Processing math: 100%
Advanced Search+
Leyi YU, Wenqi LU, Lina ZHANG. Abnormal transition of the electron energy distribution with excitation of the second harmonic in low-pressure radio-frequency capacitively coupled plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad4596
Citation: Leyi YU, Wenqi LU, Lina ZHANG. Abnormal transition of the electron energy distribution with excitation of the second harmonic in low-pressure radio-frequency capacitively coupled plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 085402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad4596

Abnormal transition of the electron energy distribution with excitation of the second harmonic in low-pressure radio-frequency capacitively coupled plasmas

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Wenqi LU: luwenqi@dlut.edu.cn

  • Corresponding author:

    Wenqi LU, luwenqi@dlut.edu.cn

  • Received Date: March 03, 2024
  • Revised Date: April 29, 2024
  • Accepted Date: April 29, 2024
  • Available Online: April 30, 2024
  • Published Date: July 01, 2024
  • The self-excited second harmonic in radio-frequency capacitively coupled plasma was significantly enhanced by adjusting the external variable capacitor. At a lower pressure of 3 Pa, the excitation of the second harmonic caused an abnormal transition of the electron energy probability function, resulting in abrupt changes in the electron density and temperature. Such changes in the electron energy probability function as well as the electron density and temperature were not observed at the higher pressure of 16 Pa under similar harmonic changes. The phenomena are related to the influence of the second harmonic on stochastic heating, which is determined by both amplitude and the relative phase of the harmonics. The results suggest that the self-excited high-order harmonics must be considered in practical applications of low-pressure radio-frequency capacitively coupled plasmas.

  • Low-pressure radio-frequency (RF) capacitively coupled plasmas (CCPs) exhibit a nonlinear response to the driving RF voltage, causing high-order harmonics from the applied frequency [1, 2]. The harmonics may cause additional effects that significantly influence the discharge properties. For instance, Berry et al have demonstrated that the change in the harmonic contents significantly affects the ion energy distribution at the electrode [3]. Mussenbrock and Brinkmann proposed that the high-order harmonics may be more effectively excited under the plasma series resonance (PSR) condition, enhancing electron heating [4]. The electron heating effect was then extensively investigated either theoretically [512] or experimentally [1319] by other researchers. Yamazawa found the electron density significantly increased when the high-order harmonics were excited by the PSR [15]. The contribution of the high-order harmonics to the electron density was also observed during a dual-frequency discharge when a harmonic of the lower frequency coincided with the higher frequency [14]. On the other hand, the enhanced high-order harmonics may worsen the discharge uniformity due to the electromagnetic standing wave effect [18, 20].

    Sharma et al used Particle-in-Cell/Monte Carlo Collision (PIC/MCC) technology to simulate a voltage-driven symmetric CCP system [21]. Under very high frequency (VHF) conditions, they observed that high-order harmonics had significant effects on the electron density, electron temperature, and the transformation of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) [21]. Despite the significant effects, most experimental studies of low-pressure RF CCPs seem not to be concerned about the self-excited harmonics, neither the harmonics being measured and analyzed nor the matching network being tuned with consideration for the harmonics. The influences of the harmonics on discharge properties are not well known. In this paper, we present an abnormal transition of the electron energy distribution with the second harmonic excitation in low-pressure RF CCPs. When the second harmonic is significantly excited by tuning the external circuit, the electron energy probability function (EEPF) changes drastically, indicating significant changes in the electron heating and the resultant electron density and electron temperature. We discuss the reason for the phenomena’s importance to practical applications by suggesting that the self-excited high-order harmonics are significant and must be considered in the operation of low-pressure RF CCPs.

    The experiments were conducted with a multi-purpose setup [2227], which is shown pictorially diagram in figure 1(a). The vacuum chamber was a stainless-steel cylinder measuring 60 cm in diameter and 80 cm in length. The electrodes were made of circular stainless-steel plates of about 12 cm in diameter. The electrodes were parallel to each other and located at the center of the chamber, a 6 cm distance between the electrodes. The upper electrode was driven through a matcher by a wideband power source capable of outputting RF power at frequencies between 25 and 60 MHz, while the lower electrode was grounded. A variable capacitor of 7–100 pF was connected between the upper electrode and ground to tune the harmonics. Similar techniques have been employed by Yamazawa [15] and Lim et al [20]. A homemade Langmuir single probe [28] was extended horizontally into the discharge region for plasma diagnostics. The probe was made of a 0.2 mm thick tungsten wire, insulated by a 1 mm thick alumina tube, except for a 5 mm long tip of the wire exposed to the plasma. An RF choke was inserted in the probe circuit just outside the discharge region to eliminate the RF perturbations [29]. In addition, the waveforms of the discharge voltage (V) and current (I) were measured by an oscilloscope (Tektronics 2022B) through a high-voltage probe (Tektronics P5100A) and a current sensor (Pearson 2877), respectively as shown in figure 1(a).

