Advanced Search+
Linlin HU, Dimin SUN, Qili HUANG, Tingting ZHUO, Guowu MA, Yi JIANG, Shenggang GONG, Zaojin ZENG, Zixing GUO, Chaohai DU, Fanhong LI, Hongbin CHEN, Fanbao MENG, Hongge MA. Design and preliminary test of a 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2b8f
Citation: Linlin HU, Dimin SUN, Qili HUANG, Tingting ZHUO, Guowu MA, Yi JIANG, Shenggang GONG, Zaojin ZENG, Zixing GUO, Chaohai DU, Fanhong LI, Hongbin CHEN, Fanbao MENG, Hongge MA. Design and preliminary test of a 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 035601. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac2b8f

Design and preliminary test of a 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Guowu MA: E-mail: hunter_ma@126.com

  • Received Date: May 29, 2021
  • Revised Date: September 26, 2021
  • Accepted Date: September 28, 2021
  • Available Online: January 29, 2024
  • Published Date: March 03, 2022
  • A dual-frequency (105/140 GHz) MW-level continuous-wave gyrotron was developed for fusion application at Institute of Applied Electronics, China Academy of Engineering Physics. This gyrotron employs a cylindrical cavity working in the TE18, 7 mode at 105 GHz and the TE24, 9 mode at 140 GHz. A triode magnetron injection gun and a built-in quasi-optical mode converter were designed to operate at these two frequencies. For the proof-test phase, the gyrotron was equipped with a single-disk boron nitride window to achieve radio frequency output with a power of ~500 kW for a short-pulse duration. In the preliminary short-pulse proof-test in the first quarter of 2021, the dual-frequency gyrotron achieved output powers of 300 kW at 105 GHz and 540 kW at 140 GHz, respectively, under 5 Hz 1 ms continuous pulse-burst operations. Power upgrade and pulse-width extension were hampered by the limitation of the high-voltage power supply and output window. This gyrotron design was preliminarily validated.

  • Gyrotrons with MW-level power are indispensable sources for electron cyclotron heating and current drive (ECH&CD) in fusion devices (e.g. ITER, EAST, JT-60SA, DIII-D, W7-X, LHD and ASDEX-U) [13]. Dual/multi-frequency or stepwise-frequency MW gyrotrons can enhance flexibility and performance for ECH&CD systems by providing a larger accessible radial range, a possible replacement of steerable antennas, and higher CD efficiency for stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes [2, 4]. Several MW-level gyrotrons of this type have been applied in fusion devices for two decades [58], e.g. the 105/140 GHz dual-frequency gyrotron of GYCOM, the 104/137/170/203 GHz four-frequency gyrotron of QST, and the stepwise-frequency (111.6–165.7 GHz) gyrotron of KIT. Institute of Applied Electronics, China Academy of Engineering Physics (IAE, CAEP) has recently developed some gyrotrons for fusion devices including a 28 GHz/50 kW/30 s gyrotron and a 28 GHz/400 kW/5 s gyrotron [9, 10]. A 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level continuous-wave (CW) gyrotron is being developed to meet the demand for domestic fusion devices for 105 or 140 GHz gyrotrons. At the end of 2020, a prototype gyrotron was fabricated. In the first quarter of 2021, a preliminary proof-test was conducted under short-pulse conditions. Gaussian beams with powers of 300 kW at 105 GHz and 540 kW at 140 GHz were achieved.

    In this paper, the design of the main components of the gyrotron is introduced in section 2. Test results are presented in section 3, and conclusions are provided in section 4.

    The main design parameters of the 105/140 GHz MW gyrotron are listed in table 1 and its diagram is shown in figure 1. The design goal for the tube is to produce an output power of 1 MW CW at two frequencies of 105 and 140 GHz. Thus, the key elements, i.e. resonant cavity, magnetron injection gun (MIG), quasi-optical (QO) mode converter and output window, must be able to work at both frequency points. Their design details are described below.

