Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Yuqi CHU, Haiqing LIU, Shoubiao ZHANG, Liqing XU, Erzhong LI, Yinxian JIE, Hui LIAN, Tianfu ZHOU, Xi FENG, Xuexi ZHANG, Yunfei WANG, Xiang ZHU, Chenbin WU, Shouxin WANG, Yao YANG, K HANADA, Bo LYU, Yingying LI, Qing ZANG, EAST Team. Magnetohydrodynamic effect of internal transport barrier on EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2726
Citation: Yuqi CHU, Haiqing LIU, Shoubiao ZHANG, Liqing XU, Erzhong LI, Yinxian JIE, Hui LIAN, Tianfu ZHOU, Xi FENG, Xuexi ZHANG, Yunfei WANG, Xiang ZHU, Chenbin WU, Shouxin WANG, Yao YANG, K HANADA, Bo LYU, Yingying LI, Qing ZANG, EAST Team. Magnetohydrodynamic effect of internal transport barrier on EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2726

Magnetohydrodynamic effect of internal transport barrier on EAST tokamak

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Shoubiao ZHANG: E-mail: bszhang@ipp.ac.cn

  • 7 See Ida et al 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aa9b03) for the EAST Team.

  • Received Date: May 30, 2021
  • Revised Date: September 12, 2021
  • Accepted Date: September 14, 2021
  • Available Online: January 29, 2024
  • Published Date: March 08, 2022
  • An internal transport barrier (ITB) can be formed on EAST in exploring high-parameter operation. Previous studies show that safety factor (q) profiles, Shafranov shift and magnetohydrodynamic behaviors could be helpful in ITB formation by suppressing anomalous transport. Recently, electron density evolution with high resolution demonstrates that fishbone could be dominant in electron density ITB formation and sustainment. The power threshold is low in the fishbone condition and the electron density profile is determined by traits of fishbone. Simulation shows that the low-k ion mode is suppressed by fishbone. Direct measurement of turbulence in the inner region shows that the internal kink mode could sustain an electron temperature ITB by suppressing the trapped electron mode. The multi-scale interaction between the kink mode and turbulence by current could be key in sustaining high-electron-temperature long-pulse operation.

  • Generated either from fusion reactions, or from auxiliary heating like neutral beam injection (NBI), ion cyclotron radio frequency wave, and low hybrid wave, the fast ions are usually highly populated in the center of the plasma and play an important role in the plasma heating [1, 2]. The magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities in tokamaks, however, will interact with fast ions and result in the transport and loss of fast ions from the core region to the edge of the plasma. This degraded confinement of fast ions has a significant impact on the fusion power and plasma properties. It will not only reduce the fusion power and energy gain of tokamaks, but also cause the degradation of plasma confinement performance and damage to the first wall. Therefore, the transport of fast ions is a critical issue for present tokamaks and future fusion devices such as ITER [3, 4].

    Due to the importance of this topic, the transport of fast ions has been studied for many years [5]. With the development of tokamak devices and theoretical models, both experiment and simulation works have been extensively carried out to study the conditions and mechanism of fast ion transport. In several tokamak devices, the transport and loss of fast ions induced by various MHD instabilities have been investigated [610]. Besides the experimental investigations, the modeling works are devoted to analyzing the experimental data and relevant physical processes, which contribute to continuous progress in the understanding of fast ion transport in recent years. Based on the experimental results of DIII-D, several simulation works are carried out utilizing the codes ORBIT, M3D-C1, OFSEF and TRANSP to study the NBI fast ion transport [1113]. The fast ion redistribution triggered by sawtooth instability is also investigated with the codes M3D-K and ORBIT [14, 15]. The effects of other MHD instabilities, like toroidal field (TF) ripples, neoclassical tearing mode [16] and ion temperature gradient driven mode [17], on fast ion transport are studied with original theoretical models. Moreover, the numerical simulation is a crucial solution for fast ion transport study during the design of future tokamak devices in the absence of experimental conditions. For instance, the codes ASCOT, SPIRAL and ORBIT are utilized to study the TF ripple-induced fusion alpha transport in SPARC [18] and CFETR [19].

    Among the existing and future tokamak devices, ITER is the most promising device to demonstrate controlled fusion energy. In the design of ITER, the fast ions generated from NBI are the main external heating method to maintain plasma heating power and achieve high energy gain [2]. Different from the energy of about 100 keV in other tokamak devices, the energy of NBI fast ions in ITER is about 1 MeV due to the heating requirement [20]. With this high energy, NBI fast ions are able to penetrate into the central region and heat the bulk plasma there. On the other hand, the plasma current in ITER is designed to be 15 MA in the D-T fusion scenario [21]. This high current may lead to a burst of the internal kink mode in the plasma core. Meanwhile, the fishbone instability can be excited by the interaction of fast ions with the internal kink mode [22]. The relevant simulation works have been extensively carried out, for instance, the investigations of NBI transport and loss in ITER by radial electric field [23] and RMPs [24, 25]. Redistribution of alpha particles by internal kink and sawtooth is studied with circular cross section and ITER-like parameters [2628]. Fast ion transport by fishbone is simulated for a JET plasma based on the experimental measurements [22]. Besides the fast ion transport, the effects of fast ions on internal kink/fishbone have been extensively studied since the last century [2942], which are therefore not discussed in this work.

