Processing math: 71%
Advanced Search+
Hui LIAO, Chaoqi HU, Yilin LI, Baoming REN, Xuan SUN. Experimental study of single-translated field-reversed configuration in KMAX[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac64f1
Citation: Hui LIAO, Chaoqi HU, Yilin LI, Baoming REN, Xuan SUN. Experimental study of single-translated field-reversed configuration in KMAX[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac64f1

Experimental study of single-translated field-reversed configuration in KMAX

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Xuan SUN, E-mail: xsun@ustc.edu.cn

  • Received Date: January 13, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 02, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 05, 2022
  • Available Online: December 07, 2023
  • Published Date: July 12, 2022
  • For collisional merging field-reversed configurations (FRCs), it is desired to have both FRCs tuned to be approximately the same, as well as to optimize each FRC to have high temperature and high translation speed so as to retain most of the equilibrium flux after traveling a distance to the middle plane for merging. The present study reports the experimental study of a single-translated FRC in the KMAX-FRC device with various diagnostics, including a triple probe, a bolometer, several magnetic probe arrays, and a novel 2D internal magnetic probe array. According to the measurements conducted in the present study, a maximum toroidal magnetic field equal to ~1/3 of the external magnetic field inside the FRC separatrix radius is observed, and the typical parameters of a single-translated FRC near the device's mid-plane are ne~(2–4)×1019 m-3, Te~8 eV, Ti~5 eV, rs ~0.2 m, ls ~0.6 m and ϕp(RR) ~0.2 mWb. The 2D magnetic topology measurement revealed, for the first time, the time evolution of the overall internal magnetic fields of a single-translated FRC, and an optimized operation regime is given in the paper.

  • A field-reversed configuration is a plasmoid enclosed with self-organized magnetic fields that belong to the compact torus [1, 2]. The features of FRCs include high beta, movability and a simple geometry, as well as a natural divertor formed by its open magnetic field lines in the edge, making it an appealing fusion concept, especially for advanced aneutronic fusion reactions, such as D-He3 and p-B11. Collisional merging (CM) FRCs formed by two single-translated FRCs have gained increasing attention following a series of experiments conducted in the Inductive Plasma Accelerator (IPA) experiment [3], the C-2 series device (C-2, C-2U and C-2W) of TAE Technologies Inc. [46], and the FAT-CM device at Nihon University [7, 8], in which the poloidal flux was amplified and the confinement was improved after merging. The collisional merging process can yield a long-lived FRC, which can benefit the quasi-steady-state operation by neutral beam injection or even the development of FRC-based magnetic inertial fusion [9, 10]. Naturally, it is crucial to form two identical and well-performed single-translated FRCs prior to the merging process.

    One of the key KMAX-FRC research topics is the translation and collision merging process of FRCs. To form a high-quality collisional merging FRC, the two single-translated FRCs must have similar parameters; for instance, similar plasma density and separatrix radius. In this paper, we first introduce the diagnostics employed in the experiments, including a newly installed 2D internal magnetic probe, and then present evidence of the formation of two similar high-speed single-translated FRCs in the confinement chamber. The measurements of the single-translated FRCs presented in this study include electron density, electron temperature, FRC separatrix radius, FRC length, translation speed, internal magnetic field profiles, etc. The experimental results of radial density scanning, Abel inversion of the emission profile, and internal magnetic topology roughly show similar separatrix radii that are usually estimated from an external magnetic probe. The estimated FRC length from the external magnetic probe array is consistent with the result from the internal measurement of the 2D magnetic probe array. Furthermore, the internal magnetic field profiles are investigated by magnetic probes and the poloidal flux is simply estimated with the rigid rotor (RR) model [11]. The 2D magnetic topology measurement reported in this study represents the first measurement to reveal the evolution characteristics of the overall internal magnetic field in the single-translated FRC.