    Table  1.  Design parameters of the 105/140 GHz MW gyrotron.
    Frequency 105 GHz/140 GHz
    Power 1 MW
    Pulse width CW
    Total beam voltage -75 kV
    Beam current 40 A
    MIG Triode type
    Cavity mode TE18, 7/TE24, 9
    Working magnetic field 4.1 T/5.5 T
    Output mode Gaussian beam
    Window BN disk for ~500 kW short pulse operation
    CVD diamond disk for CW operation
    Collector single-stage depressed collector
    Total efficiency [11] 30% (45% with SDC)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  1.  Design diagram of the gyrotron and superconducting magnet.

    The following descriptions are major considerations for the candidate modes of MW-level gyrotrons [11]: (1) maximum wall loss power density below 2.0 kW cm-2; (2) quality factor Q of the cavity at ~1100; (3) for the dual-frequency gyrotron, the two working modes should have similarity in caustic radius and beam-wave coupling radius.

    After comprehensive comparison, the matched mode pair TE18, 7 and TE24, 9 was selected to work at 105 and 140 GHz, respectively. The calculated parameters of the cavity are listed in table 2. The cavity consists of three classical sections, namely, a cut-off taper, a straight interaction midsection (interaction cavity), and an output taper. Structural optimization and beam-wave interaction analysis were iteratively performed using an in-house calculation code based on the nonlinear method [12]. Figure 2 shows the dependences of the starting currents of the neighboring modes on the magnetic field for the two working modes under beam voltage, beam radius, and velocity ratio of -75 kV, 8.678 mm and 1.2, respectively. Dense modes with similar starting current and magnetic field B were found near the working modes and classified as potential competition.

    Table  2.  Design parameters of the cavity.
    Mode TE18, 7 TE24, 9
    Frequency 105 GHz 139.33 GHz
    Eigenvalues 44.178 13 58.624 15
    Cavity radius 20.089 mm 20.089 mm
    Beam radius 8.687 mm 8.678 mm
    Caustic radius 8.185 mm 8.224 mm
    Surface roughness 0.8 μm 0.8 μm
    Wall loss power density 0.68 kW cm-2 1.74 kW cm-2
    Quality factor 1198 2066
    Magnetic field strength 4.14 T 5.46 T
    Output power 1.03 MW 1.17 MW
    Electron efficiency 34.3% 37.3%
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  Calculated starting currents of TE18, 7 mode TE24, 9 and their neighboring modes.

    The most possible competitions for the working modes are those with similar eigenvalues and coupling factors. On the basis of starting current analysis, these modes were selected to evaluate their influence on the working mode by using multi-mode time-domain calculation [12]. Figure 3 illustrates the simulated evolutions of radio frequency (RF) power and beam voltage over time under the magnetic field of B=4.14 T and B=5.46 T as follows. (1) At the initial rising of the beam voltage, several competing modes are excited, and the powers of these modes alternately fluctuate due to inherent mode competition. At this moment, the power of the working mode is growing slowly. (2) When the beam voltage continues to increase and reaches a stable condition (-75 kV), the power of the working mode increases rapidly, eventually becomes dominant, and reaches a steady output. The competing modes are suppressed, and their powers drop rapidly and eventually can be ignored. Hereto, the working mode wins the mode competition.

    Figure  3.  Evolution of the produced power of the working mode and its competing modes calculated by the multi-mode time-domain method.

    For successful application at the two frequencies, the MIG was designed to be a triode-type MIG consisting of a cathode, a modulation anode, and an anode. The modulation anode was employed to adjust a matched electrode voltages difference to keep the velocity ratio within 1.1–1.3 and velocity spread below 5%. Owing to the interaction cavity calculation, the design parameters of triode MIG were set as ~40 A emission current, ~-75 kV beam voltage, and 8.687 mm beam radius. The electrode structure, beam trajectory and magnetic field profile were iteratively optimized via PIC simulation code. Finally, the central radius and width of the emitter ring were set as 47.7 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The emission current was 42.4 A, which corresponded to a current density of 2.36 A cm-2. Owing to the voltage depression of 7.3 kV, the total beam voltage was -81 kV, and the kinetic energy of the beam at the cavity inlet was 73.7 keV.

    Figure 4 shows the MIG structure and beam trajectories, and figure 5 displays the changes in the velocity ratio and axial velocity spread of the cyclotron beam as a function of the potential difference of the cathode and modulation anode (Vck). For the low working frequency of 105 GHz (B=4.1 T) or high working frequency of 140 GHz (B=5.5 T), an optimal range of Vck was obtained to satisfy velocity ratio ~1.2 and axial velocity spread ~3%.