    As the NBI fast ion redistribution can be triggered by internal kink mode [28] and fishbone instability [43], the effect of internal MHD instabilities on transport and loss of NBI fast ions is also a key issue in ITER. Numerical studieson redistribution of high energy NBI fast ions by internal kink/fishbone in ITER, however, arescarce, which motivates the present study. In this work, the tracing particle orbit code ORBIT [44] is utilized to calculate the redistribution of NBI fast ions with ideal internal MHD instabilities in ITER. The initial fast ion distribution function is calculated by a time-dependent 2D Fokker–Planck solver in velocity space [45] with the first orbit averaged ion sources. The initial distribution of half a million fast ions is in accordance with the operation condition of ITER. Based on the operation parameters and high energy NBI condition in ITER, the effects of the internal kink mode and the fishbone with higher frequency, which is supposed to be a special phenomenon in ITER, are studied numerically. Three parameters are investigated, respectively: the perturbation amplitude A of the internal kink, the perturbation frequency f of the fishbone, and the toroidal mode number n of the internal kink. In this simulation, the perturbation amplitude is assumed to be A=100,300,500 G, the perturbation frequency is assumed to be f=0,20,40,60,80,100 kHz, and the toroidal mode numbers are n=1,2,3,4. Closely related to internal kink mode, the mode structure of the fishbone is the same as that of the m=n=1 internal kink [46], where m is the poloidal mode number. In the practical simulation, the internal kink mode structure is usually used to replace fishbone instability [6, 22, 43]. Hence the effect of the fishbone is simulated by adding different perturbation frequencies to the structure of the n=1 internal kink. The simulation results show that the NBI fast ion redistribution is sensitive to the perturbation amplitude and frequency. The loss of NBI fast ions, however, is not affected by the perturbation amplitude, the perturbation frequency, or the toroidal mode number. The structure of this paper is as follows. Section 2 briefly introduces the code ORBIT. Section 3 presents the initial distribution data of NBI fast ions and the structures of internal kink perturbation applied with different n. In section 4, the simulation of NBI fast ion redistribution by ideal internal MHD instabilities is performed. Section 5 summarizes the results.

    The effects of internal kink mode on the redistribution of NBI fast ions in ITER are simulated using the tracing particle orbit code ORBIT [44]. The code traces and calculates the position and velocity of particles in plasma by solving guiding center orbit equations. From the Hamiltonian quantities, Lagrangian quantities, Lagrangian equations and magnetic field expressions for guiding center drift motion without perturbation, the equations of particle motion without perturbation can be derived. If the magnetic field perturbation is considered, the canonical momentum, Hamiltonian, poloidal and toroidal canonical momentum will be modified and new motion equations can be obtained [44, 47]. The specific expressions and equations are presented in the appendix. By solving the particle guiding center motion equations with the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method, ORBIT can trace the position and velocity of particles and then obtain their orbits and distribution.

    The particle orbit tracing code ORBIT is utilized to simulate the effects of internal kink mode on the redistribution of NBI fast ions in ITER. In the calculation of ORBIT, this work uses the initial distribution data of half a million of NBI fast ions, which is calculated by time-dependent 2D Fokker–Planck solver in velocity space [45] with first orbit averaged ion sources, as the input data of particle distribution at the initial moment.

    Figure 1 shows the distribution of half a million NBI fast ions in ITER at the initial moment. Figures 1(a) and (b) show, respectively, the initial distribution in real space and in phase space. The color bar indicates the number of particles. Figure 1(a) shows that most NBI fast ions are populated in the core region in ITER at the initial moment. Figure 1(b) shows that most NBI fast ions have a pitch angle larger than 0.5, and the number of NBI fast ions with an energy around 1 MeV is the largest. The information provided by the real and phase spaces indicates that the initial distribution is a distribution of NBI fast ions which have just been injected into ITER and have not been slowed down for a long time. Thus, the energy and pitch angle of most fast ions are centered around 1 MeV and 0.8, respectively.

    Figure  1.  Distribution of half a million of NBI fast ions in ITER at the initial moment the color bar indicates the number of particles. (a) Distribution in real space, where the RZ plane represents the poloidal cross section of the plasma in ITER. (b) Distribution in phase space, where E is the energy of fast ions, v/v is the pitch angle of fast ions.

    To study the effects of internal kink mode/fishbone instability on redistribution of NBI fast ions in ITER, three instability parameters are investigated: the perturbation amplitude A, the perturbation frequency f and the toroidal mode number n. In the investigation of n, the structure of perturbation assumed for ORBIT will be changed due to the change of n in internal kink mode.

    Figures 2(a)(c) show the profiles of bulk plasma temperature, bulk plasma density and safety factor q in the ITER 15 MA scenario assumed for ORBIT. The horizontal coordinate sψp/ψw represents the normalized plasma radial position, where ψp is the poloidal flux and ψw denotes the poloidal flux at the wall location. Thus s=0 at the magnetic axis and s=1 at the edge of the plasma. In plot (a), the vertical coordinate denotes the temperature of the bulk plasma in units of keV. The blue dotted and red solid curves represent, respectively, the temperature profiles of bulk electrons and bulk ions. The vertical coordinate in plot (b) indicates the density of bulk plasma in units of m-3. The blue-dotted, green-dotted and red solid curves in plot (b) represent, respectively, the density profiles of bulk electrons, bulk deuterium ions and bulk tritium ions. In plot (c), the vertical coordinate is the safety factor q. The black vertical dotted line represents the radial position of s=0.53 where the safety factor q=1. In general, the safety factor q increases as s increases, while a slight negative shear presents itself in the region of 0.2<s<0.4. At the position of s=0, q=0.95. It can be seen that q<1 in the region of s<0.53 and q>1 in the region of s>0.53.