    The KMAX θ-pinch FRC is an FRC experiment with θ-pinch coils installed inside the central cell of a tandem mirror device named KMAX (Keda Mirror with AXisymmetry) [12, 13]. As depicted in figure 1(a), KMAX is at present a 10.4 m long axisymmetric tandem mirror device primarily comprising one central cell and two end cells, which are 5.2 m and 2.2 m in length, respectively [14]. The diameters of the central vessel and the mirror throat are 1.2 m and 0.3 m, respectively. The 10 mm thickness of the stainless-steel wall of the central confinement chamber can serve as a magnetic field conserver for the current KMAX θ-pinch FRC experiments (the characteristic FRC lifetime is~100 μs). The quasi-dc magnetic field is generated by 16 axially distributed solenoids, which are powered by ten sets of super-capacitors (48 V and 165 F for each). The typical profile of the axial magnetic field in the KMAX-FRC experiments with/without the main field formed by the θ-pinch coils is illustrated in figure 1(b). The axial magnetic field in the device's mid-plane is about 100 G and the mirror magnetic field at the tail end of the stepped-pinch coils is about 2000 G. The early engineering design and experimental results of KMAX-FRC have been reported by Lin et al [12, 15], after which a few minor upgrades have been incorporated since the KMAX device was relocated to another campus.

    Figure  1.  (a) The schematic of KMAX-FRC with stepped θ-pinch coils and diagnostics; (b) the typical profile of the axial magnetic field in the KMAX-FRC experiments with/without the main field formed by the θ-pinch coils.

    The capacitor-to-electrode transmission line was replaced with new coaxial cables with lower inductance and a higher voltage rating of 40 kV, which improved the pre-ionization because of faster ringing currents as well as the amplitude and rising time of the main compression magnetic field. New rapid electromagnetic valves to make fast, controllable and repeatable pulse gas injection have been developed and employed in the new experiments. When a fast-rising current is produced in the circuit (typical peak current is 2 kA and rise time is ~80 μs), the working gas, hydrogen, can be ejected quickly within 150 μs, and the duration of the gas injection is 1.5 ms. The θ-pinch discharge starts at t=1.8 ms, shortly after the end of the gas injection (gas is injected at t=0 ms). The gas injection is critical for FRC formation. There should be enough neutral gas in the formation section to ionize, yet it has to be minimized outside the source region, or it may affect the translation and performance of the FRC. The negative bias and positive main field of the θ-pinch in this work are typically adjusted to -250 G and 1200 G, respectively. Once formed, the FRC is ejected from the formation section due to the axial magnetic field gradient, and it expands during translation due to the reduced magnetic field and the large diameter of the confinement chamber. At the mid-plane of the device, a typical single-translated FRC has a radius of~0.2 m, a length of~0.6 m, and an electron density of~(2–4)×1019 m-3.

    The diagnostics used in the experiment are described below. The positions of the triple probe, the 1D Bt magnetic probe array, the 2D magnetic probe array, the flux loop near the north formation region, the bolometer near the south formation region, and the widely used external magnetic probe array (Be array) in the FRC experiment for measuring the external axial magnetic field [16], are marked in figure 1(a).

    Figure 2(a) presents a diagram of the 2D magnetic probe array installed on the R-Z plane to measure the time evolution of the internal magnetic field during the FRC collision merging. It contains a total of 32 spatial data points (4 points in the radial direction and 8 points in the axial direction), and at each data point, two pickup coils are installed orthogonally to measure Bz and Br, respectively. The interval between two adjacent spatial points, in the R or Z direction, is 5 cm. The 2D magnetic probe array is shielded by eight quartz tubes, each with a 12 mm outer diameter. The pickup coils are made of ceramic-core commercial chip inductors (Coilcraft, 1812CS-333XGLC) that have been successfully used in several plasma experiments to measure the magnetic field [1719]. The probe can move in the radial direction with a range of 30 cm, and a limit slot is used to ensure the movement is only on the R-Z plane. The entire probe is designed to be as compact as possible; the pickup coils are directly connected to the eight 19-pin LEMO plugs for external output via 64 pairs of twisted-pair wires made from machine-wound polyimide enameled wire. To minimize the entry of unwanted noise, the output signals are connected to the digitizer card via eight of the shortest shielded network cables.