    Figure  4.  Triode MIG structure and beam trajectory.
    Figure  5.  Calculated dependence of velocity ratio and axial velocity spread on the potential difference between the cathode and modulated anode.

    A built-in QO mode converter was used to separate the spent electron beam from the RF beam and achieve the horizontal output of the latter. This mode converter was designed to operate at the two frequencies by ensuring similar parameters including helical cut length, Brillouin length, Brillouin width and Brillouin angle of the two modes (table 3). The waist radius of the Gaussian beam was 25 mm.

    Table  3.  Transmission parameters of the QO converter transmission.
    Mode TE18, 7 TE24, 9
    Waveguide radius 22.5 mm 22.5 mm
    Helical cut length 47 mm 47 mm
    Brillouin length 56.8 mm 58.1 mm
    Brillouin width 132° 131.6°
    Brillouin angle 63.1° 62.6°
    Caustic radius 9.20 mm 9.21 mm
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The QO mode converter consisted of a launcher and three reflection mirrors, as shown in figure 6. The launcher was connected to the end of the output taper of the cavity with an identical radius. The taper between cavity and launcher was a nonlinear taper. The first mirror was a quasi-parabolic reflector, and the second and third reflectors were used for phase correction. The launcher adopted the pre-bunching launcher scheme to improve the conversion efficiency of the RF beam [13]. The surface irregular perturbation structure on the launcher wall was calculated and optimized by solving the scalar diffraction integral equation combined with the Katsenelenbaum–Semenov iterative optimization algorithm [14, 15]. The complete mode converter was modeled and simulated by CST microwave studio. The electric field contours at the cross-section of the QO converter at 105/140 GHz are shown in figure 7. The calculated overall conversion efficiency and the scalar Gaussian mode content were 97.3% and 98% at 105 GHz, respectively, and 99.1% and 99.7% at 140 GHz, respectively. The distributions of the power density on the window surface are shown in figure 8.

    Figure  6.  Structure of the quasi-optical converter.
    Figure  7.  Calculated contour of the relative electric field (dB) at the cross-section of the quasi-optical converter.
    Figure  8.  Calculated contour of the electric field distribution at the window surface.

    For long-pulse/CW MW-level gyrotrons, the window must adopt CVD-diamond material [11, 16]. However, at the initial proof-test phase, a single-disk boron nitride (BN) window was planned and designed for 500 kW short-pulse operations. Compared with other materials except for CVD diamond, hexagonal pyrolytic BN material presents the advantages of higher thermal conductivity, lower thermal expansion coefficient, excellent high-temperature stability, good thermal shock resistance and good flexural strength [17]. Tests of MW-level gyrotrons with BN windows revealed that single-disk BN windows can withstand a power capability of 930 kW for 2 s at 110 GHz and 960 kW for 1.2 s at 140 GHz under the quasi-uniform distribution of RF power [18]. During the test of the 110 GHz BN-window gyrotron for DIII-D tokamak, the temperature increase of the BN disk was up to 930 ℃ as observed by the infrared monitoring at the end of an 800 kW/2 s operation [19].

    The parameters of the BN window were 90 mm diameter and 1.93 mm thickness. The thickness of the BN disk was just three half-wavelengths at 105 GHz and four half-wavelengths at 140 GHz to ensure that the window can work at the two frequencies. The calculated reflection coefficient and transmission coefficient as a function of frequency are shown in figure 9. The curves were derived using the dependence of loss tangent on frequency in [17], where tanδ=78×10-5 at 105 GHz and tanδ=105×10-5 at 140 GHz. For an output RF power of 500 kW, the predicted absorbed power of the window disk was 4.88 kW at 105 GHz and 8.7 kW at 140 GHz. The output RF beam was designed to be a fundamental Gaussian beam with a waist radius of 25 mm. Under the assumption that the thermal breakdown temperature of BN is 1000 ℃ from previous rest results [18], the thermo-mechanical analysis code Workbench predicted that the BN-window gyrotron can operate for up to ~1.3 s at 105 GHz and ~0.7 s at 140 GHz.

    Figure  9.  Calculated reflection and transmission factors of the window versus frequency.

