
Citation: | Bo LIU, Fangping WANG, Heng ZHANG, Sheng ZHANG, Wenshan DUAN. Fuel compression in the magnetized cylindrical implosion driven by a gold tube heated by heavy ion beams[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 045201. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac9aed |
A magnetized cylindrical target composed of a gold tube filled with deuterium-tritium fuel plasma at low density is studied numerically in the present paper. A shock wave is produced when a heavy ion beam heats the gold along the direction of the magnetic field. The density peak of the shock wave increases with the increase in time and it propagates in the -r direction in the cylindrical tube. It seems that this wave is the supermagnetosonic wave. It is found that the Mach number M is between 6.96 and 19.19. The density peak of the shock wave increases as the intensity of the heavy ion beam increases. Furthermore, the density peak of the shock wave increases as the external magnetic field increases.
Nuclear fusion would be a future energy source [1–3]. Its major schemes are magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) [4–6] and inertial confinement fusion (ICF) [7–12]. There are several typical schemes to achieve ICF, for example, ICF with extreme intensity laser, Z-pinch and heavy ion beam.
In laser-drive ICF, there are central ignition schemes such as indirect-drive on NIF [13–17], direct-drive on OMEGA [18–22], and non-central ones such as fast ignition [23–26] and shock ignition [27–30], etc. Z-pinch is one application of Lorentz force [31, 32].
Heavy ion beam (HIB) has many advantages for ICF [33–40]. HIB-ICF (HIF) is a novel approach to thermonuclear fusion energy with higher drive efficiency than most other approaches. HIB is generated by an accelerator [41] and it has the significant advantage that it can deposit HIB energy inside material [42–45]. The energy deposition spatial profile in materials is easy to predict. Therefore, the fusion fuel design becomes relatively simple [11, 46].
There are several international research projects on HIF. The FAIR (Facility for Antiprotons and Ion Research) project has been started at Darmstadt, Germany [47]. The HIAF (High Intensity Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility) project in China has been planned for HIF and HEDP studies [48–51]. HIAF construction started in 2018 in Huizhou City, China. Research on HIF has been conducted at many research labs and universities in Japan, Germany, China, France, U.S.A., Russia, Italy, Spain, Kazakhstan, etc [11, 41].
Nearly all of the studies on the targets for heavy ion fusion are of spherical geometry. The present investigation focused on the cylindrical implosions driven by a single ion beam incident with high symmetry relative to the target axis [52–56]. There are several advantages of cylindrical targets. For example, it is easier to make more targets, run more experiments, and acquire more data to study implosion dynamics [57–59].
In order to reach thermonuclear fusion conditions, the present paper will study the cylindrical implosions which can concentrate energy in a small amount of fuel [60–62]. It is reported that the ignition threshold (Lawson's criteria) [63–65] of magnetized fuel (for deuterium-tritium (DT)) is strongly reduced compared with that of nonmagnetized DT fuel [34].
The present paper details the study of a magnetized cylindrical target which consists of a gold tube filled with fuel plasma at low density, where an axial magnetic field is applied externally. The heavy ion beam heats the outer part of the hollow cylinder (gold) along the direction of the magnetic field and the heavy ion beam evaporates the gold. We assume that the energy deposition is uniform in the axial magnetic field direction. The gold in gas state will expand radially and drive the inner part of the tube (plasma) towards the axis. The purpose of the cylindrical implosions is to concentrate energy in a small amount of fuel in order to reach thermonuclear fusion conditions. The simulation results show that a shock wave is produced when a heavy ion beam heats the gold. The density peak of the shock wave increases as the intensity of the heavy ion beam increases. It also increases as the external magnetic field increases.
Figure 1 is a sketch of a magnetized cylindrical target which consists of a tube filled with DT plasma. There is an external axial magnetic field. The heavy ion beam will heat the outer part of the cylinder, then the cylinder will expand in the radial direction and push the inner part of the tube towards the axis. The size of the targets is given in figure 1.
For this model, we set up the following column coordinate system (r, θ, z), see figure 2. The z-axis is in the direction of the external magnetic field, which is also the axis direction of the magnetized cylindrical target. Rt is the radius of the target, Zt is the length of the target, and the metallic tube material is gold.