    Figure  2.  (a) CAD drawing of the radial movable 2D magnetic probe array; (b) picture of the triple probe on the device's mid-plane; (c) schematic diagram of the optical paths of the bolometer; (d) picture of the external magnetic probe; (e) picture of the 1D Bt magnetic probe array.

    The movable triple probe is made up of three 0.5 mm diameter cylindrical tungsten wires with a tip of about 1 mm, as shown in figure 2(b). The bias voltage is -50 to -80 V to extract the ion saturation current, which is measured with a Pearson's current sensor (Pearson's 2877, voltage/current=1 V/A). The unfiltered bolometer located at Z=–0.25 m is made up of a 16 channel AXUV array (AXUV16ELG), and the amplifier is placed as close as possible. A schematic diagram of the bolometer's optical paths is shown in figure 2(c), where the outermost chord, which is~26 cm away from the center, is long enough to cover almost the entire plasma region of the single-translated FRC. The external magnetic probe array is installed at r=50 cm and evenly distributed from Z=-0.825 m to Z=0.825 m with a distance of 0.15 m. The probe at each position, as shown in figure 2(d), consists of two pickup coils (Coilcraft, 1812CS-333XGLC) mounted in parallel on a poly tetra fluoroethylene (PTFE) base to ensure operation if either of the two coils fail. Figure 2(e) shows the picture of the 1D Bt magnetic probe, which consists of 15 Bt coils that are placed along the r direction with a higher spatial resolution of 2 cm. It is also movable in the radial direction, where the first coil set (Bt #1) can be placed from r=-10 cm to r=20 cm.

    To optimize the FRC performance at the device's mid-plane, the gas injection must be tuned as low as possible so that the FRC in the formation region can have a higher initial electron temperature and subsequent faster translation speed to keep most of the initial poloidal flux.

    The time evolution of the radial density and temperature profiles of the single-translated FRC is depicted in figure 3(a). The result was obtained by scanning the triple probe from r=0 to 30 cm at intervals of 5 cm. The data collected at each point were averaged over four consecutive shots. As shown in figure 3(b), the repeatability of the FRC plasma is acceptable; the hatched area represents the standard deviation in four repeated shots. Figure 3(a) depicts the typical hollow density distribution of an FRC, with the peak density near r~15 cm; it also depicts a relatively flat electron temperature inside the FRC. Figure 3(c) depicts a time slice of the radial electron density and temperature profiles at t=20 μs, as well as typical radial profiles of the FRC mid-plane. The measured electron temperatures inside the separatrix radius (rs ~0.2 m) are nearly identical (8 eV) and rapidly decrease outside the separatrix radius (rs ~0.2 m). Outside of the FRC, the plasma density profile exhibits the same trend of rapidly decreasing. The solid red line in figure 3(c) represents the density fitting results from the RR model with n=2.5×1019sech2[0.63(r2/152-1)]. The largest discrepancy is observed on the axis, which may be caused by the inaccuracy of the simple RR model or perhaps by the cooling of the probe. Although there is no direct measurement of the ion temperature, the ion temperature Ti~5 eV in the single-translated FRC can be inferred from the radial pressure balance condition, i.e. nm(Ti+Te)=B2e/2μ0.

    Figure  3.  Experimental signals of triple probe. (a) Time history of the radial scanning of the single-translated FRC parameters: the averaged electron density and the averaged electron temperature; (b) the averaged electron density measured by triple probe at r=0 cm and r=15 cm; the hatched area indicates standard deviation in four repeated shots; (c) time slice of the radial electron density and temperature profiles at t=20 μs; the RR fit of radial electron density profile is represented by the solid red line. t=0 μs is the peak time of the main field.