    For the next phase, the BN window will be substituted by a CVD-diamond window for 1 MW, long-pulse or CW operation.

    The beam tunnel of the gyrotron has an arbitrary non-axisymmetric conical metallic structure to suppress the parasitic oscillations [2]. A single-stage depressed collector (SDC) was employed to improve the total efficiency. A longitudinal-field sweeping coil was installed outside of the collector jacket. A programmable current supply was planned to provide a periodic programmable current to the coil to ensure the time-averaged heat dissipation from the spent electron beam at the collector below 0.5 kW cm-2 [11]. A cryogen-free superconducting magnet (SCM) with a 7.0 T magnetic field and a 220 mm diameter room temperature bore hole was accordingly developed The ceramic insulator was placed above the SCM.

    The prototype gyrotron of the first version (figure 10) was fabricated at the end of 2020. The length and weight of the tube were 2.53 m and 300 kg, respectively. Proof-test was performed in the first quarter of 2021, and the test stand is shown in figure 11. The power supply system included a negative high voltage supply for the cathode, a positive supply for the anode and a filament supply. Owing to the lack of an extra source applied for the modulation anode, the modulation anode was grounded when conditioning at 105 GHz and was applied with voltage through a resistor divider connected with the anode supply when conditioning at 140 GHz.

    Figure  10.  Photo of the 105/140 GHz MW prototype gyrotron.
    Figure  11.  Test scene of the dual-frequency MW gyrotron.

    Operating points at the two frequencies were first determined through single short-pulse conditioning. Images of the outgoing RF beam at the window aperture at 105 and 140 GHz were obtained on thermal paper during a 20 ms pulse-length operation. The thermal patterns in figure 12 qualitatively illustrate the Gaussian-like distribution, thus confirming the oscillations of the designed working mode at the two frequencies. The oscillation frequencies tested by the mixer method were 105.06 and 139.36 GHz. A typical oscilloscope trace of the electrode voltages and microwave signals of 1 ms single pulse operation is shown in figure 13(a).

    Figure  12.  Thermal patterns of RF beams at the window aperture at 105 GHz (left) and at 140 GHz (right) obtained by 30 ms short pulses.
    Figure  13.  Oscillograph traces of the electrode voltages, microwave signals or beam current derived from (a) a single pulse operation and (b) a continuous 1 ms 5 Hz pulse burst operation.

    With aging, the tube can steadily work at pulse-burst mode with a low duty cycle. The RF power of the gyrotron was measured by a dummy water-load under a continuous pulse burst operation mode. After the operation at 5 Hz repetitive rate, 1 ms pulse-width, and 2000 pulse number (i.e. duty cycle of 5%, 400 s), the power of the RF beam was 300 kW at 105 GHz and 540 kW at 140 GHz. The corresponding operation parameters are listed in table 4. The repetitive-rate traces of the electrode voltages and beam current are shown in figure 13(b). The transient power curves measured by the water load are displayed in figure 14.

    Table  4.  Experimental result of the preliminary pulse test.
    Mode TE18,7 TE24,9
    Frequency 105.06 GHz 139.36 GHz
    Cathode voltage -52 kV -50 kV
    Modulation anode voltage 0 10.4 kV
    Anode voltage 26 kV 16.4 kV
    Beam current 30 A 30 A
    output power 300 kW 540 kW
    Pulse width 1 ms 1 ms
    Repetitive rate 5 Hz 5 Hz
    Total efficiency (efficiency with SDC) 19% 36%
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  14.  Transient power versus time obtained by the water load.

    Given the limitation of the cathode high-voltage power supply, the cathode voltage could not be increased further, the beam current could not be above 30 A, and pulse extension could cause instability. Thus, RF power upgrade and pulse-width extension were hampered, and the preliminary proof-test of the gyrotron was ended. The instability was mainly manifested by the current surge at the modulation anode when the pulse width was extended. One probable cause is the plasma discharging due to the poor vacuum level at the MIG region.

    Analysis of test results provides the following summary. (1) Owing to the limitation of high-voltage supply, the operating point was not optimized compared with the design parameters. Hence, the output RF power has not reached 1 MW full power. (2) The total efficiency was low, especially at 105 GHz because the status of the cyclotron beam was greatly affected due to the non-optimal operating point. (3) The design of the gyrotron was basically validated through check-calculation with the present test results.