    Figure  2.  Profiles of (a) bulk plasma temperature, (b) bulk plasma density, (c) safety factor q in ITER 15 MA scenario assumed for ORBIT.

    Figure 3 presents the structure of the internal kink mode assumed for ORBIT with n=1,2,3,4. Figures 3(a)(d) show the structure of perturbation displacement output by MARS-F [48]. The horizontal coordinate sψp/ψw is the normalized plasma radial position. The vertical coordinate ξ(norm.amp) represents the amplitude of perturbation displacement normalized by the major poloidal mode number m component. The perturbation components with different m are represented by different color curves. The negative value represents the radial direction of perturbation displacement. It can be seen that as n increases, the m component that plays a major role in perturbation displacement structure also increases, and there is always major m=n. After importing the internal kink mode structure of figures 3(a)(d) into ORBIT, the structure of radial magnetic perturbation field amplitude calculated by ORBIT is shown in figures 3(e)(h). The vertical coordinate dBr/B indicates the radial magnetic perturbation field amplitude normalized by the background magnetic field in ITER, which is 5.3 T. The actual perturbation amplitude used is determined by the amplitude peak of the maximum magnetic field component in figures 3(e)(h), which can be modified in ORBIT. These two figures show that the structures of internal kink modes with different n are all located in the region of s<0.53, which indicates the region of q<1. Moreover, the peaks of internal kink perturbations shift outward along the radial direction as n increases.

    Figure  3.  Structures of internal kink mode assumed for ORBIT. The first row (a)–(d) shows the structures of internal kink perturbation displacement with the toroidal mode number (a) n=1, (b) n=2, (c) n=3, (d) n=4. The second row (e)–(h) shows the structures of internal kink perturbation field amplitude with the toroidal mode number (e) n=1, (f) n=2, (g) n=3, (h) n=4.

    This section focuses on the effects of perturbation amplitude A on the redistribution of NBI fast ions. As the perturbation structure shown in figures 3(a) and (e), the perturbation amplitude considered here is the peak value of the radial perturbation field amplitude. The maximum perturbation amplitude is supposed as 1% of the background magnetic field, which is 5.3 T in ITER. Three different perturbation amplitudes of internal kink mode are investigated: A=100,300,500 G. The toroidal mode number and the perturbation frequency are fixed as n=1 and f=0. ORBIT is utilized to calculate the redistribution of NBI fast ions after 5 ms in ITER with four cases of no perturbation and three different perturbation amplitudes.

    The calculation results of ORBIT are shown in figure 4. Figures 4(a)(c) compare, respectively, the number profiles of NBI fast ions in real space for A=100,300,500 G perturbations with no perturbation. The vertical coordinate N indicates the number of NBI fast ions at the corresponding radial position. The blue curves represent the case without perturbation and the red curves represent the A=100,300,500 G perturbation cases. The two black vertical dotted lines in plot (c) represent the radial positions of s=0.32 and s=0.53. As figure 4 shows, the NBI fast ion profiles are basically unchanged with 100 G perturbation amplitude. When the perturbation amplitude increases, the NBI fast ion profile starts to change. Considering the cases of 500 G perturbation, in the region of 0<s0.32, the effect of internal kink mode decreases the number of NBI fast ions; in the region of 0.32<s0.53, the number of NBI fast ions increases; in the region of s>0.53, the number of fast ions is almost unchanged. This indicates that some NBI fast ions move from the region of 0<s0.32 to the region of 0.32<s0.53 under the effect of perturbation. The internal kink mode causes some NBI fast ions in the core region to transport outward.

    Figure  4.  NBI fast ion number profiles in real space. The first row (a)–(c) presents the variation of NBI fast ion number profiles in real space in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A= (a) 100 G, (b) 300 G, (c) 500 G internal kink perturbations (the perturbation frequency f=0, the toroidal mode number n=1 ). The second row (d)–(f) presents the relative change of NBI fast ion number in real space in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A= (d) 100 G, (e) 300 G, (f) 500 G internal kink perturbations.

    Figures 4(d)(f) show more clearly the relationship between the degree of NBI fast ion transport and the perturbation amplitude. The vertical coordinate indicates the relative change of NBI fast ion number at the corresponding radial position in the presence of perturbation, which is calculated as:

    Relativechange=Npert(s)-N0(s)N0(s), (1)

    where Npert(s) and N0(s) label, respectively, the NBI fast ion number at the corresponding radial position s for cases with and without perturbation. It is shown that the transport of NBI fast ions from the core region to the outer part becomes more and more obvious as the perturbation amplitude increases. When the perturbation amplitude is 500 G, the maximum relative change of NBI fast ion number is close to 5%.

    Figure 5 illustrates the relationship curve between the NBI fast ion loss rate and the perturbation amplitude. The loss rate is obtained by dividing the number of fast ions lost by the total number of fast ions, which is half a million. In this work, the free boundary condition is adopted for the internal kink computation. As for the fast ion tracing simulation by ORBIT, the last closed flux surface (LCFS) is assumed as the boundary, i.e. the fast ions that intersect the LCFS are considered lost. It can be seen that the perturbation amplitude basically does not affect the number of fast ions lost. This is because the internal kink mode perturbation occurs in the core region in ITER, and the NBI fast ions are mainly transported from 0<s0.32 to 0.32<s0.53 in the presence of perturbation. Therefore, increasing the perturbation amplitude has essentially no effect on the loss of NBI fast ions.

    Figure  5.  Relationship of NBI fast ion loss rate and perturbation amplitude A. The fast ions are considered as lost once they intersect the last closed flux surface (LCFS).

