
Citation: | Liang QIN, Yao LI, Hao GUO, Nan JIANG, Ying SONG, Rui JIA, Xiongfeng ZHOU, Hao YUAN, Dezheng YANG. Time-resolved characteristics of a nanosecond pulsed multi-hollow needle plate packed bed dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 075401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad3131 |
In this paper, self-designed multi-hollow needle electrodes are used as a high-voltage electrode in a packed bed dielectric barrier discharge reactor to facilitate fast gas flow through the active discharge area and achieve large-volume stable discharge. The dynamic characteristics of the plasma, the generated active species, and the energy transfer mechanisms in both positive discharge (PD) and negative discharge (ND) are investigated by using fast-exposure intensified charge coupled device (ICCD) images and time-resolved optical emission spectra. The experimental results show that the discharge intensity, number of discharge channels, and discharge volume are obviously enhanced when the multi-needle electrode is replaced by a multi-hollow needle electrode. During a single voltage pulse period, PD mainly develops in a streamer mode, which results in a stronger discharge current, luminous intensity, and E/N compared with the diffuse mode observed in ND. In PD, as the gap between dielectric beads changes from 0 to 250 μm, the discharge between the dielectric bead gap changes from a partial discharge to a standing filamentary micro-discharge, which allows the plasma to leave the local area and is conducive to the propagation of surface streamers. In ND, the discharge only appears as a diffusion-like mode between the gap of dielectric beads, regardless of whether there is a discharge gap. Moreover, the generation of excited states N+2(B2Σ+u) and N2(C3Πu) is mainly observed in PD, which is attributed to the higher E/N in PD than that in ND. However, the generation of the OH(A2Σ+) radical in ND is higher than in PD. It is not directly dominated by E/N, but mainly by the resonant energy transfer process between metastable N2(A3Σ+u) and OH(X2Π). Furthermore, both PD and ND demonstrate obvious energy relaxation processes of electron-to-vibration and vibration-to-vibration, and no vibration-to-rotation energy relaxation process is observed.
Visible light diagnostic is a crucial instrument for monitoring the plasma position, the plasma surface interaction, and especially for the Edge Localized Mode (ELM) eruption process in H-mode plasmas [1, 2]. It is indispensable for researching ELM-filament, which is a common and serious problem in magnetic confinement fusion research. ELM-filaments could cause severe heat and particle localized deposition, leading to material erosion for both the first wall and divertor target plates, impurity sputtering, and high particles recycling, which are particularly serious in International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) [3, 4]. A previous study showed that the pedestal temperature of ITER can be as high as 4 keV. For example, for a 10 MA plasma discharge in ITER, the energy loss due to a single ELM event can be up to 20 MJ [5], and it is far beyond the bearing capacity of the materials in the first wall.
A variety of visible light diagnostics for tokamak have been developed in the past 30 years [6–9]. In the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), the early visible light systems consist mainly of tangential stainless tubes [1]. An industrial camera was fixed at the end of the tube. The disadvantage of this method is that the camera was subjected to strong electromagnetic interference and high-level radiation from high-energy particles and x-rays, which led to a breakdown or even damage to the camera.
Furthermore, high-speed cameras require more space, so transmitting the light from the inside of the device vacuum chamber to the outside of the device is a practical solution. A wide-angle visible light system in visible range has been developed, while this system only can cover one band. This means that the system can only monitor the trajectory of a kind of particle at once. In order to monitor and thus compare the images of different bands and the trajectories of different impurities simultaneously, a more advanced system needs to be designed and developed. To achieve this goal, a new multi-band and high-speed visible light endoscope diagnostic has been developed and successfully tested on the EAST tokamak since 2021.
The results of the experimental test shown in the following contents indicate that this multi-band visible endoscope diagnostic with the high-speed camera of NAC ACS-1 M60/pco.dimax basically could meet its design requirement. This multi-band and high-speed visible light diagnostic will play an important role in image monitoring of different impurities and the identification of plasma boundary position to better achieve plasma feedback control.
