Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Advanced Search+
Xinglong ZHU. Efficient combination and enhancement of high-power mid-infrared pulses in plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 020501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac8dd5
Citation: Xinglong ZHU. Efficient combination and enhancement of high-power mid-infrared pulses in plasmas[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 020501. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac8dd5

Efficient combination and enhancement of high-power mid-infrared pulses in plasmas

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Xinglong ZHU, E-mail: xinglong.zhu@sjtu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: June 26, 2022
  • Revised Date: August 23, 2022
  • Accepted Date: August 29, 2022
  • Available Online: December 05, 2023
  • Published Date: January 05, 2023
  • High-power intense optical sources in the mid-to-long wavelength infrared region are very attractive for a wide range of fields from fundamental research to materials science and biology applications. However, there are still significant challenges in extending long-wavelength infrared pulses into the relativistic regime using conventional optical techniques. Here, based upon a new type of plasma-based optical method, we present an efficient scheme capable of combining several high-power long-wavelength infrared laser pulses into one single, more intense pulse, thus bringing the intensity of the output pulse to the relativistic regime. Such intense infrared pulses will open up new possibilities for strong-field physics and ultrafast applications. Furthermore, this is beneficial to understand the underlying physics and nonlinear processes of modulation, propagation and energy transfer of high-power intense laser pulses in plasmas.

  • High-power intense mid-infrared pulses are of particular interest in a broad range of scientific fields due to their important role in strong-field physics [1, 2], bright high-harmonic generation [3], filamentation [4], time-resolved imaging of ultrafast molecular dynamics and structures [5], and infrared spectroscopy [6]. Many of these applications would highly benefit from the long carrier wavelength, intense field strength and high pulse energy, because the ponderomotive electron energy and the emitted photon energy are roughly scaled to I0λ20, where I0 and λ0 are, respectively, the peak intensity and the carrier wavelength of the driving optical fields. However, for current ultrafast laser technology, it is still challenging to simultaneously attain these conditions. When the long-wavelength infrared pulses reach relativistically high intensity and/or multi-TW high power, they will open new avenues for investigating strong-field light-matter interactions [7], laser-plasma acceleration [8], and hard x-ray attosecond pulse generation [9]. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the development of high-power intense mid-infrared pulses by using various nonlinear optical materials [1013], but it is difficult to achieve high-energy infrared sources in the spectral range of above 5 μm, especially for extending their intensities into the relativistic regime.

    In recent years, plasma-based optical methods have attracted a lot of interest in the generation of high-power high-intensity optical pulses [1417], since there is no damage limitation in the plasma. This suggests that the plasma-based approach can sustain more intense laser pulses with much higher power and higher intensity than traditional nonlinear crystals. Furthermore, high-power infrared pulses generated by plasma methods can be extended to wavelengths above 10 μm, i.e. to the mid-to-long wavelength infrared frequency range. It is still challenging to achieve these with conventional optical techniques such as chirped mirrors. Several novel concepts for relativistically intense few-cycle infrared light pulses have been recently proposed and/or demonstrated experimentally [1824], but their spectra are quite broad and their peak powers are typically limited to the sub-TW range. Efforts continue to develop tunable intense long-wavelength infrared sources with relativistic intensity, narrow spectrum and high power in the multi-TW range, which are desired for many cutting-edge applications.

    In this paper, we introduce an efficient way of plasma-based optical modulation to solve this intriguing quest. This is attained by merging several driving pulses into a single output pulse, which leads to remarkable increase in the power and intensity of the output pulse. Moreover, the resultant pulse will also undergo strong self-focusing during the interaction. As a consequence, more intense long-wavelength infrared pulses can be obtained while maintaining a narrow spectrum similar to that of the driving pulses. Although this may lead to a broader spectrum of infrared pulses than conventional optical techniques, it enables the light pulse intensity to be expanded to the relativistic regime.