    The redistribution of NBI fast ions in the particle phase space with 500 G perturbation is shown in figure 6. Figure 6(a) corresponds to the real space region of 0<s0.32 and figure 6(b) corresponds to the region of 0.32<s0.53. The horizontal coordinate in the figures is the fast ion energy in keV, the vertical coordinate is the pitch angle of fast ions. The color bar represents the number of increases or decreases of NBI fast ions in the presence of 500 G perturbation compared with the no perturbation case. The δN represents the total increase or total decrease of NBI fast ions in the corresponding real space region.

    Figure  6.  Distribution of NBI fast ion number change in the particle phase space ( E-v/v plane) in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0, the toroidal mode number n=1 internal kink perturbation. (a) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0<s0.32 . (b) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0.32<s0.53.

    Figure 6(a) shows that in the region of 0<s0.32, NBI fast ions with energy close to 1 MeV and a pitch angle of about 0.8 decreases the most, followed by NBI fast ions with energy of about 600 to 800 keV. Figure 6(b) shows that in the region of 0.32<s0.53 the number of NBI fast ions with an energy around 1 MeV and pitch angle around 0.8 decreases the most, followed by a slight increase in NBI fast ions with energy between 600 and 800 keV. Combining the phase space information in figure 6, it can be learned that most NBI fast ions transported from 0<s0.32 to 0.32<s0.53 in the presence of 500 G perturbation have an energy around 1 MeV and a pitch angle of around 0.8. This is exactly the class of NBI fast ions with the largest number in the initial distribution data. At the same time, the fast ion energy and pitch angle do not change after transport, indicating that the type of fast ion orbit remains the same. But the orbit radius of the fast ion increases, making the fast ion transport outward.

    In the region with the largest change of NBI fast ion number in figure 6, the fast ion with an energy of 960 keV and pitch angle of 0.8 is selected. The real-space Poincaré diagrams of NBI fast ion are presented in figure 7. Figures 7(a) and (b) show, respectively, the cases without perturbation and with 500 G perturbation. The vertical coordinate θ in figure 7(a) represents the poloidal angle of the fast ion. Each vertical line represents the fast ion orbit on different magnetic surfaces. There is no transport phenomenon without perturbation. The poloidal angle of the fast ion is constantly changing while the radial position remains unchanged during its motion, so the fast ion orbit is represented as vertical lines in the Poincaré diagram. In figure 7(b), the fast ion orbits are distorted in the presence of 500 G internal kink mode perturbation, while the magnetic island structure capable of enhancing transport appears. The distortion of orbits represents a change in the radial position of the fast ion during its movement. The appearance of two magnetic islands represents the predominant role of the m=2 component in all the magnetic perturbation field components, which is consistent with the structure of magnetic perturbation assumed for ORBIT in figure 3(e).

    Figure  7.  Real-space Poincaré diagram of NBI fast ion drift orbits with E=960 keV and v/v=0.8. (a) Case without perturbation. (b) Case with the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0, the toroidal mode number n=1 internal kink perturbation.

    In this section, the effect of different mode perturbation frequencies f on the redistribution of NBI fast ions will be investigated. In the previous experiments on existing tokamak devices, the fishbone frequencies measured are in the range of 10–20 kHz [43, 4952]. With a high-power NBI (injection power of 0.95 MW and fast ion energy of 40 keV), the fishbone frequencies measured on HL-2A can reach up to 30 kHz [53]. In the burning plasmas, the maximum fishbone frequency evaluated for TFTR is about 100 kHz [54]. As the NBI power (33 MW) and fast ion energy (1 MeV) in ITER [20] are much higher than those of existing tokamaks, the fishbone frequency in ITER is supposed to be higher than 20 kHz. Hence the perturbation frequencies f=0,20,40,60,80,100 kHz are selected to calculate the distribution of NBI fast ions after 5 ms of evolution, with the toroidal mode number n=1 and the perturbation amplitude A=500 G fixed. Since changing the frequency does not affect the mode perturbation structure, ORBIT in this section uses the same perturbation structure of figures 3(a) and (e).

    The calculation results of ORBIT are shown in figures 8 and 9. Figure 8 compares the number profiles of NBI fast ions in real space with six different perturbation frequencies and without perturbation. The two black vertical dotted lines in plot (f) represent the radial positions of s=0.05 and s=0.12. The NBI fast ions under 0 kHz perturbation are mainly transported from 0<s0.32 to 0.32<s0.53. As the perturbation frequency increases, the transport in the outer region is essentially unchanged, but the transport in the inner region is more variable. The number of NBI fast ions in the region of 0<s0.05 decreases substantially under the effect of perturbation with frequencies, while in the regions of 0.05<s0.12 and 0.15<s0.25 the number of fast ions increases. This means that the NBI fast ions will transport from 0<s0.05 to 0.05<s0.12 and 0.15<s0.25 under the effect of perturbation with frequencies compared to the case without frequency.

    Figure  8.  Variation of NBI fast ion number profiles in real space in the presence of perturbations with the perturbation frequency f= (a) 0 kHz (the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the toroidal mode number n=1 internal kink perturbation), (b) 20 kHz, (c) 40 kHz, (d) 60 kHz, (e) 80 kHz, (f) 100 kHz ( A=500 G, n=1 fishbone perturbation).
    Figure  9.  Relative change of NBI fast ion number in real space in the presence of perturbations with the perturbation frequency f= (a) 0 kHz (the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the toroidal mode number n=1 internal kink perturbation), (b) 20 kHz, (c) 40 kHz, (d) 60 kHz, (e) 80 kHz, (f) 100 kHz ( A=500 G, n=1 fishbone perturbation).

