Research on quinoline degradation in drinking water by a large volume strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge reaction system

Rongjie YI (依蓉婕); Chengwu YI (依成武); Daolin DU (杜道林); Qi ZHANG (张琪); Haijun YU (喻海军); Liu YANG (杨柳)

doi:10.1088/2058-6272/abffa9

Plasma Science and Technology > 2021 > 23(8): 85505-085505. > DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/abffa9

Rongjie YI (依蓉婕), Chengwu YI (依成武), Daolin DU (杜道林), Qi ZHANG (张琪), Haijun YU (喻海军), Liu YANG (杨柳). Research on quinoline degradation in drinking water by a large volume strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge reaction system[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 85505-085505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/abffa9

Citation:

PDF (5159 KB)

Research on quinoline degradation in drinking water by a large volume strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge reaction system

School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China

Funds: Thanks to National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32071521), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX18_2272), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment for their support of this work.

More Information

Received Date: January 19, 2021
Revised Date: May 06, 2021
Accepted Date: May 09, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Quinoline is widely used in the production of drugs as a highly effective insecticide, and its derivatives can also be used to produce dyes. It has a teratogenic carcinogen to wildlife and humans once entering into the aquatic environment. In this study, the degradation mechanism of quinoline in drinking water by a strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) low-temperature plasma with large volume was explored. High concentration of hydroxyl radical (centerdotOH) (0.74 mmol l⁻¹) and ozone (O3) (58.2 mg l⁻¹) produced by strongly ionized discharge DBD system were quantitatively analyzed based on the results of electron spin resonance and O3 measurements. The influencing reaction conditions of input voltages, initial pH value, centerdotOH inhibitors, initial concentration and inorganic ions on the removal efficiency of quinoline were systematically studied. The obtained results showed that the removal efficiency and TOC removal of quinoline achieved 94.8% and 32.2%, degradation kinetic constant was 0.050 min⁻¹ at 3.8 kV and in a neutral pH (7.2). The proposed pathways of quinoline were suggested based on identified intermediates as hydroxy pyridine, fumaric acid, oxalic acid, and other small molecular acids by high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Moreover, the toxicity analysis on the intermediates demonstrated that its acute toxicity, bioaccumulation factor and mutagenicity were reduced. The overall findings provided theoretical and experimental basis for the application of a high capacity strong ionization DBD water treatment system in the removal of quinoline from drinking water.
- dielectric barrier discharge,
- hydroxyl radical,
- ozone, quinoline,
- strong ionizationdischarge,
- toxicity

FullText(HTML)

References (42)

References

[1]	Wang C R et al 2016 Chemosphere 149 219
[2]	Liu D et al 2019 Chemosphere 227 647
[3]	Jing J Y et al 2012 J. Hazard. Mater. 237–238 247
[4]	Li Y M et al 2010 J. Hazard. Mater. 173 151
[5]	Rameshraja D et al 2018 Chem. Pap. 72 617
[6]	Pachupate N J and Vaidya P D 2018 J. Environ. Chem. Eng.6 883
[7]	Bai Q et al 2015 Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 11536
[8]	Qiao L and Wang J L 2010 Bioresour. Technol. 101 7683
[9]	Lee M et al 2017 Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 497
[10]	Wang Z X 2014 MSc Thesis Dalian University of Technology (in Chinese) (https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFDLAST2015&filename=1015571933.nh)
[11]	Moreira N F F et al 2015 Water Res. 87 87
[12]	Gümüş D and Akbal F 2017 Chemosphere 174 218
[13]	Guo H et al 2021 Sep. Purif. Technol. 266 118543
[14]	Zhang Z T et al 2002 Poll. Cont. 3 25
[15]	Guo H et al 2021 J. Hazard. Mater. 403 123673
[16]	Li R J et al 2021 Sep. Purif. Technol. 274 119103
[17]	Wang B W et al 2017 J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 20 196
[18]	Iervolino G, Vaiano V and Palma V 2019 Sep. Purif. Technol.215 155
[19]	Guo H et al 2021 Chemosphere https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131156)
[20]	Gao L H et al 2013 Chem. Eng. J. 228 790
[21]	Marotta E et al 2011 Plasma Process. Polym. 8 867
[22]	Wang J et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 390 124512
[23]	Guo H et al 2021 Vacuum 185 110022
[24]	Bai M D et al 2005 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 25 539
[25]	Zhang Y B et al 2013 Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 33 751
[26]	Tao X M et al 2011 Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37 113
[27]	Napartovich A P 2001 Plasmas Polym. 6 1
[28]	Fridman A, Chirokov A and Gutsol A 2005 J. Phys. D.: Appl.Phys. 38 R1
[29]	Miao H and Yun G 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 7065
[30]	Esposito E X et al 2005 Methods Mol. Biol. 275 131
[31]	Hijosa-Valsero M et al 2013 J. Hazard. Mater. 262 664
[32]	Asaithambi P et al 2020 Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 142 212
[33]	He C C et al 2016 Sep. Purif. Technol. 165 107
[34]	Bilińska L et al 2019 Chem. Eng. J. 358 992
[35]	Irani R et al 2020 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 104595
[36]	Oulton R et al 2015 Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 3687
[37]	Wu J L et al 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 384 123300
[38]	Guo H et al 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 425 130614
[39]	Bao Y P et al 2019 Appl. Catal. B 254 37
[40]	Bing J S et al 2015 Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 1690
[41]	Wang X M et al 2004 Chemosphere 55 733
[42]	Gupta D et al 2020 J. Environ. Manage. 258 110032

