Advanced Search+
Paritosh CHAUDHURI, Chandan DANANI, E RAJENDRAKUMAR. Comparative studies for two different orientations of pebble bed in an HCCB blanket[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125604. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8807
Citation: Paritosh CHAUDHURI, Chandan DANANI, E RAJENDRAKUMAR. Comparative studies for two different orientations of pebble bed in an HCCB blanket[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125604. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8807

Comparative studies for two different orientations of pebble bed in an HCCB blanket

More Information
  • Received Date: June 13, 2017
  • The Indian Test Blanket Module (TBM) program in ITER is one of the major steps in its fusion reactor program towards DEMO and the future fusion power reactor vision. Research and development (R&D) is focused on two types of breeding blanket concepts: lead–lithium ceramic breeder (LLCB) and helium-cooled ceramic breeder (HCCB) blanket systems for the DEMO reactor. As part of the ITER-TBM program, the LLCB concept will be tested in one-half of ITER port no. 2, whose materials and technologies will be tested during ITER operation. The HCCB concept is a variant of the solid breeder blanket, which is presently part of our domestic R&D program for DEMO relevant technology development. In the HCCB concept Li2TiO3 and beryllium are used as the tritium breeder and neutron multiplier, respectively, in the form of a packed bed having edge-on configuration with reduced activation ferritic martensitic steel as the structural material. In this paper two design schemes, mainly two different orientations of pebble beds, are discussed. In the current concept (case-1), the ceramic breeder beds are kept horizontal in the toroidal–radial direction. Due to gravity, the pebbles may settle down at the bottom and create a finite gap between the pebbles and the top cooling plate, which will affect the heat transfer between them. In the alternate design concept (case-2), the pebble bed is vertically (poloidal–radial) orientated where the side plates act as cooling plates instead of top and bottom plates. These two design variants are analyzed analytically and 2D thermal-hydraulic simulation studies are carried out with ANSYS, using the heat loads obtained from neutronic calculations. Based on the analysis the performance is compared and details of the thermal and radiative heat transfer studies are also discussed in this paper.
  • [1]
    LLCB TBS System Design Description (ITER_D_RFM4QS v1.2) https://user.iter.org/?uid=RFM4QS
    [2]
    Chaudhuri P et al 2014 Fusion Eng. Des. 89 1362
    [3]
    Srinivasan R and the Indian DEMO Team 2016 Fusion Eng. Des. 112 240
    [4]
    Chaudhuri P et al 2013 Fusion Eng. Des. 88 209
    [5]
    Giancarli L M et al 2012 Fusion Eng. Des. 87 395
    [6]
    Zhu Q J, Li J and Liu S L 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 775
    [7]
    Cheng X M et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 787
    [8]
    Cismondi F et al 2009 Fusion Eng. Des. 84 607
    [9]
    Enoeda M et al 2006 Fusion Eng. Des. 81 415
    [10]
    LeeSJ,ParkYH andYuMW2013 Fusion Eng. Des. 88 3091
    [11]
    Ying A et al 2006 Fusion Eng. Des. 81 659
    [12]
    ANSYS 2000 ANSYS User’s Manual (Houston, PA: ANSYS Inc.)
    [13]
    Gierszewski P J and Sullivan J D 1991 Fusion Eng. Des. 17 95
  • Related Articles

    [1]Hao ZHENG, Hua LIANG, Jie CHEN, Haohua ZONG, Xiangzhe MENG, Like XIE, Yinghong LI. Experimental study on plasma actuation characteristics of nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 015505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac35a3
    [2]Jutao YANG (杨巨涛), Jianguo WANG (王建国), Qingliang LI (李清亮), Haiqin CHE (车海琴), Shuji HAO (郝书吉). Optimized analysis of ionospheric amplitude modulated heating parameters for excitation of very/extremely low frequency radiations[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 75301-075301. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab0bcd
    [3]Lu MA (马璐), Xiaodong WANG (王晓东), Jian ZHU (祝健), Shun KANG (康顺). Effect of DBD plasma excitation characteristics on turbulent separation over a hump model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aacdf0
    [4]Jianyang YU (俞建阳), Huaping LIU (刘华坪), Ruoyu WANG (王若玉), Fu CHEN (陈浮). Numerical study of the flow structures in flat plate and the wall-mounted hump induced by the unsteady DBD plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 15502-015502. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015502
    [5]SUN Min (孙敏), YANG Bo (杨波), PENG Tianxiang (彭天祥), LEI Mingkai (雷明凯). Optimum Duty Cycle of Unsteady Plasma Aerodynamic Actuation for NACA0015 Airfoil Stall Separation Control[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 680-685. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/16
    [6]CHEN Jiale (陈佳乐), GAO Zhe (高喆). Tokamak Plasma Flows Induced by Local RF Forces[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2015, 17(10): 809-816. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/10/01
    [7]LI Feng(李峰), GAO Chao(高超), ZHENG Borui(郑博睿), WANG Yushuai(王玉帅). Research on the Peristaltic Flow Acceleration Performance of Asynchronous and Duty Cycle Pulsed DBD Plasma Actuation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(9): 861-866. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/9/10
    [8]WANG Xiaomin(王晓敏), YUAN Qianghua(袁强华), ZHOU Yongjie(周永杰), YIN Guiqin(殷桂琴), DONG Chenzhong(董晨钟). Deposition of Polymer Thin Film Using an Atmospheric Pressure Micro-Plasma Driven by Dual-Frequency Excitation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(1): 68-72. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/1/15
    [9]LI Xuechun (李雪春), WANG Huan (王欢), DING Zhenfeng (丁振峰), WANG Younian (王友年). Effect of Duty Cycle on the Characteristics of Pulse-Modulated Radio-Frequency Atmospheric Pressure Dielectric Barrier Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(12): 1069-1072. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/12/06
    [10]ZHENG Borui (郑博睿), GAO Chao(高超), LI Yibin(李一滨), LIU Feng(刘峰), LUO Shijun(罗时钧. Flow Control over a Conical Forebody by Duty-Cycle Actuations[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 58-63. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/13

Catalog

    Article views (323) PDF downloads (470) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return