In order to understand the fundamental physical phenomena, we use the ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) equations to describe the plasma, as follows.
∂ρ∂t+∇·(ρV)=0 | (1) |
∂(ρV)∂t+∇·[ρVVT-1μ0BBT+(Pplasma+Pgold+12|B|2)I]=0 | (2) |
∂E∂t+∇·[(E+Pplasma+Pgold)V+1μ0(V×B)×B]=0 | (3) |
∂B∂t-∇×(V×B)=0 | (4) |
where ρ is the density of the plasma, I is the second order unit tensor, V is the velocity of the plasma,
When the heavy ion beam injects into the metallic tube, the rapid deposition of heat from the heavy ion beam is so high that the solid state gold is vaporized suddenly. Then an enormous pressure gradient is formed which will let the gold gas expand rapidly into the plasma region. For simplicity and convenience, as well as to understand the fundamental physical phenomena, we use the ideal hydrodynamic equations to describe the metallic tube in gas state, as follows.
∂ρ' | (5) |
(6) |
(7) |
where
The initial conditions of the plasma are given as follows:
(8) |
where
The initial conditions of the metallic tube in gas state are
(9) |
where
The initial densities of the plasma and metallic tube are shown in figures 3(a) and (b). The other parameters are shown in table 1 for different runs.
Different runs |
|
|
Bz | Br | Bθ | V | u | |
(1) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(2) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(3) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Case I | (4) | 0.97 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(5) | 1.07 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(6) | 1.17 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(7) | 1.57 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Case II | (1) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 103 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The simulation period in our simulation is so short that the gold gas moves a short enough distance. Therefore, the Rayleigh–Taylor (RT) instability is not considered in the present paper. For this reason, as well as the symmetry of the system with respect to θ, we assume that
We now numerically solve equations (1)–(7) by using a commercial software, Usim. Usim uses the Eulerian method. The Usim series of computational applications are powered by the Ulixes computational engine. Ulixes is a general purpose fluid plasma modeling code that supports shock capturing methods for MHD, Hall MHD, two fluid plasma, Navier–Stokes, Maxwell's equations, as well as multi-species, multi-temperature versions of the fluid systems mentioned [66]. The code we used in the study is a 2D cylindrical coordinate system. The simulation region is 0 ≤ r ≤ Rt, 0 ≤ z ≤ Zt, where Rt = 5 mm and Zt = 10 mm.
For this case, the boundary conditions are as follows: the copy boundaries are used at the boundaries of z = 0 and z = Zt, the fixed boundary is used at the boundary of r = Rt and the axis boundary is used at boundary r = 0.
The dependence of the plasma density on the spatial coordinates (r, z) with different times t = 20 ns, 30 ns, 38 ns is shown in figures 4(a)–(c), respectively, where
In order to further understand the dependence of the plasma density on the radial coordinate r, the variations of the plasma density with respect to the r with different times t = 20 ns, 30 ns, 40 ns at z = 5 mm are shown in figure 5. The maximum plasma density increases with time and it propagates in the -r direction.
The dependence of the maximum value of the plasma density on time t is shown in figure 6(a). The maximum values of the plasma density increase with time exponentially. The fit result is
It is noticed that the propagation direction of this wave is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field, while the fluid velocity is parallel to the wave propagation direction. Therefore, it seems that this wave is the magnetosonic wave. It is found that the Mach number
The dependence of the axial magnetic field Bz on the spatial coordinates (r, z) with different times t = 8 ns, 16 ns, 24 ns is shown in figures 7(a)–(c), respectively, where
It is found from both figures 4 and 5 and both figures 7 and 8 that the maximum plasma density and the maximum perturbed magnetic field, respectively, are at the same points. Furthermore, both of them propagate with the same velocity. This is caused by the magnetic freezing.
Dependence of the plasma density on the radial coordinate r at time t = 30 ns with different external magnetic fields B0 = 3 T, 6 T, 9 T is shown in figure 9(a). Notice that the maximum plasma density increases as the external magnetic field increases. Moreover, dependence of the magnetic field in the z-axis direction on the radial coordinate r at time t = 30 ns with different external magnetic fields B0 = 3 T, 6 T, 9 T is shown in figure 9(b). It indicates that the maximum magnetic field in the z-axis direction increases as the external magnetic field increases. It indicates from figure 9 that the external magnetic field can increase the maximum plasma density as well as the perturbed magnetic field.