    Figure  1.  (a) Pictorial diagram of the experimental setup, and (b) equivalent schematic circuit for the RF discharge.

    The equivalent circuit for the whole electric network can be sketched as shown in figure 1(b), in which Csh, Lp, and Rp represent the sheath capacitance, plasma inductance, and plasma resistance; Cstr and Cv are the stray capacitance and the variable capacitor; and Vrf and Vhmc are the RF power source and the source of the self-excited harmonics, respectively. The harmonic source is drawn in the plasma branch because it is generated there due to the nonlinear response of the sheath capacitance to the RF driving voltage. In addition, the 50 Ω resistor connected in series with Vrf represents the impedance of the RF power source and the transmission cable.

    In the experiments, pure argon gas was discharged at a lower pressure of 3 Pa and a higher pressure of 16 Pa for comparison. The RF power source was fixed at an output of 36 MHz and 20 W. By tuning the variable capacitor, the harmonics were excited to different amplitudes to investigate their influence on the discharge. In all cases, the discharge voltage and current waveforms, as well as the Langmuir probe characteristics, were recorded simultaneously. The waveforms were analyzed by fast Fourier transform (FFT) to extract the harmonic components. The amplitudes and phases of the voltage and current of each harmonic were obtained. The waveforms were also used to calculate the active power by integrating the product of voltage and current. On the other hand, the EEPF was calculated from the second derivative of the Langmuir probe characteristics by the Druyvesteyn formula [30], which is

    f(E)=(8m)1/2e3Ad2IdV2, (1)

    where f(E) is the EEPF, e and m are electron charge and mass, and V, I, and A are the probe voltage, current, and surface area, respectively. The electron energy E equals e(VsV), where Vs is the plasma space potential. The electron density ne and electron temperature Te were obtained by integrating f(E) that

    ne=0E1/2f(E)dE, (2)
    Te=1ne0E3/2f(E)dE. (3)

    A typical waveform of the discharge voltage and current between the two electrodes in the presence of the argon gas and their FFT spectra are shown in figures 2(a) and (b), respectively. The voltage waveform contains apparent harmonics up to the fourth order. We focus on the first and second harmonics because the higher ones are negligibly weak. Figure 3 shows the amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of the voltage and current changing as a function of the capacitance change from capacitor Cv in the 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa. The subtle change of Cv between 20 and 30 pF excited significant second harmonics in both voltage and current, with a maximum being attained at Cv26pF. The phenomenon we are describing is different from what is caused by the plasma series resonance (PSR) effect [15], in which the harmonics are excited significantly only in current and not in voltage due to the low impedance of PSR. We suggest that the enhancement of harmonics in our experiment was due to improved matching between the external circuit and the plasma at the harmonic frequency.

    Figure  2.  (a) The representative voltage and current waveform and (b) their FFT spectra, containing self-excited high-order harmonics.
    Figure  3.  The amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of (a) voltage and (b) current versus Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    Figure 4 shows the active power and the self-bias voltage changing with Cv. The decrease in the trend of the active power and the self-bias (less negative) was possibly due to some mismatching induced by the adjustment of Cv. We did not tune the matcher during the process to avoid artificial influence. With an enhanced second harmonic, the active power slightly oscillated while the self-bias drastically decreased to be less negative. The decrease in the self-bias was possibly due to the electrical asymmetric effect (EAE), in which the self-bias varies with the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics [3133]. Figure 5 shows the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics of the voltage and current changing with Cv. An apparent phase shift occurs between the Cv values of 24 and 28 pF with the excitation of the second harmonic (see figure 3), which provides evidence for the occurrence of EAE.

    Figure  4.  The active power and the self-bias voltage are plotted with the change in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).
    Figure  5.  The phase is given in radians (rad) of the second harmonic of the voltage and current relative to the first, with the change in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The EEPFs for different Cv quantities are shown in figure 6. With increasing Cv up to 25.6 pF, the low-energy electron population increases continuously, suggesting increasing stochastic heating [34]. At Cv=26.4 pF, the low-energy electron population drops abruptly, indicating a drastic decrease in stochastic heating. While at Cv=27.1 pF, the high-energy electron population in EEPF also reduces, indicating a reduction in ohmic heating [34]. At Cv=27.9 pF, the ohmic heating recovers, and with further increasing Cv, the stochastic heating also gradually recovers. You et al found that stochastic heating was inefficient at high frequencies [35]. The decrease of stochastic heating in our experiment may be due to the increase of the high-frequency component (the second harmonic of the base frequency).