The visible light diagnostic is designed for the identification and feedback control of the tokamak plasma boundary, the transport law of plasma impurity, and other related transient processes, such as plasma breakdown and dust plasma. Configuration reconstruction based on electromagnetic measurement diagnosis is difficult to adapt to the harsh working environment of the vacuum chamber in future fusion reactor. Therefore, it is necessary to look for alternative diagnostic methods for the reconstruction of plasma boundary. The most important application of the EAST visible light diagnostic is to identify and control the plasma boundary through visible camera, and provide a viable control scheme for future fusion devices. By comparing the difference in visible light radiated by different impurities at the boundary, the most suitable identification spectral line can be found to obtain the most ideal plasma boundary position. Therefore, the optical system is required to include different bands, covering the entire plasma cross-section and having a high spatial resolution. Combining the above factors and requirements, the endoscope is designed to cover the spectral range from 380 to 750 nm with a high spatial resolution, which is < 5 mm near the object distance. The resolution here refers to the spatial resolution corresponding to each pixel. The endoscope should be coupled to a set of three visible light cameras to monitor three different bands (corresponding to different impurities) at the same time. In addition, the system should be reasonably protected against the coating of the first mirror from wall cleaning and/or lithiation.
The filter is installed by plugging, which can be replaced manually without affecting the imaging quality of the optical path. The vacuum glass shall be easily replaced without dismantling the optical path. In case of accident, it can also be sealed by connecting the manual vacuum baffle valve with the standby KF40 vacuum flange to prevent vacuum leakage of the device. The position constraint relationship of each flange of the optical path is shown in figure 1 to ensure that the endoscope system can be built into the device smoothly. After the optical path being installed in place, the baffle connecting rod is located below the lens barrel. When standing outside of the window and looking in the window, the cylinder rotates clockwise to open the baffle, and the reverse rotation can close the baffle. The maximum rotatable angle of the baffle is 90°. The camera support connection interface flange shall be reserved in the optical path. The camera support shall be firmly connected with the optical path. The support can be adjusted in XYZ three-direction to ensure that the center of the camera sensor can be aligned with the center of the image plane of the optical path.
Coordinate system needs to be established for FOV simulation analysis. Taking the center of the EAST device as the origin of the coordinate system, as shown in figure 2, X direction passes through the origin and is perpendicular to the large flange surface of the window J, and Z direction is perpendicular to the horizontal plane and points to the top of EAST tokamak.
As shown in figure 3, the basic parameters for FOV simulating include viewpoint P, observation direction PC, horizontal FOV ∠B1PB2 and vertical direction FOV ∠D1PD2. It should be noted that PC is perpendicular to B1B2 and D1D2, and B1B2 parallels to the horizontal plane. The observation direction PC is defined by the azimuth (θ, φ) of the unit vector n on line CP. Figure 4 shows the specific parameter values of the corresponding horizontal FOV.
The first wall of EAST can be approximately obtained by rotating the polar section of the first wall around the Z-axis, as shown in figure 5. The last closed magnetic surface of the plasma is calculated by EFIT, which is also a rotation surface around the Z-axis. These two rotation surfaces can be drawn by the RevolutionPlot3D function of Mathematica (version 11.3). With the two graphic display options of ViewVector and ViewAngle, the observation effect of the light path along the PC direction at the viewpoint P can be simulated. In order that the horizontal FOV and the vertical FOV can be designed independently, the ImageCrop function is further chosen to cut the 3D graphics obtained by the RevolutionPlot3D function, to obtain the final simulation effect.
The viewpoint P and the observation direction
Based on the above design requirements and basic parameters for FOV, the FOV simulation diagram is obtained, as shown in figure 6. The FOV can cover the whole section of small circular, and the blind spot is located outside the plasma, which provides an important means for boundary identification and comparative study of the spatial distribution of different impurities.