The dependence of the maximum value of the plasma density on the time t with different parameters of
In order to further understand the physical mechanism of the present problem, we change the boundary conditions to study it. In the above investigations, as an approximation, we assume that the energy of the heavy ion beam is so high that the metallic tube is instantly vaporized into gas state initially at time t = 0. At the same time, the energy of the heavy ion beam becomes zero.
Now we consider another approximate case that the energy of the heavy ion beam is not so high, but the heavy ion beam continuously heats into the metallic tube. Then the gold in gas state is produced continuously. For this case, we assume that the total pressure is a constant, i.e.,
The dependence of the plasma density on the spatial coordinates (r, z) with different times t = 80 ns, 160 ns, 240 ns is shown in figures 11(a)–(c), respectively, where
The dependence of the maximum value of the plasma density on time t is shown in figure 13(a). It seems that the maximum value of the plasma density increases with time. The fit result is
The dependence of the axial magnetic field Bz on the spatial coordinates (r, z) with different times t = 80 ns, 160 ns, 240 ns is shown in figures 14(a)–(c), respectively, where
The numerical results are given in the present paper by using Usim. A shock wave is found when a heavy ion beam heats the gold along the direction of the magnetic field. The density peak of the shock wave increases with the increase of the time t and it propagates in the -r direction.
It is noted that this shock wave is the supermagnetosonic wave. The wave velocity can be much larger than the acoustic speed. The Mach number may decrease as the intensity of the heavy ion beam decreases. The density peak of the shock wave also increases as the external magnetic field increases.
In the future, we may do the following work. (1) In the present study, we use the ideal gas state equation to describe both the plasma and the gold in the gas state. Actually both are at high temperature and in high pressure state, so we should use a more realistic equation of state. (2) There is an interface between plasma and gold in the gas state in which the mass density is different. Therefore, RT instability may occur, and we will study the RT instability on this interface when the gold in gas state expands.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11965019, 42004131 and 42065005).
[1] |
Ongena J and Ogawa Y 2016 Energy Policy 96 770 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.037
|
[2] |
D'haeseleer W D 2003 Fusion Eng. Des. 66–68 3 doi: 10.1016/S0920-3796(03)00388-0
|
[3] |
Ongena J and Van Oost G 2012 Fusion Sci. Technol. 61 3 doi: 10.13182/FST12-A13488
|
[4] |
Aymar R, Barabaschi P and Shimomura Y 2002 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44 519 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/44/5/304
|
[5] |
Mirnov S V 2018 Nucl. Fusion 59 015001 doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aaee92
|
[6] |
Ongena J et al 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 398 doi: 10.1038/nphys3745
|
[7] |
He X T and Zhang W Y 2007 Eur. Phys. J. D 44 227 doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2007-00005-1
|
[8] |
Nuckolls J et al 1972 Nature 239 139 doi: 10.1038/239139a0
|
[9] |
Berry H G and Hass M 1982 Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 32 1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ns.32.120182.000245
|
[10] |
Betti R and Hurricane O A 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 435 doi: 10.1038/nphys3736
|
[11] |
Kawata S, Karino T and Ogoyski A I 2016 Matter Radiat. Extremes 1 89 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2016.03.003
|
[12] |
Zhang J et al 2020 Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 378 20200015 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0015
|
[13] |
Kritcher A L et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 056309 doi: 10.1063/1.5018000
|
[14] |
Callahan D A et al 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 072704 doi: 10.1063/5.0006217
|
[15] |
Meezan N B et al 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014021 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/59/1/014021
|
[16] |
Perkins L J et al 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 062708 doi: 10.1063/1.4985150
|
[17] |
Smalyuk V A et al 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 072705 doi: 10.1063/1.5042081
|
[18] |
Goncharov V N and Regan S P 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014008 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/59/1/014008
|
[19] |
Igumenshchev I V et al 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 052702 doi: 10.1063/1.4948418