    Figure 9 shows the relative change of NBI fast ion number in real space with different perturbation frequencies. The transport phenomenon of NBI fast ions from 0<s0.05 to 0.05<s0.12 can be clearly seen, and the extent of fast ion transport in this region increases as the perturbation frequency increases. The relative decrease of NBI fast ion number in the region of 0<s0.05 can reach 30% with the influence of 100 kHz perturbation.

    Although the transport of NBI fast ions in the inner region in the presence of high-frequency perturbations is severe, the radial position of this massive transport of fast ions is small and still located in the plasma core region. Therefore, in the absence of transport out of the plasma core, this large transport of NBI fast ions does not affect the NBI heating power and fusion condition in ITER.

    Figure 10 presents the relationship curve between the NBI fast ion loss rate and the perturbation frequency. It can be seen in the figure that the variation of NBI fast ion loss rate with the change of perturbation frequency is extremely small. In the background of half a million NBI fast ions, the maximum variation of the number of fast ions lost between different perturbation frequencies does not exceed 50. Thus the loss of NBI fast ions is considered to be unaffected by the perturbation frequency.

    Figure  10.  Relationship of NBI fast ion loss rate and perturbation frequency f. The fast ions are considered as lost once they intersect the LCFS.

    As different fishbone frequencies are investigated here, the resonance between the mode and the fast ions indeed affects the fast ion transport. This resonant interaction depends on the mode frequency and the assumed initial distribution of fast ions. In this work, such resonance is partially taken into account. In this subsection, the 3D perturbation structure (internal kink mode with n=1 ) and amplitude ( A=500 G) are fixed, while scanning the mode frequency (from 0 to 100 kHz) and tracing the fast ion orbits. The resonance between a rotating perturbation and the fast ions is thus taken into account in the above sense, which has been shown to slightly increase the fast ion loss rate as reported in figure 10. On the other hand, the drift kinetic effect of fast ions on the internal kink instability (which again depends on the mode-particle resonance) is not considered in this work. Physics studiesof this effect have been extensively carried out in the literature. The above two-way resonant interactions can be studied within the linear stability analysis.

    However, the nonlinear evolution of fishbone and the associated fast ion redistribution is not studied in the present work. Such nonlinear interactions, which often lead to the mode frequency chirping, have again been studied in literature e.g. in [55, 56] for ITER. Such a study is beyond the capability of the computational tools (MARS and ORBIT) employed in this work.

    Figures 11(a) and (b) present, respectively, the redistribution of NBI fast ions in the particle phase space in the regions of 0<s0.05 and 0.05<s0.12. In Figure 11(a), the number of NBI fast ions with the energy around 1 MeV and pitch angle around 0.8 decreases the most in the region of 0<s0.05 in the presence of 100 kHz perturbation. Figure 11(b) shows that most of the increased NBI fast ions in the region of 0.05<s0.12 have an energy of about 800 keV and a pitch angle of about 0.8.

    Figure  11.  Distribution of NBI fast ion number change in the particle phase space ( E-v/v plane) in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=100 kHz, the toroidal mode number n=1 fishbone perturbation. (a) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0<s0.05. (b) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0.05<s0.12.

    Combining the information in figure 11, it can be seen that in the presence of 100 kHz perturbation, most of the NBI fast ions transported from 0<s0.05 to 0.05<s0.12 have a decrease in energy from about 1 MeV to about 800 keV, while the pitch angle is not changed. This indicates that the energy of fast ions will be changed by the perturbation with frequency during the transport in this region, but the pitch angle is not affected. Therefore, the orbit type of NBI fast ions remains unchanged and the orbit radius increases, allowing the fast ions to be transported outward for some distance.

    To verify the conclusions from the real-space and phase-space redistribution, an NBI fast ion with an energy of 960 keV and pitch angle of 0.8 is taken in the region of 0<s0.05. The orbit of a fast ion moving 5 ms in the presence of 0 and 100 kHz perturbations is calculated utilizing ORBIT. The calculation results are shown in figure 12. Figures 12(a) and (b) show, respectively, the NBI fast ion orbits on theRZ plane in the presence of 0 and 100 kHz perturbations. Compared with 0 kHz perturbation, the orbit radius of the fast ion with 100 kHz perturbation is significantly larger and the orbit spans a larger region. This confirms that the NBI fast ions with the effect of 100 kHz perturbation do transport from 0<s0.05 to 0.05<s0.12 compared to the case of 0 kHz perturbation, resulting in a significant transport phenomenon in the plasma core region.

    Figure  12.  Orbits of single NBI fast ion on the RZ plane in the presence of perturbations with the perturbation frequency (a) f= 0 kHz (the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the toroidal mode number n=1 internal kink perturbation), (b) f = 100 kHz ( A=500 G, n=1 fishbone perturbation).

    In this section, the effect of internal kink modes with different toroidal mode numbers n on the redistribution of NBI fast ions is investigated. The perturbation amplitude A=500 G and the perturbation frequency f=0 are fixed, while the toroidal mode numbers are n=1,2,3,4.

    Figure 13 presents the calculation results of ORBIT for different n. Figures 13(a)(d) compare, respectively, the variation of the number profiles of NBI fast ions in real space with the n=1,2,3,4 internal kink mode perturbations and without perturbation. The four black vertical dotted lines in plots (a)–(d) represent the radial positions of s=0.32,0.34,0.36,0.38. The calculation results show that although the change of n does not affect the overall shape of NBI fast ion redistribution, the boundary of fast ions is related to n. When n=1,2,3,4, the NBI fast ions are transported, respectively, from the regions of s0.32,0.34,0.36,0.38 to the regions of s>0.32,0.34,0.36,0.38.

