Processing math: 8%
Advanced Search+
Jing OU, Jiamin LONG. Estimates of required impurity fraction for EAST divertor detachment[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad8ffb
Citation: Jing OU, Jiamin LONG. Estimates of required impurity fraction for EAST divertor detachment[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 015103. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad8ffb

Estimates of required impurity fraction for EAST divertor detachment

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Jing OU: ouj@ipp.ac.cn

  • Corresponding author:

    Jing OU, ouj@ipp.ac.cn

  • Received Date: June 02, 2024
  • Revised Date: October 31, 2024
  • Accepted Date: November 06, 2024
  • Available Online: November 07, 2024
  • Published Date: December 30, 2024
  • During the EAST radiative divertor experiments, one of the key challenges was how to avoid the occurrence of disruptive events caused by excessive impurity seeding. To estimate the required impurity fraction for divertor detachment, we introduce a reduced edge plasma radiation model. In the model, based on the momentum conservation along the magnetic field line, the upstream pressure is determined by the plasma density and temperature at the divertor target, and then the impurity radiation loss is obtained by the balance of the heat and particle fluxes. It is found that the required impurity fraction shows a non-monotonic variation with divertor electron temperature (Td) when 0.1eV<Td<10eV. In the range of 0.1eV<Td<1eV, the position near the valley of required impurity fraction corresponds to strong plasma recombination. Due to the dependence of the volumetric momentum loss effect on the Td in the range of 1eV<Td<10eV, the required impurity fraction peaks and then decreases as Td is increased. Compared to neon, the usage of argon reduces the impurity fraction by about twice. In addition, for the various fitting parameters in the pressure–momentum loss model, it is shown that the tendency of required impurity fraction with Td always increases first and then decreases in the range of 1eV<Td<10eV, but the required impurity fraction decreases when the model that characterizes the strong loss in pressure momentum is used.

  • The macroscale magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) instabilities have been continually concerned to ensure steady-state operation in tokamak plasmas [110]. The neoclassical tearing mode (NTM), one kind of MHD instabilities driven by the loss of bootstrap current inside the seeded magnetic islands, can greatly degrade the confinement and even lead to major disruptions [1120]. In the [13], it is indicated that (2, 1) NTM is potentially the most serious one as it always results in severe energy confinement degradation and can lead to disruptions. It is therefore significant to determine the scaling behavior for the (2, 1) mode of NTMs in tokamak [4, 12, 13]. On the other hand, the NTM has been observed in many experiment devices such as TFTR [14], ASDEX Upgrade [21] and DIII-D [22]. These experiments have demonstrated that the NTM can affect the heat transport and equilibrium of plasma, reducing the confinement time of plasma energy in the nuclear fusion, which is extremely detrimental during the discharge [13, 14, 2123]. In short, the NTM is greatly prone to being produced and results in deleterious consequences.

    During tokamak discharge, plasma radiation is one of the most crucial mechanisms of plasma energy loss, and plays significant roles in the development of MHD instabilities [24, 25]. In general, there are three principal types of radiation, namely the bremsstrahlung radiation, the electron cyclotron radiation and the impurity radiation [2628]. In the experiments, furthermore, the radial and poloidal evolutions of the impurity radiation are observed in JET. Then the mechanism on how the impurity radiation influences the MHD instabilities has been attempted [26]. It is worth emphasizing that the heat flux generated by the auxiliary heating from the core plasmas is shielded by the magnetic islands, such that the heat flux of the auxiliary heating only flows outside the magnetic islands along the X-point [27]. Consequently, the energy in the magnetic islands primarily depends on the Ohmic heating and the radiation cooling. In particular, some disruptions are the result of the plasma radiation, and hence the explorations on disruptions have been carried out [28, 29]. Suttrop et al observed the current contraction phase beginning with the growth of (3, 1) islands due to the cooling effect of the carbon impurity radiation at the high-q density limit in ASDEX Upgrade [30]. Teng et al studied the thermal perturbations inside and outside magnetic islands and found that the large magnetic islands at the density limit can be induced by the impurity radiation [31, 32]. However, it should be mentioned that the electron cyclotron radiation is not taken into account in the work of Teng et al [32]. Perkins and Hulse analytically investigated the effect of the ratio of the radiated power to the Ohmic heating [33]. The density limit disruptions caused by the impurity radiation are practically coincident with the current decay at the safety factor q=2 in JET [26]. A radiation-driven m=2 magnetic island near the density limit is observed in EAST, and an m=1 sideband mode is also driven in the meanwhile, which brings about an internal crash appearing as a large change of the temperature [34]. The m=2 magnetic island grows so that the whole cross section is gradually filled and eventually the disruption event occurs [35]. A numerical simulation of the radiation driven tearing modes is conducted by using the 3D toroidal geometry MHD code CLT [24]. It is found that the width of the magnetic islands increased over 20% of the minor radius (disruption scale). Generally, the plasma radiation, as one of the most important energy loss mechanisms, can destabilize the MHD instabilities and critically destroy the long pulse discharge of tokamak. Despite that the radiation effects have been extensively investigated, it remains a crucial concern in tokamak to understand the roles of radiation effects on the NTMs.