|
[20] |
Dodd E S et al 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 042703 doi: 10.1063/1.3700187
|
[21] |
Campbell E M et al 2017 Matter Radiat. Extremes 2 37 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.03.001
|
[22] |
Regan S P et al 2018 Fusion Sci. Technol. 73 89 doi: 10.1080/15361055.2017.1397487
|
[23] |
Tabak M et al 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 057305 doi: 10.1063/1.1871246
|
[24] |
Fernández J C et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 065004 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065004
|
[25] |
Johzaki T et al 2020 High Energy Density Phys. 36 100841 doi: 10.1016/j.hedp.2020.100841
|
[26] |
Ongena J et al 2006 Fusion Sci. Technol. 49 3 doi: 10.13182/FST06-A1099
|
[27] |
Perkins L J et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 045004 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.045004
|
[28] |
Atzeni S et al 2013 New J. Phys. 15 045004 doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/045004
|
[29] |
Atzeni S et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 054008 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/5/054008
|
[30] |
Betti R et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 155001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.155001
|
[31] |
Haines M G 2011 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 093001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001
|
[32] |
Shumlak U 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 200901 doi: 10.1063/5.0004228
|
[33] |
Kawata S 2021 Adv. Phys. X 6 1873860 doi: 10.1080/23746149.2021.1873860
|
[34] |
Basko M M, Kemp A J and Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 59 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/40/1/305
|
[35] |
Basko M M, Kemp A J and Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2002 Nucl. Fusion 43 16 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/1/302
|
[36] |
Kemp A J 2001 Magnetized Cylindrical Implosions Driven by Heavy Ion BeamsGarchingMPQ
|
[37] |
Zhang W Y 2016 Matter Radiat. Extremes 1 1 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2016.04.001
|
[38] |
Uchibori K et al 2020 High Energy Density Phys. 34 100748 doi: 10.1016/j.hedp.2020.100748
|
[39] |
Basko M M 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 1515 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/32/9/I02
|
[40] |
Hoffmann D H H et al 2007 Eur. Phys. J. D 44 293 doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2006-00125-0
|
[41] |
Hofmann I 2018 Matter Radiat. Extremes 3 1 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.12.001
|
[42] |
Fox R F 1999 Am. J. Phys. 67 841 doi: 10.1119/1.19335
|
[43] |
Ziegler J F and Biersack J P 1985 The Stopping and Range of
Ions in Matter Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science ed
D A Bromley (New York: Springer) 93
|
[44] |
Bangerter R O, Mark J W K and Thiessen A R 1982 Phys. Lett. A 88 225 doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90233-X
|
[45] |
Mehlhorn T A 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 6522 doi: 10.1063/1.328602
|
[46] |
Santos A G et al 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2
|
[47] |
Durante M et al 2019 Phys. Scr. 94 033001 doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/aaf93f
|
[48] |
Yang J C et al 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 317 263 doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.046
|
[49] |
Ma X et al 2017 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 408 169 doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.129
|
[50] |
Ren J R et al 2017 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 406 703 doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.018
|
[51] |
Cheng R et al 2018 Matter Radiat. Extremes 3 85 doi: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.11.001
|
[52] |
Sauppe J P et al 2020 High Energy Density Phys. 36 100831 doi: 10.1016/j.hedp.2020.100831
|
[53] |
Sauppe J P et al 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 042701 doi: 10.1063/1.5083851
|
[54] |
Rezaie-Chamani A, Ghasemizad A and Khoshbinfar S 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 042703 doi: 10.1063/1.5050964
|
[55] |
Piriz A R et al 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 056403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056403
|
[56] |
Piriz A R et al 2005 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 544 1 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2005.01.191
|
[57] |
Sauppe J P et al 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 185003 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.185003
|
[58] |
Roycroft R, Sauppe J P and Bradley P A 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 032704 doi: 10.1063/5.0083190