    Figure 1 illustrates the schematic diagram of our scheme. Two driving laser pulses with the same spatial and temporal distributions are incident on a gas target, where an underdense plasma is formed via intense laser field self-ionization. As the intense laser pulse propagates in plasmas, its ponderomotive force expels the plasma electrons out of the pulse driver leaving behind the large massive ions. The expelled electrons are then attracted by the Coulomb field of the ion column to form a plasma wave wake behind the laser pulse. The wave oscillates at the plasma frequency ωp=(4πe2ne/me)1/2, where ne is the plasma density, me is the electron rest mass, and e is the elementary charge. This gives rise to nonlinear effects such as plasma density modification and the relativistic electron mass correction by the ponderomotive force. The refractive index in the process can be expressed as η=(1-ne/γenc)1/2, where nc=ω20me/4πe2 is the plasma critical density, ω0 is the laser frequency, and γe is the electron relativistic factor. For a normal Gaussian laser pulse with an intensity profile peaked on the propagation axis, it can lead to the pulse guiding and self-focusing due to η/r<0 (i.e. a plasma focusing lens). These nonlinear effects become important as the power of the laser pulse propagation in plasmas exceeds the critical power threshold 17(ω20/ω2p)GW for relativistic self-focusing [2527]. Nonlinear coupling interactions of two intense laser pulses copropagating in underdense plasmas have the potential to merge into one pulse beam, and so cause a considerable increase in the light intensity and peak power of the resultant output pulse. In order to describe the mutual interaction of two laser pulses through nonlinear effects in a comoving frame ξ=x-ct, the coupled equations for pulse evolution in plasmas can be given by [2830]

    2ia1τ+2a1+(1-neγen0)a1=0, (1)
    2ia2τ+2a2+(1-neγen0)a2=0, (2)
    Figure  1.  Schematic diagram of high-power infrared pulse amplification using a plasma-based optical combiner. In this scheme, the energy of two input infrared pulses can be efficiently combined into a single pulse beam, thus greatly enhancing the light intensity and power of the output pulse.

    where τ=ω2pt/ω0, 2=2/y2+2/z2 with the transverse coordinate y and z normalized by c/ωp, γe(1+|a1+a2|2)1/2, and a1 and a2 are, respectively, the normalized vector potentials of the two laser pulses in the slowly varying approximation. Here, n0 is the initial electron density of the unperturbed plasma, and nen0=max(0,1+2γe) is the density disturbance associated with the ponderomotive expulsion of plasma density from the high-intensity regions.

    To demonstrate the proposed scheme, we carry out two-dimensional (2D) particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations with the electromagnetic relativistic code EPOCH [31]. The simulation window has a size of 100λ0(x)×180λ0(y) with 5000×1800 grid cells and four macroparticles per cell, which moves at the speed of light c along the x-axis. Two driving laser pulses are linearly polarized along the y-direction, which have a same temporal profile of sin2(πt/2τ0) in the longitudinal direction and the Gaussian spatial distributions of a1=a0exp[-(y-σ0/2)2σ20] and a2=a0exp[-(y+σ0/2)2σ20] in the transverse direction, with the laser amplitude a0=0.5 (normalized by E0=mecω0/e), spot size σ0=30λ0, wavelength λ0=cT0 and pulse duration of τ0=30T0 full width at half maximum. Here, we assume the wavelength of the driving pulses λ0=10μm (i.e. the CO2 laser), for example, one has the initial light intensity of 3.4×1015Wcm-2 and peak power of 4.8 TW for each laser pulse. The plasma target has an initial electron density of n0=5×10-3nc (wherenc=ω20me4πe2) with a 50λ0 density rising edge, a 50λ0 density falling edge, and a 1500λ0 uniform density part. It should be mentioned that this scheme is also applicable to other optical wavebands, because both the laser and plasma target parameters are normalized to the laser wavelength λ0 or its frequency ω0.