    In this work, we study the radiation effects during the nonlinear evolution of NTMs with different bootstrap current proportions by using a reduced MHD model. It is clearly demonstrated that with increasing the plasma radiation, the pressure is reduced and then perturbation of pressure near the rational surface is increased. At the same time, the radiation can increase the width of magnetic islands and furthermore greatly destroy the quasi-steady-state of tokamak operation. In section 2, the modeling equations are introduced. The results of numerical simulations are presented and the relevant physical mechanisms are discussed in section 3.1. Furthermore, section 3.2 shows the effects of the ratio of transport coefficients χ|| under the plasma radiation. Finally, a summary of these relevant conclusions in this paper and the prospect of the next work are presented.

    The nonlinear evolution of the NTMs with the existence of radiation, is investigated by reduced MHD equations in the cylindrical geometry r,θ,z. The normalized three-field equations, including the equation of the vorticity field, the equation of the magnetic flux and the equation of the pressure, are as follows:

    ut=u,ϕ+j,ψ+zj+R-12u, (1)
    ψt=ψ,ϕ-zϕ-SA-1j-jb+Ez0, (2)
    pt=p,ϕ+χ||||2p+χ2p+S0-Γ-1Prad, (3)

    where ϕ,ψ and p are stream function, magnetic flux and pressure, respectively. Here, j=-2ψ and u=2ϕ are the plasma current density and vorticity along the axial direction, respectively. The bootstrap current is expressed in the form of jb=-Aε/Bθp/r, where ε=a/R0 is the inverse aspect-ratio, and Bθ is the poloidal magnetic field. A is a constant that can be calculated by a given bootstrap current fraction fb=0ajbrdr/0ajrdr.Γ is the ratio of specific heat of plasmas. The kinematic Reynolds number is R=τv/τA, where τv=a2/v is the viscosity diffusion time and τA=μ0ρa/B0 is the Alfvén time. Particularly, the resistivity is SA-1r=η0P0r+p~0/0r-1.5.χ|| and χ are the parallel and perpendicular transport coefficients, respectively, and normalized by a2/τA.|| and denote the derivative parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field line, respectively. In order to balance the diffusions of the initial profiles of Ohm current and pressure, the source terms Ez0=η0P0jz0-jb0 and S0=-χ2P0 are given in equations (2) and (3), respectively, where jz0 is the total current density and jb0 is the initial bootstrap in the z direction. The Poisson brackets in equations (1)–(3) are defined as follows:

    f,g=f×g·ez=1rfrgθ-grfθ. (4)

    Each variable in equations (1)‒(3) can be written similar to fr,θ,z,t as the form f=feq+f~r,θ,z,t with feq and f~r,θ,z,t being the time-independent initial equilibrium term and the time-independent perturbation term, respectively. By applying the periodic boundary conditions in the poloidal and axial directions, the perturbation of fields can be Fourier-transformed as

    f~r,θ,z,t=12Σm,nf~m,nr,texpimθ-inzR0, (5)

    with R0 being the major radius of the tokamak.

    In the last term in equation (3) Prad is the radiation power density, including the bremsstrahlung radiation Pb and the electron cyclotron radiation Pc. By using the Born approximation, the bremsstrahlung radiation and the electron cyclotron radiation are expressed as follows [36]

    Pb=dWbdt=1.6×10-27zeff2nineT1/2ergs-1cm-3, (6)
    Pc=dWcdt=5.4×10-25neB2Tergs-1cm-3, (7)

    where Wb,Wc,ni,ne,B,T are the power loss of the bremsstrahlung radiation and the electron cyclotron radiation, ion densities (including background ions and impurities), electron densities, the normalized magnetic field and the temperature, respectively. In the case of more than one ion species, ionic charge is written as zeff=Σjenjzj2/ne. Therefore, the larger the charge number of impurities is, the greater proportion of the bremsstrahlung is. Here, the conversion relationship between the temperature T and the pressure p is p=nkT, where k is the Boltzmann constant.

    It can be measured that certain kinds of impurities are produced in tokamak edge during the discharge. Impurity radiation is one of the main energy sources of the radiation cooling and mainly originated from the magnetic islands [26]. Obviously, the impurity accumulation at O-point of the magnetic islands is the maximal, while it is the minimal at the boundary. Thus, it is assumed that the impurity is Gaussian distribution in the magnetic islands [24]:

    nim=nim0exp-ψ-ψmin2ψmin/22, (8)

    where nim,nim0 and ψmin are the impurity density, the impurity density at the O-point in magnetic islands and magnetic flux at O-point of magnetic islands, respectively. In this work, the radiation of O-point of the magnetic islands is calculated through equations (6)–(8), and then it is assumed that the radiation in the magnetic islands is Gaussian distribution:

    Prad=Prad0exp-4r-r0rd2+χ-χ0χ2, (9)

    where Prad0 is the radiation at the O-point in magnetic islands. r0,χ0 is the center of the Gaussian distribution. rd is the half deposition width in the radial direction and χ is the half deposition width in the helical angle direction during this model. In fact, we make two assumptions in the model: one is that the densities of impurities present the Gaussian distribution in the magnetic island, and another is that the radiation distribution in the magnetic island also presents Gaussian distribution. Since the impurity radiation is dominant in all radiation, the distribution of radiation in the whole space is basically Gaussian distribution according to the first assumption, which is the reason for making the second hypothesis. If the radiation distribution is truncated around the magnetic island, numerical instability will appear in the calculation. Therefore, we can only take out the real radiation value of O-point in the magnetic island, and then reverse the approximate Gaussian distribution in the magnetic island through equation (9).

    Equations (1)‒(3) can be solved by an initial value code: MDC (MHD @ Dalian Code) [11, 1519]. The two-step predictor-corrector method is applied in the time advancement. To solve these equations (1)‒(3), two different methods are used in different directions. In the radial direction, the finite difference method is employed, while the pseudo-spectral method is used for the poloidal and the toroidal directions. The initial pressure and safety factor q profiles are chosen as

    P0r=1-rp1p2,
    q(r)=q01+r2pqaq0p-11/p,

    and the plasma rotation is considered by setting

    v0(r)=ddrϕ0(r)=Ω0(1-r),

    where Ω0 is the plasma rotation frequency on the magnetic axis. In this work, we study the magnetic islands with q=2 and mainly focus on the influence of radiation effects on the (2, 1) mode. Both the initial pressure and safety factor q profiles are shown in figure 1, where the dotted line shows the position of the rational surface. The typical parameters are set as ε=a/R0=0.25,p1=2,p2=4,p=1,q0=1.44583,qa=5.24583,R-1=10-6,η0=10-6,χ=10-6,χ||=10,Γ=5/3,Ω0=10-3,rd=0.8w,χ=π/3.

    Figure  1.  (a) Initial equilibrium pressure profile, (b) safety factor q profile.

    Up to now, it has been planned to choose tungsten as the upper and lower divertor materials of EAST [37, 38]. In the future tokamak, moreover, tungsten will be selected as the first wall material in ITER [39], and then tungsten impurities must inevitably be produced during the sputtering process. Therefore, tungsten is necessarily studied as the source of the impurity radiation in this work.

    In this section, the effects of the plasma radiation on the NTMs are discussed. Particularly, tungsten is chosen as the main source of the impurity radiation and we take nim0=10-4ne to calculate the effects of the impurity radiation. As shown in figure 2, the radiation only appears inside the magnetic islands, which is consistent with that mentioned in [27]. It is prerequisite that the spatial scale of the radiation region expands correspondingly with the growth of the magnetic islands. Furthermore, the radiation region rotates along with the plasma rotation. Accordingly, MDC can ensure that the radiation is consistent with the change of magnetic islands, as shown in figures 2(b) and (d).