|
[59] |
Gittings M et al 2008 Comput. Sci. Discov. 1 015005 doi: 10.1088/1749-4699/1/1/015005
|
[60] |
Tahir N A et al 2000 Phys. Rev. E 63 016402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.016402
|
[61] |
Slutz S A et al 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 056303 doi: 10.1063/1.3333505
|
[62] |
Tahir N A et al 2001 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 41 287 doi: 10.1002/1521-3986(200103)41:2/3<287::AID-CTPP287>3.0.CO;2-H
|
[63] |
Lawson J D 1957 Proc. Phys. Soc. B 70 6 doi: 10.1088/0370-1301/70/1/303
|
[64] |
Abu-Shawareb H et al 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 075001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.075001
|
[65] |
Kesner J and Conn R W 1976 Nucl. Fusion 16 397 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/16/3/002
|
[66] |
Wang H Y and Jia H X 2013 USim software hypersonic
electromagnetic fluid with high energy density physical
simulation applications Abstract collection of the 16th
National Plasma Science and Technology Conference and
the First National Plasma Medical Symposium, Shanghai 57 (in Chinese)
|
[1] | Fusheng WANG (王富生), Xiangteng MA (马襄腾), Han CHEN (陈汉), Yao ZHANG (张耀). Evolution simulation of lightning discharge based on a magnetohydrodynamics method[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 75301-075301. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aab841 |
[2] | Jianxun LIU (刘建勋), Yanyun MA (马燕云), Xiaohu YANG (杨晓虎), Jun ZHAO (赵军), Tongpu YU (余同普), Fuqiu SHAO (邵福球), Hongbin ZHUO (卓红斌), Longfei GAN (甘龙飞), Guobo ZHANG (张国博), Yuan ZHAO (赵媛), Jingkang YANG (杨靖康). High-energy-density electron beam generation in ultra intense laser-plasma interaction[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 15001-015001. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015001 |
[3] | TAO Ling(陶玲), HU Chundong(胡纯栋), XIE Yuanlai(谢远来). Numerical Simulation of Subcooled Boiling Inside High-Heat-Flux Component with Swirl Tube in Neutral Beam Injection System[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(5): 512-520. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/5/12 |
[4] | Vahid Abbasi, Ahmad Gholami, Kaveh Niayesh. Three-dimensional Simulation of Plasma Deformation during Contact Opening in a Circuit Breaker, including Analyses of Kink and Sausage Instabilities[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(11): 996-1001. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/11/07 |
[5] | SONG Yushou(宋玉收), YAN Qiang(颜强), JING Tian(井田), XI Yinyin(席印印), LIU Huilan(刘辉兰). The Distortion of Energy Deposit Distribution of 12C Ions in Water[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(7): 665-669. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/7/22 |
[6] | YIN Hongjie (尹洪杰), M. J. EFAAF (安飞), ZHANG Weining (张卫宁). Two-Pion Interferometry for the Granular Source in Heavy Ion Collisions at LHC Energies[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(6): 445-448. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/6/01 |
[7] | LI Jibo(李吉波), DING Siye(丁斯晔), WU Bin(吴斌), HU Chundong(胡纯栋). Simulations of Neutral Beam Ion Ripple Loss on EAST[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 78-82. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/17 |
[8] | Hiroshi Naitou, Yusuke Yamada, Kenji Kajiwara, Wei-li Lee, Shinji Tokuda, Masatoshi Yagi. Global and Kinetic MHD Simulation by the Gpic-MHD Code[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(5): 528-534. |
[9] | Naohiro KASUYA, Seiya NISHIMURA, Masatoshi YAGI, Kimitaka ITOH, Sanae-I ITOH. Heavy Ion Beam Probe Measurement in Turbulence Diagnostic Simulator[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(3): 326-331. |
[10] | Leila GHOLAMZADEH, Abbas GHASEMIZAD. Non-Uniformity of Heavy-Ion Beam Irradiation on a Direct-Driven Pellet in Inertial Confinement Fusion[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2011, 13(1): 44-49. |
1. | Khoshbinfar, S.. High energy gain of ion-driven flux compression in cylindrical target with initial power-law radial density profile. Fundamental Plasma Physics, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.fpp.2025.100085 |
Different runs |
|
|
Bz | Br | Bθ | V | u | |
(1) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(2) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(3) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 104 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Case I | (4) | 0.97 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(5) | 1.07 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(6) | 1.17 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(7) | 1.57 | 1.4 × 104 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Case II | (1) | 1.37 | 1.4 × 103 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |