Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Zhikang LU, Guosheng XU, Chi-Shung YIP, Dehong CHEN, Xingquan WU, Wei ZHANG, Guanghai HU, Chenyao JIN, Di JIANG. Development of a compact high-density blue core helicon plasma device under 2000 G magnetic field of ring permanent magnets[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac6aa8
Citation: Zhikang LU, Guosheng XU, Chi-Shung YIP, Dehong CHEN, Xingquan WU, Wei ZHANG, Guanghai HU, Chenyao JIN, Di JIANG. Development of a compact high-density blue core helicon plasma device under 2000 G magnetic field of ring permanent magnets[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 095403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac6aa8

Development of a compact high-density blue core helicon plasma device under 2000 G magnetic field of ring permanent magnets

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Guosheng XU, E-mail: gsxu@ipp.ac.cn

    Chi-Shung YIP, E-mail: csyip@ipp.ac.cn

  • Received Date: March 04, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 21, 2022
  • Accepted Date: April 25, 2022
  • Available Online: December 07, 2023
  • Published Date: July 26, 2022
  • A helicon wave plasma source in a tube of ring permanent magnets (PMs) has been constructed to study the effect of the configuration of the magnetic field with zero magnetic points on plasma parameters. This device also serves as an exploration platform for a simple, compact helicon wave plasma source adaptable to engineering applications. A small-diameter (26 mm) high-density (~1018 m-3) blue core plasma is produced in ~1 Pa argon by helicon RF (radio-frequency) discharge using a Nagoya Ⅲ antenna under magnetic field (~2 kG) of compact ring PMs (length ~204 mm). Operational parameters, i.e. RF power and neutral gas pressure are scanned and plasma density is measured by an RF compensated probe to explore the operating characteristics of the device. Iconic feature of a helicon discharge, such as blue core plasmas and E-H-W mode transitions are well observed in the device, despite the wavelength calculated using the conventional dispersion relation of a bounded whistler waves (Chen 1991 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 33 339) is order of magnitudes longer than the length of the plasma in this device which seems to suggest that such helicon device is impossible. Surprisingly, the wavelength calculated by the unbounded whistle wave dispersion formula in turn suggests the occurrence of a half wavelength resonance.

  • A high-density, high-ionization-rate, compact plasma source that can operate efficiently in a steady state is a powerful device in the research and application of plasma. For decades, researchers have conducted in-depth research on the helicon plasma source in a wide range of parameters [1, 2], such as device size, the configuration and strength of magnetic field and neutral gas pressure. Owing to these advantages to generate high-density (electron density up to 1020 m-3) [3, 4], low-temperature (electron temperature from a few to several eV) [5] and high-ionization-rate (the degree of ionization more than 70%) [6] plasma at low gas pressure (pressure ranging from ~0.1 to several Pa) and low RF power (input RF power less than several kW), helicon plasma source is a potential candidate for utilization or exploration in semiconductor manufacturing [79], gas laser [10], nuclear fusion [11, 12], plasma acceleration/thruster [1317], and serves as a platform for the investigations of basic plasma physics [1820], etc. Despite helicon plasma has been considered for decades, the physical mechanisms of the formation of blue core plasma [21], efficient power absorption [2227], multiple wave mode discharge [28, 29], and mode transition [30] have not been fully understood.

    The applied magnetic field of most helicon plasma sources is traditionally generated by bulky and power-consuming electromagnetic coils. In order to move towards industrial application, Chen et al [31], Takahashi et al [32, 33] and Virko et al [34] mainly developed low-pressure solenoid-free plasma source under the external magnetic field configuration of permanent magnets (PMs). However, far too little attention has been paid to discharge in the internal field of compact ring PMs. The application of ring PMs in the helicon plasma source is a satisfactory way to miniaturize and simplify the device to adapt various engineering cases. In this work, a simple and compact helicon wave plasma source has been developed for engineering implementations, and the basic conditions of the discharge under the internal magnetic field configuration of ring PMs have been investigated.

    In this paper, the dispersion relationship of helicon plasma will be briefly reviewed in section 2. Later, the experimental device will be described in section 3, including vacuum construction, magnetic field configuration for ring-shaped PMs, RF impedance matcher, and the key diagnosis of this work, RF compensated Langmuir probe. The electron density on axis under different discharge conditions are measured in section 4.1, and the device discharge not only shows the hysteresis behavior under RF discharge, but also achieves mode transition and blue core mode discharge. In addition, an existential problem presented in section 4.2 is that the wavelength of helicon wave under magnetic field of PMs is not in agreement between theory of dispersion relation of boundary helicon wave plasma and experiment. Finally, a conclusion is presented in section 5.

    Under unbounded condition, dispersion relation for left and right polarized electromagnetic waves at an angle θ to B is [35]

    c2k2ω2=1-ω2p/ω21(ωc/ω)cosθ, (1)

    where c is the speed at which light travels in a vacuum, ω is the frequency of oscillation current of RF power supply. Here B=B0ˆz and k is the wavenumber, ωp is the electron plasma frequency, ωc is the electron cyclotron frequency.

    For ωωc<ωp, only the R wave (upper sign) propagates, and there is

    c2k2ω2=ω2pωcωcosθ. (2)

    Then,

    k=ωkzneeμ0B0. (3)

    Here ne, e and μ0 are respectively electron density, electron charge and vacuum permeability. The parallel wavenumber is kz=kcosθ.

    Helicon waves are known as bounded whistler waves. According to a simple helicon wave theory originated from KMT theory, the derivation of dispersion relations of helicon waves in a uniform cylindrical plasma bounded by cavities is systematically explained [36, 37]. Assuming the wave of the form exp[i(mθ+kz-ωt)] propagating in a field B, for m = 1 and the boundary condition, the simple dispersion relation of helicon wave is

    3.83a=ωkneeμ0B0. (4)

    Here a is plasma radius.

    Considering the electronic inertia when calculating the helicon wave dispersion relation will lead to Trivelpiece–Gould (TG) mode [38] which is observed experimentally at low magnetic fields [39, 40]. Yet, under higher magnetic field strength, the dispersion relation of helicon wave given by equation (2) dominates near the axis.

    It is well known that if wave propagates in plasma, the length of the half-wavelength of wave should be approximately the same as or less than the length of the plasma. However, the wavelength calculated from the dispersion relation (4) seems to be much larger than the length of the plasma, as details in section 4.2 of this paper.

    A schematic of the compact helicon device described in this work is shown in figure 1. The area at the end of inlet is the upstream region and the end of extraction is the downstream area, and the z-direction, defined as the same as the direction of magnetic field line within the tube of ring PMs, is oriented from antenna towards vacuum pump. Throughout the experiment, z=0 mm is located at the end face of ring PMs in the upstream region, and the origin of the axis is the intersection of the central axis and the end face of PMs in figure 1.

    Figure  1.  The schematic of cross-section of the helicon plasma device in top view.

    The device includes the vacuum system, gas supply system, a set of ring PMs, RF power matching system and diagnosis. The main vacuum chamber consists of an inlet chamber, a source chamber and a diffusion chamber. The inlet chamber is a straight cross in stainless steel with an inner diameter 35 mm. The ionization chamber is a straight quartz tube 40 cm long with an outer diameter 30 mm and an inner diameter 26 mm. The diffusion chamber is a straight cross in stainless steel with an inner diameter 105 mm. Quartz tube is used as a source chamber to connect inlet chamber and diffusion chamber. A 110ls-1 turbomolecular pump and a 4ls-1 mechanical pump are connected in turn behind the diffusion chamber to maintain the vacuum level in the chamber. Neutral gas pressure gauges are installed on the opposite side of the gas inlet and at the connection between the diffusion chamber and the pump to monitor the gas pressure in the upstream and downstream areas, as shown in figure 1. When gas pressure is higher than 1 Pa, resistance gauge is used for measurement, and the ionization gauge is used for measurement below 1 Pa, and the gas pressure involved in the experimental data of the paper is the neutral gas pressure in the upstream area (inlet chamber). Argon gas enters inlet chamber via a mass flow controller. Typical gas mass flow rate of ~1.5 sccm (standard cubic centimeter per minute) produces neutral gas pressure of ~1 Pa in the inlet chamber of the absence of plasma. When gas pressures in the upstream area (inlet chamber) are 1, 2, 3.4 and 4.1 Pa, the corresponding gas pressures in diffusion chamber are 0.023, 0.07, 0.18 and 0.28 Pa, respectively. The red blocks show the cross section of ring PMs. A Nagoya Ⅲ antenna with a length of 87 mm is connected to a 3.5 kW RF power supply with RF matching to excite the plasma. The electron density is measured by a moveable RF compensated probe.

    Compared to electromagnetic coils, PMs require no additional power supply, and their small size, simple and compact construction make them more suitable for engineering applications. A 20.4 cm long tunnel of ring-shaped PMs made of neodymium iron boron material is passed through a quartz tube and simulations show that this set of PMs can reach a peak magnetic field of 2234 G and produce a uniform magnetic field region in the center of the aperture, as shown in figure 2(a). Due to the geometrical symmetry of this set of ring PMs, it is only necessary to calculate the distribution of magnetic lines of force in the x–o–z plane and it is clear that the magnetic field is uniformly distributed in the aperture. In order to verify the correctness of the simulation, the magnetic field distribution on the central axis was compared with the experimental measurements and it can be seen that they remain consistent and the simulation model is reliable, as shown in the figure 2(b). The positions of the two zero magnetic points and the two end faces of the PM almost coincide are marked by two green dashed lines at approximately 0 mm and 204 mm respectively. The relative positions of the antenna located in the range of z=20–107 mm and PMs are shown in figure 2(a).

    Figure  2.  (a) Top sectional view of the simulated distribution of magnetic lines of force in the PMs and the relative positions of the antenna to the PMs. (b) Simulated and experimentally measured axial distribution of the magnetic field of PMs.

    Impedance matching is an operating condition where the load impedance and the internal impedance of the excitation source (RF power supply) are adapted to each other to obtain maximum power output, and impedance matchers are designed to achieve this goal. The RF adjustable power supply system of a maximum power of 3.5 kW with water-cooled circulation and automatic detection of reflected power and output power can be operated continuously at a fixed frequency of 13.56 MHz. However, due to the ability of the antenna and PMs to withstand the heat generated during the experiment, the maximum operating power in this experiment was limited to 650 W. Power is measured from the power supply. The impedance matcher is connected to the RF power supply using a coaxial cable assembly at one end and the load (i.e. the antenna and plasma) at the other end as shown in figure 3. To ensure the safety of the laboratory environment, the electromagnetic radiation generated by the RF is shielded during the RF plasma discharge by means of a well-conducting closed metal mesh or metal cover grounding.

    Figure  3.  Simplified schematic of the RF generator, RF impedance matching network and antenna system.

    The Nagoya Ⅲ antenna, 87 mm in length and 38 mm in outer diameter, is located inside the tunnel of ring-shaped PMs, sheathed outside a quartz tube. In order to achieve impedance matching between the RF generator and the antenna/plasma system, a tunable inverse L-shaped matching network is designed and used in this device. Figure 3 shows two variable capacitors with a breakdown voltage of 10 kV with an adjustable capacitance range of 25–1000 pF and a fixed inductance of ~1.83 μH in the inductor coil. As measured by a vector network analyzer, the impedance matching system can suppress return loss to 13 dB by adjusting the variable capacitance.

    One of the characteristics of the plasma produced by excitation of the antenna with an RF power source is the presence of an oscillating plasma potential. The oscillating plasma potential has the effect of distorting the IV characteristics of probe and it is therefore difficult to derive the correct plasma parameters. In order to be able to measure plasma parameters and to extend the spatial range of the measurements, a set of movable RF-compensated probe was designed. Movable RF compensation probe mainly includes three parts: an RF-compensated probe, an electric actuator and a signal acquisition system.

    The RF compensated Langmuir probe for this device was designed by referring to the work of Chen et al [5]. The CAD design and circuit design of the probe are shown in figures 4 and 5, respectively. A 2.5 mm long, 0.3 mm diameter probe tip made of tungsten was inserted through an alumina tube at one end and the other end of the alumina tube is inserted into the stainless-steel tube and held in place by a tight fit. An RF compensation electrode made of a 6 mm long stainless-steel tube with a wall thickness of 0.2 mm is placed on the alumina tube near the probe tip to contact the plasma during the discharge. 1–2 nF capacitance couples the probe tip and compensation electrode together and is then connected to the fundamental (13.56 MHz) and second harmonic (27.12 MHz) filter inductors via wires and finally to the sampling circuit as shown in figure 5.

    Figure  4.  Design drawing of the RF compensation probe.
    Figure  5.  The compensation circuit and sampling circuit of probe.

    The probe current is measured by measuring the voltage drop across the high power resistor R1=1 Ω, and the DC probe bias voltage is measured by measuring the voltage drop across the resistor R3=2 kΩ of the 51:1 voltage divider. The signal is transmitted to the data acquisition system via a coaxial cable, and probe scan voltage is added to the probe tip by a sine wave signal from a signal source input amplified to ±100 V by a power amplifier through the acquisition circuit.

    The blue core which is a strong ion light emission in the radially localized central region is a distinctive characteristic of helicon wave plasmas. Experiments with this device have some of the same properties as helicon plasma discharges, such as blue core and mode transition.

    The present device with applied magnetic field provided by PMs generated blue core plasma, and the discharge in the upstream and downstream regions as shown in figures 6(a) and (b), respectively. The discharge parameters of the blue core plasma in figures 6(a) and (b) are 350 W of RF power, ~2000 G of applied magnetic field strength and 2.0 Pa of argon neutral pressure corresponding to a gas flow rate of 5 sccm. With currently available diagnostics, the measured power presented in this paper is the output power of the RF power supply, the power absorbed by the plasma will be investigated in further studies. A distinct blue core can be seen in figure 6(a) in the region near the center of tunnel of ring PMs. In figure 6(b), the pink light emission from excited state of neutral argon is visible in the upstream and downstream regions away from the blue core. And the fine plasma column appears near the end face of PMs located downstream, instead of filling the quartz tube. Due to the limiting power and magnetic field configuration in this work, the plasma is essentially well confined within the ring PMs tube, thus limiting the length of plasma column. However, subsequent experiments have shown that in fact, by gradually increasing the power, the fine plasma column slowly becomes thicker and clearly diverges along the magnetic lines of force. As the input power increases, pink light from plasma radiation gradually becomes brighter, and when the power exceeds the threshold power, that is, the upward threshold power, blue light also known as blue core would suddenly appear. This shift in light corresponds to a jump in density, as shown in figure 6(c). Existing literature shows that the light radiated from plasma jumps from pink light to blue light, which is a manifestation of neutral depletion and high ionization rate [41], and the ionization rate can even reach nearly 80% [6]. After the appearance of the blue core mode, as the power decreases, it can be found that the blue core can exist at a lower power than the previously mentioned threshold power until it falls below another threshold power, that is, downward threshold power, where the blue core mode disappears. Then, sweeping upward and downward power, the downward and upward threshold powers of the mode transition of the blue core plasma under different neutral gas pressure are explored as shown in figure 6(d). As the Ar gas pressure increases, the neutral gas collision rate increases, and thus the upward threshold power gradually decreases with gas pressure. However, further increase of argon gas also requires more energy to ionize, so the threshold power becomes higher again. Yet, the downward threshold power remains constant under different gas pressures indicating that it is not required higher power to maintain the blue core mode once the jump is made.

    Figure  6.  The device successfully realized the blue core plasma discharge in (a) diagram of discharge in the upstream area and (b) diagram of discharge in the downstream area. In (c), under gas pressure 1 Pa, as the RF power increases, the plasma density located at 226 mm jumps. In (d), under different neutral gas pressures, the upward and downward threshold powers for blue core plasma are shown in red and blue respectively.

    To further investigate the variation of the density in the device at different power levels, power scanning experiments were conducted and the results are shown in figure 7(b). Under 4 Pa argon pressure, a power scan is performed and the plasma density is measured at the location of the red dashed line as shown in figure 7(a). The dashed line in red is located at 185 mm, and the blue dashed line is at 235 mm. The results in figure 7(b) show that there are three discharge modes, and the low to high power discharge modes correspond to the E→H→W mode. Discontinuous density jumps are the feature that separates the modes from each other.

    Figure  7.  (a) The distribution of magnetic field on axis of PMs. The magnetic fields at 185 mm and 235 mm are shown as red and blue dashed lines, respectively. (b) The variation in plasma density with power scanning under 4.1 Pa and at a position of 185 mm axial distance. The circle represents the density measured in the case of upward scanning power and the cross indicates the density measured in the case of downward scanning power.

    The power scans were performed for different positions and different gas pressures, and the corresponding plasma density variations are shown in figure 8. From the comparison of figures 8(a)(d), At the same neutral gas pressure, the z = 235 mm position is also in the area of magnetic field dispersion, and the mode jump here is not as obvious as the mode jump at z=185 mm. Possible reasons for this situation are as follows: the tangential magnetic field confines the plasma and particles cannot diffuse into the magnetic field dispersion region under low power and low pressure. Regardless of E or H mode, for both gas pressures, the density measured in the downstream (z=235 mm) region is higher than that in the upstream (z=185 mm) region; while in W mode, the density measured in the upstream (z=185 mm) region is higher than that in the downstream (z=235 mm) region. This reflects that at W mode power tends to be coupled to the dense plasma within the internal magnetic field of PM but in E and H modes there is a different spatial preference about power coupling. This work focuses on the W mode discharge and the E and H modes' discharges are out of scope of this work. The reason behind the different power coupling tendencies needs further investigations. In figure 9, it shows a partial spatial distribution of electron density along axis. The electron density increases slowly with the increase of the z distance, however, the electron density decays sharply outside the zero magnetic point (z > 204 mm), that is, the region of divergent magnetic field. This also means that the length of the plasma is confined within the boundaries of the magnetic field, limited by the length of the PMs regardless of pressure.

    Figure  8.  The functions of plasma electron density with RF power are shown in (a)–(d) under different cases. The axial positions at 185 mm and 235 mm are shown in red and blue, respectively. The circle indicates the density measured in the case of upward scanning power and the fork indicates the density measured in the case of downward scanning power.
    Figure  9.  The distributions of electron density of blue core plasma are measured along axis under different gas pressures with RF power of 350 W. The position of zero magnetic point is located on central axis of 204 mm in green dashed line.

    The discharge specifics of the device have been shown above, demonstrating the success of the device in generating helicon wave plasma. Typical discharge parameters of the blue core plasma of this device are ne~1018m-3, Te~4eV, f=13.56MHz, B0~2kG, a~1.3cm, Pin=350W. The energy deposition mechanisms of existing helicon wave plasma mainly consider the wave-particle interaction coupling, such as Landau damping [37], TG wave coupling and helicon wave coupling. Landau damping has been proved that there are not enough high-energy electrons for accelerating [42], and the high ionization region in this device is located in the blue core region, which means that the energy is deposited in the center. However, TG wave are surface wave and are only observed under low magnetic field (<50G) [39, 43]. According to the parameters of this device and the skin depth formula δ=c/ω2p-ω2, the skin depth is calculated to be ~5.3 mm, which is less than the radius of the discharge chamber. Thus, the energy is deposited to the edge of the plasma and cannot account for the energy deposition in the core region. For helicon wave that can exist in stronger magnetic field [43], simply considering the direction of wave propagation parallel to the direction of the magnetic field, the wavelength calculated by equation (4) is ~216 cm. Obviously, the wavelength calculated as dispersion relation of a bounded whistler waves is much larger than the length of the plasma (~20.4 cm) or even the length of the device. However, the wavelength which is ~68 cm calculated by the unbounded whistle wave dispersion formula (3) matches the order of the length of plasma, and it suggests a possible half-wavelength resonance. This is a surprising result, plasma is indeed bounded in the helicon device and any waves within the plasmas are also expected to be bounded. This suggests that in these very compact devices the bounded equation does not accurately describe the boundary conditions.

    A more compact helicon plasma source device was developed and the blue core plasma discharge was successfully excited. Density measurement of operational parameter sweep, such as power scan and pressure scan, and discharge characteristics obviously show the characteristics of helicon wave plasma. According to the density on axis, the length of the plasma is not as long as the entire device. The wavelength calculated as dispersion relation of bounded whistler waves is orders of magnitude longer than the length of plasma in this device. However, the wavelength calculated by the unbounded whistle wave dispersion formula shows the order of magnitude agreement.

    This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U19A20113).

  • [1]
    Isayama S, Shinohara S and Hada T 2018 Plasma Fusion Res. 13 1101014 doi: 10.1585/pfr.13.1101014
    [2]
    Shinohara S 2018 Adv. Phys. X 3 1420424 doi: 10.1080/23746149.2017.1420424
    [3]
    Buttenschön B, Fahrenkamp N and Grulke O 2018 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 075005 doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aac13a
    [4]
    Shinohara S and Mizokoshi H 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77 036108 doi: 10.1063/1.2173940
    [5]
    Sudit I D and Chen F F 1994 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3 162 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/3/2/006
    [6]
    Celik M 2011 Spectrochim. Acta B 66 149 doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2011.01.003
    [7]
    Tepermeister I 1994 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12 2310 doi: 10.1116/1.587758
    [8]
    Boswell R W and Henry D 1985 Appl. Phys. Lett. 47 1095 doi: 10.1063/1.96340
    [9]
    Hanaoka K and Takahashi K 2021 AIP Adv. 11 025013 doi: 10.1063/5.0038596
    [10]
    Zhu P Y and Boswell R W 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 2805 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2805
    [11]
    Fishler B E et al 2019 Fusion Eng. Des. 146 1047 doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.155
    [12]
    Loewenhardt P K et al 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 2792 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2792
    [13]
    Toki K et al 2006 Small helicon source for electrodeless plasma production and electromagnetic acceleration Proc. of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit (Sacramento) (AIAA) (https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4843)
    [14]
    Charles C 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 163001 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/16/163001
    [15]
    Takahashi K 2019 Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 3 3 doi: 10.1007/s41614-019-0024-2
    [16]
    Takahashi K, Imai R and Hanaoka K 2021 Front. Phys. 9 639010 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.639010
    [17]
    Takahashi K 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 2768 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82471-2
    [18]
    Yamada T et al 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 721 doi: 10.1038/nphys1029
    [19]
    Schröder C et al 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 4249 doi: 10.1063/1.1779225
    [20]
    Shamrai K P et al 2006 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. No 6. Series: Plasma Physics 12 84
    [21]
    Thakur S C et al 2015 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43 2754 doi: 10.1109/TPS.2015.2446537
    [22]
    Curreli D and Chen F F 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 113501 doi: 10.1063/1.3656941
    [23]
    Sudit I D and Chen F F 1996 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5 43 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/5/1/006
    [24]
    Molvik A W, Ellingboe A R and Rognlien T D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 233 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.233
    [25]
    Shamrai K P, Pavlenko V P and Taranov V B 1997 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39 505 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/39/3/011
    [26]
    Chen F F and Arnush D 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 3411 doi: 10.1063/1.872483
    [27]
    Arnush D and Chen F F 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 1239 doi: 10.1063/1.872782
    [28]
    Kushida T and Saiki K 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 9 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.9
    [29]
    Chi K K, Sheridan T E and Boswell R W 1999 Plasma Source Sci. Technol. 8 421 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/8/3/312
    [30]
    Hu Y B et al 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 128 043301 doi: 10.1063/1.5131164
    [31]
    Chen F F and Torreblanca H 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16 057102 doi: 10.1063/1.3089287
    [32]
    Takahashi K et al 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 084501 doi: 10.1063/1.2965497
    [33]
    Takahashi K, Shida Y and Fujiwara T 2010 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 025004 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/19/2/025004
    [34]
    Virko V F et al 2010 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 19 015004 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/19/1/015004
    [35]
    Green J and Schmitz O 2020 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 045008 doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab7852
    [36]
    Klozenberg J P, McNamara B and Thonemann P C 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 21 545 doi: 10.1017/S0022112065000320
    [37]
    Chen F F 1991 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 33 339 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/33/4/006
    [38]
    Trivelpiece A W and Gould R W 1959 J. Appl. Phys. 30 1784 doi: 10.1063/1.1735056
    [39]
    Blackwell D D et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 145002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.145002
    [40]
    Lho T et al 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 3135 doi: 10.1063/1.873040
    [41]
    Zhang Z et al 2021 Plasma Sci. Technol. 23 015401 doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/abae4a
    [42]
    Chen F F and Blackwell D D 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2677 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2677
    [43]
    Shamrai K P and Taranov V B 1996 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5 474 doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/5/3/015
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chenwen WANG, Yang LIU, Meng SUN, Tianliang ZHANG, Junfa XIE, Qiang CHEN, Haibao ZHANG. Effect of neutral pressure on the blue core in Ar helicon plasma under an inhomogeneous magnetic field[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 045403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aca1fa
    [2]Ruilin CUI, Tianliang ZHANG, Qian YUAN, Feng HE, Ruoyu HAN, Jiting OUYANG. Comparison of heating mechanisms of argon helicon plasma in different wave modes with and without blue core[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 015403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac8510
    [3]Huihui WANG (王慧慧), Zun ZHANG (张尊), Kaiyi YANG (杨凯翼), Chang TAN (谭畅), Ruilin CUI (崔瑞林), Jiting OUYANG (欧阳吉庭). Axial profiles of argon helicon plasma by optical emission spectroscope and Langmuir probe[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 74009-074009. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab175b
    [4]Guilu ZHANG (张桂炉), Tianyuan HUANG (黄天源), Chenggang JIN (金成刚), Xuemei WU (吴雪梅), Lanjian ZHUGE (诸葛兰剑), Hantao JI (吉瀚涛). Development of a helicon-wave excited plasma facility with high magnetic field for plasma–wall interactions studies[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 85603-085603. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aac014
    [5]Xuechen LI (李雪辰), Biao WANG (王彪), Pengying JIA (贾鹏英), Linwei YANG (杨林伟), Yaru LI (李亚茹), Jingdi CHU (楚婧娣). Three modes of a direct-current plasma jet operated underwater to degrade methylene blue[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(11): 115505. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa86a6
    [6]Mohsen AFSHARMANESH, Morteza HABIBI. Directional power absorption in helicon plasma sources excited by a half-helix antenna[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(10): 105403. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa8030
    [7]Y WANG (王宇), G ZHAO (赵高), C NIU (牛晨), Z W LIU (刘忠伟), J T OUYANG (欧阳吉庭), Q CHEN (陈强). Reversal of radial glow distribution in helicon plasma induced by reversed magnetic field[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(2): 24003-024003. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/19/2/024003
    [8]CHANG Lei (苌磊), LI Qingchong (李庆冲), ZHANG Huijie (张辉洁), LI Yinghong (李应红), WU Yun (吴云), ZHANG Bailing (张百灵), ZHUANG Zhong (庄重). Effect of Radial Density Configuration on Wave Field and Energy Flow in Axially Uniform Helicon Plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 848-854. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/10
    [9]A. M. HALA, L. OKSUZ, ZHU Ximing. Preliminary Study of a Hybrid Helicon-ECR Plasma Source[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(8): 832-836. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/8/07
    [10]CHENG Yuguo (成玉国), CHENG Mousen (程谋森), WANG Moge (王墨戈), YANG Xiong (杨雄), LI Xiaokang (李小康). Analysis of the Plasma Properties Affected by Magnetic Confinement with Special Emphasis on Helicon Discharges[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2014, 16(12): 1119-2225. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/16/12/06
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. Wang, C., Liu, J., Chang, L. et al. Wave field structure and power coupling features of blue-core helicon plasma driven by various antenna geometries and frequencies. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(3): 035201. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad1486
    2. Cui, Y., He, F., Zhang, T. et al. The Effect of Magnetic Field and Pressure on the Threshold Power for Entering Helicon Wave Mode. 2024. DOI:10.1109/CIEEC60922.2024.10583404
    3. Xia, Y., Yang, X., Chang, L. et al. Development of a compact helicon plasma source with two sets of ring array permanent magnets for the study of blue core plasma. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2023, 94(12): 125110. DOI:10.1063/5.0170135
    4. Yip, C.-S., Jin, C., Zhang, W. et al. A self-balanced electron-emissive double Langmuir probe drawing no electron loss from its diagnosed plasma. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2023, 32(10): 105011. DOI:10.1088/1361-6595/ad0070

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(9)

    Article views (118) PDF downloads (139) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return