    Figure  2.  Typical contours of (a) magnetic flux at t=50τA, (b) radiation at t=50τA, (c) magnetic flux at t=170τA, (d) radiation at t=170τA with fb=0.3.

    The typical contour plots of the plasma pressure with and without radiation are shown in figure 3. It can be observed that, in the presence of radiation, the pressure reduces drastically inside the magnetic islands and presents a concave structure, which can be observed obviously at 325τA. Besides, the pressure in the core region significantly decays at 325τA with the plasma radiation. Obviously, the pressure on the resonant surface with radiation is smaller than that without radiation because the radiation cooling can lead to the energy loss near the rational surface. Moreover, it can also be seen qualitatively from the equation (3) that the presence of the radiation can reduce the pressure, and the transformation of the pressure depends on the spatial scale of the radiation cooling. Consequently, the plasma radiation has a significant effect on the evolution of the pressure, decreasing the pressure nearby the rational surface domain substantially.

    Figure  3.  Typical contours of pressure with fb=0.3 at t=325τA: (a) without radiation, (b) with radiation.

    The eigenmode structures of m/n=2/1 for the perturbation of pressure with fb=0.3 at t=245τA are shown in figure 4, where m and n are the poloidal mode number and toroidal mode number, respectively. It is found that in the presence of the radiation, the amplitude of the perturbation of pressure with m/n=2/1 on the rational surface is larger than that without radiation. Moreover, as shown in figure 5, the magnitude of the bootstrap current perturbation inside the magnetic islands is enhanced due to the radiation, which indicates that the total perturbation of current increases. In other words, the plasma radiation can increase the perturbation of pressure inside the magnetic islands, and thus increase the perturbation of bootstrap current, resulting in the enhancement of instabilities.

    Figure  4.  The eigenmode structures of m/n=2/1 for the perturbation of pressure with fb=0.3 at t=245τA with/without radiation.
    Figure  5.  Typical contours of m/n=2/1 for the perturbation of bootstrap current with fb=0.3 at t=325τA: (a) without radiation, (b) with radiation.

    The temporal evolution of the magnetic island width of different fb values with and without radiation is shown in figure 6. For the case without radiation, the raise of the bootstrap current perturbation leads to the increase of the magnetic island growth rate, and the width of saturated magnetic islands also increases. Furthermore, the larger the bootstrap current fraction is, the earlier the magnetic island width reaches saturation. However, with the plasma radiation, the magnetic islands keep growing in the nonlinear phase and do not saturate which indicates that the NTM instability can be further promoted by the plasma radiation. As shown in figure 5, the perturbation of bootstrap current inside the magnetic islands increases, which promotes a gradual increase of the magnetic island width under the action of plasma radiation. Therefore, it is found that the radiation can keep destabilizing the NTMs through increasing the magnetic island width in tokamak plasmas.

    Figure  6.  Temporal evolution of magnetic island width under fb=0.1,0.2 and 0.3 with/without radiation.

    The above numerical simulation results show that the plasma radiation can destabilize the NTMs. In addition, such a result can be further explained by the theoretical analysis. White et al modified the Rutherford equation comprehensively in [40]:

    dwdt=rs2'w+δj'w+A'w, (10)

    where w and rs are the width of the magnetic islands and the position of rational surface in the radial direction, respectively. 'w,δj'w and A'w are the classical effects, the current perturbation effects caused by neo-classical or other current perturbation effects, the island asymmetry effect, respectively. Here

    δj'w=16δj1ψ0''ww2+wF2, (11)

    where wF is the Fitzpatrick's critical island width. The bracket indicates integrating over the island interior, and δj1 is the perturbation of current. As a result, the raise of the perturbation of bootstrap current, leading to the enhancement of the closed integral of current perturbation over the magnetic islands, can increase the growth rate of the magnetic islands and then broaden the width of the magnetic islands.