    The adiabatic theory of FRC translation states that the kinetic energy of an FRC is converted from the thermal energy of an FRC [20]. The experimental results indicate that the translation of FRC relies on the magnetic field gradient between the source region and the translation region [21]. Usually, in field-reversed theta-pinch (FRTP) formation, increasing the thermal energy of FRC means improving the main field, which simultaneously increases the magnetic field gradient. In our experiment, if the background magnetic field in the translation region remained unchanged, we observed that the FRC translation speeds increased almost linearly with Bmain at first, as shown in figure 4. However, when the main field reaches a 'threshold', the FRC translation speed is no longer growing, even though there is only one data point to demonstrate the trend. Furthermore, we discovered that a much higher main field will degrade the FRC quality, as evidenced by the lower excluded flux inferred from the flux loop and Be array. If the FRC exits the formation section before the main field's peak time, the remaining energy of the main field is wasted, and thus an increase in the main field does not always result in an increase in speed. In addition, a much higher main field will lead to premature ejection of plasmoid from the formation section, for example, ahead of a complete FRC formation, resulting in the deterioration of the formed FRC. Because the threshold of the main field depends on the background magnetic field, the initial gas pressure and the negative bias field, an increase in the main field above the threshold is avoided without changing other parameters in the present experiment. Further improvement of the main field is needed for the formation of a higher-temperature KMAX-FRC in the near future. To avoid the unfavorable situations mentioned above, the background field and bias field may need to be adjusted on the same scale.

    Figure  4.  The measured translation speed under different main magnetic field.

    A suitable operating range for KMAX-FRC to obtain sufficiently high poloidal flux and fast translation speed is a low-density gas injection and a suitable main compressed magnetic field to translation field ratio. The translation speed in the optimized operation, as shown in figure 5, is approximately 60 km s-1, which can be calculated from the signal of diamagnetism ∆Bz in a typical single-translated FRC. The following expression defines the reference Alfvén speed: VA=Be/μ0nimi~50kms-1. Here, μ0 denotes the magnetic permeability of free space, mi denotes the hydrogen ion mass, ni~3×1019 m-3 is the ion density, which is assumed to equal the electron density measured using the triple probe, and Be~118 G is the typical external magnetic field when a single-translated FRC passes through the device's mid-plane. The measured FRC translation speed is slightly higher than the typical reference Alfvén speed.

    Figure  5.  The time sequence of the diamagnetism ∆Bz of single-translated FRCs: (a) north FRC and (b) south FRC. The estimated translation speed is indicated by the dashed green line. t=0 μs is the peak time of the main field and the green asterisk indicates the time (t~20 μs) when FRC passes Z=0.

    The excluded flux radius can be calculated simply as rϕ~rw1-B0/Be, where rw denotes the wall radius and B0 (Be) represents the external background magnetic field without (with) the FRC passing through. Usually, rϕ ~rs is assumed, and the separatrix radius rs is indicated by the excluded flux radius. The FRC mid-plane passes through Z=0 at t~20 μs (t=0 μs is the peak time of the main compression field). Figures 6(a) and (b) show the axial distributions of the excluded flux radius at t~20 μs for the north and south single-translated FRCs, respectively. The north single-translated FRC's separatrix radius is rs (N)~0.2 m; the separatrix radius of the south single-translated FRC is similar to that of the north single-translated FRC, i.e. rs (S)~rs (N)~0.2 m. In addition, the radial density profile depicted in figure 3(c) reveals that the maximum density is located at r~0.15 m, and the normalized result of Abel inversion obtained from the bolometer signal when the south FRC passes through at t=18 μs in figure 7(a) reveals that the maximum radiation power is located at r~0.15 m as depicted in figure 7(b). The internal magnetic field measurement result presented in figure 9 indicates that the magnetic null is located at r~0.14 m, which is consistent with rs ~0.2 m since the magnetic axis radius is R0=rs/2, where the FRC is assumed to have a zero magnetic field, maximum density and radiation. The maximum radiation power occurs at the magnetic null because it is positively correlated with the plasma density (considering in our experiments that the electron temperature is low and almost the same inside the FRC; see figure 3(c)). The separatrix length is defined as the distance between two x-points of the FRC, and the position of the FRC x-point may be considered to be the point along the axis Z2/3 where the excluded flux radius has fallen to two-thirds of its maximum value [22]. Here, the excluded flux radius depicted in figure 6 was fitted from Z=-0.5 m to Z=0.5 m, followed by the calculation of the approximate FRC length ls using the expression ls~Z2/3(+)-Z2/3(-), as illustrated in figures 6(a) and (b) using dashed black lines. The length of the north single-translated FRC is ls (N)~0.57 m, while the length of the south single-translated FRC is ls (S)~0.59 m.