    Figure  6.  Change in EEPF with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The changes in electron heating caused drastic variations in the electron density and electron temperature, as shown in figure 7. These variations were related to the excitation of the second harmonic. However, it can be noted that the abrupt changes in the electron density and electron temperature do not occur at the second harmonic’s maxima (see figure 3), which suggests that the harmonic amplitude was not the unique factor affecting the discharge. In addition, neither the active power nor the self-bias behaviors can be explained because their behaviors (shown in figure 4) are not consistent with those of the electron density and electron temperature. We proposed that the relative phase difference between the first and second harmonics, in addition to the harmonic amplitude, played an important role in the discharge. Comparing figures 7 with 5, the electron density decreases where the relative phase difference decreases toward zero. The influence of the relative phase difference on the electron density has also been observed by Bienholz et al [36], which was qualitatively consistent with our observation.

    Figure  7.  Changes of the electron density and the electron temperature with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 3 Pa).

    The above experiments were repeated under a higher chamber pressure of 16 Pa, with the other conditions being kept the same. Figure 8 shows the amplitudes and phases of the first and second harmonics for both voltage and current, changing with Cv. All behaviors shown in the figure are quite similar to what is observed at the lower pressure of 3 Pa. However, their influences on the discharge are different — the changes in EEPFs as well as the electron density and temperature are insignificant in the 16 Pa case, as shown in figure 9. The difference is due to the different electronic heating mechanisms at the pressure of 3 Pa and 16 Pa. At the pressure of 16 Pa, the plasma heating was dominated by the ohmic (collisional) heating occurring in the bulk plasma, while at 3 Pa, the plasma heating includes stochastic heating in addition to ohmic heating, which was related to the sheath motion [34]. We propose that the harmonics influenced the cause of the discharge via stochastic heating. This is reasonable because the harmonics are excited over the sheath (see figure 1(b)) due to its nonlinear feature. The discharge at higher pressure was therefore less affected by the harmonics due to its lack of stochastic heating.

    Figure  8.  Changes of the amplitudes of the first and second harmonics of (a) voltage and (b) current, and (c) relative phase measured in radians (rad) of voltage and current with increasing Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 16 Pa).
    Figure  9.  Changes in (a) the EEPF and (b) the electron density and temperature with the increase in Cv (for 36 MHz discharge at 16 Pa).

    To the best of our knowledge, there has not been a theory elucidating how the harmonics affect the electron heating with their relative phase difference. A detailed investigation into the phenomena causing the physical behaviors we observed in this experiment is needed to understand the theoretical aspects causing these behaviors. However, for practical applications, our observations suggest that self-excited high-order harmonics must be considered in the operation of low-pressure RF CCPs.

    The self-excitation of the second harmonic was significantly enhanced in the RF CCPs while tuning an external variable capacitor. At the lower pressure of 3 Pa, an abnormal transition of EEPF was observed with changes in the amplitude and relative phase of the harmonics, resulting in abrupt changes in the electron density and temperature. In contrast, the changes in EEPF as well as the electron density and temperature were insignificant at the higher pressure of 16 Pa under similar changes in the harmonics. The phenomena were related to the influence of the second harmonic on stochastic heating which was caused by both the amplitudes and the relative phase of the harmonics. Our results are meaningful to practical applications where self-excited high-order harmonics must be sufficiently considered utilizing low-pressure RF CCPs.