    This section presents the influence of the heat transport coefficients on the NTMs with the plasma radiation. There is no doubt that the energy confinement time in tokamak is inversely proportional to the heat transport coefficients, so it is significantly important in the field of magnetic confinement to further understand the physical mechanism of the heat transport coefficients in the presence of the plasma radiation. It can be found that the growth rate of the magnetic islands decreases with the decline of the ratio χ||/χ in figure 7 whether there is radiation or not. For the case without radiation, the raise of the ratio χ||/χ can lead to the growth of the magnetic islands and eventually the width of magnetic islands tends to saturate. However, the magnetic islands do not saturate due to the existence of the radiation, but keep in a growing state. As shown in figure 8, the magnitude of eigenmode structures for the perturbation of pressure increases with the increase of the ratio χ||/χ by taking χ||/χ=2×106,5×106 and 1×107 at fb=0.3 in the presence of the plasma radiation. Furthermore, the influence of the parallel thermal transport term χ||||2p on the NTMs is destabilizing, whereas that of perpendicular term χ2p is opposite, as indicated in equation (3). As seen from figures 7 and 8, when the ratio of parallel to perpendicular transport coefficient, χ||/χ, is large, the pressure inside the magnetic islands is lower than that outside the magnetic islands, which causes the increase of pressure perturbation and then the incessant growth of the magnetic islands. Accordingly, simulations show that the presence of the radiation can still enhance the destabilizing effects of the increase of χ||/χ on NTMs.

    Figure  7.  Temporal evolution of magnetic island width with χ||/χ=2×106,5×106 and 1×107 at fb=0.3 with/without radiation.
    Figure  8.  The eigenmode structures of m/n=2/1 for the perturbation of pressure χ||/χ=2×106,5×106 and 1×107 at fb=0.3,t=250τA with radiation.

    The numerical results reported in this work reveal the effects of the radiation on the NTMs, based on a set of reduced MHD equations. The main results can be summarized as follows. First of all, the plasma radiation can reduce the pressure near the rational surface, resulting in the increase of the perturbation of pressure inside the magnetic islands, such that the plasma pressure forms a concave structure. Particularly, the effects of radiation can lead to the increase of the perturbation of bootstrap current inside the magnetic islands, so that the magnetic islands do not saturate and keep growing. In addition, the perturbation of pressure can also be enhanced and then the magnetic islands are destabilized by increasing the ratio of χ||/χ in the presence of the plasma radiation. Consequently, the effects of plasma radiation can greatly destabilize the NTMs. In experiments, the electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) can compensate the loss of the bootstrap current thus it is usually used to suppress the NTM islands. When the effects of plasma radiation on NTMs are taken into account, the effectiveness of ECCD may be weakened. These effects will be investigated in our future work.

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12375227) and Innovation in Fusion Engineering Technology of Institute (No. E35QT1080C).