    Figure  6.  The axial distribution of the excluded flux radius when the single-translated FRC arrives near the device's mid-plane: (a) north FRC and (b) south FRC. Fitted solid lines indicate the FRC length.
    Figure  7.  Experimental signals of bolometer in south single-translated FRC. (a) Abel inversion of the bolometer; the vertical dashed green line indicates t=18 μs; (b) the normalized result of Abel inversion at t=18 μs; the vertical dotted black line indicates r=15 cm. Pr is the total radiation power collected by each chord of the AXUV array. t=0 μs is the peak time of the main field.
    Figure  8.  The time evolution of the 2D magnetic field (R-Z plane). The magnitude and direction of the magnetic field are indicated by red arrows. The contours of the poloidal flux ψ(R,Z) are indicated by solid black lines. t=0 μs is the peak time of the main field.
    Figure  9.  (a) The difference in signal between AXUV#8 and AXUV#9 in north/south FRC experiment; (b) the radial profile of the axial field measured by the magnetic probe at Z=0.5 m in north FRC experiment.

    Meanwhile, the 2D magnetic probe array at the device's mid-plane provides the magnetic measurement of the internal Bz(R,Z) and Br(R,Z). In previous experiments on C-2 and FAT-CM [17, 23], the inserted magnetic probe array clearly affects the FRC performance and lifetime; however, the external flux signals and electron density are barely affected by the insertion of the 2D magnetic probe in our experiment. It could be due to the fact that the plasma temperature and density in KMAX-FRC are much lower, so the sputtering and the energy loss due to the presence of the probe are not severe compared with their FRCs. The time evolution of the magnetic field topology in single-translated FRCs is illustrated in figure 8, with the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field indicated with red arrows. The 2D contours of the poloidal flux ψ(R,Z) are calculated using the expression ψ(R,Z)=R02πR', represented by the black curve. The data cover almost the entire FRC region axially from Z=-17.5 to Z=17.5 cm and radially from r=0 to r=25 cm. The translation and shape of the single-translated FRC are illustrated by the 2D magnetic probe array. At t=13.5 μs, the head of the FRC has entered the probe array, and the partial internal magnetic field has already reversed its direction. As the FRC continues to move forward, the initial magnetic field line is constantly expelled, and the internal magnetic field exhibits further gradual reversal of its direction, which is indicated by the changing direction of the arrows. At t=19.5 μs, the FRC covers the entire probe region, and the position of the FRC O-point may be roughly identified (R0~0.14 m). Finally, it is observed that the entire FRC has left the probe region at t=27.5 μs and all magnetic fields have returned to their original direction. Moreover, it is possible to roughly identify the x-point in certain images, with selected x-points indicated inside colored circles in figure 8. The 'front x-points' are indicated by solid circles, while the 'rear x-points' are indicated by dashed circles. The time interval between two x-points that are passing through similar positions is 10 μs. With the estimated translation speed vz ~60 km s-1, the separatrix length may be immediately estimated to be ~0.6 m, which is consistent with the FRC length estimated from the expression ls~Z2/3(+)-Z2/3(-). The analysis of further data obtained in repeated experiments reveals that ls ~0.5–0.6 m for single-translated FRCs, according to which E=1.2~1.5 for single-translated FRCs, where the elongation E is defined as E=ls/rs.