Through FOV simulation and analysis, the parameters of the optical system are designed as follows: horizontal FOV (H):
The final performance parameters of the optical path shall be compatible with the alternative cameras given in table 1, mainly involving the size of the image plane and spatial resolution. It is required that the size of the image plane is not larger than the sensor size of NAC ACS-1 M60, and the optimal spatial resolution is designed to be less than 5 mm at object distance
Camera | Resolutions | Pixel size ( |
Frame rate (fps) |
pco.dimax | 1279 | ||
NAC ACS-1 M60 | 54 000 |
Fully superconducting tokamak EAST is the first fusion device with modern divertor configurations in the world [10–12]. The major radius and minor radius of the EAST device are 1.7 m and 0.4 m respectively. According to system requirements, the FOV of the endoscope is designed to be
The overall structure of the optical system is shown in figure 7. In the optical path, the first one is the front-end reflection system, which includes a parabolic mirror and a plane mirror. After passing through the reflection system, the optical axis rotated 180°–65°=115°, as shown in the partial enlarged detail of the optics header in figure 7 (the header in this figure should be turned
The main mirror is a paraboloid mirror, R= -133.533 mm, k=-1; luminous aperture: 86×64 mm2, off-axis: 20.1406 mm. The size of the plane mirror is 82×68 mm2. A small irregular cone is opened on the plane mirror. The results show that the aperture of the system is as small as 4 mm. In order to ensure a certain margin, the diameter of the small hole is set as 5.2 mm. According to the hole diameter of 5.2 mm, the FOV occupied by the blind spot is about 4.3°.
The turning angle of the plane mirror is determined according to the installation position and observation position of the lens. The turning angle of the plane mirror in the figure is 32.5°. After passing through the reflection system, the optical axis rotated 180°–65°=115°. In the front-end reflection system, the distance between the paraboloid mirror and the plane mirror is 70 mm. The distance between the small hole (plane mirror) and the collimating lens is 1277.238 mm; the luminous aperture of the collimating lens is 83.5 mm. After passing through the collimating lens, the beam is a parallel light. The distance between the small hole and the sealing window is 1664.351 mm; the diameter of the sealing window is 72.5 mm, the thickness is 12 mm, and the material is fused quartz. After passing through the sealed window, it is the color splitter for light splitting and the imaging mirror group of B, G and R bands. The optical structure of the three mirror groups is the same, the length of the lens barrel (front film to rear film) is 617.801 mm, and the focal length is about 182.99 mm. The structures of B, G and R bands are shown in figure 7.
The main technical specification data of the NAC ACS-1 M60 for visible light diagnostic applications are as follows. The resolution (H
Since the Nyquist frequency of the camera NAC ACS-1 M60 is 22 c mm-1, the 22 c mm-1 system transfer function is investigated for the MTF curve [13–15]. The MTF of the designed optical system for each band are analyzed with ZEMAX and shown in figures 8–10.
The maximum distortion of the system is 22.5% and the relative illuminance of the system for 0.55 μm is shown in figure 11.
The designed object distance of the system is 1750 mm. At 800 and 4800 mm object distances, the B band MTF curves are shown in figures 12 and 13 separately.
45° dichroic mirror SP1: the footprint of dichroic mirror SP1 is shown in figure 14 below. It can be seen that the luminous aperture is oval and the size is 70 mm × 100 mm.
45° dichroic mirror SP2: the footprint of dichroic mirror SP2 is shown in figure 15. It can be seen that the luminous aperture is oval and the size is 77 mm × 103 mm.
After the light passes through two 45° color separation plates, it will be offset. Based on the fused quartz material and thickness of 10 mm, the offset dt=3.15 mm.
The optical system was installed and tested on the EAST tokamak device during the April 2021 experimental campaign. There are only two NAC ACS-1 M60 cameras in hand. They were employed to image the optical red and green channels for the testing, and the blue channel was mounted with a pco.dimax high-speed camera instead of M60. The pixels size of pco.dimax is half of M60, i.e.
Based on the dichroic mirrors, the system is divided into three imaging mirror groups with the same structure and different bands, which are B (380–500 nm), G (500–580 nm) and R (580–750 nm) bands. The different wave bands correspond to different impurities radiation. On EAST device, R band corresponds to Dα, G band corresponds to Li Ⅱ and B band corresponds to C Ⅲ and He Ⅱ primarily. It can be seen from the figure 16 that there are significant differences on the low field side of different wave bands.