    We now investigate the physical processes of plasma-based optical combinations occurring in this scheme. Figure 2 illustrates the evolution of the plasma density, the laser pulse and the transverse electric field. Two driving laser pulses, with 30λ0 transverse distance between their propagation axis, are irradiated into an underdense plasma, where they experience strong interaction and induce nonlinear effects such as plasma density modification and relativistic nonlinearity. In the earlier stage of the interaction process, both the transverse field and the plasma wave are relatively weak, as seen in figure 2(a). As the two pulses propagate in plasmas and undergo self-focusing individually, they appear to attract each other in this process. After an interaction distance of about 1500λ0, the two driving pulses are merged into a single pulse with high field strength reaching about 1.8E0 more than three times higher than that (0.5E0) of the initial laser pulse, as displayed in figure 2(b). In comparison, the field strength can only be amplified to about 0.6E0 in the one pulse scheme, as seen in figure 2(d). It should be noted that when two high-power drive pulses are combined into a single pulse with relativistically high intensity, a nonlinear plasma wake is excited, leading to stronger self-focusing and nonlinear effects, which in turn change the profile of the output pulses. Nevertheless, the distinct advantage of this scheme for enhancing high-power infrared pulses is that, unlike ultra-broadband spectrum radiation in previous plasma-based methods [1924], the resulting pulses have a relatively narrow spectrum with a central wavelength around 1λ0 similar to that of the driving laser pulse, as shown in figure 2(e). The FWHM spectral width of the output pulse increases only from 0.03 to 0.08 compared to the initial input pulse. This makes it possible to obtain relativistically intense infrared pulses while maintaining narrow spectral characteristics.

    Figure  2.  Distributions of the electron density, the transverse electric field of the evolved laser pulse and its on-axis electric field are shown at the beginning of the plasma combiner (a) and at the end of the combiner (b) with two driving pulses. The corresponding distributions are shown in ((c) and (d)) with a single driving pulse. Evolution of the on-axis electric field as a function of the propagation distance in the two-pulse case (e) and in the single-pulse case (f). The red dashed lines in ((a2)–(d2)) indicate the positions of the on-axis electric fields. The insets in ((e) and (f)) display the spectral distributions of the output infrared pulses.

    For comparison, we also investigate the case of one driving laser pulse propagation in plasmas, while all other parameters are the same as those in the two-pulse case presented in figure 2. The findings indicate that one driving pulse can be still self-guided and propagated over a long distance in plasmas owing to its peak power exceeding the critical threshold 3.4 TW, but both the pulse self-focusing and plasma wave excitation are much lower than those in the two-pulse case, as shown in figures 2(c) and (d). This is attributed to the relatively weak nonlinear effects and ponderomotive force induced by one laser pulse. As a consequence, the evolution of the laser pulse propagating in plasmas is quite moderate with only a small increase in light intensity, as shown in figure 2(f), making it unsuitable for achieving high-power relativistically intense infrared pulses.

    To demonstrate the robustness of the proposed scheme, we consider the effects of the drive laser pulse and plasma target parameters on the combination and enhancement of the infrared pulses in plasmas. We first investigate the effect of the transverse distance (d0) between the two drivers on the pulse amplification in figure 3(a). The results show that the interval distance between two drive pulses should not be too large, otherwise they do not attract and combine well together. For example, when d040μm, the intensity of the combined light pulse will be lower than the relativistic intensity. On the other hand, while a smaller pulse spacing is beneficial to achieve more intense combined light pulses, this may prematurely excite stronger nonlinear and relativistic effects, leading to a decrease in the conversion efficiency of the pulse amplification. Therefore, the optimal distance should be slightly less than 30μm, which is approximately the focal spot size of the driving laser pulse.

    Figure  3.  Effects of (a) the transverse distance (d0) between the two driving laser pulses, (b) the length (L0) of the uniform density part, (c) the plasma density (n0), and (d) the driving laser intensity (a0) on the normalized intensity (a) and energy efficiency (ρ) of the output infrared pulses. Here, ρ represents the ratio of the output infrared pulse energy to the input driving pulse energy.

    Figure 3(b) illustrates the effect of the longitudinal length of the uniform density part of the plasma combiner on the resultant infrared pulse, where the plasma length (L0) is changed in the range from 1200λ0 to 2010λ0, while keeping all other parameters unvaried. It is shown that an appropriately long plasma length is beneficial for pulse attraction and combination, because the mutual interaction of optical pulses in plasmas and their nonlinear coupling effects become more strong. This allows the light intensity of the output infrared pulse to increase with the length of the plasma target. Nevertheless, the plasma length should not be too long; otherwise, it will cause significant pulse depletion or attenuation due to strong absorption. The simulation results show that the optimal plasma length is about L0=1800λ0 for high-efficiency intense infrared pulse amplification in the considered parameter conditions.