    The internal magnetic field profiles were investigated by a 2D magnetic probe array and a 1D Bt magnetic probe array. It is noted that no obvious FRC radial shift was observed in the KMAX single-translated FRC. As shown in figure 9, the overlap of signals between AXUV#8 and AXUV#9, as well as the internal magnetic field measurement in the north FRC, validates the assumption of FRC axisymmetry. Therefore, in a typical KMAX-FRC internal-field measurement, the first pickup coil set (Bz #1 or Bt #1) of probes is usually placed at r=0. Figure 10(a) shows the temporal evolution of the Bz (r) profile in a single-translated north FRC, which is extracted from the internal magnetic field measurement of the 2D magnetic probe array at Z=-2.5 cm. When the FRC passes through the probe, the field-reversed structure of the translated FRC is clearly recorded. Figure 10(b) depicts the temporal evolution of the Bt(r) profile in another similar shot, in which a significant toroidal magnetic field is observed inside the FRC separatrix radius. It should be mentioned that the appearance of Bt inside a translated FRC has been evidenced in previous experiments [17, 2327] and related numerical simulations [28, 29]. What is more, in our experimental measurement, an opposite polarity of Bt can be repeatedly measured outside the FRC's separatrix radius and at the rear of a single-translated FRC, which is assumed to be contributed by the plasma on the open magnetic field line. Figure 10(c) shows time slices of the radial magnetic field profiles at t~20 μs in figures 10(a) and (b), revealing that the maximum value of Bt inside the FRC separatrix radius is~1/3 of the external magnetic field Be. The experimental results also indicate that the south FRC in KMAX has a similar Bt profile to the single-translated north FRC but with the opposite helicity.

    Figure  10.  The temporal evolution of (a) Bz(r) profile and (b) Bt(r) profile in the single-translated north FRC; (c) time slices of the radial magnetic field profiles at t~20 μs in (a) and (b).

    With the assumption of RR distribution of the Bz profile, the poloidal flux of the FRC can be estimated as ϕp(RR)~0.31πBerϕ3/rw, where rϕ~rw1-B0/Be. When a typical single-translated FRC in KMAX translates through the device's mid-plane, the value of B0 is 103 G, and the maximum of Be is about 118 G, which gives the estimated poloidal flux ϕp(RR) ~0.2 mWb. Considering that the RR model is more appropriate to describe FRC in equilibrium or with a negligible toroidal field, the estimated poloidal flux above may have some discrepancy with the real situation. To measure the poloidal flux accurately, a direct measurement of the internal magnetic field by a probe with much higher spatial resolution is required, because it allows the poloidal flux to be integrated from the measured Bz profile with barely any data fit.

    In summary, FRC formation and translation in conical θ-pinch coils are investigated in the KMAX-FRC experiment; it is discovered that the FRC formation time and acceleration time should be optimized to make full use of the capacitor energy. Moreover, a high-temperature, low-density FRC is more advantageous for fast translation, which is consistent with adiabatic translation theory. In addition, two similar single-translated FRCs have been successfully formed in the north and south formation regions and accelerated to a high speed via the magnetic field gradient. The global measurement of a single-translated FRC is performed using various diagnostics. The typical parameters of a well-formed single-translated FRC near the device's mid-plane are ne~(2–4)×1019 m-3, Te~8 eV, Ti~5 eV, rs ~0.2 m, ls ~0.6 m and ϕp(RR) ~0.2 mWb. The internal magnetic field measurements showed a clear field-reversed structure of the Bz (r) profile and a significant toroidal field inside the FRC separatrix radius. The observed toroidal field may have positive effects on the stability and confinement of FRCs in KMAX [30, 31]. However, the KMAX-FRC parameters (temperature, magnetic flux, translation speed, etc) are much lower than those reported in previous experiments, which may limit the ability to provide high-accuracy prediction of high-energy FRC dynamics. The parameters obtained in our experiment are much lower than those obtained in the devices such as C-2 and FAT CM, however, the underlying physics associated with magnetic reconnection and shockwave generation should be the same, though direct comparison with their experimental observation should exercise caution. Furthermore, the success of the internal magnetic topology measurement will pave the way for subsequent KMAX CM-FRC experiments to conduct magnetic measurements.