Figure 16 shows a visible transient image of shot #111 798 from 2021 campaign. For the image acquisition, the region of interest is 1200×1704 for blue channel with a frame rate of 2 kfps and 592×848 for green and red channels with frame rates of 10 kfps, respectively. The exposure times for blue, green and red channels are 80 μs, 15 μs, and 10 μs, respectively. It should be noted that the red channel is equipped with a filter of
In fact, various interesting and complex phenomena will be observed using this high-speed camera system, such as the spatial distribution and evolution of different impurities in the same FOV. Another phenomenon is the identification of plasma boundary. It should be noted that although the boundary on the low field side is not very clear to our naked eyes sometimes, the outermost boundary has been sufficiently identified through image recognition and machine learning. We have compared it with the EFIT data at the same time and found a good agreement which will be presented detailed in a separate paper in the future. The optical system will be used to contrastively study the spatial distribution of different impurities and related physics, including the recognition of plasma boundary.
The new high-speed and multi-band visible endoscope diagnostic has been implemented on the EAST tokamak to contrastively investigate the spatial distribution and evolution of different impurity spectrums in the same wide-angle FOV. The FOV of the optical system includes the inner and outer walls, the upper and lower divertors of EAST. The spatial resolution is less than 5 mm near the object distance
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (Nos. 51977023 and 52077026) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. DUT23YG227).
[1] |
Jiang N et al 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 412 128627 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128627
|
[2] |
Jiang N et al 2019 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 259 118061 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118061
|
[3] |
Jiang N et al 2020 J. Hazard. Mater. 393 122365 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122365
|
[4] |
Li Y et al 2023 Chem. Eng. J. 461 141922 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141922
|
[5] |
Patil B S et al 2016 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 194 123 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.055
|
[6] |
Ma X T et al 2019 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 39 109 doi: 10.1007/s11090-018-9931-1
|
[7] |
Nicot J P and Duncan I J 2012 Greenh. Gases 2 352 doi: 10.1002/ghg.1300
|
[8] |
Al-abduly A, Christensen P and Harvey A 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 035002 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab6c82
|
[9] |
Huiskamp T et al 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 405201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8617
|
[10] |
Li Y et al 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 54 245206 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/abed6e
|
[11] |
Li Y et al 2022 Appl. Sci. 12 2215 doi: 10.3390/app12042215
|
[12] |
Li Y et al 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 055004 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab844e
|
[13] |
Wang W Z, Butterworth T and Bogaerts A 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 214004 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/abe8ff
|
[14] |
Mujahid Z U I and Hala A 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 11LT02 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa8cd
|
[15] |
Zhu M et al 2022 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55 225207 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac55c1
|
[16] |
Ren C H et al 2023 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 43 1613 doi: 10.1007/s11090-023-10374-3
|
[17] |
Xiong Q et al 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 415201 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/41/415201
|
[18] |
Lu X et al 2014 Phys. Rep. 540 123 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.006
|
[19] |
Sun Y H et al 2023 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 56 165205 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/acbce0
|
[20] |
Opaits D F et al 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 073505 doi: 10.1063/1.2955767
|
[21] |
Marode E 1975 J. Appl. Phys. 46 2005 doi: 10.1063/1.321882
|
[22] |
Ono R, Takezawa K and Oda T 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 043302 doi: 10.1063/1.3190530
|
[23] |
Sato S et al 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 455203 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac1b5d
|
[24] |
Huang B D et al 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 044001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab7854
|
[25] |
Peng B F et al 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 035018 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab6f23
|
[26] |
Van Laer K and Bogaerts A 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 015002 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/25/1/015002
|
[27] |
Wang W Z et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 334 2467 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.139
|
[28] |
Kruszelnicki J et al 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 025203 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/50/2/025203
|
[29] |
Li T et al 2022 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 31 055016 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ac676e
|
[30] |
Zhang B et al 2022 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 31 085006 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ac823c
|
[31] |
Yi W J and Williams P F 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 205 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/35/3/308
|
[32] |
Jiang N et al 2022 Plasma Process. Polym. 19 e2100108 doi: 10.1002/ppap.202100108
|
[33] |
Kossyi I A et al 1992 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1 207 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/1/3/011
|
[34] |
Bourdon A et al 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 035002 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/25/3/035002