    Figure 3(c) presents the effect of the plasma target density on the infrared pulse amplification, which is varied from 3×10-3nc to 7×10-3nc. Based on the critical power model that is inversely proportional to the plasma density as 17(ω20/ω2p)GWnc/ne, when using a higher density, one can obtain a lower power threshold for self-focusing, so that the mutual interaction and focusing effects of laser pulses and the plasma wave excitation become stronger according to equations (1) and (2). This is demonstrated by our PIC simulations, where one can observe that the intensity of the enhanced infrared pulses increases with the plasma density, as exhibited in figure 3(c). It should be noted that the energy efficiency of the output infrared pulse decreases with increasing plasma density due to the strong interaction between the laser pulse and the plasma resulting in a large amount of pulse energy being absorbed.

    The effect of the driving laser intensity on the pulse amplification is illustrated in figure 3(d). Here all other parameters are the same as those presented in the two-pulse case in figure 2, except for the driving laser amplitude a0, which changes in the range from 0.3 to 0.7. One can see that the normalized amplitude of the output infrared pulse is approximately proportional to that of the driving pulses. This is because the effects of the ponderomotive force, plasma density modification, and relativistic nonlinearity are mainly determined by the driving laser intensity. Interestingly, even using two non-relativistic driving laser pulses with a0=0.4, it is still possible to obtain a relativistic-intensity output pulse via our scheme. This is due not only to the pulse merging effect, but also to the relativistic self-focusing of the amplified infrared pulse itself in the plasma. More importantly, about 95% of the total energy of the two drive pulses can be effectively combined into a single output pulse. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the drive laser intensity should not be raised to an arbitrarily high value, e.g., for a0>0.7; otherwise, a lot of pulse energy will be absorbed and/or transferred to the plasma wave, and strong nonlinear coupling effects may damage the performance of the output pulse. In addition to these effects, electron injection, acceleration, and radiation may occur at high intensities [32, 33], we will not discuss these in detail here, because they are beyond the scope of this paper.

    In conclusion, we have proposed and numerically demonstrated a promising and efficient scheme to combine two high-power infrared pulses into one single, more intense pulse, so that the light intensity of the output pulse can enter the relativistic regime. The findings show that the output infrared pulses can be flexibly tuned by varying the driving laser and/or plasma target parameters, where more than 90% of the driving pulse energy can be converted into the output pulses. This scheme provides a robust and practical method for efficient combination and enhancement of high-power long-wavelength infrared pulses in underdense plasmas, enabling a new regime of relativistic intensity and monochromatic spectrum. Such intense infrared pulses may open new possibilities for a variety of applications from fundamental research to materials science and biomedicine.

    This work was supported by the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents of China (No. BX20220206). Thanks for the useful discussion with Prof Z M Sheng.