    Figure  13.  NBI fast ion number profiles in real space. The first row (a)–(d) shows the variation of NBI fast ion number profiles in real space in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0 internal kink perturbations with the toroidal mode number (a) n=1, (b) n=2, (c) n=3, (d) n=4. The second row (e)–(h) shows the relative change of NBI fast ion number in real space in the presence of the internal kink perturbations with the toroidal mode number (e) n=1, (f) n=2, (g) n=3, (h) n=4.

    The boundary of fast ion transport increases as n increases. Figures 13(e)(h) show the relative change of NBI fast ion number in real space with different n. The relative change of NBI fast ion number is basically constant when n increases, while the region where fast ion transport occurs is gradually shifted outward in the radial direction. This shift of transport region is related to the outward excursion of internal kink perturbations with different n along the radial direction, which is presented in figure 3.

    The relationship curve between the loss rate of NBI fast ions and toroidal mode number n is shown in figure 14. It can be seen that the loss rate of fast ions is not affected by n. Similar conclusions are shown in sections 4.1 and 4.2 that the perturbation amplitude and frequency have no effect on the fast ion loss rate. As the internal kink/fishbone perturbation occurs mainly in the core region in ITER, which is a large-scale tokamak device, the transport of NBI fast ions with perturbation is not sufficient to cause the fast ions to move to the plasma edge and escape from the plasma. Hence the internal MHD perturbation does not affect the loss of NBI fast ions in ITER.

    Figure  14.  Relationship of NBI fast ion loss rate and the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0 internal kinks with different toroidal mode numbers n. The fast ions are considered lost once they intersect the LCFS.

    Figure 15 presents the redistribution of NBI fast ions in the particle phase space in the regions of 0.15<s0.36 and 0.36<s0.60. Figure 15(a) shows that in the presence of the n=3 internal kink mode perturbation, NBI fast ions in the region of 0.15<s0.36 with the largest number reduction have the pitch angle around 0.8, while the energy is distributed between 700 keV and 1 MeV, and between 200 and 500 keV. Figure 15(b) shows that the number of NBI fast ions with pitch angle around 0.8 and energy around 700 and 500 keV increases the most. Thus the NBI fast ions are transported from 0.15<s0.36 to 0.36<s0.60 without any change in pitch angle, while the fast ion energy is changed by the perturbation.

    Figure  15.  Distribution of NBI fast ion number change in the particle phase space ( E-v/v plane) in the presence of the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0, the toroidal mode number n=3 internal kink perturbation. (a) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0.15<s0.36. (b) Distribution in the real region of the radial position 0.36<s0.60.

    The NBI fast ion with an energy of 720 keV and pitch angle of 0.8 is selected from the region where fast ion transport occurs in figure 15. The real-space Poincaré diagram is calculated and plotted. As figure 16(b) shows, the fast ion orbit is distorted in the region of 0.15<s0.36 where NBI fast ion transport occurs. The radial position is changed, and a magnetic island structure is present. This structure enables the NBI fast ions to cross from the left side to the right side of the magnetic island, which greatly enhances fast ion transport. Hence the transport of NBI fast ions from 0.15<s0.36 to 0.36<s0.60 is confirmed.

    Figure  16.  Real-space Poincaré diagram of NBI fast ion drift orbits with E=720 keV and v/v=0.8. (a) Case without perturbation. (b) Case with the perturbation amplitude A=500 G, the perturbation frequency f=0, the toroidal mode number n=3 internal kink perturbation.

    Redistribution of half a million of NBI fast ions by the ideal internal MHD instabilities in ITER has been simulated utilizing the tracing particle orbit code ORBIT. Three parameters associated with MHD perturbations are considered in this work: the perturbation amplitude A of the internal kink, the perturbation frequency f of the fishbone, and the toroidal mode number n of the internal kink. The effects of these parameters on the transport and loss of fast ions are investigated. The perturbation amplitude is assumed to be A=100,300,500 G, the perturbation frequency is assumed to be f=0,20,40,60,80,100 kHz, and the toroidal mode numbers are n=1,2,3,4.

    Redistribution of NBI fast ions is found to be sensitive to the perturbation amplitude and frequency. With the n=1 internal kink perturbation, the NBI fast ions transport from the region of 0<s0.32 to 0.32<s0.53. The transport becomes greater as the perturbation amplitude increases. As the perturbation amplitude rises to 500 G, which is 1% of the background magnetic field in ITER, the maximum relative change of fast ion number in the radial position approaches 5%.

    With respect to the effect of fishbone perturbation frequency, a strong fast ion transport occurs between the regions of 0<s0.05 and 0.05<s0.12, and higher frequency leads to stronger transport. When the perturbation frequency reaches 100 kHz, the number of fast ions in the region of 0<s0.05 is reduced by 30%.

    The perturbation structure with different toroidal mode numbers n does not affect the relative change of the NBI fast ion number in real space. But as the value of n increases, the fast ion transport regions shift outward along the radial direction, which is consistent with the outward excursion of internal kink perturbations with different n in the radial direction.

    As for the loss of NBI fast ions, we find that the loss number is independent of the perturbation amplitude A, the perturbation frequency f and the toroidal mode number n. This is because the internal kink mode/fishbone perturbation occurs in the core region in ITER, which is a device sufficiently large in size to allow particles to escape. Of course, fast ion loss may occur at (unrealistically) higher perturbation amplitude which we do not consider here. Transport induced by MHD perturbations considered in this work is not sufficient to cause the NBI fast ions to move to the plasma edge and escape from the plasma. Hence the ideal internal MHD perturbation does not affect the loss of NBI fast ions in ITER.