  • [1]
    Loarte A et al 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S203 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S04
    [2]
    Pitts R A et al 2019 Nucl. Mater. Energy 20 100696 doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2019.100696
    [3]
    Ye M Y et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 096049 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab2bd0
    [4]
    Zhang M Z et al 2024 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 64 e202300135 doi: 10.1002/ctpp.202300135
    [5]
    Kallenbach A et al 2010 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52 055002 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/52/5/055002
    [6]
    Maddison G P et al 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 49 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/1/306
    [7]
    Eldon D et al 2021 Nucl. Mater. Energy 27 100963. doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2021.100963
    [8]
    Ravensbergen T et al 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1105 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21268-3
    [9]
    Koenders J T W et al 2023 Nucl. Fusion 63 026006 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aca620
    [10]
    Bernert M et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 024001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abc936
    [11]
    Wang L et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 076002 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac4774
    [12]
    Wu K et al 2023 Nucl. Mater. Energy 34 101398 doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2023.101398
    [13]
    Chen M W et al 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 076009 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab8c65
    [14]
    Wu K et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 056019 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aab506
    [15]
    Tao Y Q et al 2023 Nucl. Fusion 63 076008 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/acd014
    [16]
    Lengyel L L 1981 Analysis of radiating plasma boundary layers IPP Report 1/191 Garching: Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
    [17]
    Kallenbach A et al 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 045013 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/4/045013
    [18]
    Goldston R J, Reinke M L and Schwartz J A 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 055015 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa5e6e
    [19]
    Reinke M L 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 034004 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa5145
    [20]
    Huber A and Chankin A V 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 036049 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abdded
    [21]
    Stangeby P C 2018 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 044022 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aaacf6
    [22]
    Zhang X et al 2023 Nucl. Mater. Energy 34 101354 doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2022.101354
    [23]
    Krasheninnikov S I, Kukushkin A S and Pshenov A A 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 125011 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac9a6f
    [24]
    Krasheninnikov S I and Kukushkin A S 2017 J. Plasma Phys. 83 155830501 doi: 10.1017/S0022377817000654
    [25]
    Hiwatari R et al 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 337–339 386 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.043
    [26]
    Ou J, Gan C Y and Ye L 2014 Plasma Sci. Technol. 16 907 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/10/02
    [27]
    Chen J L, Jia G Z and Xiang N 2021 J. Fusion Energy 40 1 doi: 10.1007/s10894-021-00292-7
    [28]
    Wang M et al 2022 Plasma Sci. Technol. 24 015101 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac320f
    [29]
    Wang F Q et al 2023 Plasma Sci. Technol. 25 115102 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ace026
    [30]
    Dragojlovic Z et al 2010 Fusion Eng. Des. 85 243 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.02.015
    [31]
    Eich T et al 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 215001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215001
    [32]
    Stangeby P 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62 025013 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ab51d6
    [33]
    Goswami R et al 2021 Phys. Plasmas 8 857 doi: 10.1063/1.1342028
    [34]
    Mavrin A A 2017 J. Fusion Energy 36 161 doi: 10.1007/s10894-017-0136-z
    [35]
    Zhou Y L et al 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 065006 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac6827
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yiming ZU, Zhiwei MA, Yuchen XU. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation study of impurity radiation-excited and driven tearing mode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 035102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ad9e91
    [2]Lili DONG, Li LI, Wenjun LIU, Tong LIU, Yunfeng LIANG, Jiaqi DONG, Huasheng XIE, Yuejiang SHI, the EHL-2 Team. Instabilities of ideal magnetohydrodynamics mode and neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive for EHL-2 spherical torus[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 024006. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ada421
    [3]Yun YUAN (袁赟), Xingqiang LU (路兴强), Jiaqi DONG (董家齐), Zhixiong HE (何志雄), Ruibo ZHANG (张睿博), Shijia CHEN (陈诗佳), Xueyu GONG (龚学余), Yun YUAN (袁赟), Xingqiang LU (路兴强), Jiaqi DONG (董家齐), Zhixiong HE (何志雄), Ruibo ZHANG (张睿博), Shijia CHEN (陈诗佳), Xueyu GONG (龚学余). Influence of stationary driven helical current on the m=2/n=1 resistive tearing mode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 55101-055101. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aafdc7
    [4]Ding LI (李定), Wen YANG (杨文), Huishan CAI (蔡辉山). On theoretical research for nonlinear tearing mode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(9): 94002-094002. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aabde4
    [5]Liping DONG (董丽平), Yanmin DUAN (段艳敏), Kaiyun CHEN (陈开云), Xiuda YANG (杨秀达), Ling ZHANG (张凌), Feng XU (徐峰), Jingbo CHEN (陈竞博), Songtao MAO (毛松涛), Zhenwei WU (吴振伟), Liqun HU (胡立群). Influence of impurity seeding on the plasma radiation in the EAST tokamak[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 65102-065102. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aab20c
    [6]Xiangyang LIU (刘向阳), Siyu WANG (王司宇), Yang ZHOU (周阳), Zhiwen WU (武志文), Kan XIE (谢侃), Ningfei WANG (王宁飞). Thermal radiation properties of PTFE plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 64012-064012. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa65e8
    [7]Le Chi KIEN. Analyses on the Ionization Instability of Non-Equilibrium Seeded Plasma in an MHD Generator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 674-679. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/6/15
    [8]LI Mei (李美), ZHANG Junpeng (张俊鹏), HU Yang (胡杨), ZHANG Hantian (张含天), WU Yifei (吴益飞). Simulation of Fault Arc Based on Different Radiation Models in a Closed Tank[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 549-553. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/18
    [9]SONG Tianming (宋天明), YANG Jiamin (杨家敏), ZHU Tuo (朱托), LI Zhichao (李志超), HUANG Chengwu (黄成武). Continued Study on Hohlraum Radiation Source with Approximately Constant Radiation Temperature[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 342-345. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/02
    [10]LI Li(李莉), LIU Yue (刘悦), XU Xinyang(许欣洋), XIA Xinnian(夏新念). The Effect of Equilibrium Current Profiles on MHD Instabilities in Tokamaks[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 14-19. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/04

Catalog

    Figures(9)

    Article views (21) PDF downloads (8) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return