    A 105/140 GHz MW-level gyrotron was designed, successfully fabricated and proof-tested in IAE, CAEP. At the preliminary pulse test, the gyrotron generated an output power of 300 kW at 105.06 GHz and 540 kW at 139.36 GHz during the 1 ms 5 Hz continuous pulse burst operation. Power upgrade and pulse length extension were hampered by the limitation of the high-voltage power supply and the output window. Given the non-optimal operating point, the current output power has not yet achieved 1 MW full power, and the efficiency is low. The proposed gyrotron design was basically validated. The work has laid a good foundation for power upgrade to MW-level and pulse-width extension to second-level at the next phase.

    This work is supported in part by NSAF (No. U1830201), in part by the State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for Nation Defense of China, Technology Foundation Project (No. JSJL2019212B006), in part by the Academy Innovation Funder (No. CX2020038), and in part by the National Defense Basic Scientific Research Program (No. 2018212C015).

  • [1]
    Nusinovich G S, Thumm M K A and Petelin M I 2014 J. Infrared Millim. Terahz. Waves 35 325 doi: 10.1007/s10762-014-0050-7
    [2]
    Thumm M K A et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 073001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab2005
    [3]
    Xu H D et al 2016 Plasma Sci. Technol. 18 442 doi: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/19
    [4]
    Litvak A G et al 2011 J. Infrared Millim. Terahz. Waves 32 337 doi: 10.1007/s10762-010-9743-8
    [5]
    Gantenbein G et al 2014 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 61 1806 doi: 10.1109/TED.2013.2294739
    [6]
    Thumm M et al 2001 Fusion Eng. Des. 53 407 doi: 10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00519-6
    [7]
    Alberti S et al 2019 High-efficiency, long-pulse operation of MW-level dual-frequency gyrotron, 84/126 GHz, for the TCV Tokamak Proc. 2019 44th Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (Paris, France) (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE)(https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2019.8874423)
    [8]
    Denisov G et al 2017 EPJ Web Conf. 147 04003 doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201714704003
    [9]
    Hu L L et al 2021 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 49 1468 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2021.3066553
    [10]
    Sun D M et al 2021 Recent results of a 28 GHz 400 kW long pulse Gyrotron at IAE-CAEP Proc. 2021 46th Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (Chengdu, China)
    [11]
    Kartikeyan M V et al 2004 Gyrotron: High-Power Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (Berlin: Springer)
    [12]
    Fliflet A W et al 1991 Phys. Rev. A 43 6166 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.6166
    [13]
    Jin J B et al 2009 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 57 1661 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2021878
    [14]
    Katsenelenbaum B Z and Semenov V V 1967 Radio Eng. Electron. Phys. 12 223
    [15]
    Huang Q L et al 2021 Development of A MW-level dual-frequency gyrotron for fusion Proc. 2021 46th Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (Chengdu, China)
    [16]
    Thumm M et al 2001 Fusion Eng. Des. 53 517 doi: 10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00531-7
    [17]
    Parshin V V et al 1994 Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 15 339 doi: 10.1007/BF02096245
    [18]
    Myasnikov V E et al 1999 Development of 1 MW long-pulse/CW gyrotrons in 110–170 GHz frequency range Proc. Int. University Conf. Electronics and Radiophysics of Ultra-High Frequencies (Saint Petersburg, Russia) (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE)(https://doi.org/10.1109/UHF.1999.787900)
    [19]
    Gorelov Y et al 2002 Infared monitoring of 110 GHz gyrotron windows at DⅢ-D Proc. 12th Joint Workshop Aix-en-Provence (France: World Scientific)(https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812705082_0070)
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yinan WANG (王一男), Shuaixing LI (李帅星), Li WANG (王莉), Ying JIN (金莹), Yanhua ZHANG (张艳华), Yue LIU (刘悦). Effects of HF frequency on plasma characteristics in dual-frequency helium discharge at atmospheric pressure by fluid modeling[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 115402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac71e