    Although the NBI fast ion transport induced by 100 kHz fishbone perturbation can result in a maximum decrease of 30% in the relative value of fast ion number, the transport regions of 0<s0.05 and 0.05<s0.12 are still located in the core region of the plasma where the fusion reaction mainly occurs. Thus the strong transport of NBI fast ions triggered by high-frequency fishbone perturbations does not affect the NBI heating power and fusion condition in ITER. On the other hand, the particle transport from 0<s0.32 to 0.32<s0.53 can cause a 5% decrease in the fast ion number when the perturbation amplitude reaches 500 G. The influence of this kind of transport on the fusion condition of ITER needs further study in the future.

    Here are the specific expressions and equations applied by ORBIT. First, there are Hamiltonian quantities, Lagrangian quantities, Lagrangian equations, and magnetic field expressions for guiding center drift motion without perturbation:

    H=ρ2B22+μB+Φ (A.1)
    L=(A+ρB)v+μ˙ξH (A.2)
    ddtL˙q=Lq (A.3)
    B=gζ+Iθ+δψp, (A.4)

    where ρ=v/B represents the normalized parallel gyration radius of a particle; μ=v2/2B represents the normalized magnetic moment of a particle; Φ is the electric potential. The magnetic field can be written as B=×(ψθψpζ)=×A with A=ψθψpζ representing the magnetic vector potential; v denotes the guiding center velocity; ξ labels the cyclotron phase. q is the safety factor, (ψp,θ,ζ) is the magnetic surface coordinates used in ORBIT, ψp represents the poloidal flux coordinates, θ represents the poloidal angle, ζ represents the toroidal angle. From the above equations, the equations of particle motion without perturbation can be derived as:

    ˙ρ=1ρgD((μ+ρ2B)Bθ+Φθ) (A.5)
    ˙ψp=gD((μ+ρ2B)Bθ+Φθ) (A.6)
    ˙θ=ρB2D(1ρg)+gD((μ+ρ2B)Bψp+Φψp) (A.7)
    ˙ζ=ρB2D(q+ρ(Iψpqδθ))ID((μ+ρ2B)Bψp+Φψp)+qδD((μ+ρ2B)Bθ+Φθ) (A.8)

    where

    D=gq+I+ρ(gIψpIgψpgqδθ+Iqδζ)

    After considering the magnetic field perturbation, the perturbation in ORBIT takes the form:

    δB=×αB, (A.9)

    where α is an arbitrary function of ψp,θ,ζ, i.e. α = α(ψp,θ,ζ) From the modified canonical momentum, Hamiltonian, poloidal and toroidal canonical momentum:

    ρc=ρ+α (A.10)
    H=(ρcα)2B22+μB+Φ (A.11)
    Pθ=Iρc+ψ (A.12)
    Pζ=gρc+ψp. (A.13)

    The new motion equations can be obtained as:

    ˙ρ=ρ2B+μD((1+ρcg+gαψp)Bθ+(Iαζgαθ)Bψp)q+ρcIDΦζ1ρcgDΦθ+1D(αψp(gΦθIΦζ)+Φψp(Iαζgαθ))αt (A.14)
    ˙ψp=gD(ρ2B+μ)Bθ+gρB2Dαθ+IρB2DαζgDΦθ+IDΦζ (A.15)
    ˙θ=HPθ=(ρ2B+μ)gDBψp+ρB2(1ρcg)DρB2gDαψp+gDΦψp (A.16)
    ˙ζ=HPζ=(ρ2B+μ)IDBψp+ρB2(q+ρcI)D+ρB2IDαψpIDΦψp (A.17)
    ˙Pθ=Hθ=(ρ2B+μ)Bθ+ρB2αθΦθ (A.18)
    ˙Pθ=Hζ=ρB2αζΦζ. (A.19)

    The code ORBIT solves the above particle guiding center equations by the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method to obtain the orbits and distribution of particles.

    This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0301705). This work is also supported in part by the Key Program of Research and Development of Hefei Science Center, CAS (No. 2019HSC-KPRD001). This work is also supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11975271 and 11675211). This work was partly supported by the Collaborative Research Program of the Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University.