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0301802) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12175226).

  • [1]
    Steinhauer L C 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 070501 doi: 10.1063/1.3613680
    [2]
    Tuszewski M 1988 Nucl. Fusion 28 2033 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/28/11/008
    [3]
    Votroubek G et al 2008 J. Fusion Energy 27 123 doi: 10.1007/s10894-007-9103-4
    [4]
    Binderbauer M W et al 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 045003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.045003
    [5]
    Gota H et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112009 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0be9
    [6]
    Gota H et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 116021 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa7d7b
    [7]
    Asai T et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 096032 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac189c
    [8]
    Asai T et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 056024 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0c45
    [9]
    Degnan J H et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 093003 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/9/093003
    [10]
    Gota H et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 106039 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac2521
    [11]
    Conti F et al 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 022511 doi: 10.1063/1.4866144
    [12]
    Lin M N et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 093505 doi: 10.1063/1.5001313
    [13]
    Liu M et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 053505 doi: 10.1063/1.4983801
    [14]
    Ren B M et al 2021 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63 035027 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/abdcdd
    [15]
    Lin M N et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 083507 doi: 10.1063/1.5001313
    [16]
    Tuszewski M and Armstrong W T 1983 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54 1611 doi: 10.1063/1.1137320
    [17]
    Gota H et al 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 10D706 doi: 10.1063/1.4729497
    [18]
    Romero-Talamás C A, Bellan P M and Hsu S C 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 2664 doi: 10.1063/1.1771483
    [19]
    Zhong H, Tan Y and Gao Z 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 026101 doi: 10.1063/1.5013231
    [20]
    Intrator T P, Siemon R E and Sieck P E 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 042505 doi: 10.1063/1.2907165
    [21]
    Kobayashi D and Asai T 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 022101 doi: 10.1063/5.0026146
    [22]
    Steinhauer L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 082516 doi: 10.1063/1.4894477
    [23]
    Gota H et al 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 10J114 doi: 10.1063/1.5036997
    [24]
    Guo H Y et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 245001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245001
    [25]
    Shiokawa A and Goto S 1993 Phys. Fluids B 5 534 doi: 10.1063/1.860538
    [26]
    Tuszewski M and Wright B L 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 2236 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2236
    [27]
    Wira K and Pietrzyk Z A 1990 Phys. Fluids B 2 561 doi: 10.1063/1.859293
    [28]
    Hewett D W 1984 Nucl. Fusion 24 349 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/24/3/009
    [29]
    Milroy R D and Brackbill J U 1986 Phys. Fluids 29 1184 doi: 10.1063/1.865867
    [30]
    Milroy R D and Steinhauer L C 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 022508 doi: 10.1063/1.2842361
    [31]
    Omelchenko Y A 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 1443 doi: 10.1063/1.873963
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yuxuan HUANG, Ming ZHANG, Yong YANG, Fangwei LYU, Xiaopeng YI, Chaofan LYU, Yisong ZHANG, Bo RAO. Design and experimental study of a field-reversed configuration plasma thruster prototype[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 035507. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ada376
