10.1002/ppap.202200188 | |
6. | Cai, Z., Wang, Z. Evaluation of Salt Matrix and Organic Additives in Solution Anode Glow Discharge Optical Emission Spectrometry: Taking Silver, Cadmium and Mercury as Examples. Atomic Spectroscopy, 2023, 44(5): 354-364. DOI:10.46770/AS.2023.190 | |
7. | Kolobov, V.I., Golubovskii, Y.B. The principle of minimal power. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2022, 31(9): 094003. DOI:10.1088/1361-6595/ac8b31 | |
8. | Chen, J., Zhang, F., Jia, P. et al. Argon plume transition from a hollow swell to a diffuse swell with increasing amplitude of a trapezoidal voltage. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 085402. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ac6570 |
l | I (mA) | Pattern type |
l=2 | 10≤I < 14 | Single ring |
l=3 | 14≤I < 20 | Single ring with a central spot |
l=4 | 20≤I < 22 | Double ring |
l=5 | 22≤I < 24 | Double ring with a central spot |
l=6 | 24≤I < 25 | Triple ring |
l=7 | 25≤I < 27 | Triple ring with a central spot |
l=8 | 27≤I < 28 | Quadruple ring |
l=9 | 28≤I < 30 | Quadruple ring with a central spot |
l=10 | 30≤I < 31 | Quintuple ring |
l=11 | 31≤I < 32 | Quintuple ring with a central spot |