  • [1]
    ITER Physics Basis Editors et al 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2137 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301
    [2]
    Gormezano C et al 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5544 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5544
    [3]
    Joffrin E et al 2002 Nucl. Fusion 42 235 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/42/3/302
    [4]
    Fujita T and the JT-60 Team 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 1527 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/12/001
    [5]
    Bell R E et al 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 1429 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1429
    [6]
    Greenfield C M et al 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 1959 doi: 10.1063/1.874176
    [7]
    Quigley E D et al 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 1189 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/44/11/004
    [8]
    Hoang G T et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4593 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4593
    [9]
    Yu D L et al 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 056003 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/56/5/056003
    [10]
    Baranov Y F et al 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1463 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/10/308
    [11]
    Litaudon X et al 1999 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41 A733 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/066
    [12]
    Fujisawa A et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 165002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.165002
    [13]
    Austin M E et al 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 082502 doi: 10.1063/1.2245579
    [14]
    Maget P et al 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 1385 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/45/8/301
    [15]
    Fourment C et al 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 233 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/45/3/305
    [16]
    Long F F et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 036008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab668c
    [17]
    Yang Y et al 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 085003 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa6f2a
    [18]
    Gao X and the EAST team 2018 Phys. Lett. A 382 1242 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2018.03.006
    [19]
    Wu M F et al 2020 Plasma Sci. Technol. 22 025102 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab4f8a
    [20]
    Joffrin E et al 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 1167 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/10/018
    [21]
    Liu Z X et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 122001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abb146
    [22]
    Li J et al 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 817 doi: 10.1038/nphys2795
    [23]
    Wan B N et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 104015 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/10/104015
    [24]
    Liu F K et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 123022 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/12/123022
    [25]
    Hu C D 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 1 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/1/01
    [26]
    Li Y Y et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 11E428 doi: 10.1063/1.4890408
    [27]
    Zang Q et al 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 063502 doi: 10.1063/1.3599039
    [28]
    Han X et al 2014 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 073506 doi: 10.1063/1.4891040
    [29]
    Liu H Q et al 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 11D903 doi: 10.1063/1.4963378
    [30]
    Zhu X et al 2015 Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 733 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/17/9/03
    [31]
    Qian J P et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 036008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa4e58
    [32]
    Xu L Q et al 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 122510 doi: 10.1063/1.4939020
    [33]
    Chen L et al 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 1122 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1122
    [34]
    Wong K L et al 2004 Nucl. Fusion 45 30 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/1/004
    [35]
    Duong H H et al 1993 Nucl. Fusion 33 749 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/33/5/I06
    [36]
    Staebler G M, Kinsey J E and Waltz R E 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 102508 doi: 10.1063/1.2044587
    [37]
    Staebler G M et al 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 055909 doi: 10.1063/1.2436852
    [38]
    Staebler G M et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 055003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.055003
    [39]
    Staebler G M et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 113017 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113017
    [40]
    Feng X et al 2019 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90 024704 doi: 10.1063/1.5075615
    [41]
    Lian H et al 2019 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90 053501 doi: 10.1063/1.5089699
    [42]
    Ding W X et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 035002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.035002
    [43]
    Zhang T et al 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 115101 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac9b5
    [44]
    Wang W X et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 084002 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab266d
  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhihui ZOU, Ping ZHU, Charlson C KIM, Wei DENG, Xianqu WANG, Yawei HOU. Frequency multiplication with toroidal mode number of kink/fishbone modes on a static HL-2A-like tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 124005. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca00a
    [2]Xingyuan XU (徐行远), Yingfeng XU (徐颖峰), Xiaodong ZHANG (张晓东), Youjun HU (胡友俊), Lei YE (叶磊), Xiaotao XIAO (肖小涛). Simulations of first-orbit losses of neutral beam injection (NBI) fast ions on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 85101-085101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab8973
    [3]Yaorong YANG (杨耀荣), Yawei HOU (候雅巍), Wei CHEN (陈伟), Ping ZHU (朱平), Xianqu WANG (王先驱), Zhihui ZOU (邹志慧), Yi YU (余羿), Min XU (许敏), Minyou YE (叶民友). Investigation of ion fishbone stability on HL-2A using NIMROD[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 85101-085101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab1295
    [4]Kunihiro OGAWA, Mitsutaka ISOBE, Takeo NISHITANI, Sadayoshi MURAKAMI, Ryosuke SEKI, Hideo NUGA, Neng PU, Masaki OSAKABE, LHD Experiment Group. Study of first orbit losses of 1 MeV tritons using the Lorentz orbit code in the LHD[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 25102-025102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aaeba8
    [5]ZHENG Ting (郑婷), WU Bin (吴斌), XU Liqing (徐立清), HU Chundong (胡纯栋), ZANG Qing (臧庆), DING Siye (丁斯晔), LI Yingying (李颖颖), WU Xingquan (伍兴权), WANG Jinfang (王进芳), SHEN Biao (沈飙), ZHONG Guoqiang (钟国强), LI Hao (李昊), SHI Tonghui (石同辉), EAST Team. Fishbone Mode Excited by Deeply Trapped Energetic Beam Ions in EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 595-600. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/03
    [6]HE Yihua (贺艺华), YANG Chang (杨昶), HE Zhaoguo (何兆国), ZHANG Zelong (张择龙), et al.. Observation and Modeling of Geostationary Orbit Electron Energization Induced by Enhanced Dayside Whistler-Mode Waves[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(9): 866-870. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/9/06
    [7]QU Hongpeng (曲洪鹏). Ion-Banana-Orbit-Width Effect on Bootstrap Current for Small Magnetic Islands[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(9): 852-856. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/9/03
    [8]WANG Zhongtian (王中天), WANG Long (王龙), LONG Yongxing (龙永兴), DONG Jiaqi (董家齐), HE Zhixiong (何志雄), LIU Yu (刘宇), TANG Changjian (唐昌建). Shaping Effects of the E-Fishbone in Tokamaks[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(1): 12-16. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/1/03
    [9]WU Guojiang (吴国将), ZHANG Xiaodong (张晓东). Calculations of the Ion Orbit Loss Region at the Edge of EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(9): 789-793. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/9/03
    [10]GAO Zhe. Analytical Theory of the Geodesic Acoustic Mode in the Small and Large Orbit Drift Width Limits and its Application in a Study of Plasma Shaping Effect[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(1): 15-20.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. Hao, G., Xu, J., Sun, Y. et al. Summary of the 11th Conference on Magnetic Confined Fusion Theory and Simulation. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 101001. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad5d8a
    1. Hao, G., Xu, J., Sun, Y. et al. Summary of the 11th Conference on Magnetic Confined Fusion Theory and Simulation. Plasma Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 101001. DOI:10.1088/2058-6272/ad5d8a

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(16)

    Article views (131) PDF downloads (60) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return