    [2]Jiaojiao LI (李娇娇), Qianghua YUAN (袁强华), Xiaowei CHANG (常小伟), Yong WANG (王勇), Guiqin YIN (殷桂琴), Chenzhong DONG (董晨钟). Deposition of organosilicone thin film from hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) with 50kHz/ 33MHz dual-frequency atmospheric-pressure plasma jet[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(4): 45505-045505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa57e4
    [3]WANG Hongyu (王虹宇), JIANG Wei (姜巍), SUN Peng (孙鹏), ZHAO Shuangyun (赵双云), LI Yang (李阳). Modeling of Perpendicularly Driven Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(2): 143-146. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/2/08
    [4]WANG Xiaomin(王晓敏), YUAN Qianghua(袁强华), ZHOU Yongjie(周永杰), YIN Guiqin(殷桂琴), DONG Chenzhong(董晨钟). Deposition of Polymer Thin Film Using an Atmospheric Pressure Micro-Plasma Driven by Dual-Frequency Excitation[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(1): 68-72. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/1/15
    [5]BAI Yang (柏洋), JIN Chenggang (金成刚), YU Tao (余涛), WU Xuemei (吴雪梅), et al.. Experimental Characterization of Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled Plasma with Inductive Enhancement in Argon[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(10): 1002-1005. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/10/08
    [6]LIU Wenyao (刘文耀), ZHU Aimin (朱爱民), Li Xiaosong (李小松), ZHAO Guoli (赵国利), et al.. Determination of Plasma Parameters in a Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled CF 4 Plasma Using Optical Emission Spectroscopy[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(9): 885-890. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/9/10
    [7]LU Wenqi (陆文琪), JIANG Xiangzhan (蒋相站), LIU Yongxin (刘永新), YANG Shuo (杨烁), et al. Improved Double-Probe Technique for Spatially Resolved Diagnosis of Dual-Frequency Capacitive Plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2013, 15(6): 511-515. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/6/05
    [8]YU Yiqing(虞一青), XIN Yu(辛煜), LU Wenqi(陆文琪), NING Zhaoyuan(宁兆元). Abnormal Enhancement of N2+ Emission Induced by Lower Frequencies in N2 Dual-Frequency Capacitively Coupled Plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(3): 222-226. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/3/07
    [9]CHENG Li (程立), SHI Jia-ming(时家明), XU Bo (许波). Analytical Expressions of Dual-Frequency Plasma Diagnostic Theory[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 37-39. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/09
    [10]HUANG Hongwei (黄宏伟), YE Chao (叶超), XU Yijun (徐轶君), YUAN Yuan (袁圆), SHI Guofeng (施国峰), NING Zhaoyuan (宁兆元). Effect of Low-frequency Power on F, CF2 Relative Density and F/CF2 Ratio in Fluorocarbon Dual-Frequency Plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2010, 12(5): 566-570.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. Zheng, P.W., Feng, J.L., Lu, L.F. et al. Impact of hot plasma effects on electron cyclotron current drive in tokamak plasmas. Nuclear Fusion, 2024, 64(12): 126059. DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ad8667
    2. Hu, L., Huang, Q., Zhuo, T. et al. Achieving prolonged continuous operation of a self-designed 28 GHz/50 kW gyrotron | [自研 28 GHz/50 kW 回旋管实现长时间连续运行*]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202436.240049
    3. Hu, L., Sun, D., Huang, Q. et al. Design and experimental progress of a 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron | [105/140 GHz 双频兆瓦级回旋管的设计与实验进展]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(8): 083004. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.230114
    4. Hu, L., Sun, D., Huang, Q. et al. 1.0 MW pulse power achieved in 105/140 GHz dual-frequency MW-level gyrotron | [105/140 GHz 双频兆瓦回旋管实现 1.0 MW 脉冲输出]. Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(2): 023001. DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.220388
    5. Sun, D., Huang, Q., Hu, L. et al. Recent Results of a 50 GHz High Power Gyrotron for ECRH at XL-50 Tokamak. 2023. DOI:10.1109/IVEC56627.2023.10156980
    6. Hu, L., Ma, G., Sun, D. et al. Recent Development of a 105/140GHz MW-level Gyrotron at IAE. International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, IRMMW-THz, 2022. DOI:10.1109/IRMMW-THz50927.2022.9895711

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(14)  /  Tables(4)

    Article views (174) PDF downloads (87) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return