|
[35] |
Gerber T and Lüthy W 1983 J. Chem. Phys. 79 5445 doi: 10.1063/1.445708
|
[36] |
Eichwald O et al 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 82 4781 doi: 10.1063/1.366336
|
[37] |
Tang S K et al 2000 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18 2213 doi: 10.1116/1.1286362
|
[38] |
Ho G H and Golde M F 1991 J. Chem. Phys. 95 8866 doi: 10.1063/1.461219
|
[39] |
Zhang S et al 2012 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 40 2191 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2012.2206613
|
[40] |
Hoder T et al 2016 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 045021 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/25/4/045021
|
[41] |
Obrusník A et al 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 085013 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aad663
|
[42] |
Bílek P et al 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 085012 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/aad666
|
[43] |
Bílek P, Šimek M and Bonaventura Z 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 115011 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab3936
|
[44] |
Paris P et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 3894 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/21/010
|
[45] |
Komuro A, Ono R and Oda T 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 175206 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/46/17/175206
|
[46] |
Kozlov K V et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 518 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/4/003
|
[47] |
Hoder T et al 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 073302 doi: 10.1063/1.4913215
|
[48] |
Šimek M et al 2001 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34 3185 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/34/21/311
|
[49] |
Bílek P et al 2022 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 31 084004 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ac7ad1
|
[50] |
Simek M 2003 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 12 454 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/12/3/322
|
[51] |
Ono R et al 2009 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 025006 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/18/2/025006
|
[52] |
Liu K et al 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 065201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/abc211
|
[53] |
Laux C O et al 2003 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 12 125 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/12/2/301
|
[54] |
Zhou X F et al 2023 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 56 455202 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/acec81
|
[55] |
Deng X L et al 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 023305 doi: 10.1063/1.4774328
|
[56] |
Hsieh K C, Wang H H and Locke B R 2016 Plasma Process. Polym. 13 908 doi: 10.1002/ppap.201500204
|
[57] |
Bruggeman P J et al 2014 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 23 023001 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/2/023001
|
[58] |
Lo A et al 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 115201 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/11/115201
|
[59] |
Shkurenkov I et al 2014 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 23 065003 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/065003
|
1. | Zhong, F., Zhang, T., Li, G. et al. Pedestal dynamics and turbulence in H-mode density ramp-up experiment on EAST. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(12): 126062. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8666 |
2. | Hao, G., Xu, J., Sun, Y. et al. Summary of the 11th Conference on Magnetic Confined Fusion Theory and Simulation. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 101001. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad5d8a |
3. | Wu, M.-X., Xie, K., Liu, Y. et al. Diagnosing ratio of electron density to collision frequency of plasma surrounding scaled model in a shock tube using low-frequency alternating magnetic field phase shift. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(5): 055204. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad2d56 |
4. | Su, P., Lan, H., Zhou, C. et al. Bursting core-localized ellipticity-induced Alfvén eigenmodes driven by energetic electrons during EAST ohmic discharges. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(3): 036019. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af7 |
5. | Zhang, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, W. et al. Line identification of extreme ultraviolet spectra from aluminum ions in EAST Tokamak plasmas. Physica Scripta, 2024, 99(2): 025615. DOI:10.1088/1402-4896/ad2049 |
1. | Zhong, F., Zhang, T., Li, G. et al. Pedestal dynamics and turbulence in H-mode density ramp-up experiment on EAST. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(12): 126062. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8666 |
2. | Hao, G., Xu, J., Sun, Y. et al. Summary of the 11th Conference on Magnetic Confined Fusion Theory and Simulation. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 101001. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad5d8a |
3. | Wu, M.-X., Xie, K., Liu, Y. et al. Diagnosing ratio of electron density to collision frequency of plasma surrounding scaled model in a shock tube using low-frequency alternating magnetic field phase shift. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(5): 055204. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad2d56 |
4. | Su, P., Lan, H., Zhou, C. et al. Bursting core-localized ellipticity-induced Alfvén eigenmodes driven by energetic electrons during EAST ohmic discharges. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(3): 036019. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af7 |
5. | Zhang, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, W. et al. Line identification of extreme ultraviolet spectra from aluminum ions in EAST Tokamak plasmas. Physica Scripta, 2024, 99(2): 025615. DOI:10.1088/1402-4896/ad2049 |
Camera | Resolutions | Pixel size ( |
Frame rate (fps) |
pco.dimax | 1279 | ||
NAC ACS-1 M60 | 54 000 |