  • [1]
    Miller P A, Anderson H and Splichal M P 1992 J. Appl. Phys. 71 1171 doi: 10.1063/1.351283
    [2]
    Kawata H, Kubo T and Murata K 1994 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 4365 doi: 10.1143/JJAP.33.4365
    [3]
    Berry L et al 2000 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18 2806 doi: 10.1116/1.1319819
    [4]
    Mussenbrock T and Brinkmann R P 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 151503 doi: 10.1063/1.2194824
    [5]
    Czarnetzki U, Mussenbrock T and Brinkmann R P 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 123503 doi: 10.1063/1.2397043
    [6]
    Lieberman M A et al 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 063505 doi: 10.1063/1.2928847
    [7]
    Mussenbrock T et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 085004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.085004
    [8]
    Bora B et al 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 094103 doi: 10.1063/1.3690870
    [9]
    Bora B and Soto L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 083509 doi: 10.1063/1.4893148
    [10]
    Schüngel E et al 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 043512 doi: 10.1063/1.4918702
    [11]
    Sharma S et al 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 055205 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/abc11b
    [12]
    Sharma S, Sirse N and Turner M M 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 073506 doi: 10.1063/5.0151866
    [13]
    Schulze J et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 86 012010 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/86/1/012010
    [14]
    Semmler E, Awakowicz P and Von Keudell A 2007 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 16 839 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/16/4/020
    [15]
    Yamazawa Y 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 191504 doi: 10.1063/1.3261752
    [16]
    Bora B et al 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 103509 doi: 10.1063/1.3646317
    [17]
    Cao M L et al 2016 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55 096201 doi: 10.7567/JJAP.55.096201
    [18]
    Zhao K et al 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 185002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.185002
    [19]
    Liu Z H, Yuan Q H and Yin G Q 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 103502 doi: 10.1063/5.0102194
    [20]
    Lim Y M et al 2022 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 40 063003 doi: 10.1116/6.0002016
    [21]
    Sharma S et al 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 365201 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab2959
    [22]
    Xu J et al 2001 Thin Solid Films 390 107 doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)00926-9
    [23]
    Xu J et al 2001 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19 425 doi: 10.1116/1.1340654
    [24]
    Li J Q et al 2016 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 34 061304 doi: 10.1116/1.4964834
    [25]
    Bai Y J et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 083522 doi: 10.1063/1.4961002
    [26]
    Li J Q et al 2018 Vacuum 155 566 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.06.061
    [27]
    Ding L L et al 2022 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 31 045018 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ac6443
    [28]
    Li J Q et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 115106 doi: 10.1063/1.4992017
    [29]
    Lu W Q et al 2013 Plasma Sci. Technol. 15 511 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/6/05
    [30]
    Druyvesteyn M J 1930 Z. Physik 64 781 doi: 10.1007/bf01773007
    [31]
    Heil B G et al 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 165202 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/16/165202
    [32]
    Donkó Z et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 025205 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/2/025205
    [33]
    Zhang Q Z et al 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 305203 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/30/305203
    [34]
    Godyak V A, Piejak R B and Alexandrovich B M 1992 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1 36 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/1/1/006
    [35]
    You S J, Ahn S K and Chang H Y 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 171502 doi: 10.1063/1.2348739
    [36]
    Bienholz S, Styrnoll T and Awakowicz P 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 065201 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/6/065201
  • Related Articles

    [1]You HE, Yeong-Min LIM, Jun-Ho LEE, Ju-Ho KIM, Moo-Young LEE, Chin-Wook CHUNG. Effect of parallel resonance on the electron energy distribution function in a 60 MHz capacitively coupled plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 045401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9b9f
    [2]Jianwu HE (贺建武), Longfei MA (马隆飞), Senwen XUE (薛森文), Chu ZHANG (章楚), Li DUAN (段俐), Qi KANG (康琦). Study of electron-extraction characteristics of an inductively coupled radio-frequency plasma neutralizer[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 25403-025403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa89e1
    [3]Xudong WANG (王旭东), Liuwei XU (许留伟), Peng FU (傅鹏), Ji LI (李冀), Yanan WU (吴亚楠). Harmonics analysis of the ITER poloidal field converter based on a piecewise method[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 125602. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa86a5
    [4]JIN Yizhou (金逸舟), YANG Juan (杨涓), TANG Mingjie (汤明杰), LUO Litao (罗立涛), FENG Bingbing (冯冰冰). Diagnosing the Fine Structure of Electron Energy Within the ECRIT Ion Source[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(7): 744-750. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/7/08
    [5]BAI Yujing (白玉静), LI Jianquan (李建泉), XU Jun (徐军), LU Wenqi (陆文琪), WANG Younian (王友年), DING Wanyu (丁万昱 ). Improvement of the Harmonic Technique of Probe for Measurements of Electron Temperature and Ion Density[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(1): 58-61. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/1/10
    [6]YANG Wei (杨薇), DONG Zhiwei (董志伟). Electron-Vibrational Energy Exchange in Nitrogen-Containing Plasma: a Comparison Between an Analytical Approach and a Kinetic Model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(1): 12-16. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/1/03
    [7]GE Lei(葛蕾), ZHANG Yuantao(张远涛). A Simple Model for the Calculation of Plasma Impedance in Atmospheric Radio Frequency Discharges[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(10): 924-929. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/05
    [8]ZHANG Zhihui(张志辉), WU Xuemei(吴雪梅), NING Zhaoyuan(宁兆元). The Effect of Inductively Coupled Discharge on Capacitively Coupled Nitrogen-Hydrogen Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(4): 352-355. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/4/09
    [9]BAI Yang (柏洋), JIN Chenggang (金成刚), YU Tao (余涛), WU Xuemei (吴雪梅), et al.. Experimental Characterization of Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled Plasma with Inductive Enhancement in Argon[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(10): 1002-1005. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/10/08
    [10]GAO Min (高敏), CHEN Shaoyong (陈少永), TANG Changjian (唐昌建). Electron Cyclotron Harmonic Wave Heating in Tokamak Plasmas with Different Polarization Modes[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(4): 313-317. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/4/02

Catalog

    Figures(9)

    Article views (40) PDF downloads (17) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return