Effect of cylindrical cavity height on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with spatial confinement

Junfeng SHAO (邵俊峰); Tingfeng WANG (王挺峰); Jin GUO (郭劲); Anmin CHEN (陈安民); Mingxing JIN (金明星)

doi:10.1088/2058-6272/19/2/025506

Plasma Science and Technology > 2017 > 19(2): 25506-025506. > DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/2/025506

Junfeng SHAO (邵俊峰), Tingfeng WANG (王挺峰), Jin GUO (郭劲), Anmin CHEN (陈安民), Mingxing JIN (金明星). Effect of cylindrical cavity height on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with spatial confinement[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(2): 25506-025506. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/2/025506

Citation:

PDF (754 KB)

Effect of cylindrical cavity height on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with spatial confinement

1 State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter & Innovation Laboratory of Electro-Optical Countermeasures Technology, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, People’s Republic of China 2 Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, People’s Republic of China 3 Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy (Jilin University), Changchun 130012, People’s Republic of China

Funds: We acknowledge the support from the Fundamental Research Project of Chinese State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter (Grant No. SKLLIM 1502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674128, 11474129 and 11504129), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014M551169).

More Information

Received Date: July 17, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we present a study on the spatial confinement effect of laser-induced plasma with a cylindrical cavity in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). The emission intensity with the spatial confinement is dependent on the height of the confinement cavity. It is found that, by selecting the appropriate height of cylindrical cavity, the signal enhancement can be significantly increased. At the cylindrical cavity (diameter = 2mm) with a height of 6 mm, the enhancement ratio has the maximum value (approximately 8.3), and the value of the relative standard deviation (RSD) (7.6%) is at a minimum, the repeatability of LIBS signal is best. The results indicate that the height of confinement cavity is very important for LIBS technique to reduce the limit of detection and improve the precision.
- LIBS,
- spatial confinement,
- cavity height,
- signal enhancement

FullText(HTML)

References (52)

References

[1]	Miziolek A W, Palleschi V and Schechter I 2006 Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) (New York: Cambridge University Press)
[2]	Fortes F J et al 2013 Anal. Chem. 85 640
[3]	Butler O T et al 2014 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 29 17
[4]	Kammel R et al 2014 Light: Science & Applications 3 e169
[5]	Rubenchik A M, Fedoruk M P and Turitsyn S K 2014 Light: Science & Applications 3 e159
[6]	Winefordner J D et al 2004 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 19 1061
[7]	Popov A M, Colao F and Fantoni R 2010 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 25 837
[8]	Zeng X H et al 2003 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 58 867
[9]	Mason K J and Goldberg J M 1991 Appl. Spectrosc. 45 1444
[10]	Rai V N et al 2003 Laser Part. Beams 21 65
[11]	Zhou W et al 2013 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 28 702
[12]	Semerok A and Dutouquet C 2004 Thin Solid Films 453 501
[13]	Wu D et al 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 364
[14]	Hontzopoulos E et al 1988 Opt. Commun. 67 124
[15]	Fried D et al 1991 J. Appl. Phys. 70 2337
[16]	Liu L et al 2015 Opt. Express 23 15047
[17]	Liu L et al 2014 Opt. Express 22 7686
[18]	De Giacomo A et al 2013 Anal. Chem. 85 10180
[19]	Goueguel C et al 2010 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 25 635
[20]	Gautier C et al 2005 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 60 265
[21]	Killinger D K et al 2007 Opt. Express 15 12905
[22]	Lin X M, Li H and Yao Q H 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 953
[23]	Ma Q et al 2010 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 65 896
[24]	Hahn D W and Omenetto N 2012 Appl. Spectrosc. 66 347
[25]	Wang Z et al 2012 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 68 58
[26]	Gao X et al 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 175205
[27]	Shen X K et al 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 081501
[28]	Yeates P and Kennedy E T 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 093306
[29]	Hou Z Y et al 2013 Opt. Express 21 15974
[30]	Shen X K et al 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 093301
[31]	Li X W et al 2014 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 29 2127
[32]	Li C M et al 2014 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 29 638
[33]	Guo L B et al 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 131501
[34]	Meng D S et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 632
[35]	Kumar B, Singh R K and Kumar A 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 083511
[36]	FuYT,HouZYandWangZ 2016 Opt. Express 24 3055
[37]	Ma Q et al 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 053301
[38]	Bai X et al 2013 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 87 27
[39]	Ma Q et al 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 204101
[40]	Bai X et al 2015 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 113 158
[41]	Guo L B et al 2011 Opt. Express 19 14067
[42]	Su X J, Zhou W D and Qian H G 2014 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 29 2356
[43]	Su X J, Zhou W D and Qian H G 2014 Optics Express 22 28437
[44]	Harilal S S 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 123306
[45]	Harilal S S et al 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 221501
[46]	Schiffem J T, Doerr D W and Alexander D R 2007 Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 62 1412
[47]	Lu Y et al 2013 J. Anal. At. Spectrom 28 743
[48]	Wu Z et al 2011 Chinese Opt. Letters 9 093201
[49]	Chen A M et al 2015 Opt. Express 23 24648
[50]	Li X et al 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 243304
[51]	Atif H et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 693
[52]	Boueri M et al 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 9566