  • [1]
    Colosimo P et al 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 386 doi: 10.1038/nphys914
    [2]
    Wolter B et al 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 021034
    [3]
    Popmintchev T et al 2012 Science 336 1287 doi: 10.1126/science.1218497
    [4]
    Silva F et al 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 807 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1816
    [5]
    Blaga C I et al 2012 Nature 483 194 doi: 10.1038/nature10820
    [6]
    Yan M et al 2017 Light: Sci. Appl. 6 e17076 doi: 10.1038/lsa.2017.76
    [7]
    Samsonova Z et al 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 021029
    [8]
    Pogorelsky I V et al 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 034003 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/3/034003
    [9]
    Weisshaupt J et al 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 927 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.256
    [10]
    Pupeza I et al 2015 Nat. Photonics 9 721 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.179
    [11]
    Shumakova V et al 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12877 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12877
    [12]
    Fu Y X et al 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 241105 doi: 10.1063/1.5038414
    [13]
    Ma J et al 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6 021317 doi: 10.1063/1.5037274
    [14]
    Thaury C et al 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 424 doi: 10.1038/nphys595
    [15]
    Leblanc A et al 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 440 doi: 10.1038/nphys4007
    [16]
    Weng S M et al 2017 Optica 4 1086 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001086
    [17]
    Kirkwood R K et al 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 80 doi: 10.1038/nphys4271
    [18]
    Tsung F S et al 2001 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 29 doi: 10.1073/pnas.262543899
    [19]
    Gordon D F et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 215001 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.215001
    [20]
    Nie Z et al 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 489 doi: 10.1038/s41566-018-0190-8
    [21]
    Zhu X L et al 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 12 054024 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054024
    [22]
    Zhu X L et al 2020 Light: Sci. Appl. 9 46 doi: 10.1038/s41377-020-0282-3
    [23]
    Nie Z et al 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2787 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16541-w
    [24]
    Zhu X L et al 2022 Matter Radiat. Extremes 7 014403 doi: 10.1063/5.0068265
    [25]
    Sun G Z et al 1987 Phys. Fluids 30 526 doi: 10.1063/1.866349
    [26]
    Borisov A B et al 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 5830 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.5830
    [27]
    Sheng Z M and Meyer-ter-Vehn J 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 1833 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.1833
    [28]
    Sheng Z M et al 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 066409 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.066409
    [29]
    Dong Q L, Sheng Z M and Zhang J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 027402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.027402
    [30]
    Wu H C, Sheng Z M and Zhang J 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 026407 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026407
    [31]
    Arber T D et al 2015 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57 113001 doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/57/11/113001
    [32]
    Zhu X L et al 2021 Phys. Rev. Appl. 15 044039 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.044039
    [33]
    Zhu X L et al 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eaaz7240 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz7240
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wei WANG, Yao LI, Zhaoquan CHEN, Sisi LI, Yi FENG, Zhi ZHENG, Dezheng YANG, Yue LIU. One-step direct ammonia synthesis by pulse-modulated microwave plasma at atmospheric pressure[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 044014. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/adc065
    [2]Xucheng WANG, Shuhan GAO, Yuantao ZHANG. Numerical study on peak current in pulse-modulated radio-frequency discharges with atmospheric helium–oxygen admixtures[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 085401. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac67bf
    [3]Guan WANG (王冠), Ye KUANG (匡野), Yuantao ZHANG (张远涛). Kinetic simulation of the transition from a pulse-modulation microwave discharge to a continuous plasma[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2020, 22(1): 15404-015404. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab4d82
    [4]Yuantao ZHANG (张远涛), Yu LIU (刘雨), Bing LIU (刘冰). On peak current in atmospheric pulse-modulated microwave discharges by the PIC-MCC model[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(8): 85402-085402. DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa6a51
    [5]Jianxun LIU (刘建勋), Yanyun MA (马燕云), Xiaohu YANG (杨晓虎), Jun ZHAO (赵军), Tongpu YU (余同普), Fuqiu SHAO (邵福球), Hongbin ZHUO (卓红斌), Longfei GAN (甘龙飞), Guobo ZHANG (张国博), Yuan ZHAO (赵媛), Jingkang YANG (杨靖康). High-energy-density electron beam generation in ultra intense laser-plasma interaction[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 15001-015001. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/19/1/015001
    [6]ZHANG Jie (张杰), GUO Ying (郭颖), HUANG Xiaojiang (黄晓江), ZHANG Jing (张菁), SHI Jianjun (石建军). Operation Mode on Pulse Modulation in Atmospheric Radio Frequency Glow Discharges[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(10): 974-977. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/10/02
    [7]WANG Xifeng (王喜凤), SONG Yuanhong (宋远红), ZHAO Shuxia (赵书霞), DAI Zhongling (戴忠玲), WANG Younian (王友年). Hybrid Simulation of Duty Cycle Influences on Pulse Modulated RF SiH4/Ar Discharge[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 394-399. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/4/11
    [8]FANG Juan(方娟), HONG Yanji(洪延姬), LI Qian(李倩). Numerical Analysis of Interaction Between Single-Pulse Laser-Induced Plasma and Bow Shock in a Supersonic Flow[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(8): 741-746. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/8/11
    [9]XU Weidong (徐伟东), XUAN Weimin (宣伟民), YAO Lieying (姚列英), WANG Yingqiao (王英翘). Development of 8 MW Power Supply Based on Pulse Step Modulation Technique for Auxiliary Heating System on HL-2A[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(3): 263-268. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/3/14
    [10]WEN Xueqing (闻雪晴), XIN Yu (信裕), FENG Chunlei (冯春雷), DING Hongbin (丁洪斌). Electron Energy and the Effective Electron Temperature of Nanosecond Pulsed Argon Plasma Studied by Global Simulations Combined with Optical Emission Spectroscopic Measurements[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2012, 14(1): 40-47. DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/1/10

Catalog

    Figures(3)

    Article views (168) PDF downloads (425) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return