    [2]Xutao XU, Tianchao XU, Chijie XIAO, Zuyu ZHANG, Renchuan HE, Ruixin YUAN, Ping XU. Reconstruction of poloidal magnetic field profiles in field-reversed configurations with machine learning in laser-driven ion-beam trace probe[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 034012. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad1042
    [3]Lishan TIAN (田丽山), Weimin BAO (包为民), Yanming LIU (刘彦明), Chao SUN (孙超), Chengwei ZHAO (赵成伟). Probe method to measure the electromagnetic field in a plasma by Poynting vector conversion[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 125402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac264c
    [4]Hui LIAO (廖晖), Munan LIN (林木楠), Ming LIU(刘明), Guanghui ZHU (朱光辉), Zhida YANG (杨智达), Peiyun SHI (时培运), Ming LUO (罗明), Xuan SUN (孙玄). Translation speed measurements of hydrogen, helium, and argon field-reversed configurations in the central cell of a KMAX mirror device[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 85102-085102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab19e8
    [5]Yaroslav MURZAEV, Gennadii LIZIAKIN, Andrey GAVRIKOV, Rinat TIMIRKHANOV, Valentin SMIRNOV. A comparison of emissive and cold floating probe techniques for electric potential measurements in rf inductive discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 45401-045401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf250
    [6]Satoshi NODOMI, Shuichi SATO, Mikio OHUCHI. Electron Temperature Measurement by Floating Probe Method Using AC Voltage[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(11): 1089-1094. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/11/06
    [7]WANG Zesong (王泽松), ZHANG Zaodi (张早娣), HE Jun (何俊), LEE Jae Choon (李载春), LIU Chuansheng Liu (刘传胜), WU Xianying (吴先映), FU Dejun (付德君). A Computerized System for the Measurement of Nanomaterial Field Emission and Ionization[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(9): 819-823. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/9/09
    [8]ZHOU Mulin (周木林), LIU Feng (刘峰), LI Chun (李春), DU Fei (杜飞), LI Yutong (李玉同), WANG Weimin(王伟民), SHENG Zhengming (盛政明), CHEN Limin (陈黎明), MA Jinlong (马景龙), LU Xin (鲁欣), DONG Quanli (董全力), ZHANG Jie(张杰). Single-Shot Broad Bandwidth Terahertz Pulse Measurement[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 20-23. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/05
    [9]Naohiro KASUYA, Seiya NISHIMURA, Masatoshi YAGI, Kimitaka ITOH, Sanae-I ITOH. Heavy Ion Beam Probe Measurement in Turbulence Diagnostic Simulator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(3): 326-331.
    [10]LI Bin, LI Hong, CHEN Zhipeng, XIE Jinlin, FENG Guangyao, LIU Wandong. Experimental and Simulational Studies on the Theoretical Model of the Plasma Absorption Probe[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2010, 12(5): 513-518.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. Zhang, J., Shi, L., Zhou, Z. et al. In-situ observation of heavy ion beam-induced luminescence of Al2O3 (Cr3+) in a 0 - 10 T magnetic field background. Optics Express, 2024, 32(21): 37813-37826. DOI:10.1364/OE.532190
    2. Xiao, C., Xu, T., Wu, M. et al. Advances in Magnetic Mirror, Field Reversed Configuration, and Dipole Field in Magnetic Confinement Fusion | [磁 约 束 聚 变 方 案 中 的 磁 镜 、 场 反及 偶 极 场 位 形 研 究 进 展]. Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2024. DOI:10.7538/yzk.2024.youxian.0512
    3. Yang, J., Xie, J., Ling, W. et al. Design of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Probe System for Space Plasma Environment Research Facility (SPERF). Sensors, 2024, 24(16): 5302. DOI:10.3390/s24165302
    4. Yang, Z., Xu, Z., Zhu, G. et al. An axisymmetric mirror device for studying confinement and instability. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2023, 94(3): 033507. DOI:10.1063/5.0117894
    5. Liao, H., Hu, C., Li, Y. et al. First direct experimental evidence of the merging of two colliding field reversed configurations. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2022, 64(11): 115003. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ac91a2
    6. Liao, H., Li, Y., Hu, C. et al. The dynamic axial compression of FRC with high-speed translated θ-pinch plasma. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2022, 64(10): 105015. DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ac8d2a

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(10)

    Article views (145) PDF downloads (169) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return