[1]	Shuheng HU, Weiwen YAN, Jinming YU, Bin ZHU, Yan LAN, Wenhao XI, Zimu XU, Wei HAN, Cheng CHENG. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole in water by dielectric barrier discharge plasma jet: influencing parameters, degradation pathway, toxicity evaluation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 035510. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9d85
[2]	Songru XIE (谢松汝), Yong HE (何勇), Dingkun YUAN (袁定琨), Zhihua WANG (王智化), Sunel KUMAR, Yanqun ZHU (朱燕群), Kefa CEN (岑可法). The effects of gas flow pattern on the generation of ozone in surface dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 55505-055505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aafc50
[3]	Yangting FU (傅杨挺), Zongyu HOU (侯宗余), Yoshihiro DEGUCHI (出口祥啓), Zhe WANG (王哲). From big to strong: growth of the Asian laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy community[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 30101-030101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaf873
[4]	Jingyu REN (任景俞), Nan JIANG (姜楠), Kefeng SHANG (商克峰), Na LU (鲁娜), Jie LI (李杰), Yan WU (吴彦). Evaluation of trans-ferulic acid degradation by dielectric barrier discharge plasma combined with ozone in wastewater with different water quality conditions[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 25501-025501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaef65
[5]	Linsheng WEI(魏林生), Xin LIANG (梁馨), Yafang ZHANG (章亚芳). Numerical investigation on the effect of gas parameters on ozone generation in pulsed dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(12): 125505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aadca6
[6]	Yuchuan QIN (秦豫川), Shulou QIAN (钱树楼), Cheng WANG (王城), Weidong XIA (夏维东). Effects of nitrogen on ozone synthesis in packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(9): 95501-095501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac203
[7]	Hong ZHAO (赵红), Chengwu YI (依成武), Rongjie YI (依蓉婕), Huijuan WANG (王慧娟), Lanlan YIN (尹兰兰), I N MUHAMMAD, Zhongfei MA (马中飞). Research on the degradation mechanism of dimethyl phthalate in drinking water by strong ionization discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(3): 35503-035503. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa97d1
[8]	Zhiwei XIA (夏志伟), Wei LI (李伟), BoLI (李波), Qingwei YANG (杨青巍). Geometrical aspects of cylindric magnetic shields in strong static fields[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115603. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8031
[9]	WEI Linsheng (魏林生), PENG Bangfa (彭邦发), LI Ming (李鸣), ZHANG Yafang (章亚芳), HU Zhaoji (胡兆吉). Dynamic Characteristics of Positive Pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge for Ozone Generation in Air[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(2): 147-156. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/2/09
[10]	QU Guangzhou(屈广周), LIANG Dongli(梁东丽), QU Dong(曲东), HUANG Yimei(黄懿梅), LI Jie(李杰). Comparison Between Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma and Ozone Regenerations of Activated Carbon Exhausted with Pentachlorophenol[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(6): 608-613. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/6/13

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(12)

1.	Chen, M., Moher, D., Rogers, J. et al. Effects of Halides on Organic Compound Degradation during Plasma Treatment of Brines. Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 58(11): 5139-5152. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.3c07162
2.	Yi, C., Zhang, J., Yi, R. et al. Degradation mechanism and decomposition of sulfamethoxazole aqueous solution with persulfate activated by dielectric barrier discharge. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 2024. DOI:10.1080/09593330.2024.2354058
3.	Li, M., Wang, Y., Xu, J. et al. Deciphering the toxicity mechanism of haloquinolines on Chlorella pyrenoidosa using QSAR and metabolomics approaches. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114943
4.	Tian, H., Li, Y., Chen, H. et al. Aerobic biodegradation of quinoline under denitrifying conditions in membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Environmental Pollution, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121507
5.	Balasubramaniyan, S., Usha Mary, T.M., Swaminathan, M. Microbial degradation of quinoline by immobilized bacillus subtilis. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102604
6.	Cheng, X., He, S., Zhang, X. et al. Enhanced degradation of quinoline in near-neutral pH aqueous solution by magnetically recoverable biochar: Performance, mechanism and variables effects. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104447
7.	Yi, C., Yang, L., Yi, R. et al. Degradation of the nonylphenol aqueous solution by strong ionization discharge: evaluation of degradation mechanism and the water toxicity of zebrafish. Water Science and Technology, 2022, 86(2): 227-243. DOI:10.2166/wst.2022.175
8.	Jiang, Y., Zhang, F., Xu, S. et al. Biodegradation of Quinoline by a Newly Isolated Salt-Tolerating Bacterium Rhodococcus gordoniae Strain JH145. Microorganisms, 2022, 10(4): 797. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms10040797
9.	Zhang, A., Zhou, Y., Li, Y. et al. Motivation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by a novel non-thermal plasma coupled with calcium peroxide system for synergistic removal of sulfamethoxazole in waste activated sludge. Water Research, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118128
10.	Lin, Q., Peng, H., Xie, W. et al. Evaluation catalytic performance of Ag/TiO2 in dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Vacuum, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110844
11.	Yi, R., Zhang, Q., Yi, C. Research on the Degradation of Oxacillin in Water by Strong Ionization Discharge. 2021. DOI:10.3233/ATDE210323
12.	Yi, R., Yu, H., Zhang, Q. et al. Mechanism and Pathway of Nonylphenol Degradation in Aqueous Solution by Dielectric Barrier Discharge. 2021. DOI:10.3233/ATDE210274

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (127) PDF downloads (123) Cited by(12)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Research on quinoline degradation in drinking water by a large volume strong ionization dielectric barrier discharge reaction system